Citations

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the hypothesis that the rate of postoperative decline in global cognition is greater in older adults exposed to general anesthesia with nitrous oxide (N 2 O) compared to general anesthesia without N 2 O. METHODS: Longitudinal measures of cognitive function were analyzed in nondemented adults, 70–91 years of age, enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Linear mixed-effects models with time-varying covariates assessed the relationship between exposure to surgery with general anesthesia (surgery/GA) with or without N 2 O and the rate of long-term cognitive changes. Global cognition and domain-specific cognitive outcomes were defined using z scores, which measure how far an observation is, in standard deviations, from the unimpaired population mean. RESULTS: The analysis included 1819 participants: 280 exposed to GA without N 2 O following enrollment and before censoring during follow-up (median [interquartile range {IQR}] follow-up of 5.4 [3.9–7.9] years); 256 exposed to GA with N 2 O (follow-up 5.6 [4.0–7.9] years); and 1283 not exposed to surgery/GA (follow-up 4.1 [2.5–6.4] years). The slope of the global cognitive z score was significantly more negative following exposure to surgery/GA after enrollment (change in slope of −0.062 [95% confidence interval {CI}, −0.085 to −0.039] for GA without N 2 O, and −0.058 [95% CI, −0.080 to −0.035] for GA with N 2 O, both P < .001). The change in slope following exposure to surgery/GA did not differ between those exposed to anesthesia without versus with N 2 O (estimated difference −0.004 [95% CI, −0.035 to 0.026], P = .783). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to surgery/GA is associated with a small, but statistically significant decline in cognitive z scores. Cognitive decline did not differ between anesthetics with and without N 2 O. This finding provides evidence that the use of N 2 O in older adults does not need to be avoided because of concerns related to decline in cognition.

Abstract Background Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) is an urgent public health threat associated with significant mortality and medical cost. Microbiota therapy is gaining acceptance as a strategy to reduce rCDI recurrence. We present the final 24-month analysis of clinical safety, efficacy, and microbiome restoration from a Phase 2 open-label trial of RBX2660 for prevention of CDI recurrence. Methods Participants with multi-recurrent CDI received <2 doses of RBX2660 delivered via enema 7 days apart in this multicenter, open-label Phase 2 study. Efficacy was defined as the absence of CDI recurrence through 56 days after the last dose and was compared with 8-week recurrence-free rates for a historical control cohort that received standard-of-care antibiotic therapy. Fisher exact test compared the proportion of treatment participants who were CDI-free by age and sex. Durability was defined as continued absence of CDI episodes beyond 8 weeks. Safety and durability assessments occurred at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Participant stool samples were collected prior to and for up to 720 days after treatment, and microbiome changes were assessed by shallow shotgun sequencing. Results The efficacy of RBX2660 to prevent rCDI at 8 weeks (78.9%; 112/142) was higher than the CDI-free rate in the historical control group (30.7%, 23/75; P < 0.0001). Age and sex did not impact efficacy. Among participants who achieved treatment success at 8 weeks and were evaluable for long-term durability (n = 95), 8 experienced a new CDI episode by the 24-month follow-up for an overall durability of 91.6%. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports for RBX2660. In total, 503 stool samples from 110 treatment responders were analyzed. Within 7 days of treatment, the relative abundance of Bacteroidia and Clostridia remained shifted higher than pre-treatment levels while Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli declined sharply after treatment, and these changes persisted to at least 24 months. Conclusion RBX2660, a microbiota-based drug, was safe and efficacious for preventing rCDI with clinical durability to 24 months after treatment, independent of age or sex, and RBX2660 durability associated with durable microbiome shifts from pre-treatment to a healthier composition. Disclosures Robert Orenstein, DO, Rebiotix Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member), Sarah Mische, PhD, Rebiotix Inc. (Employee), Ken Blount, PhD, Rebiotix Inc. (Employee), Lindy Bancke, PharmD, Rebiotix Inc. (Employee), Xin Su, MD, MSci, Rebiotix Inc. (Employee), Dana Walsh, PhD, Rebiotix Inc. (Employee), Adam Harvey, PhD, Rebiotix Inc. (Employee), Carlos Gonzalez, MS, Rebiotix Inc. (Consultant), Dale N. Gerding, MD, Rebiotix Inc. (Board Member).

