Vallurupalli, Anusha

Abstract The cumulative impact of baseline comorbidities on outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is not well established. Therefore, we developed and validated a Cellular Therapy Comorbidity Index (CT-CI) to predict outcomes following CD19-directed CAR-T therapy for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Patients aged 18 or older receiving commercial CAR-T therapy for LBCL during 2017 to 2020 were selected from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. Patients were randomly assigned to training or validation cohorts. Comorbidities given weighted scores comprised the CT-CI, which was then validated for overall survival (OS) prognostication. A total of 1916 patients from 97 medical centers were included, with a median age of 64 years (19-91 years). About 70% of patients had comorbidities, such as cardiac disease (12%); diabetes (14%); hepatic dysfunction (mild, 8%; moderate to severe, 2%); psychiatric disturbance (18%); and pulmonary dysfunction (moderate, 15%; severe, 12%). The CT-CI was calculated, stratified patients in 3 categories, and was associated with increased mortality. Patients with higher CT-CI scores had worse OS (CT-CI 1: hazard ratio [HR], 1.37 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.62; P< .001]; CT-CI 2: HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.17-1.89; P = .001]; CT-CI ≥ 3: HR, 2.55 [95% CI, 1.90-3.42; P< .001]). Higher CT-CI scores predicted treatment-related mortality and relapse. There was no correlation between the CT-CI score and CAR-T–related toxicities. The novel CT-CI score stratifies the effect of patient comorbidities on survival after CAR-T therapy and can be used for clinical decision-making and treatment selection in high-risk populations. However, comorbidities and fear of increased toxicity should not preclude patients from this effective therapy.

Background: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are known safety concerns following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Axi-cel, a CAR T-cell therapy approved in the US for adults with R/R LBCL after ≥ 1 line of prior therapy (2L+), has been administered in the outpatient setting, where a common cause for post-infusion hospital admissions were CAR T-cell-related toxicities (Furqan et al., 2024). Due to reimbursement policies in the US, patients at higher risk for safety events requiring inpatient care within 3 days of infusion may not be ideal candidates for outpatient care. We sought to identify what pre-infusion characteristics may put patients more at risk for developing early CRS and ICANS after axi-cel. Methods : Patients receiving axi-cel for R/R LBCL 2L+ between 01/2021−10/2023 registered in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) observational database were potentially eligible for analysis. Patients with prior non-transplant cellular therapy or missing data for analysis were excluded. Primary endpoints were onset of early CRS and early ICANS, defined as an any grade event within 3 calendar days of axi-cel infusion (date of infusion is defined as Day 0 and onset of CRS/ICANS before the end of Day 3 is an early event). Early Grade ≥ 2 and early Grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS (onset of CRS/ICANS before the end of Day 3 and maximum Grade ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 per ASTCT Criteria) were also evaluated. Patient demographics, ECOG PS, comorbidities, disease characteristics at diagnosis and prior to infusion, line of therapy (LoT), lab assessments prior to infusion, and infusion-related attributes were evaluated by univariate screening and multivariable regression for development of early CRS or early ICANS. Results: A total of888 patients from 105 centers were included in the analysis. Median age was 63 years (45% ≥ 65 years) and 66% were male. At LBCL diagnosis, 22% of patients had a histological transformation. Prior to infusion, 5% of patients had ECOG PS ≥ 2 and 70% had at least 1 clinically significant comorbidity. Half (50%) of patients received axi-cel with 1 prior LoT (2L) and 10% of patients underwent a prior autologous hematopoietic cell transplant. Median time from leukapheresis to infusion was 30 days (interquartile range [IQR] 27−34). Bridging therapy of any type was administered in 59%, and