Lorenzini, Ileana

Abstract Importance Decline in olfactory function may be used as a predictor of cognitive decline, to enhance early detection models, improve risk stratification, and enable early intervention. Objective To assess the longitudinal association between olfactory decline, cognitive decline, and postmortem neuropathology. Design, setting and participants Retrospective longitudinal analysis with clinicopathological correlations of a prospective population-based cohort study using data from the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (AZSAND) and its Brain and Body Donation Program. Participants included cognitively unimpaired individuals without parkinsonism that converted to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and/or dementia or remained cognitively stable. Main Outcomes and Measures longitudinal change in olfaction, neuropsychiatric symptoms, motor function and memory, conversion to MCI/dementia, postmortem neuropathology Results Over a mean follow-up period of 7.7 ± 5.4 years, out of 922 participants who were cognitively unimpaired at the first cognitive conference, 643 remained cognitively unimpaired, 279 converted to MCI, and 82 developed dementia. Of these, 633 individuals had at least 2 olfactory tests. Converters showed reduced olfactory function (t=-12.6, p <0.0001), faster progression in neuropsychiatric symptom burden (t=3.42, p < 0.001), and faster decline in memory (t= -7.33, p <0.0001) prior to conversion while no significant differences were observed in motor scores between converters and non-converters. Using ROC analysis, olfactory decline, increased neuropsychiatric symptom burden, as well as motor and memory decline predicted conversion to MCI with a consistent accuracy of ∼ 70% up to 5 years before conversion, while UPSIT alone had an accuracy of ∼ 60%. Longitudinal decline in olfaction was associated with a higher burden of a-synuclein (t= -8.21, p <0.0005), tau tangle (t= -2.66, p < 0.01) and amyloid plaque burden (t= -2.85, p < 0.005) and a faster decline over time was associated with a higher burden of tau (t=5.66, p<0.0001). Conclusions and Relevance A reduction in olfactory identification ability is observed up to a decade prior to conversion to MCI and is associated with underlying burden of neuropathology markers, underscoring the value of incorporating olfactory testing in cognitively unimpaired individuals to identify those at-risk of future cognitive decline.

ABSTRACT Braak and others have proposed that Lewy body pathology (LBP) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) may arise not only in the brain but alternatively from an initial site in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract with subsequent passage to the central nervous system CNS through the vagus nerve or other routes. We tested this hypothesis by using both immunohistochemistry (IHC) and RT QuIC a form of alpha synuclein seed amplification assay (SAA) to detect alpha synuclein LBP in samples from selected brain regions and 10 GI tract sites taken from autopsies of 50 PD subjects and 128 elderly subjects without parkinsonism or dementia including 34 with IHC identified CNS incidental Lewy body disease (ILBD) and 94 with no Lewy body IHC pathology detected (NLB). A positive SAA or IHC result was restricted to the GI tract in only 2 subjects while LBP by either SAA or IHC was restricted to the brain in 11 subjects. To fairly compare GI-only with brain-only synucleinopathy, however, we would have to do SAA on brain samples from all ILBD and NLB cases in at least 4 critical brain regions: olfactory bulb, medulla, pons, and amygdala. Further SAA of brain regions is estimated, based on the proportional results to date, to potentially identify 21 additional brain-only LBP subjects, for a total of 32, if it were done on all of the NLB subjects. From this brain-only LBP is estimated to be 16 times more common than GI-only LBP. To assess the clinical impact of SAA-positive GI sites we found that the number of positive sites per subject is significantly correlated with UPDRS motor score and SCOPA-AUT GI related scores including those for salivation, straining, constipation, and bowel movement.

Abstract Cerebral white matter rarefaction (CWMR) was considered by Binswanger and Alzheimer to be due to cerebral arteriolosclerosis. Renewed attention came with CT and MR brain imaging, and neuropathological studies finding a high rate of CWMR in Alzheimer disease (AD). The relative contributions of cerebrovascular disease and AD to CWMR are still uncertain. In 1181 autopsies by the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (AZSAND), large-format brain sections were used to grade CWMR and determine its vascular and neurodegenerative correlates. Almost all neurodegenerative diseases had more severe CWMR than the normal control group. Multivariable logistic regression models indicated that Braak neurofibrillary stage was the strongest predictor of CWMR, with additional independently significant predictors including age, cortical and diencephalic lacunar and microinfarcts, body mass index, and female sex. It appears that while AD and cerebrovascular pathology may be additive in causing CWMR, both may be solely capable of this. The typical periventricular pattern suggests that CWMR is primarily a distal axonopathy caused by dysfunction of the cell bodies of long-association corticocortical projection neurons. A consequence of these findings is that CWMR should not be viewed simply as “small vessel disease” or as a pathognomonic indicator of vascular cognitive impairment or vascular dementia.