Abstract Background Cancer patients have a higher risk of thromboembolic events but it is not well known if these patients also have a higher risk of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. Methods Cancer patients who underwent first-time single vessel PCI from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2013 were identified by cross-matching of institutional cancer and PCI registries. These cancer patients were matched 4:1 to non-cancer patients, likewise undergoing first-time single vessel PCI in the time period. The combined primary endpoint was death, MI and revascularization at 5 year follow-up. Secondary endpoints were death and MI combined and the individual components of the primary endpoint. Both time dependent and non-time-dependent analyses were conducted. Results A total of 712 cancer patients were identified and matched to 2,848 non-cancer patients (one third women in either group). Bare-metal stents were used in one third of patients in both groups. The combined primary study endpoint was significantly more frequently encountered in the cancer than in the non-cancer group in both time-dependent (Figure 1) and non-time dependent analyses (5-year event rate 48.6% vs. 31.2%, p<0.001). This was driven by a higher 5-year event rate of death (39.0% vs. 20.1%) and MI (14.8% vs 4.86%) in the cancer group. The 5-year rate of revascularization did not differ significantly between the two groups (10.5% vs 10.3%). Figure 1. MI + revascularization-survival Conclusion Cancer patients have a two times higher rate of death and a three times higher rate of MI over the first 5 years after PCI. Future studies will need to define the etiology and factors accounting for this higher event rate in cancer patients, especially of these patients are predisposed to stent thrombosis and need longer term dual antiplatelet therapy.

Abstract Context Prognosis of metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma following 131-Iodine metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is incompletely characterized due to small samples and shorter follow-up in these rare, often indolent tumors. Objective To describe long-term survival, frequency, and prognostic impact of imaging, biochemical, and symptomatic response to 131-I MIBG. Design Retrospective chart and imaging review at a tertiary referral center. Patients Six hundred sixty-eight person-years of follow-up in 125 patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma with progression through prior multimodal treatment. Intervention Median 18 800 MBq 131-I MIBG. Main Outcome Measures Overall survival, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST) imaging response, symptomatic response per chart review, and biochemical response (20% change over 2 consecutive assays of catecholamines, vanillylmandelic acid, metanephrines, or chromogranin A). Results Median survival standard deviation [SD] from diagnosis was 11.5 years [2.4]; following metastasis, 6.5 years [0.8]; post treatment, 4.3 years [0.7]. Among 88 participants with follow-up imaging, 1% experienced complete response, 33% partial response, 53% stability, and 13% progression. Fifty-one percent showed subsequent progression, median progression-free survival [SD] of 2.0 years [0.6]. Stability/response vs progression at first imaging follow-up (3–6 months) predicted improved survival, 6.3 vs 2.4 years (P = 0.021). Fifty-nine percent of 54 patients demonstrated biochemical response. Fifty percent of these relapsed, with median time to laboratory progression [SD] of 2.8 years [0.7]. Biochemical response did not predict extended survival. Seventy-five percent of 83 patients reported improvement in pretreatment symptoms, consisting primarily of pain (42%), fatigue (27%), and hypertension (14%). Sixty-one percent of these patients experienced subsequent symptomatic progression at median [SD] 1.8 years [0.4]. Symptomatic response did not predict extended survival. Conclusions Imaging, symptomatic, and laboratory response to multimodal treatment including high-dose 131-I MIBG were achieved on long-term follow-up in metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. Imaging response at 3 to 6 months was prognostic.

AbstractBackgroundAn association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and obesity has been observed. Little is known about the effect of weight loss on IBD course. Our aim was to determine the impact of bariatric surgery on long-term clinical course of obese patients with IBD, either Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC).MethodsPatients with IBD who underwent bariatric surgery subsequent to IBD diagnosis were identified from 2 tertiary IBD centers. Complications after bariatric surgery were recorded. Patients were matched 1:1 for age, sex, IBD subtype, phenotype, and location to patients with IBD who did not undergo bariatric surgery. Controls started follow-up at a time point in their disease similar to the disease duration in the matched case at the time of bariatric surgery. Inflammatory bowel disease medication usage and disease-related complications (need for corticosteroids, hospitalizations, and surgeries) among cases and controls were compared.ResultsForty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Appropriate matches were found for 25 cases. Median follow-up among cases (after bariatric surgery) and controls was 7.69 and 7.89 years, respectively. Median decrease in body mass index after bariatric surgery was 12.2. Rescue corticosteroid usage and IBD-related surgeries were numerically less common in cases than controls (24% vs 52%; odds ratio [OR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08–1.23; 12% vs 28%; OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.004–1.79). Two cases and 1 control were able to discontinue biologics during follow-up.ConclusionsInflammatory bowel disease patients with weight loss after bariatric surgery had fewer IBD-related complications compared with matched controls. This observation requires validation in a prospective study design.

