Citations

Introduction: Patients requiring postcardiotomy veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A-ECMO) have a high risk of early mortality. In this analysis, we evaluated whether any interinstitutional difference exists in the results of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO. Methods: Studies on postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO were identified through a systematic review for individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. Analysis of interinstitutional results was performed using direct standardization, estimation of observed/expected in-hospital mortality ratio and propensity score matching. Results: Systematic review of the literature yielded 31 studies. Data from 10 studies on 1269 patients treated at 25 hospitals were available for the present analysis. In-hospital mortality was 66.7%. The relative risk of in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in six hospitals. Observed versus expected in-hospital mortality ratio showed that four hospitals were outliers with significantly increased mortality rates, and one hospital had significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate. Participating hospitals were classified as underperforming and overperforming hospitals if their observed/expected in-hospital mortality was higher or lower than 1.0, respectively. Among 395 propensity score matched pairs, the overperforming hospitals had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (60.3% vs 71.4%, p = 0.001) than underperforming hospitals. Low annual volume of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO tended to be predictive of poor outcome only when adjusted for patients’ risk profile. Conclusions: In-hospital mortality after postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO differed significantly between participating hospitals. These findings suggest that in many centers there is room for improvement of the results of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO.

Multiple Myeloma (MM) progresses from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and/or smoldering MM (SMM). Despite similar primary genetic events as MM, MGUS and SMM PCs are non- or low-proliferative. Since oncogene activation and DNA damage drive senescence growth arrest to promote immune clearance of potentially malignant cells, we hypothesized that MGUS and SMM pre-malignant PCs exhibit senescence features. To test this, we performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of a published human PC gene array dataset (GSE5900) comparing normal, MGUS, and SMM PCs for custom senescence phenotyping gene sets (Senescence Up, SenUp; Senescent Cell Anti-Apoptosis Pathways, SCAPs; Senescence Growth Arrest, SenGA; Inflammatory Senescence Associated Secretory Phenotype, iSASP; Interferon SASP, IFN-SASP) versus biological aging gene sets (SenMayo; CellAge). MGUS and SMM PCs exhibited significant enrichment (NES>1.5, q<0.05) for senescence gene sets SenUp, SenGA, and SCAPs compared to normal PCs, with no enrichment for aging gene sets. MGUS PCs were also enriched for iSASP (NES=1.4, q=0.11), whereas SMM PCs were enriched for IFN-SASP (NES=2.3, q<0.05), characteristic of late-senescence. Thus, both MGUS and SMM PCs show enrichment of senescence gene sets compared to normal PCs with differential SASP profiles. Next, we evaluated MGUS, SMM, and MM patient PCs isolated by magnetic sorting for histological senescence features. PCs were immunostained for LMNB1 and HMGB1, and fluorescent in situ hybridized for α-satellite. Cellular senescence was defined as loss of ≥50% nuclear membrane LMNB1, loss of HMGB1, and ≥2 senescence-associated distensions of satellite (SADS) per nuclei. PCs from MGUS patients (N=12) exhibited increased percentage of senescent PCs (26.9±4.1%, Mean±SEM, p<0.0001) compared to SMM (11.0±1.9%, N=19, p<0.0001) and MM (11.6±1.5%, N=11, p<0.001). A subset analysis of SMM patients for which disease stability was known (≥2 years, N=6-8) showed no differences. These results demonstrate that the percentage of senescent PCs is increased in MGUS but not SMM PCs compared to proliferative disease. To assess PC senescence in the native bone marrow microenvironment (BMME), we evaluated trephine bone biopsies from MGUS and SMM patients that progressed or not to MM ≤10 years, as well as newly diagnosed MM. Biopsies were immunostained for CD138, LMNB1, and HMGB1. Whole biopsy images were analyzed using the artificial intelligence-based software HALO. Cells were classified as senescent if they were double negative and non-senescent if they were double positive for LMNB1 and HMGB1. The percentage of non-senescent PCs increased with progression to MM and positively correlated with total PC burden (R=0.52, p<0.0001), reflective of proliferative disease. Senescent PCs correlated with total senescent BMME (R=0.87, p<0.0001), consistent with a role for senescent cells to drive paracrine senescence. We performed proximity analysis to evaluate the cellular composition within 25um of senescent and non-senescent PCs. As expected, non-senescent PCs exhibited a significantly greater percentage of proximate non-senescent BMME in all groups (p<0.0001). In contrast, senescent PCs in stable MGUS (N=16) and SMM (N=14) were equally surrounded by senescent and non-senescent BMME. In progressing MGUS (N=21) and SMM (N=20), as well as MM (N=18), senescent PCs exhibited significantly reduced senescent BMME in their proximate environment (p<0.05). This suggests that senescent PCs in progressive disease, in contrast to stable disease, fail to drive local paracrine senescence responses. These data demonstrate that PCs from stable MGUS and SMM patients exhibit senescence features, with isolated PCs from stable MGUS showing increased senescence gene expression and histologic features. While stable SMM also exhibits senescence gene expression, they lose morphological features of senescence and show a preferential IFN SASP. Within the bone compartment, senescent PCs in stable MGUS and SMM exhibit the expected proximity to senescent BMME. In contrast, progressing MGUS and SMM, as well as NDMM, show a loss of proximate senescent BMME. Given the role of senescence to drive inflammation to clear potentially tumorigenic cells, these data support that failure to drive paracrine senescence may be key to the immune escape of pre-malignant cells in MGUS and SMM.

