Citations

Abstract Introduction Revascularization to prevent limb loss is not feasible or represents a very high risk in a significant proportion of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI). No standard definition currently exists to define this population of patients. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based, multidomain definition to improve clinical assessment and reporting of studies in people with ‘no option’ (NO) or ‘poor option’ (PO) CLTI. Methods A modified Delphi process was conducted with 164 specialists from 30 countries. Two iterative survey rounds were used to reach consensus, defined as ≥70% agreement with a score of ≥7 on a nine-point scale. Results Some 164 international vascular specialists participated in the study, averaging 19 years of experience. A multidomain framework including arterial disease anatomy, biology, risk, function, and context (ABRFC) achieved 83% consensus. A ‘desert foot’ was defined as the absence of distal arterial revascularization targets on advanced non-invasive imaging, invasive digital subtraction angiography, and at least one failed endovascular revascularization attempt (81.6% agreement). Inadequate autogenous bypass conduit was defined as the lack of usable autologous vein across all four limbs (85% agreement). Patients were classified as NO for revascularization if they present with ‘desert foot’, prohibitive medical risk, a non-functional limb, or in those patients who refused arterial revascularization. PO revascularization patients combined factors such as severe infection, lack of autologous vein, or treatment non-compliance (72.1% agreement). Conclusion This consensus study established a structured, expert-validated definition of no option or poor option for revascularisation of patients with CLTI. The multidomain ABRFC framework provides a foundation for standardized clinical assessment, trial design, and future guideline development.

Abstract Introduction: Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is a FET::ETS family member-driven primary bone cancer demonstrating vast heterogeneity. Between a patient’s primary diagnosis and disease progression, tumor cell state adaptation, microenvironment changes, and the landscape of evolving therapeutic vulnerabilities remain poorly understood. To address these gaps, the Sean Karl Cohort was established in 2025 to conduct the largest single-cell transcriptomic analysis of retrospective paired tumor samples from patients with EwS. Here, we present data from the five analytic teams, and through shared SOPs now expand this cohort to Europe. Methods: Common sample processing SOPs were established to isolate cells from FFPE material from paired patient EwS samples. Single-cell (sc) RNAseq was generated using the GEM-X Flex Gene Expression protocol (10x Genomics). Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation (ALSF) Data Lab established a common data processing and integration pipeline with an EwS-specific cell annotation workflow to create a harmonized dataset for downstream analyses. Analytic teams were created to define tumor cell subpopulations and their therapeutic vulnerabilities and to characterize the tumor microenvironment. Data: We demonstrate the feasibility of generating high-quality scRNAseq profiles from retrospective FFPE-preserved EwS tumors. To date, 116 samples have yielded ∼800,000 cells. Integrated analysis reveals reproducible EwS tumor cell states shared across patients with regulatory network analyses nominating candidate therapeutic vulnerabilities. The scale of this international cohort enables saturation analysis for rare cell populations. Paired and longitudinal samples further allow correlation of emergent cell states with therapy resistance and metastatic progression. For example, immune-focused analyses show increases in T cell and macrophage populations in post-therapy samples. A novel, standardized EwS-specific cell annotation workflow has been developed to harmonize analyses and findings. These data will be openly shared with the community through the ALSF Single-cell Pediatric Cancer Atlas Portal. Conclusion: Large-scale international collaborative sample sharing, standardized processing pipelines, and harmonized EwS-specific annotations now enable deep single-cell analyses to characterize tumor heterogeneity in this rare pediatric and adolescent cancer. An in vivo expansion of the Sean Karl Cohort is underway to assess conservation of EwS tumor cell states and regulatory vulnerabilities identified in human tumors pre- and post-therapy in preclinical models, further supporting translation of these findings toward therapeutic strategies. Citation Format: Abbe Pannucci, Elina Mukherjee, Jessica D. Daley, Shireen Sita Ganapathi, Elissa Boguslawski, Lea Surrey, Lauren Gutstein, Patrick Azar, Emily Stockfisch, Azfar Neyaz, Ivy John, Jennifer Picarsic, Yutaro Tanaka, Byron Butaney, Riaz Gillani, Brian D. Crompton, Katherine A. Janeway, Jaclyln Taroni, Jessica Davis, Damon Reed, Adam Shlien, Theodore W. Laetsch, Rajen Mody, Clémence Henon, Thomas G. Grünewald, Elizabeth R. Lawlor, Filemon Dela Cruz, Patrick J. Grohar, Jovana Pavisic, Ally Hawkins, Anthony R. Cillo, Kelly M. Bailey. The Sean Karl Cohort: An international single-cell RNAseq study of paired patient Ewing sarcoma specimens [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 643.