Abstract Background: Current prognostication in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) utilizes MIPSS70 (mutation-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for transplant-age patients), MIPSS70+ version 2.0 (karyotype-enhanced MIPSS70) and GIPSS (genetically-inspired prognostic scoring system, which is based on mutations and karyotype) (JCO 2018;36:310; JCO doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9867; Leukemia. 2018;doi:10.1038/s41375-018-0107). These contemporary models are inter-complimentary and highly efficient in predicting overall survival. However, specific risk factors for very long survival (e.g. 20+ years) and short-term mortality (i.e. death within 5 years of diagnosis) have not been systematically looked into. Methods: Study patients were recruited from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Diagnoses were according to the 2016 World Health Organization criteria (Blood. 2016;127:2391). Logistic regression statistics was used to identify predictors of 20-year survival and 5-year mortality. Variables evaluated in the logistic model included those that are currently listed in MIPSS70, MIPSS70+ version 2.0 and GIPSS, as well as age (≤70 vs >70 years) and sex. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were used to estimate predictive accuracy. The JMP® Pro 13.0.0 software from SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA, was used for all calculations. Results: A total of 1,282 consecutive patients with PMF (median age 65 years, range 19-92; 63% males) were used to identify 26 (2%) patients (median age 51 years, range 28-71; 38% males) who survived their disease for at least 20 years (very long-lived patients) and 626 (49%) patients (median age 68 years, range 27-92; 66% males) who died within 5 years of their diagnosis. Clinically-derived information, including the clinical variables used in MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+ version 2.0, with the exception of fibrosis grade (information available in 60%), was available in 99% of the study population; cytogenetic information was available in 94%, driver mutational status in 71% and the full profile of high molecular risk (HMR) mutations, including ASXL1, SRSF2, U2AF1 Q157, EZH2, IDH1 and IDH2, in 42%. MIPSS70+ version 2.0 risk distribution for the entire study population (n=1,282) was 4% very low risk, 16% low risk, 19% intermediate risk, 40% high risk and 21% very high risk; the corresponding percentages for the 26 very long-lived patients were 14%, 29%, 14%, 43% and 0% and for the 626 short-term survivors were 0%, 4%, 10%, 47% and 39% (p<0.001). Cytogenetic, driver mutation and HMR mutation information was available in 100%, 58% and 27% of the 26 long-term survivors, respectively, and 98%, 63% and 39% of the 626 short-term survivors. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of 20-year survival identified the following seven variables as being favorable: age ≤70 years (p=0.002); female sex (p=0.03); hemoglobin level ≥10 g/dl for women and ≥11 g/dl for men (p=0.03), leukocyte count ≤25 x 109/l (p=0.009), platelet count ≥100 x 109/l (p=0.002), circulating blasts ≤1% (p=0.03) and absence of constitutional symptoms (p=0.04). The particular phenotypic profile exhibited a high degree of predictive accuracy with an estimated AUC of 0.90 (Figure 1a); karyotype and mutations did not retain significance in this particular analysis; in fact, 5 (71%) of the 7 long-term survivors who were informative harbored at least one HMR mutation. A similar analysis for 5-year mortality identified the following risk factors: high molecular risk mutations (p<0.001); unfavorable or very high risk karyotype (p<0.001); absence of type 1/like CALR mutations (p<0.001); age >70 years (p<0.001); constitutional symptoms (p<0.001); hemoglobin level <10 g/dl for women and <11 g/dl for men (p<0.001); leukocyte count >25 x 109/l (p=0.004); and circulating blasts >1% (p=0.001); predictive accuracy was estimated at AUC 0.87 (Figure 1b). Conclusions: The phenotypic profile of long-lived patients in PMF includes young age (≤70 years old), female sex, asymptomatic disease (i.e. no constitutional symptoms) and absence of moderate to severe anemia, thrombocytopenia or leukocytosis and ≤1% circulating blasts; each one of these parameters, with the exception of female sex, were present in ≥80% of long-term survivors. Karyotype and mutations were more relevant in predicting short-term mortality. