Citations

Abstract Purpose: Inhibitors of the Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) protein kinase, a critical component of the DNA damage repair response, have synergistic anti-cancer activity with platinum compounds in preclinical models. We therefore conducted a Phase 2 study of the ATR inhibitor berzosertib+carboplatin vs. docetaxel+carboplatin in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients previously treated with at least one androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and taxane underwent mandatory biopsy and were randomized 1:1 to receive Arm A (docetaxel 60 mg/m2+carboplatin AUC4 day 1; or carboplatin AUC5 if not a docetaxel candidate) or Arm B (berzosertib 90 mg/m2 days 2,9+carboplatin AUC5 day 1) every 21 days. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; ≥50% PSA decline or radiographic response). Results: Of 73 randomized patients, 65 received protocol treatment: 34 on Arm A (26 docetaxel+carboplatin; 8 carboplatin alone) and 31 on Arm B. Thirteen patients (38%) in Arm A and 20 (65%) in Arm B had ≥Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TrAEs). ORR was 15% in Arm A (5/34; 5/26[19%] with docetaxel+carboplatin) and 0% in Arm B (0/31). At interim analysis after 65 of planned 130 patients were treated, enrollment was halted due to futility. Homologous recombination repair deficiency status from tissue and blood did not correlate with clinical outcomes, but ATM-deficiency or high levels of phoshpo-KAP1 detected in tissue was associated with clinical benefit across both arms of the trial. Conclusions: Berzosertib+carboplatin demonstrated lower ORR and more frequent ≥grade 3 TrAEs compared to docetaxel+carboplatin in this heavily pre-treated, biomarker-unselected population. NCT03517969

Abstract Objective To evaluate the clinical value of breast MRI in radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAASB) for assessing disease extent at diagnosis and after neoadjuvant therapy compared with clinical examination and surgical pathology. Methods This IRB-approved retrospective study included 25 patients with breast MRIs between1995 and 2020. MRI estimated disease extent was compared to clinical exam and surgical pathology. MRI findings were evaluated for additional disease and impact on clinical management. Agreement between MRI and clinical assessment of disease was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa statistic. Results Baseline MRI demonstrated moderate agreement with clinical disease extent (Cohen’s κ = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.14-0.75). Thirteen of 24 (54%) of MRIs reflected clinical exam, 4/24 (17%) MRIs underestimated disease, and 5/24 (21%) MRIs overestimated disease. Baseline MRI changed surgical management in 4/24 (17%). In 8 patients who proceeded directly to surgery, MRI reflected pathology in 6/8 (75%). In 10 patients with post-neoadjuvant MRI, 4/10 (40%) pathology and MRI extent were similar, 5/10 (50%) MRI overestimated disease, and 1/10 (10%) MRI underestimated disease. Conclusion MRI has clinical value in assessing RAASB with the potential for significantly altering surgical management. In this small cohort, post-neoadjuvant MRI demonstrated limited additional clinical value. Larger studies are needed to define the optimal role and timing of post-neoadjuvant MRI. Advances in knowledge Baseline MRI detected additional disease not identified on initial clinical exam in 5/24 (21%) and changed surgical management in 4/24 (17%). Although baseline MRI demonstrated moderate agreement with clinical examination, post-neoadjuvant MRI frequently overestimated residual disease when compared with final pathology.

Abstract Background Identification of individuals at increased risk for synucleinopathies is becoming more feasible with advances in biomarkers. However, the ethical and practical aspects of communicating disease risk remain unresolved, particularly across diagnostic groups and cultural contexts. Objectives We aimed to evaluate attitudes toward disclosure of future synucleinopathy risk among individuals with isolated/idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD), as well as in individuals who developed Parkinson's disease (PD), or multiple system atrophy (MSA), in a large non‐Western registry. Methods This nationwide survey study included participants from 28 movement disorders and sleep centers across Türkiye. Questionnaires assessing attitudes toward risk disclosure, additional testing, and clinical trial participation were administered face‐to‐face. Responses were analyzed using contingency tables and regression models. Results are reported following the Consensus‐Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) guideline. Results Among 1385 participants (1039 PD, 107 MSA, 239 iRBD), individuals with iRBD showed the highest support for risk disclosure (88.3%), exceeding PD (64.4%) and MSA (51.9%). Approval declined modestly (3–8%) when framed within the absence of disease‐modifying treatment. iRBD participants were more willing for additional testing but less willing to join clinical trials (31.8%) than PD (45.3%) or MSA (48%). MSA patients expressed the greatest concern about psychological impact. Male sex had more favorable views on disclosure and trial participation, while younger and better‐educated participants favored additional testing. Conclusions Attitudes toward risk disclosure differ markedly across the synucleinopathy spectrum and demographic characteristics. Culturally informed and diagnosis‐specific disclosure strategies will be essential for trial recruitment and patient‐centered care.

