Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumour with limited prognostic tools that are broadly implementable in routine clinical settings. Current models often depend on molecular platforms not universally accessible. We aimed to develop and validate a clinically practical prognostic model for GBM that integrates ICAM1 protein expression, imaging-derived tumor morphometrics, and clinical features. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed ICAM1 expression in GBM at the DNA methylation, RNA, and protein levels using public datasets and institutional cohorts, confirming its association with tumor grade and poor survival. ICAM1 protein levels were then quantified via digital pathology in a multi-institutional cohort of 197 newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve GBM patients. Tumor surface irregularity (SIR) was calculated from pre-operative contrast-enhanced MRI using open-source imaging tools. Age at diagnosis was also recorded. These three variables—ICAM1 expression, SIR, and age—were integrated into a Clinical-Imaging-Molecular (CIM) model using multivariable Cox regression. The model was validated in an independent external GBM cohort (n = 20). Survival prediction was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, ROC analysis, and concordance index (c-index). RESULTS ICAM1 expression was associated with DNA hypomethylation and significantly correlated with reduced survival at transcriptomic and proteomic levels. Pathway analysis identified associations with immune activation and angiogenesis. In the clinical cohort, high ICAM1 expression, elevated tumor SIR, and older age independently predicted worse survival. The CIM model combining these factors stratified patients into distinct prognostic groups, achieving strong performance (c-index = 0.779, AUC = 0.778). External validation confirmed the model’s predictive utility (median survival difference: 9.1 months, P = 0.009). CONCLUSION We present a validated and clinically applicable prognostic model for GBM that integrates ICAM1 expression, imaging features, and age. The CIM model is scalable, interpretable, and feasible for implementation across academic and community settings, providing a robust tool for patient stratification, treatment planning, and trial design.

Abstract BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer rarely metastasises to the brain, thus studies reporting the outcomes of affected patients are lacking. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is now the mainstay of management for patients with brain metastases (BM) from most primary sites, but little evidence of its efficacy in ovarian cancer is available. The current study was undertaken to provide guidance for SRS management using pooled data from multiple institutions. MATERIAL AND METHODS Centers participating in the IRRF (International Radiosurgery Research Foundation) were asked to provide outcome data for patients who had SRS for ovarian cancer brain metastases between 2020 and 2024 and at least one clinical and imaging follow-up after the procedure. Primary endpoints included survival from SRS, local tumor response according to RANO-BM criteria and occurrence of adverse radiation effects (ARE). Cox regression analyses were performed to identify variables impact each endpoint. RESULTS 128 patients had SRS for a total of 532 BM treated. Epithelial histology was the most common (91%). Median age at SRS was 62 years (IQR 56-70). Median KPS was 80% (IQR 80-90%) and 71.9% of patients had neurological symptoms at presentation. Other active systemic metastases were present in 41.4%. The median number of treated BM was 2 (IQR1-3) and the median cumulative treatment volume was 6 cc (IQR 2-12.9). The median margin dose was 18 Gy (IQR 16-20). At last follow-up, 19.5% of patients were still alive. The median overall survival (OS) after SRS was 27 months, and 6-, 12- and 24-month OS was 83.8%, 74.2% and 52.2%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that increasing age at SRS (HR 1.02, p=0.05), active systemic metastases (HR 2, p=0.005) and increasing number of brain metastases (HR 1.05, p=0.04) were associated with worse survival, while repeating SRS (HR 0.4, p=0.002) led to improved survival. Local failure occurred in 12.8% of treated BM. Actuarial progression-free survival (PFS) at 6, 12 and 24 months was 92.3%, 86.6% and 70.3%, respectively. Only prior WBRT (HR 4.36, p=0.03) led to worse local control on multivariate analyses. New remote BM appeared in 49.5% of patients and 14.5% suffered from leptomeningeal dissemination. ARE were seen in 12.1% of BM but were symptomatic in only 3.2%. On multivariate analyses, prior SRS (HR 3.13, p=0.002) was associated with increased risk of ARE. CONCLUSION Ovarian cancer brain metastases can be safely and effectively managed with SRS as the primary treatment modality in most patients.

