Citations

BACKGROUND Previous epidemiologic studies of autoimmune diseases in the US have included a limited number of diseases or used metaanalyses that rely on different data collection methods and analyses for each disease. METHODS To estimate the prevalence of autoimmune diseases in the US, we used electronic health record data from 6 large medical systems in the US. We developed a software program using common methodology to compute the estimated prevalence of autoimmune diseases alone and in aggregate that can be readily used by other investigators to replicate or modify the analysis over time. RESULTS Our findings indicate that over 15 million people, or 4.6% of the US population, have been diagnosed with at least 1 autoimmune disease from January 1, 2011, to June 1, 2022, and 34% of those are diagnosed with more than 1 autoimmune disease. As expected, females (63% of those with autoimmune disease) were almost twice as likely as males to be diagnosed with an autoimmune disease. We identified the top 20 autoimmune diseases based on prevalence and according to sex and age. CONCLUSION Here, we provide, for what we believe to be the first time, a large-scale prevalence estimate of autoimmune disease in the US by sex and age. FUNDING Autoimmune Registry Inc., the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

Background: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare disease characterized by neoplastic mast cell (MC) infiltration of extracutaneous tissues. Nonadvanced SM (NonAdvSM) is associated with debilitating symptoms which may significantly reduce health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In up to 95% of patients (pts), SM is driven by the somatic KIT c.2447 A>T (p.D816V) missense mutation. Bezuclastinib (bezu; CGT9486) is an oral, potent, small molecule, selective type 1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with activity against KIT D816V. Results from Part 1 of the 3-part Summit trial demonstrated that bezu is well-tolerated and is associated with encouraging clinical activity, including both reduced MC burden and improvement in symptoms over a 12-week (wk) period vs placebo (PBO). Based on safety, PK, biomarker, and efficacy results, a dose of 100mg QD bezu (optimized formulation) was selected for Summit Part 2. Trial Design and Methods: Summit (NCT05186753) is a multi-center, Phase 2, double-blind, PBO-controlled RCT of bezu in pts with NonAdvSM who have inadequate control of symptoms despite treatment with best supportive care (BSC). A novel pt-reported outcome measure, the Mastocytosis Symptom Severity Daily Diary (MS2D2), was designed to assess disease-specific symptom severity in NonAdvSM pts. Eleven symptoms are included in the MS2D2 Total Symptom Score (TSS). Summit Part 1a randomized pts 1:1:1 to PBO, 100mg, or 200mg, original formulation while Part 1b randomized 1:1:1 to PBO, 100mg, or 150mg, optimized formulation. Pts completing Part 1 of the Summit trial were allowed to receive bezu in the open-label extension (OLE) Part 3 of the trial. Results: As Part 2 will evaluate safety and efficacy of 100 mg bezu at 24 wks, this abstract reports on pts treated with both bezu formulations at 100mg in Parts 1a or 1b, which had similar PK exposures. The presentation will focus on 24-wk outcomes in pts receiving the selected 100 mg bezu dose and participating in the OLE. In Summit Part 1, 19 pts received PBO and 18 received 100 mg bezu for 12 wks. At baseline (BL), the symptoms identified as most severe were within the skin and fatigue domains. At BL, pts were managing their symptoms of NonAdvSM with 2 (43%), 3 (24%), or ≥4 (32%) BSC medications. At the 12-wk assessment in Part 1 (datacut 18Dec2023), the safety and tolerability profile was encouraging, with the majority of TEAEs low grade and reversible without dose modification. The most common TEAEs (>10% in 100 mg bezu) included hair color changes, nausea, diarrhea, peripheral edema, GERD, taste disorder, and neutropenia. There were no reported bleeding or cognitive impairment events. Of 37 pts randomized to PBO or 100 mg QD bezu, 36 (97%) received bezu in the OLE; one pt randomized to the 100 mg original formulation dose reduced and subsequently discontinued due to TEAE of ALT increase. All 19 PBO pts (100%) crossed over to receive bezu in the OLE; of these, 9 were randomized to the 100mg QD bezu dose. Reduction in MC burden was robust among those treated with 100mg bezu - 94.4%, 100%, and 92.3% of pts had at least a 50% reduction in basal serum tryptase, KIT p.D816V variant allele frequency, and bone marrow MCs, respectively. Pts treated with 100 mg bezu had reduction in MS2D2 TSS by 49.1% vs 21.1% with PBO. On a 0-10 scale, the most severe MS2D2 symptom mean change from BL was -3.03 from a BL mean of 7.6 with bezu vs -1.04 from a BL mean of 7.7 with PBO. Individual symptoms of the MS2D2 TSS, as well as others not in the TSS including diarrhea and brain fog, improved more with bezu than with PBO; mean change from BL ranged from -1.66 to -2.69 with bezu vs. a range of -0.52 to -1.58 with PBO. LS mean change from BL in quality of life (Mastocytosis (MC)-QoL, a disease-specific measure) was -22.05 in pts treated with 100mg bezu versus -10.71 in pts treated with PBO. Objective measurements of skin lesions, including centrally adjudicated longitudinal assessments of skin photography, also significantly reduced on bezu. Conclusions: In Part 1 (12 wk assessment), treatment with 100mg bezu resulted in favorable safety and tolerability, significant and deep reductions across all markers of MC burden, and clinically meaningful reduction in all individual MS2D2 TSS symptoms and across domains. The presentation will report on durability and safety/tolerability data beyond 12 wks for those pts randomized to 100 mg in Part 1 and pts who crossed over from PBO in Part 1 to 100mg in Part 3. Summit Part 2 is actively enrolling.