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Surgical management of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) is often mastectomy. No guidelines specifically address contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for this population. We assessed factors associated with CPM at the time of IBTR mastectomy. Methods Patients undergoing mastectomy for IBTR (10/2008‐5/2024) were identified. Demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment details were assessed. Results Of the 381 eligible IBTR patients, 221 (58.0%) had a unilateral therapeutic mastectomy and 160 (42.0%) underwent mastectomy with CPM. CPM patients were younger ( p < 0.0001), with lower clinical T category tumors ( p < 0.001) and less HR + HER2‐ invasive disease ( p = 0.004). CPM patients were more likely to undergo germline genetic testing (63.1% vs 41.6%, p < 0.0001) and were twice as likely to have immediate breast reconstruction ( p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, younger age, HR‐HER2 + IBTR subtype, pathogenic variants known at the time of surgery (relative to negative testing and/or no genetic testing), immediate breast reconstruction, and prior radiation for index cancer were each associated with CPM (all p < 0.05). Conclusion In our series of 381 patients treated with mastectomy for IBTR, 42% also had a CPM. Multiple factors, including age, tumor stage and biology, immediate breast reconstruction, and genetic testing may impact CPM choice.

ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the https://www.asco.org/practice-patients/guidelines/guideline-methodology . ASCO Guidelines follow the https://www.asco.org/about-asco/legal/conflict-interest-coi . Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance (“Guidance”) provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by clinicians and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature, and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 (online only) for more . PURPOSE To offer clinicians recommendations concerning breast cancer follow-up and surveillance after primary treatment. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel to develop recommendations based on a systematic review and a formal consensus process. RESULTS One randomized controlled trial (RCT) was identified and formed the evidentiary basis for the surveillance mammography guideline recommendation. No RCTs were identified that evaluated different follow-up approaches by risk of relapse in patients treated for early-stage breast cancer. Given the dearth of evidence identified in the systematic review of the literature, formal modified Delphi consensus-based recommendations were generated. RECOMMENDATIONS The guideline offers recommendations on the role of a risk-based approach to the frequency and intensity of follow-up among patients with breast cancer in the adjuvant setting. Regular history, physical examination, and mammography are recommended for breast cancer follow-up. Either virtual or in-person visits can be offered. Certain patients at a high risk of cancer recurrence warrant closer surveillance, such as those patients with locally advanced disease or residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Recommendations on the use of blood-based biomarkers and supplemental imaging are provided. Guideline recommendations will be updated once additional evidence-based tools become available to better individualize surveillance. Additional information is available at www.ascopubs.org/topics/asco-guidelines/breast-cancer .

Importance Transvaginal pelvic imaging is an integral and sensitive aspect of gynecologic care that individuals find both invasive and burdensome. At-home transvaginal imaging provides an opportunity to navigate these barriers to care. Objective To evaluate the use of at-home transvaginal ultrasonography for gynecologic assessment, as measured by diagnostic imaging quality and participant satisfaction, in a broad sampling of women aged 22 to 50 years. Design, Setting, and Participants Prospective, interventional, single group nonrandomized clinical trial with blinded review of collected images from premenopausal women aged 22 to 50 from Florida, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, and Washington, DC. Images were gathered between July 2022 and July 2023, and data were analyzed from April to September 2025. Intervention At-home pelvic ultrasonography guided by verbal communication with a fully trained remote sonographer who had real-time access to study images. Cine clips were used to capture standard views of the uterus, ovaries, cervix, and posterior cul-de-sac. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were image quality and participant net promoter score (NPS), reflecting participants' likelihood of recommending the procedure, with higher scores indicating greater likelihood. Secondary outcomes included minor pain or discomfort, sonographer reported experience and/or pain, and all other adverse events. Results A total of 265 participants (mean [SD] age, 32 [6.7] years; mean [SD] body mass index, 27.0 [5.6]) enrolled in the trial, and 263 ultrasonographic scans were completed. Image quality showed that 253 at-home ultrasonographic scans (96.2%) met diagnostic quality while 10 (3.8%) did not. NPS was significantly higher with use of the at-home ultrasonography (59) compared with in-clinic scans (24), with an adjusted difference of 33.7 (95% CI, 23.3-44.0; z = 6.35; P &amp;lt; .001). No adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance This nonrandomized clinical trial of at-home pelvic ultrasonography in premenopausal women demonstrated that broad use of at-home gynecologic ultrasonography technology is feasible, safe, and preferred by participants and sonographers compared with in-clinic ultrasonography. At-home ultrasonographic imaging presented an innovative and clinically acceptable alternative to in-clinic care, providing opportunities for improved access to and decreased burden of gynecologic and reproductive care. Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05443698