Background: Event-free survival at 24 months (EFS24) after frontline immunochemotherapy (IC) is an important endpoint in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma, and patients who achieve EFS24 have similar survival compared to age- and sex-matched general population. The role of EFS24 in predicting subsequent survival has not been established in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), possibly due to perceived poor survival historically. In the last decade, the outcomes of MCL are improving in the evolving treatment landscape. In this international multicenter study, we investigated conditional survival and cause of death in patients with MCL who achieved EFS24 after frontline IC in the older and more recent eras. Methods: Outcomes after frontline IC were evaluated in 5 independent cohorts that included over 3000 patients in total: Mayo/Iowa MER prospective cohort, BC Cancer retrospective population-based cohort, US 12-center retrospective cohort, Swedish Lymphoma Registry, and Danish National Lymphoma Registry. For each cohort, 2 treatment eras were defined based on cohort-specific shifts in treatment patterns (Table 1). Overall survival (OS) after diagnosis and after achieving EFS24 were compared to the background age- and sex-matched general population using a standardized mortality ratio (SMR). Cumulative incidences of cause-specific deaths were analyzed using a competing risk model. Results: In the MER cohort, patients treated in Era M1 (2002-2009; n=147) and Era M2 (2010-2015; n=153) both had inferior OS compared to the general US population. A lower SMR in Era M2 vs M1 (2.25 vs 3.46) suggests a narrower gap in OS compared to the general US population. Lymphoma was the leading cause of death in both eras. In Era M1, patients who achieved EFS24 still had inferior OS compared to the general US population (SMR=2.40, 95% CI 1.76-3.19), and lymphoma remained the leading cause of death. For patients in Era M2 who achieved EFS24, the difference in OS compared to the general US population was not statistically significant with current follow-up (SMR=1.43, 95% CI 0.93-2.09), and lymphoma was no longer the leading cause of death (Table 2). In the BC cohort, patients treated in Era B2 (6/2013-2019; n=188) vs Era B1 (2003-5/2013; n=250) had a narrower gap in OS compared to the general British Columbia population (SMR 4.53 vs 6.69). Lymphoma was the leading cause of death in both eras. For patients achieving EFS24, the gap in OS was narrower in Era B2 vs B1 (SMR 3.56 vs 4.99). After achieving EFS24, lymphoma was the single leading cause of death for patients in Era B1 but not in Era B2 (Table 2). In the US 12-center cohort, patients treated in Era U1 (2002-2011; n=312) and Era U2 (2012-2016; n=417) both had inferior OS compared to the general US population (SMR 2.68 and 2.92, respectively). In patients who achieved EFS24, with current follow up, the difference in OS compared to the general US population was statistically significant in Era U1 (SMR=2.01, 95% CI 1.50-2.64) but not in Era U2 (SMR=1.44, 95% CI 0.82-2.34). Lymphoma was not the leading cause of death after achieving EFS24 (Table 2). In the Swedish cohort, the gap in OS compared to the general Swedish population was narrower in Era S2 (2013-2018; n=439) vs S1 (2006-2012; n=442), both after frontline IC (SMR 4.8 vs 5.4) and after achieving EFS24 (SMR 2.6 vs 3.4). After achieving EFS24, lymphoma was the leading cause of death for patients in Era S1 but not in Era S2 (Table 2). In the Danish cohort, patients treated in Era D2 (2014-2020; n=370) vs Era D1 (2004-2013; n=461) had a slightly narrower gap in OS compared to the general Danish population (SMR 1.90 vs 2.10). For patients who achieved EFS24, those in Era D1 still had inferior OS compared to the general Danish population (SMR=1.44, 95% CI 1.22-1.68), but the OS difference compared to the general Danish population in Era D2 was not statistically significant (SMR=1.27, 95% CI 0.92-1.72) with current follow-up (Table 2). Cause of death data were not available in this cohort. Conclusion: Survival in patients with MCL who achieved EFS24 after frontline IC improved in the more recent treatment era and moved closer to the background expected survival. After achieving EFS24, lymphoma-related mortality was no longer the leading cause of death in the more recent era. EFS24 following frontline treatment may become a critical endpoint for predicting subsequent outcomes in patients with MCL in the modern era.