NPM1 mutations (NPM1+) are found in about 30% of adult AML. While NPM1+ are generally associated with favorable risk, prior studies have shown that NPM1+ older patients, defined as ≥ 65 years, have significantly worse outcomes. The updated European Leukemia Net 2022 (ELN22) now classifies NPM1+ AML patients with FLT3-ITD (ITD+) and MDS-associated mutations (MDSm+) as adverse-risk, while NPM1+/ITD-/MDSm+ patients remain favorable-risk unless they have an adverse-risk karyotype. A recent report (Chan et al., Blood Adv 2024) found MDSm+ conferred worse OS only in patients ≥ 60 years; however another report (Othman et al., Blood 2024) did not find MDSm+ were significantly associated with adverse outcomes in a larger cohort of NPM1+ patients. To further assess this question, we examined the mutational landscape in a large cohort of pre-treatment, diagnostic specimens from 456 patients enrolled in SWOG clinical trials (SWOG-9031, SWOG-9333, S0106, and S0112) and 126 patients from the UW/FHCC Hematopoietic Repository (Total N=582). Patients were treated with curative intent as per standard practice or clinical trials. Out of the 582 patients, 191 were NPM1+ (33%), of which 148 patients had cytogenetic and long-term outcome data. Kaplan-Meier and cumulative incidence estimates were estimated. C-statistics and AUC for Cox, cause-specific and logistic regression models for overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), time to relapse (TTR, calculated in n=106 who achieved complete remission [CR], death in remission analyzed as a competing risk) and CR were calculated for age, ELN17, and ELN22, as well as ELN17 and ELN22 adjusting for age. ELN17 favorable-risk patients reclassified as adverse-risk (N=5 of 108) demonstrated significantly shorter EFS (HR=2.50, p=0.05) and CR rate (OR=0.20, p=0.024), although with similar OS (HR 1.30, p=0.66) and TTR (HR=1.20, p=0.86). ELN17 favorable-risk patients reclassified as ELN22 intermediate-risk (N=23 of 108) did not show a significant difference in OS (HR 1.47, p=0.20), EFS (HR 1.35, p=0.12), CR rate (OR 0.75, p=0.46), or TTR (HR=1.64, p=0.11) compared to ELN22 favorable-risk. For ELN17 intermediate-risk (N=40), 5 patients were reclassified as ELN22 adverse-risk (12.5%) and had significantly shorter EFS (HR 2.89, p=0.037) compared to ELN22 intermediate risk, although there was not a significant difference in CR rate (OR 0.31, p=0.23) or OS (HR 0.81, p=0.67). We next compared the prognostic significance of age relative to ELN risk classification. Age was associated with higher C-statistics (OS=0.65, TTR=0.57 and EFS=0.60) and AUC (CR=0.64) compared to both ELN17 (OS=0.56, TTR=0.54, EFS=0.54, CR=0.54) or ELN22 (OS=0.57, TTR=0.57, EFS=0.57, CR=0.58). The combination of age and ELN22 resulted in the highest C-statistics for OS, TTR, and EFS (OS=0.68, TTR=0.60, EFS=0.64). To further assess the impact of MDSm on risk-stratification of NPM1+ AML, we performed multivariable analyses adjusting for FLT3-ITD, MDSm, and age in patients without adverse-risk disease. These analyses showed MDSm did not have a significant association with OS when controlling for age or FLT3-ITD. We also compared ELN22 favorable-risk patients with and without MDSm (MDSm+ N=18; MDSm- N=61). Compared with the MDSm-, there was a trend toward an inferior OS (HR 1.85, p=0.054) for MDSm+ patients but not EFS (HR 1.38, p=0.3) or TTR (HR 1.2, p=0.64). When stratified by age (<65, N=53 vs. ≥65, N=26), MDSm+ in younger patients did not show a difference for OS (HR 0.96, p=0.96), EFS (HR 0.63, p=0.53) or TTR (HR 0.4, p=0.37). Older ELN22 favorable-risk patients (≥65) had similarly poor OS (MDSm- HR 3.33 and MDSm+ 3.27, respectively, p=0.001 for both) and EFS (MDSm- HR 3.11 and MDSm+ 2.39, p=0.001 and 0.01) compared to younger MDSm- patients. In our study, the ELN22 guidelines incrementally improve risk stratification for EFS in NPM1+ patients. However, age remains the most prognostic factor, and patients ≥ 65 years have similar adverse clinical outcomes, whether classified as favorable risk by ELN17, ELN22, or incorporating MDSm. Moreover, MDSm do not confer a worse prognosis in NPM1+ patients when accounting for age or FLT3-ITD status. These findings differ from a recent report by Chan et al. and are in keeping with the report by Othman et al. Therefore, further understanding of the underlying biology of age and its effect on NPM1+ AML is needed to improve outcomes for older patients.