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Introduction For patients with Stage III/IV Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), lack of response as assessed by PET scan following cycle 2 (PET2) of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) is predictive of poor clinical outcomes. SWOG Study S0816 utilized response-adapted therapy, where patients achieving a complete remission (CR) on PET2 (Deauville Score ≤ 3) continued 4 additional cycles of ABVD and those patients unable to achieve a complete remission (CR) on PET2 (Deauville Score > 3) were switched to therapy with escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (eBEACOPP) for 6 cycles. This study demonstrated a 2-year PFS of 64% in the PET2+ patients after switching to eBEACOPP, which was much higher than expected (Press 2016). Herein, we report the 5-year follow-up of survival and toxicities of the patients treated on S0816. Methods Patients with Stage III/IV HL were enrolled to S0816 from 7/1/09-12/2/12 (n=358). Eligible patients were age 18-60 years, had measurable disease, no prior lymphoma therapy, a Zubrod performance status of 0-2, and no serious medical comorbidities. Patients were treated with response-adapted therapy as above. A subset of 336 eligible and HIV-negative patients were analyzed. Of 336, 331 had central review of PET2. PFS and OS estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The two-sided Fisher's exact test was used to compare the rate of second cancer between patients switched to treatment eBEACOPP and those treated with continued ABVD after 2 initial cycles of ABVD. Results The median age of patients was 32 years (range, 18-60). All were Stage III/IV and 51% had an International Prognostic Score of ≥ 3. PET2 was negative in 271 patients (82%) and positive in 60 patients (18%). Of PET2+ patients, 49 (82%) switched to eBEACOPP as planned and 11 (18%) declined. Median follow-up is now 5.9 years (range, 0.2-8.3 years). Eighty-five (25%) patients have either progressed or died, for an estimated 5-year PFS of 74% (95% CI: 69%-79%; Figure 1). There were 64 (24%) events in those patients who were PET2- for a 5-year PFS of 76% (95% CI: 71-81%; Figure 2). There were 20 (33%) events in those patients who were PET2+ for a 5-year PFS of 65% (95% CI: 51-76%; Figure 2). One event occurred in a patient without central review of PET2. Nineteen patients have died for an estimated 5-year overall survival of 94% (95% CI: 91%-96%; Figure 1). Eleven (3%) patients died of HL including 6 (2%) that had PET2- and 5 (8%) that had PET2+. Other causes of death included: treatment-related toxicity [sepsis (eBEACOPP n=1), bleomycin lung injury (eBEACOPP n=1; ABVD n=1), and graft versus host disease (ABVD n=1)]; second primary cancers [(eBEACOPP n=2; cervical cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)]; and unknown causes (ABVD n=2). Post-therapy grade 3 adverse events were uncommon but included 1 case each of heart failure, peripheral neuropathy, prolonged neutropenia, diarrhea, DVT (catheter-related) in patients who received continued ABVD and osteonecrosis of hips/shoulders in patients who received eBEACOPP. There were 13 (4%) cases of reported second cancers, including 7 (14%) in patients treated with eBEACOPP [1 each of myelodysplastic syndrome, kidney, melanoma, NHL, cervical, medullary thyroid, and basal cell carcinoma] and 6 (2%) in patients treated with ABVD (1 each of kidney, melanoma, NHL, bladder, prostate, and squamous cell carcinoma; 2-sided Fisher's exact P value = 0.001). Conclusions The long-term overall survival of the patients treated on S0816 remains high (94%) at 5 years. Despite historical data suggesting favorable clinical outcomes in patients with a negative PET2, nearly 25% of these patients experienced relapse events, demonstrating limitations of a PET-adapted approach and of standard frontline therapy with ABVD. In patients who were PET2+, PFS was favorable relative to historical series, but was associated with a high rate of secondary malignancies. Our results emphasize the importance of long-term follow-up in this disease, and the need for better biomarkers at diagnosis of HL and less toxic approaches for patients with a positive PET2. Acknowledgment In memory of Oliver W. Press, principal investigator of this trial, who died in 2017. Disclosures Straus: DAVA Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Medical Crossfire: Speakers Bureau; Millenium (Takeda): Consultancy, Research Funding; JUNO: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Onco Tracker: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Roch China: Speakers Bureau; InPractice Elselvier: Consultancy; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Employment. Rimsza:NanoString: Other: Inventor on the patent for the Lymph2Cx assay. Bartlett:ImaginAB: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck & Co: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Evens:Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics International DMC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Affimed: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Tesaro: Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy. LaCasce:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Data safety and monitoring board; Research to Practice: Speakers Bureau; Humanigen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Barr:AbbVie, Gilead: Consultancy. Leonard:Gilead: Consultancy; Sutro: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Biotest: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; United Therapeutics: Consultancy. Kahl:Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; CTI: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Smith:BMS: Consultancy; Portola: Honoraria. Friedberg:Bayer: Honoraria.