ABSTRACT Background Academic departments in medicine face increasing pressure to balance clinical productivity with their broader academic missions, including education, scholarship, mentorship, and service. While clinical work is routinely quantified through relative value units (RVUs), non‐clinical academic contributions are inconsistently measured and often undervalued. Academic Value Unit (AVU) systems have emerged as frameworks to quantify these activities, but adoption remains limited due to inconsistent funding models, lack of standardized frameworks, and minimal evidence demonstrating outcomes such as faculty satisfaction, retention, or return on investment (ROI). Methods This concept paper synthesizes current AVU implementation strategies in emergency medicine and proposes an evidence‐informed six‐step framework for AVU design, funding, and sustainability. The framework was informed by a literature review, analysis of institutional dashboards, and multi‐institutional input from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) community, including feedback from a national didactic session at the 2025 SAEM Annual Meeting. Results The proposed framework outlines practical steps for AVU implementation: defining mission‐aligned domains, identifying measurable academic activities, establishing transparent weighting systems, integrating real‐time tracking dashboards, developing sustainable blended funding models, and engaging leadership and faculty through iterative review. The model incorporates customizable templates, adaptable activity menus, and suggested ROI metrics that departments can tailor to local institutional priorities and resources. Conclusions AVU systems offer a structured approach to recognizing and incentivizing non‐clinical academic contributions in emergency medicine. A transparent, mission‐aligned framework supported by sustainable funding and measurable ROI metrics may enhance faculty engagement, equity, and long‐term departmental sustainability. Future work should focus on establishing validated benchmarks for AVU weighting, integrating AVUs with faculty development and wellness initiatives, and evaluating longitudinal outcomes such as retention, satisfaction, and equity.

Background: Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) rates are increasing, with instability, aseptic loosening, and infection identified as primary indications for surgery. Managing significant acetabular and femoral bone loss remains a complex challenge, requiring standardized classification systems to guide reconstruction strategies. Objective: This article reviews current surgical protocols and clinical outcomes for complex THA revisions, specifically focusing on the management of bone defects and periprosthetic fractures using techniques employed at the Mayo Clinic. Key Points: Preoperative evaluation must prioritize the exclusion of infection via inflammatory markers and joint aspiration. Acetabular reconstructions are categorized by the Paprosky classification; Type 3 defects often necessitate jumbo cups, porous tantalum augments, or custom triflange implants to achieve stability. In cases of pelvic discontinuity, tantalum cup-cage constructs or distraction techniques are utilized, showing high short-term survival despite risks of stress fractures or reduced bone stock. Femoral revisions utilize modular fluted tapered stems (TMFT) for Paprosky Type 3 and 4 defects, providing superior axial and longitudinal stability compared to cemented options. Extended lateral femoral osteotomy is frequently employed to facilitate component removal. Periprosthetic fractures are managed according to the Vancouver classification, with stable stems treated via internal fixation and loose stems requiring TMFT or proximal femoral replacement. Conclusion: Successful THA revision relies on meticulous preoperative planning and the selection of implants that ensure osseointegration and mechanical stability. The shift toward porous metal technology and modular femoral components has improved outcomes in cases of severe bone deficiency.

PURPOSE Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare myeloid neoplasm characterized by clinical heterogeneity and is associated with poor outcomes. To date, limited molecular information has been incorporated into disease classification and risk stratification. We aimed to integrate genomic features into the clinical decision-making process for CMML. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 3013 patients with CMML (training set) and a prospective population of 516 patients (validation set). Using an innovative framework for multimodal data analysis, we developed molecular-based disease taxonomy and prognostication. RESULTS Unsupervised clustering identified nine entities with distinct genomic features and outcomes ( P < .001), including splicing machinery, transcription factors, signal transduction and tyrosine kinase pathways aberrations, and high-risk molecular signatures. Notably, 15% of patients showed molecular/clinical overlap with other myeloid neoplasms. We integrated molecular and clinical information to build the international CMML Prognostic Scoring System (iCPSS), incorporating mutations in nine genes together with hematologic parameters and cytogenetic abnormalities. The iCPSS identified five groups with distinct probability of overall and leukemia-free survival in both training and validation cohorts ( P < .001), outperforming existing prognostic models. Importantly, 55% of patients were reassigned to higher or lower risk groups by the iCPSS. Decision analysis demonstrated that iCPSS could refine the optimal timing of allogeneic transplantation at the individual level; compared with conventional prognostic tools, iCPSS-based decision modeling changed transplantation strategy in 31% of cases, resulting in a significant gain-in-life expectancy for eligible patient population ( P < .001). A federated learning platform was implemented to enable continuous, privacy-preserving model update across multiple centers. CONCLUSION Molecular information improves CMML classification and prognostication, supports more effective clinical decision making, and potentially refines the design of clinical trials.