*Authors contributed equally. Introduction. Two chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have been FDA approved for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel). Prior work from our consortium identified racial and ethnic differences in safety and response to ide-cel among patients treated in the standard of care (SOC) setting; despite these differences, survival was similar across race and ethnicity. Here, we extend this work to investigate racial and ethnic differences in safety, efficacy, and outcomes in a larger cohort of patients treated with SOC ide-cel with longer follow-up and patients treated with SOC cilta-cel. Methods. Data for RRMM patients who underwent leukapheresis by 12/31/2022 and were treated with SOC ide-cel or cilta-cel were pooled across 19 institutions in the U.S. Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. We compared Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic (any race) patients, excluding other racial and ethnic groups due to small sample sizes that precluded sub-group investigations. Separately for each CAR T-cell therapy, racial and ethnic differences in baseline patient characteristics, safety, and treatment responses were examined using chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to examine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by race and ethnicity. Results. Among 332 RRMM patients treated with ide-cel, Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients comprised 17% and 10% of the cohort, respectively. Hispanic patients were younger at infusion compared to Non-Hispanic Black and Non-Hispanic White patients (55.5 vs. 63 vs. 66 years, p<0.001). Non-Hispanic Black patients had a higher disease burden (≥ 50% bone marrow plasma cell percentage) compared to Non-Hispanic White and Hispanic patients (35% vs. 20% vs. 19%, p=0.05), while a higher proportion of Non-Hispanic White patients had high-risk cytogenetics compared to Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients (37% vs. 23% vs. 10%, p=0.003). Non-Hispanic Black patients were more likely to develop severe (≥ grade 3) cytopenia at day 30 (p<0.001) and day 90 (p=0.01) post-infusion, and these differences were particularly driven by higher rates of severe neutropenia among Non-Hispanic Black patients at these time points. Non-Hispanic White patients were more likely to achieve a best response of partial response (PR) or better (82%) compared to Non-Hispanic Black (75%) and Hispanic patients (63%, p=0.02). No other racial and ethnic differences in baseline patient characteristics (including cytopenias), safety, PFS, and OS were observed (p>0.05). Among 222 RRMM patients treated with cilta-cel, Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients comprised 12% and 9% of the cohort, respectively. At baseline, Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to have anemia (p=0.01), and Non-Hispanic Black patients were more likely to have thrombocytopenia (p=0.02) and neutropenia (p=0.06) compared to Non-Hispanic White patients. No other differences in baseline patient characteristics were observed by race and ethnicity. While not statistically significant, a higher rate of severe (≥ grade 3) cytopenia at day 90 post-infusion was observed among Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients compared to Non-Hispanic White patients (33% vs. 44% vs. 21%, p=0.07), similar to the ide-cel cohort. This finding was primarily driven by higher rates of severe neutropenia among Non-Hispanic Black patients and higher rates of anemia among Hispanic patients. No other racial and ethnic differences in safety, responses to cilta-cel, PFS, or OS were not observed in the cilta-cel cohort (p>0.05). Conclusion. In a large cohort of RRMM patients treated with SOC ide-cel or cilta-cel, we observed a higher rate of cytopenias post-infusion and inferior ide-cel responses among racial and ethnic minority patients compared to Non-Hispanic White patients. Despite these differences, survival was similar across race and ethnicity, suggesting that both available CAR T-cell therapies for RRMM patients can be utilized across all populations. Future studies that include larger patient cohorts of racially and ethnically diverse patients should be conducted to confirm these findings and additionally evaluate long-term outcomes.

