Shang, Pei

Deep brain stimulation (DBS), a cornerstone neurosurgical intervention for advanced Parkinson’s disease, exerts modulatory effects on aberrant basal ganglia circuitry through continuous high-frequency electrical stimulation. This approach yields sustained amelioration of motor symptoms while concurrently reducing the requisite dosage of dopaminergic pharmacotherapy. Nonetheless, DBS still has its limitations: its efficacy on non-motor symptoms remains limited, electrode implantation leads to biological reactions, and it cannot alter the trajectory of disease progression. Embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells can be directed to differentiate into functionally mature nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons, demonstrating the potential for neuronal replacement and neuroprotective effects in preclinical models and early-phase clinical trials. Mesenchymal stem cells and their derived exosomes mitigate neuroinflammation and impede α-synuclein aggregation through neurotrophic support and immunomodulatory mechanisms. This article reviews two core domains that have achieved breakthroughs in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease—DBS and stem cells—and covers their current status and future prospects. First, this review elucidates the therapeutic mechanisms of DBS, including neurotransmitter release regulation and neuroinflammation suppression, while evaluating its long-term efficacy (e.g., the sustainability of motor improvement and advancements in directional stimulation technology) and safety challenges (e.g., cognitive impairment, mood disturbances, and glial scar formation induced by electrode implantation). Second, it provides an in-depth analysis of the differentiation mechanisms of stem cells from different sources (embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, etc.), preclinical efficacy validation, and early-phase clinical trial outcomes (e.g., the long-term safety and motor function enhancement observed in the transplantation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived nigrostriatal dopaminergic progenitor cells). Third, the article addresses the standardization of stem cell therapy protocols, strategies for managing immune rejection, and current international regulatory and ethical frameworks. The core challenges of current Parkinson’s disease treatment paradigms are as follows: DBS shows limited efficacy in improving axial symptoms (e.g., freezing of gait), whereas stem cell transplantation faces issues such as low long-term graft survival and insufficient functional integration. Looking ahead, multidisciplinary integration is essential to promote the synergistic application of DBS and stem cell therapy, develop personalized treatment protocols under the guidance of precision medicine, and translate novel neural interface materials and genetic engineering technologies into clinical practice. Ultimately, such integrated strategies hold the promise of advancing Parkinson’s disease therapy from mere symptom control to true disease modification.

Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques have emerged as a promising therapeutic option for various central nervous system demyelinating diseases. Demyelinating diseases represent a group of pathological conditions that impact the central or peripheral nervous system. They are characterized by damage to or loss of the myelin sheath surrounding nerve fibers. This damage to myelin sheaths disrupts nerve signal transmission, leading to a wide range of signs and symptoms associated with neurological impairment. Treatment for demyelinating diseases usually aligns with the specific underlying cause. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques can affect neuronal electrical activity and glial cell function, suggesting a potential option for intervention. In this narrative review, we explore the potential of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques for the treatment of central nervous system demyelinating disorders. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques, including transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial electrical stimulation, transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation, optogenetic stimulation, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, and transcranial photobiomodulation, have been shown to potentially intervene in the treatment of demyelinating diseases by affecting the electrical activity of nerve cells and glial cell function. In addition, this review summarizes the applications and mechanisms of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques in the treatment of central nervous system demyelinating diseases and how these techniques promote myelin regeneration and improve disease prognosis. This review also summarizes research advances in noninvasive brain stimulation techniques for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, and neuromyelitis optical spectrum disorder. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques can improve disease symptoms by promoting oligodendrocyte proliferation and differentiation, enhancing myelin regeneration, and modulating immune responses. Although noninvasive brain stimulation techniques have shown potential in the treatment of various neurological disorders, their use in treating demyelinating diseases remains challenging. For example, transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation is a relatively new noninvasive brain stimulation technique with the advantages of high spatial resolution and the ability to stimulate deep brain structures, but its safety and efficacy in clinical applications need to be further investigated. Optogenetic stimulation offers highly precise neuromodulation, but its feasibility in clinical practice is limited by technical and ethical constraints. Overall, noninvasive brain stimulation techniques have significant potential in the treatment of central nervous system demyelinating diseases, but further research is needed to optimize stimulation parameters, improve therapeutic efficacy, and gain insight into their mechanism of action. With the continuous development of technology and in-depth clinical trials, noninvasive brain stimulation techniques are expected to become an effective treatment for central nervous system demyelinating diseases and provide new therapeutic options for such patients.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), first used for pain relief in 1967, serves as an invasive neuromodulation with the targeted delivery of stimulations and the alertness of neural activities. Based on the gate-controlled theory of pain and multiple research studies, the application of SCS to motor recovery, pain relief, and sensory and cognitive restoration has been shown to be significant. Considering that movement disorders and pain are complications of various diseases, the categories, applications, and technical operation of SCS are coming of age. In terms of its impact on the immune system, SCS alters the trajectory of neurological diseases by modulating local immune responses through immunomodulatory mechanisms that vary depending on the different patterns of SCS. In addition to existing targets, the combinations of SCS and emerging techniques deepen the research at the molecular level, contributing to the exploration of potential targets and novel treatments. However, to secure a place in the future trend of non-invasive and precise treatment, it is necessary to improve SCS in terms of mechanism research, cost reduction, and application to more diseases.

IntroductionAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease with neurogenic fiber tangles caused by amyloid-β protein plaques and tau protein hyperphosphorylation as the pathological manifestations. This study was based on multi-omics to investigate the mechanisms and immune characterization of AD.Material and methodsBased on bulk RNA-seq (GSE122063 and GSE97760), we screened potential biomarkers for AD by differential expression analysis and machine learning algorithms. Then, we elaborated the expression characteristics and immune functions of the above biomarkers by scRNA-seq (single-cell RNA sequencing) data analysis (GSM4996463 and GSM4996462) and immune infiltration analysis.ResultsFive biomarkers (RBM3, GOLGA8A, ALS2, FSD2, and LOC100287628) were identified using machine learning algorithms. Single-cell analysis revealed distinct expression patterns of these biomarkers in astrocytes from AD samples compared to normal samples. Additionally, three key biomarkers were selected based on interaction networks, and the diagnostic models indicated high diagnostic efficacy for these biomarkers. Based on immune infiltration and correlation analyses, RBM3, GOLGA8A, and ALS2 were all highly correlated with CD8 T cell content in the immune microenvironment of AD.ConclusionsThe biomarkers identified in this study demonstrate significant diagnostic potential for AD. Notably, the downregulation of RBM3 in astrocytes and the decreased presence of CD8 T cells infiltrating brain tissue are potential risk factors for AD.

: Cerebral Edema (CE) is the final common pathway of brain death. In severe neurological disease, neuronal cell damage first contributes to tissue edema, and then Increased Intracranial Pressure (ICP) occurs, which results in diminishing cerebral perfusion pressure. In turn, anoxic brain injury brought on by decreased cerebral perfusion pressure eventually results in neuronal cell impairment, creating a vicious cycle. Traditionally, CE is understood to be tightly linked to elevated ICP, which ultimately generates cerebral hernia and is therefore regarded as a risk factor for mortality. Intracranial hypertension and brain edema are two serious neurological disorders that are commonly treated with mannitol. However, mannitol usage should be monitored since inappropriate utilization of the substance could conversely have negative effects on CE patients. CE is thought to be related to bloodbrain barrier dysfunction. Nonetheless, a fluid clearance mechanism called the glial-lymphatic or glymphatic system was updated. This pathway facilitates the transport of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) into the brain along arterial perivascular spaces and later into the brain interstitium. After removing solutes from the neuropil into meningeal and cervical lymphatic drainage arteries, the route then directs flows into the venous perivascular and perineuronal regions. Remarkably, the dual function of the glymphatic system was observed to protect the brain from further exacerbated damage. From our point of view, future studies ought to concentrate on the management of CE based on numerous targets of the updated glymphatic system. Further clinical trials are encouraged to apply these agents to the clinic as soon as possible.