Aksamit, Allen J.

ABSTRACT Objective The optimal treatment for neurosarcoidosis myelitis is uncertain. We characterize incident neurosarcoidosis myelitis and assess treatment response by MRI and clinical scales. Methods Incident probable or definite neurosarcoidosis myelitis in adults was retrospectively identified from 13 academic medical centers. Cases were analyzed by initial treatment. The primary outcome was T1 post‐contrast gadolinium enhancement resolution at 6 months post‐treatment. Secondary outcomes were changes in modified Rankin scale (mRS) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) from nadir to final follow‐up. Results Two hundred two patients were identified (median diagnosis age: 47 years (IQR 39–55); male: female 1.3:1). Median nadir mRS and EDSS were 2 (IQR 2–3) and 4 (IQR 2.5–6). At initial treatment, 129 (63.9%) received prolonged corticosteroids ≥ 4 weeks (group A 1 ), 36 (17.8%) received corticosteroids < 4 weeks (B 1 ), 21 (10.4%) received corticosteroids plus sarcoidosis‐directed immunosuppressant (E), and 16 (7.9%) received corticosteroids plus non‐sarcoidosis‐directed agents (F). In 167 cases with sufficient imaging, there were no significant differences in contrast enhancement resolution at 6 months (A 1 27/106 (25.5%), B 1 9/28 (32.1%), E 5/19 (26.3%), F 5/14 (35.7%); Fisher's exact p = 0.76). There were no significant differences in changes in mRS or EDSS among treatment groups (Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.69 and 0.63, respectively) after median follow‐up of 46.5 months (IQR 18–91.3). Interpretation Different initial immunosuppression strategies did not correlate with MRI contrast enhancement resolution at 6 months or clinical scales (mRS, EDSS). However, conclusions are limited by retrospective design, imbalanced cohorts, and insensitivity of binary MRI outcomes and available clinical scales for treatment response in neurosarcoidosis.

This case report discusses a man who tested positive for IgLON5-IgG antibody after intermittent episodes of paresthetic feeling involving the throat and jaw, associated with subtle dysarthria and dysphagia, and upper-extremity paresthesia with piloerection of the forearms.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytokine/chemokine profile of central nervous system (CNS) neurosarcoidosis (NS), and its utility in differential diagnosis, treatment, and prognostication.MethodsIn this case–control study, we validated 17 cytokines/chemokines (interleukin [IL]‐1‐beta, IL‐2, IL‐4, IL‐5, IL‐6, IL‐10, IL‐12p70, IL‐13, IL‐17A, BAFF, IL‐8/CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL13, GM‐CSF, interferon‐gamma, and tumor necrosis factor [TNF]‐alpha) in a multiplexed automated immunoassay system (ELLA; Bio‐Techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and assessed them in CSF and serum of symptomatic patients with probable or definite CNS NS (01/2011–02/2023) with gadolinium enhancement and/or CSF pleocytosis. Patients with multiple sclerosis, primary CNS lymphoma, aquaporin‐4 immunoglobulin G positivity, non‐inflammatory disorders, and healthy individuals were used as controls.ResultsA total of 32 NS patients (59% women; median age, 59 years [19–81]) were included; concurrent sera were available in 12. CSF controls consisted of 26 multiple sclerosis, 8 primary CNS lymphoma, 84 aquaporin‐4 immunoglobulin G positive, and 34 patients with non‐inflammatory disorders. Gadolinium enhancement was present in 31 of 32 NS patients, and CSF pleocytosis in 27 of 32 (84%). CSF IL‐2, IL‐6, IL‐10, IL‐13, BAFF, IL‐8/CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL13, GM‐CSF, interferon‐gamma, and TNF‐alpha levels were significantly higher in NS patients compared with non‐inflammatory controls (p ≤ 0.02); elevations were more common in CSF than serum. Concurrent elevation of IL‐6, CXCL9, CXCL10, GM‐CSF, interferon‐gamma, and TNF‐alpha was present in 18 of 32 NS patients, but only in 1 control. Elevated IL‐6, IL‐10, IL‐13, CXCL9, CXL10, GM‐CSF, and TNF‐alpha associated with measures of disease activity.InterpretationNS CSF cytokine/chemokine profiles suggest T cell (mainly T helper cell type 1), macrophage, and B‐cell involvement. These signatures aid in NS diagnosis, indicate disease activity, and suggest therapeutic avenues. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:704–714