Introduction: Brexu-cel is an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy approved in the US and EU for treatment of adults with R/R MCL (after ≥2 prior therapies in EU) based on a high objective response rate (ORR; 93%; 67% complete response [CR] rate) in pts who received the pivotal dose (2×106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg; Cohort 1; N=60) in ZUMA-2 (NCT02601313; Wang et al, N Engl J Med 2020). After ~4 years (y) of median follow-up, Brexu-cel demonstrated a median overall survival (OS) of 46.4 months (mo) in 68 pts with R/R MCL in Cohort 1 (Goy et al. ASH 2023). Cohort 2 was established to assess a lower dose (0.5 x 106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg); however, the risk/benefit ratio of the Cohort 1 dose was deemed the optimal dose before Cohort 2 reached full enrollment. Here we report primary outcomes of Cohort 2 and 5-y outcomes of Cohorts 1 and 2. Methods: Pts with R/R MCL and ≤5 prior therapies including a BTKi received optional bridging therapy (protocol-defined), lymphodepleting chemotherapy, and 1 infusion of brexu-cel. The primary endpoint was ORR (CR + partial response [PR]) per Lugano classification (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014) by independent radiology review committee (IRRC) assessment. Key secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), best objective response (BOR), progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and safety. After ≥24 mo of assessment, pts could transition to long-term follow-up (LTFU), NCT05041309, where they were monitored for late-onset targeted/serious adverse events (AEs) possibly related to brexu-cel, presence of replication-competent retrovirus (RCR), and/or insertional mutagenesis. Descriptive statistics are reported herein. Results: As of the primary analysis data cutoff date, July 24, 2019, 17 pts enrolled in Cohort 2, 14 (82%) of whom were treated with brexu-cel with median follow-up of 16.0 mo (range, 13.9-18.0). Pt characteristics for Cohort 2 (N=14) were similar to Cohort 1; median (range) age and number or prior therapies was 61.5 y (52-73) and 3 (2-5); 100% US-treated, 79% male, 71% extranodal disease, 50% intermediate or high s-MIPI scores, 50% refractory to last therapy, and 43% had prior autologous stem cell transplantation. ORR was 93% (95% CI, 66.1-99.8) per IRRC; 64% had a CR (95% CI, 35.1-87.2), 29% had a PR (95% CI, 8.4-58.1) and 1 pt was not assessed. All 14 pts had ≥1 AE of any grade (Gr), with Gr ≥3 AEs occurring in 93% of pts; the most common being hypotension (50%), white blood cell count decrease (50%), anemia (43%), and neutrophil count decrease (43%). Rates of Gr ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological events were 7% and 43%, respectively. As of April 1, 2024, median follow-up (range) for Cohort 1 and 2 was 67.8 mo (58.2-88.6; N=68) and 72.3 mo (70.1-74.3; N=14), respectively. In Cohort 1, 24 pts were still alive (35%; 2 withdrew consent and 1 lost to follow up) and 44 pts died (65%). In Cohort 2, 8 pts were still alive (57%; 2 withdrew consent and 1 lost to follow up) and 6 pts died (43%). A total of 27 pts (Cohort 1, n=23; Cohort 2, n=4) enrolled in the LTFU study by data cutoff with a median follow-up time of 70.2 mo (range, 58.2-88.6). Median (95% CI) investigator-assessed DOR and PFS were 36.5 mo (17.7-48.9; n=60; 17 patients in ongoing response, all CR) and 25.3 mo (12.7-46.6; N=68) in Cohort 1; and 57.5 mo (4.7-not estimable [NE]; n=12; 3 pts in ongoing response, all CR) and 29.5 mo (3.3-NE; N=14) in Cohort 2. Median OS (95% CI) and 60-mo OS rates (95% CI) were 46.5 mo (24.9- 60.2) and 38.5% (26.7-50.1) in Cohort 1; and not reached (9.4-NE) and 53.6% (23.8-76.2) in Cohort 2. One pt had 3 ongoing AEs on LTFU, hypogammaglobulinemia and 2 viral infections that arose prior to LTFU. Two pts died on LTFU, both due to progressive disease; no new secondary malignancies or RCR cases were reported. Conclusions: Consistent with Cohort 1, brexu-cel demonstrated a high ORR, durable responses, and an expected safety profile in pts with R/R MCL in Cohort 2 despite the lower dose. However, small sample size limits interpretation of these results. With >5 y of median follow-up, pts in Cohort 1 and 2 continued to experience durable responses with high 60-mo OS rates. No new safety signals were detected and no secondary malignancies or RCR cases were reported in LTFU. Additionally, ZUMA-2 results are consistent with real-world outcomes of brexu-cel in the post BTKi R/R MCL setting (89% ORR and 81% CR rate; Wang Y, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023). These results support the continued use of brexu-cel in R/R MCL.

