Citations

Abstract Edmonston vaccine strains of measles virus (MV) have significant antitumor activity in mouse xenograft models of ovarian cancer. MV engineered to express the sodium iodide symporter gene (MV-NIS) facilitates localization of viral gene expression and offers a tool for tumor radiovirotherapy. Here, we report results from a clinical evaluation of MV-NIS in patients with taxol- and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. MV-NIS was given intraperitoneally every 4 weeks for up to 6 cycles. Treatment was well tolerated and associated with promising median overall survival in these patients with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer; no dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 16 patients treated at high-dose levels (108–109 TCID50), and their median overall survival of 26.5 months compared favorably with other contemporary series. MV receptor CD46 and nectin-4 expression was confirmed by immunohistochemistry in patient tumors. Sodium iodide symporter expression in patient tumors after treatment was confirmed in three patients by 123I uptake on SPECT/CTs and was associated with long progression-free survival. Immune monitoring posttreatment showed an increase in effector T cells recognizing the tumor antigens IGFBP2 and FRα, indicating that MV-NIS treatment triggered cellular immunity against the patients' tumor and suggesting that an immune mechanism mediating the observed antitumor effect. Our findings support further clinical evaluation of MV-NIS as an effective immunovirotherapy. Cancer Res; 75(1); 22–30. ©2014 AACR.

Abstract Background: Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates multiple critical aspects of cell progression. PLK1 is over-expressed in many human tumor types and its over-expression is a negative prognostic indicator of patient outcome in a variety of cancers. TKM-080301 is a lipid nanoparticle formulation of a small interfering RNA (siRNA) directed against PLK1 that has been shown to effect highly selective reductions in PLK1 mRNA in vitro and in tumor xenograft models in mice. Methods: A phase I multi-center, open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation study of TKM-080301 is ongoing in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Sequential cohorts of 3 to 6 patients receive TKM-080301 as a 30-minute IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Primary objectives include determination of safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary objectives include characterization of pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary assessment of anti-tumor activity and pharmacodynamic effects. Pre-and post-dose biopsy samples are being collected from patients treated after DLT has been established. Results: Twenty-three (23) patients, receiving a cumulative total of 128 doses, have been treated with TKM-080301 at doses ranging from 0.15 to 0.9 mg/kg/week. The most common drug-related adverse events have been mild-to-moderate infusion related reactions with delayed onset, pyrexia, chills, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. Mild, transient increases in certain cytokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1) have been observed at dose levels ≤0.75 mg/kg/week and generally correlated with the timing of delayed infusion reactions. DLTs were observed at 0.9 mg/kg/week and included hypoxia/dyspnea in one patient (with a previous history of asthma) and thrombocytopenia in another patient. The dose level was subsequently reduced to 0.75 mg/kg/week. Pharmacokinetic parameters determined after the first dose in Cycles 1 and 2 demonstrated dose proportional Cmax and AUC and no obvious accumulation. Two patients have received TKM-080301 for at least 6 months (6 cycles) with no evidence of cumulative toxicity, including one patient with stable disease (colon) and one patient with a durable confirmed partial response (carcinoid tumor) who has received 8+ cycles of treatment. Conclusions: Preliminary results from this first-in-human trial indicate TKM-080301 was generally well-tolerated by the majority of patients. Preliminary antitumor efficacy has been observed, supporting PLK1 as a therapeutic target. As two DLTs were observed at the dose of 0.9 mg/kg/week, patient accrual is continuing at the 0.75 mg/kg/week dose level. Citation Format: Ramesh K. Ramanathan, Solomon I. Hamburg, Mitesh J. Borad, Mahesh Seetharam, Madappa N. Kundranda, Peter Lee, Paul Fredlund, Mark Gilbert, Cathy Mast, Sean C. Semple, Adam D. Judge, Brynne Crowell, Linda Vocila, Ian MacLachlan, Donald W. Northfelt. A phase I dose escalation study of TKM-080301, a RNAi therapeutic directed against PLK1, in patients with advanced solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-289. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-LB-289