Abstract Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) are a mainstay therapy for homologous recombination (HR)-deficient cancers; however, resistance remains a major clinical challenge. Previously, through a genome wide CRISPR screen, we identified ZNF251 haploinsufficiency as a novel driver of PARPi resistance. In BRCA1 -mutant ( BRCA1 mut ) cells, ZNF251 deficiency led to HR hyperactivation, conferring PARPi resistance that could be reversed by RAD51 inhibition. In this study, we further show that ZNF251 deficiency induces replication stress and a pseudo-senescence state, in which cells exhibit molecular and phenotypic markers of senescence while retaining proliferative capacity. Because senomorphic and senolytic therapies can target senescent cells, we tested whether these approaches could overcome PARPi resistance in ZNF251 -deficient breast cancer cells. Critically, targeting this senescence-like state with either senomorphic agents, such as cytokine inhibitors, or senolytic agents, such as BCL-2 and BCL-XL inhibitors, overcame PARPi resistance ex vivo and in vivo . Importantly, pseudo-senescence was also observed in other PARPi-resistant contexts driven by HR hyperactivation, including 53BP1 - and Shieldin -mutant cells, suggesting that it may represent a broader mechanism underlying PARPi resistance in breast cancer. Furthermore, in two olaparib-resistant, BRCA -mutant triple-negative breast cancer organoid models, treatment with DT2216, a BCL-XL–targeting PROTAC, sensitized both models to olaparib. Together, our work defines a novel pathway linking HR hyperactivation, replication stress, and pseudo-senescence, and positions both senomorphic and senolytic therapies as promising strategies to overcome PARPi resistance in BRCA1 mut breast cancer. Highlights ZNF251 deficiency drives PARP inhibitor resistance through HR hyperactivation, replication stress, and pseudo-senescence in BRCA1 -mutant breast cancer. Senomorphic and senolytic therapies overcome PARP inhibitor resistance in vitro , in vivo , and in patient-derived organoid models. Pseudo-senescence represents a shared vulnerability of HR-hyperactivated PARPi-resistant cancers and can be therapeutically targeted.

Importance Currently, there are no standardized outcome domains or measures in clinical trials for facial aging. Heterogeneity in outcome domains and measurement instruments across clinical trials creates difficulty in directly comparing interventions, determining superior therapies, and developing high-quality meta-analyses. Objective To develop a core outcome set (COS) of essential domains to be reported in clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of interventions for facial aging. Evidence Review PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL were searched from September 2005 to September 2015. An updated search of the same databases was performed from September 2015 to February 2026. Studies were included if (1) they were randomized clinical trial or controlled clinical trial in design, (2) they assessed the efficacy or safety of an intervention for facial aging, (3) they were published in English, and (4) they involved human participants. Complementary sources, including patient interviews, were used to capture further relevant outcomes. Two rounds of Delphi surveys, followed by consensus meetings, were used to identify outcome domains considered most important by both patient and physician stakeholders. Findings The final COS consists of 6 outcome domains: (1) overall convenience of treatment; (2) time to return to normal work and social activity; (3) overall assessment of focused area of treatment (at the point in time when treatment is expected to provide peak benefit); (4) duration of treatment effect; (5) severity of persistent local or systemic adverse events, including pigmentary change, skin texture change, delayed healing, scarring, and serious adverse events; and (6) patient satisfaction with treatment. Conclusions and Relevance The 6 outcome domains identified through a Delphi consensus are recommended for reporting in future facial aging trials to ensure that outcomes that matter most to patients and clinicians are measured and that results are comparable across interventions.