Introduction. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) and idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), two anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CAR T therapies, have demonstrated remarkable responses and improved survival among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the clinical trials and standard of care (SOC) setting. Here, we compare safety, efficacy, and survival for patients treated with SOC ide-cel and cilta-cel. Methods. Data were from a retrospective chart review of RRMM patients leukapheresed by 12/31/2022 with the intent to receive SOC ide- or cilta-cel at 19 institutions in the US Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach was used to compare outcomes by therapy type (cilta- vs. ide-cel), balancing on age, sex, race and ethnicity, performance status, extramedullary disease, high-risk cytogenetics, prior BCMA therapy, bone marrow plasma cells, penta-refractory status, lymphodepleting chemotherapy, baseline ferritin, low cell dose, and bridging therapy response. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association of treatment type with safety, efficacy, and survival accordingly, while adjusting for IPTW weights. We employed propensity score matching utilizing the same covariates to identify the association of treatment type with progression-free survival (PFS) within relevant patient sub-groups. Results. A total of 641 patients were leukapheresed by 12/31/2022 with ide-cel (n=386) and cilta-cel (n=255). 586 patients were infused (n=350 for ide-cel; n=236 for cilta-cel) with a median follow-up of 13.0 and 12.6 months, respectively. After IPTW, patient characteristics were well-balanced. Patients treated with cilta-cel were more likely to have grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (OR=5.52, 95% CI=1.76-17.30, p=0.004), infections (OR=2.07, 95% CI=1.44-2.97, p<0.001), and delayed neurotoxicity (NT) (OR=20.97, 95% CI=4.75-92.42, p<0.001) compared to patients treated with ide-cel. In the cilta-cel cohort, 24 patients (10%) experienced delayed NT compared to 2 patients (1%) in the ide-cel cohort. Although not statistically significant, patients treated with cilta-cel were more likely to have any second primary malignancies (SPMs) (OR=1.87, 95% CI=0.94-3.71, p=0.08) and any SPMs excluding non-melanoma skin cancers (OR=1.78, 95% CI=0.78-4.10, p=0.2) but no association was observed for odds of hematologic SPMs (OR=0.98, 95% CI=0.26-3.61). No association was observed for therapy type with any or severe immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, any CRS, severe cytopenias, and non-relapse mortality. Compared to ide-cel, cilta-cel was associated with better treatment responses of ≥ complete response (OR=2.38, 95% CI=1.61-3.51, p<0.001) and ≥ partial response (OR=1.74, 95% CI=0.99-3.05, p=0.06). Patients treated with cilta-cel had a longer PFS and overall survival (OS) than ide-cel (HR=0.47, 95% CI=0.35-0.62, p<0.001 and HR=0.63, 95% CI=0.42-0.93, p=0.02, respectively), and these findings were similar in the intention to treat cohort (PFS: HR=0.44, 95% CI=0.34-0.55, p<0.001; OS: HR=0.55, 95% CI=0.41-0.73, p<0.001, respectively). We observed consistent findings when repeating the analyses restricting the ide-cel cohort to patients infused during the same time-period as FDA approval for cilta-cel (≥ March 2022), restricting to patients with data on all covariates, and restricting to sites that contributed data for both products. In a propensity matched population, (n=380; n=190 for cilta-cel and n=190 for ide-cel), patients treated with cilta-cel had superior PFS compared to those treated with ide-cel in most subgroups with respect to age and disease characteristics including extramedullary disease, high-risk cytogenetics, and elevated baseline ferritin (p<0.05). Conclusion. Our results suggest superior efficacy of cilta-cel with a higher incidence of certain toxicities compared to ide-cel in the SOC setting. This study provides valuable information for patient counseling and guiding the selection of CAR T-cell therapy for specific patient populations. Further validation through similar large-scale real-world experiences or prospective studies is needed to confirm our results and enhance applicability in the clinical setting. *DH, LP, & DD are co-first authors * YL, KP, & SS are co-last authors

Introduction: Recent efforts have shed light on the clinical and laboratory factors associated with toxicity and response to BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, a major limitation of current scoring systems lies in their assessment at time of lymphodepletion. Because they are not determined before apheresis, they are ill-equipped to guide patient selection, anticipate level-of-care, or plan pre-emptive toxicity management strategies. We therefore aimed to characterize early predictors of CAR-T toxicity and response. Study Design: In this multicenter observational study, we examined demographic, clinical, and laboratory data across three distinct timepoints: indication (e.g., treatment decision), apheresis, and pre-lymphodepletion (LD). CRS and ICANS were graded according to ASTCT criteria. Hematotoxicity (ICAHT) was graded using EHA/EBMT criteria. Early infections (day 0-100) were defined based on microbiologic data or as a clinical infection syndrome, and graded per Hill et al, Blood 2018. Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared by log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models were applied to explore associations between pre-apheresis risk factors and key toxicity and survival outcomes. The CAR-HEMATOTOX (HT) score - encompassing markers of inflammation (e.g., CRP, ferritin) and marrow reserve (e.g., hemoglobin, ANC, platelet count) - was determined at each timepoint (Rejeski et al, Blood 2021). Results: We included 530 RRMM patients treated with standard-of-care cilta-cel (n=184) or ide-cel (n=346) across nine centers. Median age was 65 (range 31-88), median ECOG was 1 (IQR 0-1), and patients received a median of 5 prior lines of therapy (IQR 4-7). The median time from indication to apheresis was 16 days (IQR 7-52), while the median time from apheresis to infusion was 56 days (IQR 46-69). The proportion of high-risk patients by HT score did not change between the pre-apheresis and LD timepoints (19% vs. 20%, p=0.82). Most patients stayed either low-risk (n=388, 73.2%) or high-risk (n=68, 12.8%). However, 35 patients (6.6%) shifted from high-to-low risk, while 39 patients (7.4%) progressed from low-to-high risk - reflecting their response to bridging therapies. We noted considerable differences in morbidity and mortality based on the pre-apheresis HT score. Compared to their low-risk counterparts (score 0-2, n=427), high-risk patients (score ≥3, n=103) were hospitalized longer (12 vs. 15 days, p=0.009) and required more frequent ICU admissions (6% vs. 12%, p=0.05). They exhibited more severe early cytopenias (G3+: 8% vs. 25%, p<0.001) and late cytopenias (G3+: 7% vs. 21%, p<0.001), resulting in increased use of TPO agonists and stem cell boosts. Grade 3 or higher ICANS was also more common in HThigh patients (3% vs. 11%, p=0.006), as were severe infections (14% vs. 27%, p=0.007). We found increased non-relapsed mortality in HThigh patients (1-yr NRM 4.6% vs. 16.1%, p<0.001), but no significant difference in the occurrence of secondary malignancies (p>0.9). With a median follow-up of 12.4 months, HThigh patients showed inferior PFS (1-yr PFS 29% vs. 63%, p<0.0001) and OS (1-yr OS 49% vs. 83%, p<0.0001). Transitioning from a low-to-high score was linked to poor survival (1-yr PFS 26%), while the shift from high-to-low risk was associated with favorable outcomes (1-yr PFS 51%). In a multivariable Cox regression model of pre-apheresis features, a high HT score (aHR 2.52, p<0.0001), prior anti-BCMA therapy (aHR 1.55, p=0.04), history of extramedullary disease (aHR 1.42, p=0.02), and penta-refractoriness (aHR 1.45, p=0.02) were independently associated with PFS. Notably, the presence of more than 3 of these high-risk features defined an ultra-high-risk cohort of 28 patients (5.3%) with particularly dismal survival (1-year PFS 15%). Conclusions: Leveraging granular pre-apheresis data from a large international cohort, we identify early markers of toxicity and response in CAR-T-treated RRMM patients. The HT score - reflecting baseline inflammation and hematopoietic reserve - identified high-risk patients likely to benefit from pre-emptive toxicity mitigation strategies such as prophylactic stem cell collection. Most importantly, we characterize a small yet ultra-high-risk group of RRMM patients in need of more effective bridging and therapeutic options.

Background: C10603/RATFIY was the first AML trial to show the benefit of adding a targeted agent to intensive chemotherapy for a specific genetically determined subset (Stone R et al, NEJM 2017). The addition of the multi-kinase inhibitor midostaurin (M) to chemotherapy in previously untreated adults with FLT3-mutant AML resulted in superior event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to placebo (P) and led to the approval of this agent in combination therapy. Subsequently, additional targeted drugs including gilteritinib for relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutant AML and quizartinib plus chemotherapy in untreated adults with AML with FLT3-ITD disease have gained approval. Long-term follow-up after reporting of the primary endpoint, especially if met, is important in oncology. Objective: We report the EFS and OS data from C10603 using 10 years of follow up to determine the persistence of a midostaurin benefit and to assess the nature of late relapses or toxicity. Methods: C10603 enrolled 717 pts (360 on the M and 357 on the P arm; median age 47.8 years (range 18-61), 398 women (55.5%) of whom 51.7% were randomized to M and 59.4% to P (p=0.04), and 89% white) from 2011-2015 with previously untreated AML who had either a FLT3-TKD or ITD mutation with allelic ratio of >0.05 to receive daunorubicin/cytarabine (3+7) induction (one reinduction permitted) followed by up to 4 consolidation cycles with cytarabine 3 g/m2 every 12h on days 1, 3 and 5. M (50 mg bid) or P was given orally on days 8-22 of each chemotherapy cycle as well as daily during one year of single-agent maintenance. Allogeneic transplantation (alloHCT) was employed at investigator's discretion; study drug was not continued post-HCT. Pts stayed on their randomized arm and were not re-randomized prior to maintenance. Pts were followed for relapse and survival after the end of protocol therapy, regardless of subsequent therapy, for 10 years. Log-rank tests, Kaplan-Meier methods, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the treatment effect