systemic bridging therapy in 48%, of patients and 14% of patients were intended to be treated in the outpatient setting. Thirty percent of patients had chemo-sensitive disease prior to infusion. Median follow-up post-infusion was 12.3 months (range 3−38). Median time to onset of CRS was 4 days (IQR 2−6) and 84% of patients experienced CRS at any time. Early any grade (Grade ≥ 3) CRS was observed in 47% (3%) of patients. In the multivariate analysis of early any grade CRS, only prior LoT (≥ 2 vs 1) was associated with lower risk (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.55−0.94), but this association was not seen in the analyses of early Grade ≥ 2 nor early Grade ≥ 3 CRS. Notably, 47% and 52% of patients with ≥ 2 vs 1 prior LoT, respectively, only experienced early Grade 1 CRS (defined as fever only). In the analysis of early Grade ≥ 3 CRS, only ECOG PS 0−1 was associated with lower risk vs patients with ECOG PS ≥ 2 (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06−0.48). Median time to onset of ICANS was 7 days (IQR 5−9) and 47% of patients experienced ICANS at any time. Early any grade (Grade ≥ 3) ICANS occurred in 9% (5%) of patients. After multivariate adjustment, age < 65 vs ≥ 65 (OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.23−0.62]) and 1 vs ≥ 2 prior LoT (OR 0.58 [95% CI 0.36−0.95]) were associated with lower risk of early any grade ICANS. Age < 65 vs ≥ 65 was also associated with lower risk of early Grade ≥ 3 ICANS (OR 0.31 [95% CI 0.15−0.61]), as was ECOG PS 0−1 vs ECOG PS ≥ 2 (OR 0.30 [95% CI 0.11−0.83]). Comorbidities were evaluated and no significant associations with early CRS nor early ICANS were found. Conclusions: This analysis of readily available clinical variables in a real-world contemporary cohort of patients treated with axi-cel demonstrates that younger patients and patients with better ECOG PS have lower risk of early CRS and early ICANS. Axi-cel in 2L setting, vs 3L+, is associated with lower risk of early any grade ICANS and comparable early Grade ≥ 2 CRS, but a higher risk of early fever. These results further enable a more informed decision of patient selection for physicians, which is critical for the success of outpatient administration.

Abstract Background: High grade B-cell Lymphoma with rearrangements of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6, also known as double hit lymphoma (DHL), and double expressing lymphomas (DEL; DLBCL with IHC expression of MYC and BCL2, but without double hit cytogenetics) are highly aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas and patients (pts) often develop relapsed/refractory disease following standard first-line chemoimmunotherapy. DA-EPOCH-R is widely used in patients with DHL, and a phase 1 trial of venetoclax + DA-EPOCH-R established the dose of 600 mg for 5 days with each cycle as the recommended phase 2 dose (Rutherford, et al. Proc ASCO 2020). A051701 is a phase II/III randomized trial evaluating chemoimmunotherapy +/- the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax in a DHL cohort (pts with DHL with BCL2 rearrangement and/or expression), and a DEL cohort. Here we report the initial results from the DHL cohort of A051701. Methods: Pts age ≥ 18 years with newly diagnosed DHL were stratified on International Prognostic Index (IPI) score and receipt of a single cycle of chemotherapy prior to registration, which was permitted, and randomized 1:1 to receive DA-EPOCH-R (Arm 1) or DA-EPOCH-R with venetoclax (Arm 2). Enrollment was based on local pathology results which were centrally confirmed. DA-EPOCH-R was administered as previously published. Venetoclax was dosed at 600 mg po daily on days 4-8 of cycle 1 and on days 1-5 of subsequent cycles for up to 6 total cycles. All cycles were supported by GCSF or peg-GCSF. For the interim analysis at the end of phase II, 53 events ensured 90% power to detect an improvement in 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) from 40% in Arm 1 to 60% in Arm 2 (HR=0.557) using a one-sided stratified log-rank test with type I error rate of 20%. The Alliance Data and Safety Monitoring Board approved the data release after accrual was stopped early due to excess toxicity in Arm 2. These data were frozen July 8, 2021. Results: 73 pts were registered (36 in Arm 1 and 37 in Arm 2) between 8/7/19 and 