Fox, C K

SummaryIntroductionTo better inform the field of obesity medicine, we set out to describe the current use of pharmacotherapy meant to improve patient weight status among a group of clinicians connected through the Paediatric Obesity Weight Evaluation Registry (POWER), as well as reasons behind clinicians' use or non‐use of the medications.MethodsPaediatric weight management (PWM) programs participating in POWER were asked to complete a program profile survey in 2014 (n = 30) and 2017 (n = 33); questions about pharmacotherapy use were included. Descriptive statistics were used to identify: (a) the proportion of PWM programs offering obesity pharmacotherapy; (b) the medications most commonly prescribed; and (c) reasons among non‐prescribers for not offering pharmacotherapy.ResultsThe 2014 and 2017 surveys were completed by 29 PWM programs (97%) and 30 PWM programs (91%), respectively. Twenty‐one programs completed both surveys. In 2014, 10 (34%) programs reported offering pharmacologic agents specifically for weight control, whereas in 2017, 16 (53%) reported offering pharmacotherapy for a primary indication of weight loss. Metformin was reported as the most commonly used agent in 2014, and topiramate in 2017. Largest reported increases in use over time were for topiramate and phentermine.DiscussionOur survey results demonstrate that a majority of this group of PWM programs offered pharmacotherapy to promote weight loss in patients with complications or associated medical conditions. There was a trend indicating increasing use over time, despite the significant gap regarding pharmacotherapy use in the literature.ConclusionsThese data suggest the need for (a) additional robust paediatric drug trials to further develop the evidence base guiding use or non‐use of pharmacotherapy in paediatric weight management, and (b) increased understanding of both facilitators and barriers to prescribing anti‐obesity pharmacotherapy for youth with obesity.

SummaryBackgroundAlthough obesity affects approximately one in five youths, only a fraction is treated in pediatric weight management clinics. Characteristics distinguishing youth with obesity who seek weight management treatment from those who do not are largely unknown. Yet identification of specific health characteristics which differentiate treatment‐seeking from non‐treatment seeking youth with obesity may shed light on underlying motivations for pursuing treatment.ObjectivesCompare the cardiometabolic profiles of an obesity treatment‐seeking sample of youth to a population‐based sample of youth with obesity, while controlling for body mass index (BMI).MethodsThis cross‐sectional study included participants, ages 12–17 years, with obesity from the Pediatric Obesity and Weight Evaluation Registry (POWER) and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, representing the treatment‐seeking and population samples, respectively. Mean differences were calculated for systolic and diastolic blood pressure percentiles, total cholesterol, low‐density and high‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin and alanine aminotransferase, while adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, and multiple of the 95th BMI percentile.ResultsThe POWER and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cohorts included 1,823 and 617 participants, respectively. The POWER cohort had higher systolic blood pressure percentile (mean difference 17.4, 95% confidence interval [14.6, 20.1], p < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure percentile (21.8 [19, 24.5], p < 0.001), triglycerides (42.3 [28, 56.5], p < 0.001) and alanine aminotransferase (7.5 [5.1, 9.8], p < 0.001) and lower fasting glucose (−6.9 [−8.2, −5.6], p < 0.001) and high‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (−2.3 [−3.8, −0.9], p < 0.002). There were no differences in total cholesterol or low‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol or clinical differences in glycated hemoglobin.ConclusionFor a given BMI, obesity treatment‐seeking youth are more adversely affected by cardiometabolic risk factors than the general population of youth with obesity. This suggests that treatment‐seeking youth may represent a distinct group that is at particularly high risk for the development of future cardiometabolic disease.

ObjectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of short‐term meal replacement therapy followed by topiramate for body mass index (BMI) reduction in adolescents with severe obesity.MethodsAdolescents (ages 12–18 years) with severe obesity (BMI ≥1.2 times the 95th percentile or BMI ≥35 kg/m2) were recruited for this double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. Participants completed 4 weeks of meal replacement therapy followed by randomization (1:1) to either 24 weeks of topiramate 75 mg/day or placebo. Mean changes were compared between groups.ResultsThirty adolescents (mean age 15.2 ± 1.7 years, mean BMI 40.3 ± 4.6 kg/m2) completed the meal replacement phase and were randomized; 21 completed the study. The difference in mean percent change in BMI between the topiramate and placebo groups was not significant (−1.9%; 95% CI: −5.2% to +1.5%; P = 0.291). Significant improvements in visceral fat and very‐low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol were observed in the topiramate compared with the placebo group. There were no concerning changes in neurocognitive function or bone health.ConclusionsIn this pilot study, 4 weeks of meal replacement therapy followed by 24 weeks of low‐dose topiramate compared with meal replacement therapy alone did not result in significant BMI reduction for adolescents with severe obesity.