in EFS and OS, as well as the alloHCT effect. All p values are two-sided. Results: We have completed the 10-year FU on this trial and data collection has concluded. The median EFS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.5-11.4) on the M arm compared with 3.0 months for P (95% CI, 1.9-6.0) with a HR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.94, p=0.0067). Among the 420 CR pts who achieved complete remission (CR) by the protocol specified time of 60 days, 253 have had an event (death in 69 and relapse in 184); these events were relatively equal on each arm. OS, the co-primary endpoint, remained marginally superior for those randomized to M compared to P; the 10-year OS estimate was 43.7% (95% CI, 38.7-49.3%) vs 38.6% (95% CI, 33.6-44.4%) (p= 0.0485). The hazard ratios for OS favored randomization to M in each key biological subgroup (FLT3-ITD low or high allelic ratio or FLT3-TKD), but smaller subsets precluded statistical significance. There was a 10-year OS benefit in favor of M in men (p=0.005), but not women (p=0.9). A total of 414 transplants were performed: only 5 in the latter half of the follow-up period. Transplantation in CR1 was highly beneficial overall (10-year OS, 56% vs 35.8% without transplantation, p=0.001). Among those transplanted in CR1, randomization to M was marginally better than P (61.5% vs 49%, p=.064). After censoring for alloHCT in CR1, there was an OS trend in favor of M (51.8% v 48.0%, p=0.102). In CR1 patients who were randomized to maintenance therapy, M reduced the cumulative incidence of relapse in ELN 2017 favorable and intermediate risk pts, but not in those with adverse risk disease (HR 0.71, 0.47, and 1.01, respectively); maintenance M had no effect on OS. Only 3 pts relapsed after 5 years (all randomized to M). 25 pts randomized to M vs 13 P pts died after 5 years of follow-up. 5 pts on each arm died of a new primary cancer whereas 17 M and 5 P pts were coded as having died from treatment-related causes. None of the 3 pts who relapsed after 4 years had spliceosome mutations at diagnosis; whereas 18% (21/117) patients pts who had relapsed earlier had spliceosome mutations at diagnosis (p=0.419). Conclusions: The EFS benefit of randomization to midostaurin vs placebo when added to chemotherapy was maintained over time, although the benefit for OS was diminished, likely due in part to aging. Patient and disease factors differed between early vs late relapses, which could suggest the use of alternative therapies during distinct therapeutic stages.

Background: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are known safety concerns following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Axi-cel, a CAR T-cell therapy approved in the US for adults with R/R LBCL after ≥ 1 line of prior therapy (2L+), has been administered in the outpatient setting, where a common cause for post-infusion hospital admissions were CAR T-cell-related toxicities (Furqan et al., 2024). Due to reimbursement policies in the US, patients at higher risk for safety events requiring inpatient care within 3 days of infusion may not be ideal candidates for outpatient care. We sought to identify what pre-infusion characteristics may put patients more at risk for developing early CRS and ICANS after axi-cel. Methods : Patients receiving axi-cel for R/R LBCL 2L+ between 01/2021−10/2023 registered in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) observational database were potentially eligible for analysis. Patients with prior non-transplant cellular therapy or missing data for analysis were excluded. Primary endpoints were onset of early CRS and early ICANS, defined as an any grade event within 3 calendar days of axi-cel infusion (date of infusion is defined as Day 0 and onset of CRS/ICANS before the end of Day 3 is an early event). Early Grade ≥ 2 and early Grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS (onset of CRS/ICANS before the end of Day 3 and maximum Grade ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 per ASTCT Criteria) were also evaluated. Patient demographics, ECOG PS, comorbidities, disease characteristics at diagnosis and prior to infusion, line of therapy (LoT), lab assessments prior to infusion, and infusion-related attributes were evaluated by univariate screening and multivariable regression for development of early CRS or early ICANS. Results: A total of888 patients from 105 centers were included in the analysis. Median age was 63 years (45% ≥ 65 years) and 66% were male. At LBCL diagnosis, 22% of patients had a histological transformation. Prior to infusion, 5% of patients had ECOG PS ≥ 2 and 70% had at least 1 clinically significant comorbidity. Half (50%) of patients received axi-cel with 1 prior LoT (2L) and 10% of patients underwent a prior autologous hematopoietic cell transplant. Median time from leukapheresis to infusion was 30 days (interquartile range [IQR] 27−34). Bridging therapy of any type was administered in 59%, and systemic bridging therapy in 48%, of patients and 14% of patients were intended to be treated in the outpatient setting. Thirty percent of patients had chemo-sensitive disease prior to infusion. Median follow-up post-infusion was 12.3 months (range 3−38). Median time to onset of CRS was 4 days (IQR 2−6) and 84% of patients experienced CRS at any time. Early any grade (Grade ≥ 3) CRS was observed in 47% (3%) of patients. In