Back to Authors

Weiner, Mark G.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5586-9940

Mayo Clinic

Weill Cornell Medicine

Citations 2

Estimation of prevalence of autoimmune diseases in the United States using electronic health record data
Abend, Aaron, He, Ingrid, Bahroos, Neil , Christianakis, Stratos , Crew, Ashley B., Lipori, Gloria , He, Xing , Murphy, Shawn N. , Herrick, Christopher, Weiner, Mark G. , Zelko, Jacob S., Matute-Arcos, Erica, Abajian, M. , Davis, Heather , Hoberg, Asher A, Ortman, Chris, Gode, Amit D., Osinski, Kristen , Rose, Noel R., Fairweather, DeLisa , Di Florio, Damian N, Fairweather, DeLisa , Wise, Leanna , Avasarala, Jagannadha Rao , Payne, Philip , Lai, Albert M. , Gode, Amit, Taylor, Bradley , Florio, Damian N. Di , Miller, Frederick W. , Tsokos, George C.

Journal of Clinical Investigation | December 12, 2024 | Volume: 135 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1172/jci178722 Get It

BACKGROUND Previous epidemiologic studies of autoimmune diseases in the US have included a limited number of diseases or used metaanalyses that rely on different data collection methods and analyses for each disease. METHODS To estimate the prevalence of autoimmune diseases in the US, we used electronic health record data from 6 large medical systems in the US. We developed a software program using common methodology to compute the estimated prevalence of autoimmune diseases alone and in aggregate that can be readily used by other investigators to replicate or modify the analysis over time. RESULTS Our findings indicate that over 15 million people, or 4.6% of the US population, have been diagnosed with at least 1 autoimmune disease from January 1, 2011, to June 1, 2022, and 34% of those are diagnosed with more than 1 autoimmune disease. As expected, females (63% of those with autoimmune disease) were almost twice as likely as males to be diagnosed with an autoimmune disease. We identified the top 20 autoimmune diseases based on prevalence and according to sex and age. CONCLUSION Here, we provide, for what we believe to be the first time, a large-scale prevalence estimate of autoimmune disease in the US by sex and age. FUNDING Autoimmune Registry Inc., the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
Extracting social determinants of health from electronic health records using natural language processing: a systematic review
Patra, Braja Gopal , Sharma, Mohit , Vekaria, Veer , Adekkanattu, Prakash , Patterson, Olga V. , Glicksberg, Benjamin S. , Ryu, Euijung , Furmanchuk, Al’ona , George, Thomas J. , Yang, Xi , Bian, Jiang , Wickramaratne, Priya , Weiner, Mark G. , Pathak, Jyotishman , Patra, Braja G , Sharma, Mohit M , Glicksberg, Benjamin , George, Thomas J , Hogan, William , Bian, Jiang , Campion, Thomas R , Weiner, Mark , Pathak, Jyotishman , Vekaria, Veer , Lepow, Lauren , Biernacka, Joanna M. , Hogan, William R. , Wu, Yonghui , Weissman, Myrna M. , Mann, J. John , Olfson, Mark

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | August 5, 2021 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2716-2727

10.1093/jamia/ocab170 Get It

Abstract Objective Social determinants of health (SDoH) are nonclinical dispositions that impact patient health risks and clinical outcomes. Leveraging SDoH in clinical decision-making can potentially improve diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient outcomes. Despite increased interest in capturing SDoH in electronic health records (EHRs), such information is typically locked in unstructured clinical notes. Natural language processing (NLP) is the key technology to extract SDoH information from clinical text and expand its utility in patient care and research. This article presents a systematic review of the state-of-the-art NLP approaches and tools that focus on identifying and extracting SDoH data from unstructured clinical text in EHRs. Materials and Methods A broad literature search was conducted in February 2021 using 3 scholarly databases (ACL Anthology, PubMed, and Scopus) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 6402 publications were initially identified, and after applying the study inclusion criteria, 82 publications were selected for the final review. Results Smoking status (n = 27), substance use (n = 21), homelessness (n = 20), and alcohol use (n = 15) are the most frequently studied SDoH categories. Homelessness (n = 7) and other less-studied SDoH (eg, education, financial problems, social isolation and support, family problems) are mostly identified using rule-based approaches. In contrast, machine learning approaches are popular for identifying smoking status (n = 13), substance use (n = 9), and alcohol use (n = 9). Conclusion NLP offers significant potential to extract SDoH data from narrative clinical notes, which in turn can aid in the development of screening tools, risk prediction models, and clinical decision support systems.