Hinge, Maja

Multiple Myeloma (MM) progresses from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and/or smoldering MM (SMM). Despite similar primary genetic events as MM, MGUS and SMM PCs are non- or low-proliferative. Since oncogene activation and DNA damage drive senescence growth arrest to promote immune clearance of potentially malignant cells, we hypothesized that MGUS and SMM pre-malignant PCs exhibit senescence features. To test this, we performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of a published human PC gene array dataset (GSE5900) comparing normal, MGUS, and SMM PCs for custom senescence phenotyping gene sets (Senescence Up, SenUp; Senescent Cell Anti-Apoptosis Pathways, SCAPs; Senescence Growth Arrest, SenGA; Inflammatory Senescence Associated Secretory Phenotype, iSASP; Interferon SASP, IFN-SASP) versus biological aging gene sets (SenMayo; CellAge). MGUS and SMM PCs exhibited significant enrichment (NES>1.5, q<0.05) for senescence gene sets SenUp, SenGA, and SCAPs compared to normal PCs, with no enrichment for aging gene sets. MGUS PCs were also enriched for iSASP (NES=1.4, q=0.11), whereas SMM PCs were enriched for IFN-SASP (NES=2.3, q<0.05), characteristic of late-senescence. Thus, both MGUS and SMM PCs show enrichment of senescence gene sets compared to normal PCs with differential SASP profiles. Next, we evaluated MGUS, SMM, and MM patient PCs isolated by magnetic sorting for histological senescence features. PCs were immunostained for LMNB1 and HMGB1, and fluorescent in situ hybridized for α-satellite. Cellular senescence was defined as loss of ≥50% nuclear membrane LMNB1, loss of HMGB1, and ≥2 senescence-associated distensions of satellite (SADS) per nuclei. PCs from MGUS patients (N=12) exhibited increased percentage of senescent PCs (26.9±4.1%, Mean±SEM, p<0.0001) compared to SMM (11.0±1.9%, N=19, p<0.0001) and MM (11.6±1.5%, N=11, p<0.001). A subset analysis of SMM patients for which disease stability was known (≥2 years, N=6-8) showed no differences. These results demonstrate that the percentage of senescent PCs is increased in MGUS but not SMM PCs compared to proliferative disease. To assess PC senescence in the native bone marrow microenvironment (BMME), we evaluated trephine bone biopsies from MGUS and SMM patients that progressed or not to MM ≤10 years, as well as newly diagnosed MM. Biopsies were immunostained for CD138, LMNB1, and HMGB1. Whole biopsy images were analyzed using the artificial intelligence-based software HALO. Cells were classified as senescent if they were double negative and non-senescent if they were double positive for LMNB1 and HMGB1. The percentage of non-senescent PCs increased with progression to MM and positively correlated with total PC burden (R=0.52, p<0.0001), reflective of proliferative disease. Senescent PCs correlated with total senescent BMME (R=0.87, p<0.0001), consistent with a role for senescent cells to drive paracrine senescence. We performed proximity analysis to evaluate the cellular composition within 25um of senescent and non-senescent PCs. As expected, non-senescent PCs exhibited a significantly greater percentage of proximate non-senescent BMME in all groups (p<0.0001). In contrast, senescent PCs in stable MGUS (N=16) and SMM (N=14) were equally surrounded by senescent and non-senescent BMME. In progressing MGUS (N=21) and SMM (N=20), as well as MM (N=18), senescent PCs exhibited significantly reduced senescent BMME in their proximate environment (p<0.05). This suggests that senescent PCs in progressive disease, in contrast to stable disease, fail to drive local paracrine senescence responses. These data demonstrate that PCs from stable MGUS and SMM patients exhibit senescence features, with isolated PCs from stable MGUS showing increased senescence gene expression and histologic features. While stable SMM also exhibits senescence gene expression, they lose morphological features of senescence and show a preferential IFN SASP. Within the bone compartment, senescent PCs in stable MGUS and SMM exhibit the expected proximity to senescent BMME. In contrast, progressing MGUS and SMM, as well as NDMM, show a loss of proximate senescent BMME. Given the role of senescence to drive inflammation to clear potentially tumorigenic cells, these data support that failure to drive paracrine senescence may be key to the immune escape of pre-malignant cells in MGUS and SMM.