the multivariate analysis of early any grade CRS, only prior LoT (≥ 2 vs 1) was associated with lower risk (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.55−0.94), but this association was not seen in the analyses of early Grade ≥ 2 nor early Grade ≥ 3 CRS. Notably, 47% and 52% of patients with ≥ 2 vs 1 prior LoT, respectively, only experienced early Grade 1 CRS (defined as fever only). In the analysis of early Grade ≥ 3 CRS, only ECOG PS 0−1 was associated with lower risk vs patients with ECOG PS ≥ 2 (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06−0.48). Median time to onset of ICANS was 7 days (IQR 5−9) and 47% of patients experienced ICANS at any time. Early any grade (Grade ≥ 3) ICANS occurred in 9% (5%) of patients. After multivariate adjustment, age < 65 vs ≥ 65 (OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.23−0.62]) and 1 vs ≥ 2 prior LoT (OR 0.58 [95% CI 0.36−0.95]) were associated with lower risk of early any grade ICANS. Age < 65 vs ≥ 65 was also associated with lower risk of early Grade ≥ 3 ICANS (OR 0.31 [95% CI 0.15−0.61]), as was ECOG PS 0−1 vs ECOG PS ≥ 2 (OR 0.30 [95% CI 0.11−0.83]). Comorbidities were evaluated and no significant associations with early CRS nor early ICANS were found. Conclusions: This analysis of readily available clinical variables in a real-world contemporary cohort of patients treated with axi-cel demonstrates that younger patients and patients with better ECOG PS have lower risk of early CRS and early ICANS. Axi-cel in 2L setting, vs 3L+, is associated with lower risk of early any grade ICANS and comparable early Grade ≥ 2 CRS, but a higher risk of early fever. These results further enable a more informed decision of patient selection for physicians, which is critical for the success of outpatient administration.

Introduction: Over 80,000 new cases of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) are diagnosed annually, but modifiable risk factors are largely unknown. Circadian disruption has been identified as a risk factor for several cancers, including breast and prostate cancer, and affects immune cells such as Natural Killer (NK) cells and T-helper cells. Disruptions in circadian rhythms can lead to aberrant immune cell trafficking and proliferation. Despite this biological connection, evidence linking circadian disruptions to NHL remains inconclusive. Only single Mendelian Randomization (MR) study (PMID: 32895918) has explored the causal relationship between sleep traits and overall NHL risk, without examining NHL subtypes. Studies have shown distinct risk factor profiles among NHL subtypes. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the causal relationship between sleep traits and NHL subtypes in European populations using MR. Methods: We conducted a two-sample MR analyses using genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data on sleep traits and NHL subtypes. The GWAS summary statistics on sleep traits were obtained from publicly available UKBiobank datasets. The sleep traits analyzed included chronotype (N=449,734), insomnia (N=237,627), sleep duration (N=446,118), daytime sleepiness (N=452,071), short sleep (N=411,934), and long sleep (N=339,926). Only independent, genome-wide significant SNPs (p < 5×10-8) were considered as valid instruments. The NHL subtype-specific summary statistics came from the InterLymph including follicular lymphoma (FL: N=6,508 cases / 64,183 controls), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL: N=1,169 cases / 61,603 controls), and Waldenström macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (WM/LPL: N=1,697 cases / 59,333 controls). Our primary analysis used the random-effects inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method. In addition, we employed MR-Egger to adjust for directional pleiotropy. Heterogeneity in the MR results was evaluated with Cochran's Q statistic. Results: The IVW method did not identify any statistically significant causal association between sleep traits and the risk of NHL subtypes (FL,MCL,WM/LPL), but did yield several intriguing associations. Chronotype (early rising) showed a tendency towards a marginally an increased NHL risk across subtypes [Odds ratio (OR) range: 1.07 - 2.56]. Conversely, a decreased risk was noted for long sleep (≥ 9 hours vs. 7-8 hours) [OR range: 0.19 - 0.62], insomnia [OR range: 0.72 - 0.88], and short sleep (excludes MCL) [OR range: 0.12 - 0.72]. Confidence limit for long sleep was wide due to small number of variants (N=8). The MR-Egger regression analysis did not provide evidence of significant directional horizontal pleiotropy. The F-statistics for all sleep traits were greater than 10 indicating absences of weak instrument bias. Conclusions: Our study found no statistically significant associations between sleep traits and three NHL subtypes (FL, MCL, WM/LPL) in European populations. However, we observed potential influences of chronotype, long and short sleep, and insomnia on NHL risk. These findings align with and extend previous MR study by providing subtype-specific insights. Future directions include expanding our analysis to additional NHL subtypes, generating polygenic risk scores, and conducting stratified analyses using the InterLymph population. These efforts aim to further elucidate the complex relationship between sleep characteristics and NHL risk across diverse subtypes and populations.