Citations

Abstract Background The majority of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) exhibit intrinsic resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) following radiotherapy (RT). This resistance is generally attributed to the limited antigen presentation of heterogeneous cells within tumors. Here, we aimed to isolate and characterize these diverse subgroups of tumor post‐RT to understand the molecular mechanisms of their resistance to ICB. Methods Single‐cell RNA‐sequencing (scRNA‐seq) was used to profile senescent cancer cell clusters induced by RT in LNCaP cells. The expression and phosphorylation levels of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3‐related protein (ATR) were assessed by immunohistochemistry in clinical samples from patients with or without RT. Co‐immunoprecipitation, mutagenesis, and Western blotting were used to measure the interactions between proteins. Xenograft experiments were performed to assess the tumor immune response in the mice. Results We identified a subset of PCa cells that exhibited resistance to RT, characterized by a reduced antigen presentation capability, which enhanced their ability to evade immune detection and resist cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated protein 4 (CTLA‐4) blockade. scRNA‐seq revealed that the senescent state was a transient phase of PCa cells post‐RT, particularly in CTLA‐4 blockade treatment‐resistant cells. This state was marked by increased cytosolic ATR level. Cytosolic ATR phosphorylated CD86 in its cytosolic domain and enhanced the interaction between CD86 and its E3 ligase MARCH1 through electrostatic attraction. Depletion or inhibition of Atr increased the sensitivity to immune attack and improved responses to anti‐Ctla‐4 antibody treatment in a mouse model. Conclusions Our findings indicate that the activation of cytosolic ATR, which is associated with cellular senescence, impedes the effectiveness of combined RT and ICB treatments. This discovery may provide valuable insights for improving the efficacy of combined RT and ICB therapies in PCa.

Abstract The immune system is a key player in the onset and progression of neurodegenerative disorders. While brain resident immune cell‐mediated neuroinflammation and peripheral immune cell (eg, T cell) infiltration into the brain have been shown to significantly contribute to Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology, the nature and extent of immune responses in the brain in the context of AD and related dementias (ADRD) remain unclear. Furthermore, the roles of the peripheral immune system in driving ADRD pathology remain incompletely elucidated. In March of 2023, the Alzheimer's Association convened the Alzheimer's Association International Conference (AAIC), Advancements: Immunity, to discuss the roles of the immune system in ADRD. A wide range of topics were discussed, such as animal models that replicate human pathology, immune‐related biomarkers and clinical trials, and lessons from other fields describing immune responses in neurodegeneration. This manuscript presents highlights from the conference and outlines avenues for future research on the roles of immunity in neurodegenerative disorders. Highlights The immune system plays a central role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. The immune system exerts numerous effects throughout the brain on amyloid‐beta, tau, and other pathways. The 2023 AAIC, Advancements: Immunity, encouraged discussions and collaborations on understanding the role of the immune system.

Abstract Chemotherapy regimens for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) combine agents without knowing which agents drive response. Consequently, predictors derived from multi-agent regimens cannot be assumed to generalize to individual drugs or other regimens, motivating development of treatment-matched predictors. Here, we used TNBC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) treated with carboplatin, docetaxel, or the combination to deconvolute drug-specific responses and identify associated molecular features. Combination treatment rarely improved upon the best single agent, with enhanced responses in only 13% of PDXs and antagonism in a comparable fraction. Proteogenomic analyses identified high cytokeratin-5 (KRT5) as a general marker of chemotherapy responsiveness and KRT5 immunohistochemistry discriminated responsive PDXs (AUROC, 0.83). To train treatment-specific predictors, we integrated these data with independent PDX and clinical cohorts with responses assessed after anthracycline-free platinum, taxane, or platinum-taxane therapy, ensuring response corresponded to the modeled treatment. Four feature selection strategies yielded largely nonoverlapping biomarker panels converging on treatment-relevant pathways. On independent test data, RNA-based predictors of complete response (CR) to platinum-based (carboplatin or cisplatin) and taxane-based (docetaxel or paclitaxel) chemotherapy achieved AUROCs of 0.80 and 0.86, respectively. For platinum-taxane regimens (carboplatin plus docetaxel or paclitaxel), proteomic-guided