Abstract Bone marrow adipocytes (BMAd) have recently been implicated in accelerating bone metastatic cancers, such as acute myelogenous leukemia and breast cancer. Importantly, bone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT) expands with aging and obesity, two key risk factors in multiple myeloma disease prevalence, suggesting that BMAds may influence and be influenced by myeloma cells in the marrow. Here, we provide evidence that reciprocal interactions and cross-regulation of myeloma cells and BMAds play a role in multiple myeloma pathogenesis and treatment response. Bone marrow biopsies from patients with multiple myeloma revealed significant loss of BMAT with myeloma cell infiltration of the marrow, whereas BMAT was restored after treatment for multiple myeloma. Myeloma cells reduced BMAT in different preclinical murine models of multiple myeloma and in vitro using myeloma cell-adipocyte cocultures. In addition, multiple myeloma cells altered adipocyte gene expression and cytokine secretory profiles, which were also associated with bioenergetic changes and induction of a senescent-like phenotype. In vivo, senescence markers were also increased in the bone marrow of tumor-burdened mice. BMAds, in turn, provided resistance to dexamethasone-induced cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis, illuminating a new possible driver of myeloma cell evolution in a drug-resistant clone. Our findings reveal that bidirectional interactions between BMAds and myeloma cells have significant implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of multiple myeloma. Targeting senescence in the BMAd or other bone marrow cells may represent a novel therapeutic approach for treatment of multiple myeloma. Significance: This study changes the foundational understanding of how cancer cells hijack the bone marrow microenvironment and demonstrates that tumor cells induce senescence and metabolic changes in adipocytes, potentially driving new therapeutic directions.

Abstract Introduction: For decades conventional skeletal survey (CSS) has been the standard imaging technique for the detection of bone impairment caused by Multiple Myeloma (MM). The development of cross-sectional imaging techniques like Whole Body Computed Tomography (WBCT) with or without Positron Emission Tomography (PET/PET-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) led to the use of these techniques in several centers worldwide and to the implementation of their findings into the revised diagnostic criteria of MM. The aim of the current multicenter study was to compare sensitivity and prognostic significance of WBCT and CSS in patients with monoclonal plasma disorders. Methods: For the current retrospective analysis 308 patients with different stages of monoclonal plasma cell disorders from 8 centers were included. Compact discs with pseudonymized imaging data of WBCT and CSS were sent to the organizing center and uploaded to the picture archiving and communication system. In addition, questionnaires were completed by each center to collect clinical data of the patients. Image analysis was performed in consensus reading by three experienced radiologists (LAM, SD, VK) blinded to the clinical data of the patients. Osteolytic lesions in 19 pre-specified anatomic regions were characterized as "definitely present", "probably present", "probably absent" and "definitely absent". For the analysis only "definitely present" and "probably present" entries were counted as myeloma lesions. To define symptomatic or active versus smoldering myeloma based on the presence of bone lesions, findings of CSS were used to simulate the situation before the introduction of WBCT. For comparison of WBCT and CSS only those anatomic regions having valid measurements from both methods performed within 30 days without treatment in the meantime were considered. WBCT and CSS were tested for differences in detection sensitivity with the exact McNemar test. Results: Of 308 submitted datasets; 160 patients were without prior treatment and 56 of them had smoldering myeloma. Of 160 patients 80 (50%) had no osteolytic lesions on either CSS or WBCT and 33 (20.6%) showed osteolyses on both techniques. In 9 patients (5.6%) osteolyses were found on CSS but not in WBCT while 38 patients (23.8%) were positive on CT alone. Of note is that for some CT-scans, the upper extremities were not evaluable due to positioning during the examination. Odds ratio for osteolyses on WBCT compared to CSS was 4.22 (P < 0.0001). The regions where WBCT was most significantly superior in detecting osteolyses were the iliac bone, thoracic and lumbar spine as well as the ribs. CSS compared to WBCT revealed osteolyses in more patients only in the proximal extremities: for left humerus 10 (6.5%) versus 3 (1.9%), right humerus 12 (7.7%) versus 4 (2.6%), left femur 11 (7.1%) versus 7 (4.5%) and right femur 10 (6.5%) versus 8 (5.2%) respectively. Of 157 evaluable patients 63 (40.1%) showed osteoporosis (defined by radiological criteria) on both techniques while 29 (18.5%) had osteoporosis on WBCT only and 10 (6.4%) on CSS only (OR 2.90, P = 0.003). In the 56 patients with smoldering myeloma, with bone disease being defined according to the findings of CSS 12 (21.4%), were positive for osteolyses on WBCT (P = 0.0005). Conclusion: WBCT shows significantly more sites of bone destruction compared to conventional X-ray imaging particularly in skeletal regions composed primarily of trabecular bone while CSS shows more osteolyses in the appendicular skeleton - in part due to a limited field of view. More than 20% of patients with smoldering myeloma based on CSS have active disease that needs treatment based on WBCT. Therefore, WBCT is the current standard for the detection of osteolytic lesions in myeloma. The prognostic significance of WBCT and CSS findings for survival and correlation with clinical parameters will be reported at the meeting. Disclosures Hillengass: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Research Funding. Plesner:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Dimopoulos:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lentzsch:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy. Terpos:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria.