SummaryObjectiveRising prevalence of obesity has led to increased rates of prediabetes and diabetes mellitus (DM) in children. This study compares rates of prediabetes and diabetes using two recommended screening tests (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] and haemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]).Study DesignData were collected prospectively from 37 multi‐component paediatric weight management programs in POWER (Paediatric Obesity Weight Evaluation Registry).ResultsFor this study, 3962 children with obesity without a known diagnosis of DM at presentation and for whom concurrent measurement of FPG and HbA1c were available were evaluated (median age 12.0 years [interquartile range, IQR 9.8, 14.6]; 48% males; median body mass index 95th percentile [%BMIp95] 134% [IQR 120, 151]). Notably, 10.7% had prediabetes based on FPG criteria (100–125 mg/dL), 18.6% had prediabetes based on HbA1c criteria (5.7%–6.4%), 0.9% had DM by FPG abnormality (≥126 mg/dL) and 1.1% had DM by HbA1c abnormality (≥6.5%). Discordance between the tests was observed for youth in both age groups (10–18 years [n = 2915] and age 2–9 years [n = 1047]).ConclusionThere is discordance between FPG and HbA1c for the diagnosis of prediabetes and DM in youth with obesity. Further studies are needed to understand the predictive capability of these tests for development of DM (in those diagnosed with prediabetes) and cardiometabolic risk.
Characteristics of paediatric weight management in the United States: Associations with program retention and
BMI
outcomes in the paediatric obesity weight evaluation registry (
PO
Summary Objective To describe characteristics of paediatric weight management (PWM) programs across the United States and evaluate associations with program‐specific retention rates and body mass index (BMI) outcomes at 6 months. Methods A program profile survey was administered to 33 programs within the Paediatric Obesity Weight Evaluation Registry (POWER) to assess program staffing, services, and treatment format. Patient retention and percent of the 95th BMI percentile (%BMIp95) changes were assessed for each program. Results At 6 months program retention rates ranged from 15% to 74% (median: 41%), and program %BMIp95 changes ranged from −9.0 to +0.5 percentage points (median: −1.7). Percent of patients with ≥5 percentage‐point decrease in %BMIp95 ranged from 17% to 71% across programs (median: 29%). No associations were detected between program characteristics and retention or %BMIp95 changes. Conclusions Six‐month patient retention and BMI outcomes vary substantially in PWM programs across the United States. Yet, no associations were found between PWM treatment factors and these program‐level patient outcomes.