feature selection generated a 10-biomarker, protein- informed RNA predictor of pathologic complete response (pCR) that outperformed RNA-only feature selection and achieved an AUROC of 0.85 in an independent clinical cohort, while retaining practicality as an RNA-based assay. Treatment-matched integration of multi-omic PDX and clinical datasets provides a framework for chemotherapy-specific predictors with clinically relevant performance, supporting biomarker-guided precision selection and treatment optimization for patients with TNBC. Statement of significance Integration of multi-omic data from patient-derived xenografts with treatment-matched clinical cohorts yielded three retrospectively validated predictors of platinum, taxane, and platinum+taxane response, enabling biomarker-guided chemotherapy selection for patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Introduction: Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the central nervous system (CNS), traditionally referred to as primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), is a rare type of primary large B-cell lymphoma of immune-privileged sites with significantly poorer prognosis than systemic DLBCL. Genetic profiles of PCNSL were widely studied, whereas the tumor microenvironment has not been well characterized. Patients and Methods: A series of molecular analyses were performed using DLBCL FFPE tissues collected by the International Lymphoma Consortium. First, multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) using antibodies for CD20, PAX5, CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, CD45RO, CD68, CD56, PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, and CTLA-4 was performed on PCNSL tissues from 121 immunocompetent patients and de novo systemic DLBCL tissues from 405 patients. Digital quantification results for 405 patients with EBV-negative systemic DLBCL or primary testicular (PT) DLBCL have been reported previously. The preliminary mfIHC results of PCNSL will be presented. Second, mfIHC for multiple B cell biomarkers, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD68, CD163, CD11c, and CD31 were performed for 10 PCNSL validation cases, 24 PT-DLBCL and 451 systemic DLBCL tissues (unpublished). Third, RNA samples were extracted and sequenced for the targeted 1408 cancer-associated genes, successfully in 142 PCNSL cases, including 102 cases evaluated by either of these two mfIHC panels and additional 40 PCNSL cases, Results: First, in the first large mfIHC cohort, PCNSLs compared with de novo systemic nodal or extranodal DLBCL had significantly higher mean/median CD56+ cell densities whereas lower T cell densities (consistent with the immune privilege), as well as lower CD45RO+, PD-1+, and FOXP3+ percentages in T cells whereas higher CD4¯CD8¯ double-negative percentages in T cells. Prognostic analysis in the PCNSL cohort showed that high CD56+ cell densities and high CD45RO+CD8+ T cell densities were associated with significantly poorer and better patient survival, respectively, which are opposite to their prognostic effects in systemic DLBCL as previously reported. Twelve patients had very high PD-L1 expression in B cells and significantly poorer survival in the PCNSL cohort. Second, as validation, the 10 PCNSL cases in the second mfIHC study showed significantly less T cells than systemic DLBCL and PT-DLBCL cases, and low CD8 T cell densities and having low percentage of CD8 T cells adjacent to tumor cells were associated with significantly poorer survival. Immunofluorescence landscapeand spatial analysisrevealed significant differences in immune privilege between PCNSL and PT-DLBCL. Third, gene expression profiling analysis by targeted RNA-seq identified 282 significantly differentially expressed genes between PCNSL and systemic DLBCL, referred to as the PCNSL signature. Unsupervised clustering analysis divided the PCNSL cohort into two clusters, which had no significant difference in MYD88 mutation frequencies analyzed at the mRNA level. Importantly, the cluster with higher expression of many neural glial genes in the PCNSL signature had significantly poorer survival, which remained significant in multivariate analysis adjusting for clinical factors and/or treatments, two PCNSL subcohorts (as training and validation cohorts), and methotrexate-treated patients. NCAM1 (Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule 1, encoding CD56) was among the upregulated PCNSL signature genes, explaining the poorer prognosis associated with higher CD56+ cell densities in PCNSL by the mfIHC analysis. Summary: Our studies represent the largest immunophenotypic and gene expression profiling studies currently in PCNSL, a rare type of primary DLBCL of immune-privileged sites. Multiplex immunofluorescence revealed the immune landscape in PCNSL in comparison with systemic and testicular DLBCL, and identified prognostic immune biomarkers. Targeted RNA-seq identified a PCNSL gene signature enriched with neuronal-glial genes and showing significant prognostic effect in PCNSL. These novel findings in the PCNSL microenvironment warrant further studies.

Severe COVID-19 is a multisystem condition with thromboinflammation as a significant driver of morbidity and mortality. Cellular components involved in inflammatory and coagulation responses include platelets, endothelium, monocytes, and neutrophils. Thrombotic manifestations, such as arterial thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, and tissue microthrombosis, occur in at least 20% of ICU COVID-19 patients, possibly more based on postmortem studies. This study investigates the presence of prothrombotic antibodies similar to those found in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a condition caused by platelet-activating antibodies targeting platelet factor 4 (PF4) when complexed with heparin (PF4/H). In a study of samples from 130 hospitalized patients collected on average 3.6 days after COVID-19 diagnosis, 80% were found to have IgG antibodies recognizing PF4/H. This percentage is significantly lower than in 22 HIT patients (100%) but higher than in 51 non-COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory symptoms (ARS) (25%) and 12 healthy subjects (0%). Additionally, 41% of the 130 patients had antibodies inducing PF4-dependent P-selectin expression in CpG-treated normal platelets, a rate significantly lower than in 12 HIT patients (100%) but higher than in 51 non-COVID-19 ARS patients (20%) and 12 healthy subjects (0%). Significantly, platelet-activating antibodies in COVID-19 patients were associated with a specific elevation of platelet α-granule proteins in the plasma and correlated with inflammation and tissue damage markers, suggesting these antibodies' functionality in patients. Significantly, unlike HIT, both PF4/H-reactive and platelet-activating antibodies were found in COVID-19 patients regardless of recent heparin exposure, indicating different antigenic stimuli for these antibodies in COVID-19. Notably, certain antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 possessed sequence motifs, RKH and Y5, in the heavy-chain complementarity-determining region 3 (HCDR3) resembling those in pathogenic HIT antibodies identified in our previous studies, suggesting that these antibodies can activate platelets. Introducing exogenous RBD to COVID-19 plasma or IgG purified from COVID-19 plasma significantly reduced their ability to activate platelets. Furthermore, immunodepleting RBD-reactive antibodies from COVID-19 plasma or IgG purified from COVID-19 plasma using RBD-coated beads significantly reduced their ability to activate platelets. These findings demonstrate that some RBD-specific plasma IgG antibodies can activate platelets. To demonstrate the presence of RBD-specific, platelet-activating antibodies at the clonal level, we produced recombinant antibodies from 42 RBD-binding IgG+ B cells, tested their ability to activate platelets, and identified four that could do so. Interestingly, three antibodies possess HCDR3 sequences resembling RKH or Y5 motifs. Additionally, we identified RKH or Y5 motifs in RBD-specific antibodies reported by other groups, produced 15 such antibodies recombinantly, tested their ability to activate platelets, and identified four more that could do so. IgG+ B cells with these HCDR3 motifs were markedly expanded in severe COVID-19 patients, suggesting an expansion of B cells producing platelet-activating antibodies. The demonstration of functional and structural similarities between certain RBD-specific antibodies in COVID-19 patients and pathogenic HIT antibodies suggests a novel mechanism by which RBD-specific antibodies might contribute to thrombosis in COVID-19.

Background. Study of myeloid neoplasms (MN) has been rapidly transformed by genome characterization. Gene mutations have been reported to influence disease phenotype and risk of disease progression, and the evaluation of mutational status can provide valuable insights to improve the decision-making process. In this international study, we evaluated the clinical impact of mutational screening in patients with CMML, which is characterized by significant clinical and genomic heterogeneity, including a substantial proportion of patients with poor outcomes and unmet needs. Currently, only limited molecular information has been incorporated into CMML classification and prognostication. Methods. We retrospectively collected 3182 CMML patients. We used MOSAIC, an AI-based framework for multimodal analysis in rare cancers (PMID: 38875514) to develop innovative, molecular-based tools for classification and prognostication. An independent validation of the results on 516 prospectively collected patients was performed. Results. Bayesian Networs and Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes were used to identify genomic associations and define a CMML molecular classification. We identified 11 clusters with distinct clinical and genomic features, including splicing machinery, signal transduction and tyrosine kinase pathways aberrations, and high-risk molecular signatures (i.e., AML-like and TP53 mutations). Up to 15% of patients showed clear genomic overlap with other MN. Importantly, extensive multi-color flow cytometry on T lymphocytes, NK and myeloid cells (BD FACSymphony A5 Cell Analyzer) revealed specific immunologic and inflammation signatures associated with molecular subgroups. We then integrated molecular and clinical information to build an international CMML Prognostic Scoring System (iCPSS). We assessed the performance of different statistical and AI-based methods; L1-penalized Cox Model resulted as the best performing method. Selected features included hematological