Abstract Background: Guadecitabine SC (SGI-110) is a dinucleotide next generation HMA resistant to degradation by cytidine deaminase resulting in extended in vivo exposure to its active metabolite decitabine. A Phase 1 established 60 mg/m2 QDx5 as the biologically effective dose (BED), and 90 mg/m2 QDx5 as the Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in MDS patients given in 28-day cycles (Issa et al, 2015, Lancet Oncology). Phase 2 is conducted to evaluate dose response between the BED and MTD in both untreated MDS patients, and patients previously treated with other HMAs. M ethods: Int, or HR MDS, and CMML patients who were either treatment-naïve (TN) or relapsed/refractory to other HMAs (r/r) were randomized to either 60 mg/m2 or 90 mg/m2 QDx5 every 28 days. Efficacy was evaluated by the clinical responses of CR, PR, marrow CR (mCR), and Hematological Improvement (HI) based on the International Working Group Criteria 2006, as well as transfusion-independence, and overall survival (OS). Adverse events (AEs) were graded by the CTCAE v4 criteria. Results: The study completed target enrolment with 102 patients: 53 r/r MDS, and 49 TN MDS. Fifty three patients were randomized to 60 mg/m2 and 49 patients to 90 mg/m2 QDx5 with a median follow up of 3.2 years (IQR 2.8-3.5 years). Median age was 72 and 71 years for r/r and TN MDS respectively. Most baseline patient characteristics were well balanced between the 2 treatment dose groups except that more CMML patients were randomized to the 60 mg/m2 group (28%) vs. 14% in the 90 mg/m2 group, and more patients with baseline BM blasts >5% were in the 90 mg/m2 group (67%) vs. 38% in the 60 mg/m2 group. Most patients were RBC transfusion-dependent at baseline (57%). In the r/r MDS cohort, most patients (58%) received their last HMA treatment <3 month before enrolment, and most of them received ≥6 months of prior HMA treatment (77%). Median number of treatment cycles was 5 for both r/r and TN MDS (range 1-37 in r/r MDS and 1-49 in TN MDS). In the TN MDS cohort CR was achieved in 11 (22%) of patients with no major difference between the 2 dose groups (19% in the 60 mg/m2 group vs 27% in the 90 mg/m2 group). Overall CR+mCR was achieved in 18 patients (37%) in TN MDS patients and median OS was 23.4 months. In the r/r MDS cohort, CR was achieved in 4% of patients in each of the 2 dose groups. Overall CR+mCR in the r/r MDS cohort was achieved in 17 patients (32%), with a median duration of response of 7.9 months, and median OS of 11.7 months. No significant difference in response or OS between the 2 dose groups was observed. In patients who were RBC transfusion-dependent at baseline, transfusion independence for at least 8 weeks was achieved in 42% of TN MDS, and 15% in r/r MDS patients. In the overall population of 102 TN and r/r MDS patients there were no major differences in OS based on DNMT3A or TET2 mutation status while patients with TP53 mutations had worse median OS (7.4 months) compared to those without TP53 mutations (22.6 months). Other baseline prognostic factors for worse OS were BM blasts >5%; RBC transfusion-dependence; IPSS High Risk; and ECOG Performance Status of >1. Overall incidence of Grade ≥3 AEs regardless of relationship to treatment was reported in 83 vs. 96% for 60 and 90 mg/m2 dose groups respectively. There was a slightly higher but non-significant difference in Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia (57 vs 41.5%); neutropenia (51 vs 39.6%); febrile neutropenia (43% vs 32%); and pneumonia (32.7 vs. 26.4%) for the 90 mg/m2 compared to 60 mg/m2 dose group. Early 30, 60, and 90-day all-cause mortality was observed in 0, 3.7%, and 5.7% in the 60 mg/m2 dose group respectively; and in 2%, 4%, and 12% in the 90 mg/m2 dose group respectively. Conclusions: Guadecitabine at both dose groups is a well-tolerated novel HMA with clinical activity in the treatment of both TN and r/r Int and HR MDS, and CMML patients. In TN MDS patient CR rate of 22% and median OS of 23.4 months compare well with first generation HMA efficacy (Fenaux et al, 2009, Lancet Oncology). Activity in r/r MDS who previously failed prior HMAs is particularly promising (CR+mCR in 32% of patients with median duration of response and overall survival of almost 8 and 12 months respectively). A phase 3 trial (ASTRAL-3) of guadecitabine vs Physician Treatment Choice in r/r MDS and CMML patients previously treated with azacitidine or decitabine is actively enrolling (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02907359). Disclosures Ritchie: NS Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. Savona:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kropf:Celegene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Daver:Pfizer: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy; ARIAD: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding. Jabbour:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Yee:Celgene, Novartis, Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agensys, Astex, GSK, Onconova, Genentech/Roche: Research Funding. Stock:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Griffiths:Alexion Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex/Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene, Inc: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis, Inc.: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding. Podoltsev:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Daiichi Snakyo: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Berdeja:Genentech: Research Funding; Bluebird: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Glenmark: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Naim:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Hao:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Azab:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Roboz:Orsenix: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Aphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Aphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding.