Yılmaz, Rezzak

Abstract Background Identification of individuals at increased risk for synucleinopathies is becoming more feasible with advances in biomarkers. However, the ethical and practical aspects of communicating disease risk remain unresolved, particularly across diagnostic groups and cultural contexts. Objectives We aimed to evaluate attitudes toward disclosure of future synucleinopathy risk among individuals with isolated/idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD), as well as in individuals who developed Parkinson's disease (PD), or multiple system atrophy (MSA), in a large non‐Western registry. Methods This nationwide survey study included participants from 28 movement disorders and sleep centers across Türkiye. Questionnaires assessing attitudes toward risk disclosure, additional testing, and clinical trial participation were administered face‐to‐face. Responses were analyzed using contingency tables and regression models. Results are reported following the Consensus‐Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) guideline. Results Among 1385 participants (1039 PD, 107 MSA, 239 iRBD), individuals with iRBD showed the highest support for risk disclosure (88.3%), exceeding PD (64.4%) and MSA (51.9%). Approval declined modestly (3–8%) when framed within the absence of disease‐modifying treatment. iRBD participants were more willing for additional testing but less willing to join clinical trials (31.8%) than PD (45.3%) or MSA (48%). MSA patients expressed the greatest concern about psychological impact. Male sex had more favorable views on disclosure and trial participation, while younger and better‐educated participants favored additional testing. Conclusions Attitudes toward risk disclosure differ markedly across the synucleinopathy spectrum and demographic characteristics. Culturally informed and diagnosis‐specific disclosure strategies will be essential for trial recruitment and patient‐centered care.

The ability to identify individuals in the prodromal phase of Parkinson’s disease has improved in recent years, raising the question of whether and how those affected should be informed about the risk of future disease. Several studies investigated prognostic counselling for individuals with isolated REM sleep behavior disorder and have shown that most patients want to receive information about prognosis, but autonomy and individual preferences must be respected. However, there are still many unanswered questions about risk disclosure or early diagnosis of PD, including the impact on personal circumstances, cultural preferences and specific challenges associated with different profiles of prodromal symptoms, genetic testing or biomarker assessments. This narrative review aims to summarize the current literature on prognostic counselling and risk disclosure in PD, as well as highlight future perspectives that may emerge with the development of new biomarkers and their anticipated impact on the definition of PD.