parameters (WBC, Hb, PLT and marrow blasts), cytogenetic abnormalities, and mutations in 10 genes (ASXL1, DNMT3A, EZH2, NRAS, RUNX1, SETBP1, STAG2, TET2, TP53, U2AF1). By Bayesian thresholds optimization, we identified 5 risk classes (i.e., very-low, low, intermediate, high and very-high) with median overall survival (OS) ranging from 99 to 9 months (P<.001), and median leukemia-free survival (LFS) ranging from 210 to 18 months (P<.001). iCPSS provided better patient discrimination across all clinical endpoints compared to currently available prognostic tools, with a Concordance Index (CI) for OS of 0.75 versus 0.62-0.64, respectively. Notably, compared to available scoring systems, up to 40% of patients were reassigned to higher or lower risk classes by the iCPSS. External validation on an independent prospective cohort confirmed that the performance of iCPSS is superior to existing prognostic models (CI for OS 0.71 vs 0.54-0.61, respectively) To demonstrate the clinical utility of iCPSS, we focused on 753 patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In multivariable analysis, iCPSS stratified the probability of OS post-HSCT (P<.001) and identified groups of patients with different probabilities of disease relapse, ranging from 9% to 62% (P<.001). We employed a clinical- and genomic-based decision support system (PMID: 38723212) to determine the optimal timing of HSCT. Preliminary analyses indicated that higher-risk patients according to iCPSS (i.e., intermediate, high, and very high) benefit from an immediate HSCT strategy. Lower-risk patients (i.e., very low and low) had life expectancy maximized with delayed HSCT. Modeling decision analysis using iCPSS compared to conventional scores, resulted in a change in transplantation policy for a significant proportion of patients (up to 25%). Conclusion. Molecular information significantly improves the classification of CMML patients, providing a basis for refining diagnostic boundaries with other MN and for a more rational inclusion of patients in clinical trials. The iCPSS demonstrated superior performance over currently available scoring systems and improved HSCT decision making process.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe complication of heparin therapy, driven by IgG antibodies (Abs) that target platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin, resulting in platelet activation and a pro-thrombotic state. The PF4/Heparin (PF4/H) ELISA is the most commonly used screening assay for HIT due to its wide accessibility and high sensitivity. Despite its limited specificity, resulting in only a small fraction of positive cases progressing to actual HIT, PF4/H ELISA remains a critical tool in initial diagnostics. It is generally believed that HIT patients produce two types of Abs - those that bind to PF4/H and may or may not activate platelets. However, there are documented but rare HIT cases with an atypical profile: Abs testing negative in the PF4/H ELISA (ELISA-) but capable of platelet activation, suggesting the presence of a third type of Abs - those that activate platelets but can't recognize PF4/H complex. Since a PF4/H ELISA- result typically excludes an HIT diagnosis, overseeing these cases could lead to the resumption of heparin, potentially resulting in life-threatening thrombosis. Additionally, in HIT cases with a positive ELISA test profile, or classic HIT cases, levels of platelet-activating Abs and PF4/H-reactive Abs are not always correlated, suggesting the presence of ELISA- platelet-activating Abs. We thus investigated whether ELISA- platelet-activating Abs are present in classic HIT. To identify and characterize ELISA- Abs at the serological level, we firstly purified IgG Abs from the plasma of 5 healthy donors (HD) and 8 HIT patients using protein A beads, followed by the depletion of PF4/H-binding Abs using PF4/H-coated Sepharose beads. The efficiency of IgG purification and PF4/H-specific IgG depletion was confirmed by IgG and PF4/H ELISA. P-selectin expression assay (PEA) was conducted to evaluate the platelet activating ability of purified IgG pre and post depletion of PF4/H-specific Abs. We found that variable, but significant levels of platelet-activating Abs exist in the PF4/H non-reactive IgG portion in all 8 HIT samples, but none of the HD samples. Closely resembling those found in the PF4/H-reactive Abs in HIT patients' plasma, platelet activation induced by post-depletion Abs relied on exogenous PF4 and FcγRIIa and was inhibited by high-dose heparin. These data demonstrate that PF4/H non-reactive IgG Abs coexist with PF4/H-reactive Abs and may contribute to platelet activation in HIT patients. To verify these findings at the clonal level, we conducted single B-cell culture to induce antibody secretion by the cultured B cells from patients experiencing clinical manifestations of HIT. We screened clonal Abs made by 1506 single IgG1+ B cells isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of seven HIT patients and identified 18 clones capable of platelet activation. Of these, 13 were unable to bind to PF4/H. The functionality of these Abs was confirmed by recombinant Abs derived from single B-cell clones. This finding suggests that PF4/H non-reactive platelet-activating Abs exist at a higher frequency than those that bind to PF4/H. Interestingly, even though these Abs tested negative in the PF4/H ELISA, they were able to bind to the surface of PF4-treated platelets, and their platelet activation ability correlated with platelet binding affinity, suggesting a potential method for their detection. In summary, our study identified a novel group of potentially pathogenic Abs in HIT that, while unable to recognize the PF4/H complex, can bind to the PF4-coated platelet surface. These Abs frequently coexist with PF4/H-binding pathogenic Abs and may contribute to HIT pathogenesis. These insights will enrich our understanding of HIT pathogenesis and may pave the way for more advanced diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