Context.— Though numerous quality assurance (QA) measures are in place for the practice of gynecologic cytopathology, many of them are not clearly defined and may be variably used by laboratories worldwide. Objective.— To assess current practice patterns regarding the implementation of selected gynecologic cytology QA metrics to help develop guidance for laboratories. Design.— A supplemental questionnaire was mailed to laboratories participating in the 2022 College of American Pathologists (CAP) Gynecologic Cytopathology (PAP Education) Program requesting data regarding their QA measures in gynecologic cytology. Results.— A total of 562 laboratories responded to the supplemental questionnaire; responses from 511 laboratories were analyzed further. Of 492 laboratories, most considered Papanicolaou (Pap) tests from patients with untreated abnormal cytology in the previous year (386; 78.5%) or with an abnormal gynecologic biopsy finding (concurrent or within the past year) (331; 67.3%) as high-risk for negative rescreening. Many laboratories (436 of 511; 85.3%) required pathologist review of Pap tests for indications other than reactive/abnormal cells (eg, endometrial cells in women 45 years of age and older). For assessing cytologists’ performance, 88.5% (399 of 451) of respondents recorded the discrepancy rate between cytologist’s and pathologist’s interpretations. For monitoring pathologists’ performance, most laboratories (243 of 389; 62.5%) evaluated cases with significant cytologic-histologic discrepancy. Conclusions.— The CAP survey provided a detailed assessment of current QA practices regarding gynecologic cytology, which can aid laboratories in making decisions related to enhancement of QA in their setting. As the guidelines and tools for cervical cancer screening evolve, QA metrics will need to be accordingly refined.

ABSTRACT The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap remains the preferred flap option for autologous breast reconstruction following mastectomy. This case report presents the novel use of the cephalic vein (CV) as an interposition graft to alleviate venous congestion in a patient undergoing DIEP flap reconstruction. A 42‐year‐old woman experienced venous congestion following her initial autologous reconstruction, attributed to thrombus formation from kinking of the vascular pedicle. Despite initial attempts to resolve the congestion, the condition persisted. Since the flap was based on a single perforator, we decided to attempt a CV turndown. The CV was noted to be attenuated and not feasible for use in turndown; therefore, venous salvage was completed by using the CV as an interposition graft to bypass the affected flap vena comitans. The procedure successfully restored venous flow, allowing for flap salvage and subsequent healing. This case underscores the potential of CV as an interposition graft in autologous breast reconstruction, particularly when traditional CV turndown is not possible due to vessel attenuation.

Abstract Background To ensure the Pediatric Infectious Diseases (ID) Certifying Examination remains aligned with current clinical practice, the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) conducted a comprehensive practice analysis to update the exam content outline. Methods A panel of 9 pediatric ID physicians identified 34 core tasks across 5 performance domains to guide revisions to the existing outline. The panel identified relevant, testable knowledge areas aligned with these tasks and organized them into 22 domains and 186 initial subdomains. A nationwide validation survey of board-certified pediatric ID physicians collected relevance ratings and feedback on missing or outdated topics and suggested exam weights, which were used to guide further revisions. Subsequently, the pediatric ID subboard conducted an item reclassification process, which resulted in additional refinement. Results The final content outline comprises 22 domains and 196 subdomains, with updated domain weights to better reflect the clinical landscape. Notably, domains such as cardiovascular, bone and joint, and urologic infections increased in weight, while antimicrobial principles decreased. Conclusions This rigorous, inclusive process strengthens the exam’s content validity and supports the ABP’s goal of certifying physicians who possess the knowledge needed to deliver safe and effective care.

Abstract Background X and Y chromosome analysis is a critical component of genetic testing, used both diagnostically and as a quality control (QC) metric. Discordances between expected and observed sex chromosome data can arise due to mislabeling, demographic data errors, transplant history, or biological variations. Such discordances pose challenges to laboratories and affect patient care, particularly in marginalized populations and unique clinical contexts. Methods We reviewed cases of sex chromosome discordance identified at our laboratory from January 2021 through August 2023. Cases spanned various testing methods and were categorized by the root cause, including mislabeling, sample mix-ups, transgender individuals, stem cell transplants, and unexplained causes. Case outcomes were assessed, and potential resolutions were analyzed. Results Among 65 cases identified, the leading cause of discordance was mislabeling (n = 20, 31%), followed by other/not identified (n = 16, 25%), sample mix-ups (n = 13, 20%), transgender individuals (n = 9, 14%), and stem cell transplants (n = 7, 11%). Cases required additional QC processes such as reanalysis, clinician contact, and occasionally sample re-collection. The process extended turnaround times by up to 13 business days. Detailed case reviews highlighted the challenges and implications of managing these discordances, emphasizing the importance of accurate data transmission and inclusive practices. Conclusion Using X and Y chromosome data as a QC metric can identify critical errors but also introduces limitations and bias. Improved standardization, inclusive practices, and alternative QC methods are necessary to ensure accuracy and equitable patient care. Collaborative efforts are required to address demographic complexities and reduce testing delays.