Abstract Purpose: The therapeutic potential of PARP inhibitors is predicted to extend beyond BRCA mutant phenotypes to homologous recombination (HR)-deficient cancers. Response of individual ovarian cancers to niraparib was characterized using treatment naïve, patient-derived tumorgraft models and correlated with predicted HR status and gene expression profile. Methods: Utilizing a living tumor bank of patient-derived ovarian xenografts (PDXs), niraparib (MK-4827) was evaluated in five high-grade ovarian cancer tumorgrafts (PDX077, PDX087, PDX039, PDX080 and PDX95) as monotherapy, combination with carboplatin ± paclitaxel and maintenance therapy. Intraperitoneal tumorgrafts were monitored for tumor growth with twice-weekly transabdominal ultrasound imaging. In vivo response to niraparib was correlated to massively parallel sequencing data (BROCA) for HR genes and with each source patient's platinum response. Tumorgrafts were accordingly classified into predicted HR-proficient and HR-deficient phenotypes. PARP1 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymer (pADPr) expression as well as gene expression by DNA microarray were compared between treatment and control tumor replicates, and HR-deficient vs. HR-proficient tumors. Results: PDX077 (verified to harbor a somatic BRCA2 mutation (predicted HR deficient)) and PDX039 without any HR mutations detected by BROCA (predicted HR proficient) both responded to niraparib monotherapy and combination therapy in vivo (p=0.002 and 0.009 for treated vs. control groups, respectively). Significant growth attenuation, but not regression, in response to single agent treatment was demonstrated in PDX080 (CDK12 mutation; predicted HR-deficient; p=0.02 vs. control). In comparison, a BRCA2-mutant model (PDX095) failed to respond to niraparib monotherapy (p=0.97). As predicted, niraparib was not active as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy in a BRCA wild-type, predicted HR-proficient tumorgraft (PDX087; p=not significant). Niraparib enhanced tumor regression with carboplatin but not with paclitaxel/carboplatin in an HR-deficient tumorgraft (PDX077), and maintenance niraparib therapy was effective in prolonging recurrence-free survival. pADPr inhibition was demonstrated in all niraparib-treated tumorgrafts, while PARP1 degrada-tion was evident in tumorgrafts responsive to single agent niraparib. Differential gene expression was seen in niraparib treated vs. control tumors in HR-deficient tumorgrafts in comparison to HR-proficient tumors at the end of 4 weeks of treatment. Clustering of 6 most/least differentially expressed genes was predictive of response to niraparib. Furthermore, RAD51C and PTEN gene expression were diminished in PDX039 (HR proficient by BROCA; niraparib responsive), suggesting a possible mechanism for its sensitivity to niraparib. Conclusion: Response to niraparib was seen in both BRCA-mutant and BRCA-wildtype xenografts. Thus, BRCA or HR gene mutational status alone was not sufficient to predict response to niraparib. Low RAD51C, PTEN and loss of PARP1 expression following treatment were most characteristic of tumors responding to niraparib. Paclitaxel may be detrimental to the sensitizing effects of PARP inhibition on carboplatin, which may have clinical implications for the incorporation of PARP inhibitors in front-line treatment. Our data are supportive of the phase III study of niraparib as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. This abstract is also presented as Poster A30. Citation Format: Mariam Al Hilli, S. John Weroha, Marc Becker, Xiaonan Hou, Sean Harrington, Sarah McKinstrey, Kimberly Kalli, Karin Goodman, Keith Wilcoxen, Elizabeth Swisher, Scott Kaufmann, Paul Haluska. In vivo antitumor activity of the PARP inhibitor niraparib (MK-4827) in homologous recombination deficient and proficient ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: From Concept to Clinic; Sep 18-21, 2013; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2013;19(19 Suppl):Abstract nr PR05.