AbstractMacitentan is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) approved for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). SOPRANO evaluated the efficacy and safety of macitentan versus placebo in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. SOPRANO was a phase 2, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study. Patients with an LVAD implanted within the prior 90 days who had persistent PH (i.e., mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥25 mmHg, pulmonary artery wedge pressure [PAWP] ≤18 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR] >3 Wood units [WU]) were randomized (1:1) to macitentan 10 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in PVR. Secondary endpoints included change in right‐heart catheterization hemodynamic variables, N‐terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide levels, World Health Organization functional class, and safety/tolerability. Fifty‐seven patients were randomized to macitentan (n = 28) or placebo (n = 29). A statistically significant reduction in PVR from baseline to Week 12 was observed with macitentan versus placebo (placebo‐corrected geometric mean ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.94; p = .0158). No statistically significant differences were observed in secondary endpoints. In a post‐hoc analysis, 66.7% of patients receiving macitentan achieved PVR <3 WU versus 40.0% receiving placebo (p = .0383). Macitentan was generally well tolerated; adverse events were consistent with those in previous PAH studies with macitentan. In conclusion, macitentan showed promising tolerability and significantly reduced PVR in PH patients with persistently elevated PVR after LVAD implantation. ClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT02554903.

Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques have emerged as a promising therapeutic option for various central nervous system demyelinating diseases. Demyelinating diseases represent a group of pathological conditions that impact the central or peripheral nervous system. They are characterized by damage to or loss of the myelin sheath surrounding nerve fibers. This damage to myelin sheaths disrupts nerve signal transmission, leading to a wide range of signs and symptoms associated with neurological impairment. Treatment for demyelinating diseases usually aligns with the specific underlying cause. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques can affect neuronal electrical activity and glial cell function, suggesting a potential option for intervention. In this narrative review, we explore the potential of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques for the treatment of central nervous system demyelinating disorders. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques, including transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial electrical stimulation, transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation, optogenetic stimulation, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, and transcranial photobiomodulation, have been shown to potentially intervene in the treatment of demyelinating diseases by affecting the electrical activity of nerve cells and glial cell function. In addition, this review summarizes the applications and mechanisms of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques in the treatment of central nervous system demyelinating diseases and how these techniques promote myelin regeneration and improve disease prognosis. This review also summarizes research advances in noninvasive brain stimulation techniques for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, and neuromyelitis optical spectrum disorder. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques can improve disease symptoms by promoting oligodendrocyte proliferation and differentiation, enhancing myelin regeneration, and modulating immune responses. Although noninvasive brain stimulation techniques have shown potential in the treatment of various neurological disorders, their use in treating demyelinating diseases remains challenging. For example, transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation is a relatively new noninvasive brain stimulation technique with the advantages of high spatial resolution and the ability to stimulate deep brain structures, but its safety and efficacy in clinical applications need to be further investigated. Optogenetic stimulation offers highly precise neuromodulation, but its feasibility in clinical practice is limited by technical and ethical constraints. Overall, noninvasive brain stimulation techniques have significant potential in the treatment of central nervous system demyelinating diseases, but further research is needed to optimize stimulation parameters, improve therapeutic efficacy, and gain insight into their mechanism of action. With the continuous development of technology and in-depth clinical trials, noninvasive brain stimulation techniques are expected to become an effective treatment for central nervous system demyelinating diseases and provide new therapeutic options for such patients.