9/18/20. Analyses were performed for the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, defined as eligible pts with DHL histology confirmed (n=66; 30 Arm 1, 36 Arm 2). Median age was 65 years in both arms (range 37-80) and baseline demographic factors were well balanced. An allowed pre-protocol chemoimmunotherapy cycle was administered in 60% and 56% of Arm 1 and Arm 2 pts, respectively. The majority of pts had advanced stage disease (Arm 1 87%, Arm 2 86%), GCB immunophenotype (Arm 1 100%, Arm 2 88%), ECOG PS 0-1 (Arm 1 90%, Arm 2 86%), and high-intermediate/high risk IPI score (Arm 1 63%, Arm 2 64%). Therapy was completed per protocol in 70% and 47% of pts, respectively, for Arm 1 and 2, and disease progression on therapy occurred in 10% and 3%. Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 7% of pts in Arm 1 and 11% of pts in Arm 2. Consent was withdrawn after beginning treatment in 3% and 11% in Arm 1 and 2, respectively. Death on treatment occurred in 1 patient (3%; PJP pneumonia) in Arm 1 and 6 pts (17%; sepsis (n=4), cardiac arrest (n=2)) in Arm 2. The observation of excess deaths on Arm 2 prompted suspension of accrual to the DHL cohort. Treatment was discontinued for other reasons in 3 (10%) and 4 (11%) pts in Arms 1 and 2, respectively. Venetoclax was dose-reduced and/or omitted in 15 (42%) pts. Grade 4 neutropenia was not significantly different between arms (Arm 1 67%, Arm 2 71%), nor was grade ≥3 neutropenic fever (Arm 1 36%, Arm 2 40%). Sepsis occurred more frequently in Arm 2 (14% vs. 23%). The end of treatment overall and complete response rates in the mITT population were 73% and 67% in Arm 1, and 58% and 50% in Arm 2. The end of treatment overall and complete response rates among only pts evaluated for response (n=52) were 79% and 71% in Arm 1, and 88% and 75% in Arm 2. With a median follow-up of 7.4 months, the median PFS was not reached (NR) in Arm 1 (95% CI 6.1-NR) and was 6.7 months in Arm 2 (95% CI 4.5-NR) (two-sided p=0.13). The median OS was NR in Arm 1 and was 8.5 months in Arm 2 (95% CI 5.2-NR) (two-sided p=0.004). Conclusions: DA-EPOCH-R plus venetoclax in DHL pts resulted in excess treatment-related mortality compared to DA-EPOCH-R alone, prompting early discontinuation of accrual and venetoclax treatment for the study cohort. Based on these data, we recommend against combining venetoclax with DA-EPOCH-R in DHL. Robust accrual to this study shows that prospective trials are feasible in DHL, and the favorable outcome thus far in the DA-EPOCH-R arm may serve as a benchmark for future trials Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Abramson: Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy; Allogene Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Kymera: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; EMD Serono: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Morphosys: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Seagen Inc.: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy. Ruppert: Telios Pharma: Consultancy. Hsi: Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Cytomx: Honoraria; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Landsburg: Triphase: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: DSMB member; ADCT: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kahl: AbbVie, Adaptive, ADCT, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Incyte, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kite, MEI, Pharmacyclics, Roche, TG Therapeutics, and Teva: Consultancy; AbbVie, Acerta, ADCT, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech: Research Funding. Friedberg: Acerta: Other: DSMC ; Novartis: Other: DSMC ; Bayer: Other: DSMC . Bartlett: Millennium: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Autolus: Research Funding; Seagen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Leonard: ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Epizyme, Inc., Genmab, Gilead/Kite, Karyopharm, BMS/Celgene, Regeneron, MEI Pharma, Miltenyi, Roche/Genentech, Sutro: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: venetoclax in double hit lymphoma