Abstract With the goal of preventing more hip fractures, a next generation of the VirtuOst Biomechanical Computed Tomography (BCT) test was developed that integrates measurements from a clinical CT scan related to fall risk, impact force, and femoral strength, the three main determinants of hip fracture. Here, we introduce the test and validate it against BMD and FRAX. Our source population from a large healthcare system comprised of 341364 patients (≥65 yr) with an abdominal-pelvic CT during care. Using data from 3035 patients (1790 with hip fracture), we developed a “BCT Risk Score” (range: 0-100) having input risk factors of age, femoral strength, ratio of trabecular/cortical BMD, muscle area, intramuscular fat, FN volume, hip width, and posterior fat thickness. In a geographically distinct set of 2124 patients (1293 with hip fracture), we then compared the BCT Risk Score against a DXA-equivalent hip BMD T-score (lowest hip value, measured from the CT scan by VirtuOst) and FRAX hip fracture risk (with BMD but without parental fracture history) for predicting a first incident hip fracture within 5 yr. For the women, the c-statistic for predicting fracture was higher for BCT (0.89, 95% CI: 0.87-0.90) than for BMD (0.81, 0.79-0.84) or FRAX (0.85, 0.83-0.87). Using binary thresholds to identify high-risk patients, sensitivity for BCT (Risk Score ≥ 75) was higher than for BMD (T-score ≤ −2.5) and FRAX (hip risk ≥ 3.0%): 81.4% vs 47.8% vs 75.9%, respectively; positive predictive values confirmed comparable high-risk status (BCT 13.6% vs BMD 15.3% vs FRAX 12.7%). Similar trends were observed for the men, 2-yr outcomes, and identifying very-high-risk patients. We conclude that, compared to both BMD and FRAX, the integrative BCT test better predicted hip fracture and its high sensitivity should improve fracture prevention.

Abstract Importance and Objective Upadacitinib, an oral, reversible Janus kinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD). Limiting corticosteroid exposure is an important goal in treating CD. This posthoc analysis evaluated the corticosteroid-sparing effects of upadacitinib in patients with CD. Design and Setting This study included pooled data from two phase 3, multicenter, double-blind induction trials and one maintenance trial. Randomization was stratified by corticosteroid use at induction baseline, with a mandatory corticosteroid taper starting at induction week 4. Efficacy was evaluated by baseline corticosteroid use and by achieving corticosteroid-free outcomes through year 2 of maintenance therapy. Safety was also assessed. Results At baseline, 34.7% (234/674) and 35.7% (124/347) of upadacitinib 45 mg and placebo-treated patients were taking corticosteroids, respectively. At induction week 12 and maintenance week 52, higher rates of upadacitinib-treated patients were corticosteroid-free among all patients and among patients with baseline corticosteroid use compared with placebo; upadacitinib-treated patients achieved higher rates of corticosteroid-free outcomes, compared with placebo, including corticosteroid-free clinical remission (stool frequency/abdominal pain score [SF/APS]: 42.7% vs 16.1%; CD activity index [CDAI]: 41.2% vs 23.4%) and corticosteroid-free endoscopic response (37.0% vs 8.1%), with similar results observed among responders to upadacitinib induction therapy at maintenance week 52. Corticosteroid-free outcomes were sustained through year 2 of maintenance therapy. The safety profile was similar to the overall population, with no new safety risks identified. Conclusions and Relevance The results from pivotal studies demonstrated that upadacitinib effectively induced early and sustainable corticosteroid-free clinical remission with a manageable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe CD. Clinical trial identifiers U-EXCEL, U-EXCEED, and U-ENDURE ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03345849, NCT03345836, and NCT03345823.