Importance Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens may be administered after pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (A-IPMNs), although the evidence supporting their use is limited. Objective To evaluate the survival benefit associated with contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after resection in A-IPMNs between 2017 and 2023. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was an international, multicenter study with 69 participating centers across Europe, North America, South America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients undergoing resection for A-IPMNs were included. Data were analyzed from May to August 2025. Intervention Contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, such as gemcitabine-capecitabine (GemCap); 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX), modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX), and S-1. Main Outcome and Measure Overall survival (months). Results Among 1321 patients (median [IQR] age 70 [63 to 76] years; 713 males [54.0%] and 608 females [46.0%]), 781 patients (59.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, while in 181 patients (13.7%) it was omitted due to poor patient fitness. Of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, 568 patients (72.6%) received contemporary regimens, including GemCap (232 patients [29.7%]), FOLFIRINOX (176 patients [22.5%]), mFOLFIRINOX (71 patients [9.1%]), and S-1 (70 patients [9.0%]). The median (IQR) follow-up for the cohort was 64.2 (40.4 to 85.0) months, and the median overall survival was 73.8 months (95% CI, 66.4 to 81.9 months). After 90-day landmark analysis and exclusion of patients ineligible for chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 243:243 patients) was not associated with improved overall survival (median, 82.3 months; 95% CI, 78.2 months to not applicable [NA] vs not reached; 95% CI, 75.3 months to NA; P = .58). Contemporary regimens vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 309:309 patients) was not associated with longer survival, and a mean survival benefit greater than 4.2 months over 5 years was excluded (difference in restricted mean survival, 1.26 months; 95%, −1.72 to 4.24 months). Treatment outcomes did not vary by chemotherapy regimen or disease characteristic (eg, N stage or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival in A-IPMNs, and a randomized clinical trial is indicated.

Objective This study evaluates the impact of international observerships organized by Help Ukraine Group (HUG) on professional development, knowledge transfer, and clinical practice improvement in radiation oncology in Ukraine. Methods A total of 50 observerships were facilitated for Ukrainian medical professionals at 14 institutions across the USA, Canada, Europe, and Australia from 2022 to 2024, including 31 radiation oncologists and medical physicists. A survey assessed their impact on oncology care, focusing on knowledge gained, lessons learned, and challenges in implementing new techniques. The primary outcome was the success score, defined as a composite score of implementing new procedures, initiating improvement projects, and knowledge dissemination efforts. Descriptive and comparative analyses examined satisfaction and success outcomes. Results A total of 43 respondents participated in the survey (response rate 86.0%). Twenty-eight of the responders were radiation oncology professionals (67.8% radiation oncologists, 32.1% medical physicists). The median observership duration for radiation oncology professionals was four weeks, with 96.4% also attending a professional conference. Overall satisfaction was high (mean 9.5 out of 10, median 10.0, IQR 9.0-10.0) while the success score was substantial (mean 6.1 out of 10, median 7.0, IQR 5.0-8.0). Time since certification influenced success, with ≥10 years’ experience associated with higher success scores (7.4 vs. 4.7, p=0.01). Importantly, 100% of respondents learned new procedures, 89.3% reported shifts in their clinical perspective, and 60.7% successfully implemented new techniques. Subsequent knowledge dissemination in Ukraine was substantial: 82.1% provided informal training, 60.7% delivered institutional or national presentations, 39.3% incorporated materials into lectures, and 10.7% engaged in all activities. Continued mentorship with host institutions was reported by 82.1%. Conclusions Amid the war, international observerships advanced clinical practice, education, and procedures in Ukraine, demonstrating the resilience of its medical community and providing a model that other LMICs/UMICs can follow.

ABSTRACT Braak and others have proposed that Lewy body pathology (LBP) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) may arise not only in the brain but alternatively from an initial site in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract with subsequent passage to the central nervous system CNS through the vagus nerve or other routes. We tested this hypothesis by using both immunohistochemistry (IHC) and RT QuIC a form of alpha synuclein seed amplification assay (SAA) to detect alpha synuclein LBP in samples from selected brain regions and 10 GI tract sites taken from autopsies of 50 PD subjects and 128 elderly subjects without parkinsonism or dementia including 34 with IHC identified CNS incidental Lewy body disease (ILBD) and 94 with no Lewy body IHC pathology detected (NLB). A positive SAA or IHC result was restricted to the GI tract in only 2 subjects while LBP by either SAA or IHC was restricted to the brain in 11 subjects. To fairly compare GI-only with brain-only synucleinopathy, however, we would have to do SAA on brain samples from all ILBD and NLB cases in at least 4 critical brain regions: olfactory bulb, medulla, pons, and amygdala. Further SAA of brain regions is estimated, based on the proportional results to date, to potentially identify 21 additional brain-only LBP subjects, for a total of 32, if it were done on all of the NLB subjects. From this brain-only LBP is estimated to be 16 times more common than GI-only LBP. To assess the clinical impact of SAA-positive GI sites we found that the number of positive sites per subject is significantly correlated with UPDRS motor score and SCOPA-AUT GI related scores including those for salivation, straining, constipation, and bowel movement.