Background: CLR 131 is a novel targeted radiotherapeutic that exploits the selective uptake and retention of phospholipid ethers (PLEs) by malignant cells. Based on initial preclinical and clinical experience and the radiosensitivity of MM, fractionated dosing of CLR 131 is being examined in RRMM in a Phase 1 trial (NCT02278315) and a Phase 2 trial, CLOVER-1 (NCT02952508). Methods: Both the Phase 1 and Phase 2 trials of CLR 131 aim to determine efficacy and safety in RRMM. Eligibility criteria include progressive or relapsed MM that is refractory to at least 1 proteasome inhibitor (PI) and 1 immunomodulatory (IMiD) drug with no upper limit to the number of prior lines of therapy. Prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and external beam radiation therapy are allowed (< 20% of total marrow irradiated). The Phase 1 trial was a single and fractionated ascending dose escalation safety study and the Phase 2 trial is evaluating 3 doses: a bolus dose and 2 fractionated doses. The fractionated doses of CLR 131 included infusion of either 31.25 mCi/m2 CLR 131 or 37.5 mCi/m2 CLR 131 (administered as 15.625 mCi/m2 or 18.75 mCi/m2, respectively, on day 1 and day 7 (± 1 day)) administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion is reported here. Adverse events (AEs) are graded by NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Responses were determined using IMWG criteria as assessed by the investigator. Results: As of 30Jul2019, 10 subjects have received fractionated 31.25 mCi/m2 and 6 subjects fractionated 37.5 mCi/m2 CLR 131. In addition, 1 subject was scheduled to receive fractionated 37.5 mCi/m2 CLR 131 but died due to progressive disease prior to administration of the second dose; this subject is not included in the analyses below as they did not receive both fractionated doses. There is no upper age limit for enrollment and the median age for the 16 RRMM patients was 71 (range 51-83), including 6 females and 10 males with a median of 4 prior therapies (range 2 to 13). Seven patients had prior ASCT. CLR 131 demonstrated 100% disease control rate in subjects receiving either fractionated dose of CLR 131. The overall response rate (ORR) in the fractionated 37.5 mCi/m2 cohort is 50%. Three subjects in the cohort experienced a partial responses (PR), median time to response 43 days, and the other three had minimal responses (MR) with an average 39% reduction in m-protein. In this cohort, 80% of the subjects were either quad- or penta-refractory; all 80% were refractory to daratumumab. There were two subjects in the 31.25 mCi/m2 cohort with non-secretory disease and their status was followed by FDG-PET imaging. Both have been excluded from the evaluation of efficacy as their disease does not meet with IMWG criteria for response. No patients in this cohort achieved a PR or better however a majority of the subjects experienced a minimal response. The primary AEs include thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, and fatigue (Table 2). The hematologic AEs were expected, manageable and followed a predictable timeline to nadir (average. 40 days) and subsequent recovery (average 17 days post nadir). Conclusions: CLR 131 is a unique, first in class targeted radiotherapeutic for RRMM. Preliminary data for CLR 131 administered as a fractionated dose shows an acceptable and expected safety profile in this patient population. Fractionated dosing at 37.5 mCi/m2 has shown an efficacy signal and has been adopted as the standard for CLR 131 dosing in ongoing and future trials. Dose escalation to determine the highest tolerated dose is ongoing in the Phase 1 study and is currently examining a fractionated infusion of 40 mCi/m2 administered as 20 mCi/m2 CLR 131 on day 1 and day 7 (± 1 day). Based upon these data enrollment to the fractionated 37.5 mCi/m2 cohort of the Phase 2 trial continues. Disclosures Ailawadhi: Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy. Stiff:Gilead/Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Gamida-Cell: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding. Ibrahim:Cellectar: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfeizer: Research Funding; Puma: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Hoffman-LaRoche: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Cull:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Green:GSK: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Cellectar: Research Funding. Oliver:Cellectar Biosciences: Employment. Longcor:Cellectar Biosciences: Employment, Equity Ownership.