Lessard, Sarah

BACKGROUND Guidelines and evidence related to antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery have evolved since the authors' previously published advisory statement. OBJECTIVE To provide an updated advisory statement on antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery as guided by updated recommendations from the American Heart Association and the American Dental Association with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines. METHODS A structured literature review was performed. A multidisciplinary team of specialists from dermatologic surgery, infectious diseases, and pharmacy were convened to review up-to-date data and develop updated comprehensive evidence-based recommendations. RESULTS Consistent with the previous advisory statement, prophylactic antibiotics are recommended for patients with high-risk cardiac or prosthetic joint conditions, when the dermatologic surgical site is infected or if the procedure breaches the mucosa. Significant changes were made for prophylaxis of surgical site infection. Updated recommendations were made regarding antibiotic selection in penicillin-allergic patients and intraoperative use of intraincisional clindamycin in the local anesthetic. LIMITATIONS Reviewed data are predominantly limited to retrospective data. CONCLUSION Recommendations regarding antibiotic prophylaxis around dermatologic surgery are evolving as new data and practices are introduced. The 2025 advisory statement provides the latest recommendations for appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery.

Abstract Background Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) allows patients to complete extended antimicrobial treatment at home, improving quality of life and reducing healthcare costs. National guidelines outline best practices for antimicrobial administration, vascular access management, monitoring, and recommend involving an infectious disease physician and a multidisciplinary team. Evaluating adherence to these practices can identify improvement opportunities and enhance outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to assess patient outcomes related to adherence to OPAT best practices at Mayo Clinic Health System – Southwest Wisconsin (MCHS–SWWI). Secondary objectives included evaluating adherence to key process metrics and identifying associations between baseline characteristics and outcomes. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adults discharged from MCHS–SWWI on home OPAT from November 2021 to July 2024. Patients were excluded if under 18 years old or if they received OPAT in non-home settings (e.g., skilled nursing, infusion center). Data on process metrics, outcomes, and safety were collected through manual chart review. These findings were evaluated against established best practices to assess the OPAT program's adherence and determine the impact of this adherence on patient outcomes. Statistical analysis used Pearson’s chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to measure associations of patient characteristics with outcomes. Results A total of 164 patients were included. The MCHS-SWWI OPAT program demonstrated high adherence ( > 85%) to majority of established best practices. Successful OPAT completion occurred in 92.7% of patients, and overall incidence of adverse events and poor outcomes was generally low. Adherence to best practices was below 85% for vascular access selection (81.7%) and completion of weekly labs and vascular access care throughout the OPAT course (∼69%). Conclusion High adherence to OPAT best practices led to a generally low incidence of adverse events, treatment failures, and other unfavorable patient outcomes. The results of this study provide valuable insights to guide institutional quality improvement initiatives aimed at optimizing patient outcomes in OPAT therapy through targeted interventions. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

BACKGROUND Approximately 10% of patients report penicillin allergy. Based on historical guidelines, patients with a penicillin allergy should receive an alternative to cephalexin for prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery. OBJECTIVE To determine, based on evidence, if cephalexin should be used as a first-line prophylactic antibiotic in dermatologic surgery for patients with penicillin allergy. METHODS Systematic review of the literature was performed with defined search terms. RESULTS Less than 5% of those with penicillin allergy labels have a true penicillin allergy. For patients with true, persistent penicillin allergy, there is an overall low cross-reactivity with cephalosporins, especially with cephalosporins that do not share identical R1 side chain. The first-generation cephalosporins, including cephalexin, have a slightly higher risk of cross-reactivity in patients with reported allergy to amino-penicillins (amoxicillin, ampicillin) but not other penicillins. The risk of severe cross-reactivity of cephalosporins in patients with low-risk penicillin allergies is extremely low. Cephalexin has a superior side effect profile and efficacy compared to alternatives. CONCLUSION Cephalexin should be used as the first-line prophylactic antibiotic in dermatologic surgery for patients with documented penicillin allergy, including anaphylaxis. There may be a higher risk of cross-reactivity with cephalexin in patients with a confirmed amino-penicillin allergy.

Abstract Reducing antimicrobial exposure by limiting the duration of therapy is an effective antimicrobial stewardship strategy. In this article, we describe the impact of modification of the electronic health record to remove default durations of therapy on ambulatory antibiotic prescriptions issued from emergency departments in a large, multicenter health system.

Background: Recent literature demonstrated a 24-hour reduction in vancomycin duration of therapy (DOT) for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) with a negative methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screening versus a positive nasal screening. Objective of this study was to investigate vancomycin DOT in patients with SSTIs who received MRSA nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) screening versus those who did not receive MRSA nasal PCR screening. Methods: A retrospective, multi-center, cohort study was completed in admitted adult patients on vancomycin for SSTI from 01/01/2020 to 09/30/2022. Hospital policy permits any clinician to order a MRSA nasal PCR screening test for various indications, including SSTIs, pneumonia and sepsis. Results: One-hundred-fifty-one patients were included, of which 71 had MRSA nasal PCR screening tests obtained, and 80 did not. The median vancomycin DOT in patients with MRSA nasal PCR screening tests was 19.9 versus 36.7 hours ( P = .014) in patients without screening tests. Conclusion: Patients with SSTIs who receive MRSA nasal PCR screening tests have a shortened vancomycin DOT. These results contribute to current data in support of the efficacy and clinical utility of obtaining MRSA nasal PCR screening tests for SSTIs.

Regulatory bodies in the United States have implemented quality metrics aimed at improving outcomes for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. The current study was a quality improvement (QI) project in a community-based academic center aimed at improving adherence to sepsis quality metrics, time to antibiotic administration, and patient outcomes. Electronic health record systems were utilized to capture sepsis-related data. Regular audits and feedback sessions were conducted to identify areas for improvement, with a focus on the timely administration of antibiotics. Interventions included improving access to antibiotics, transitioning from intravenous piggyback to intravenous push formulations, and providing continuous staff education and training. This multidisciplinary QI initiative led to significant improvements in the mortality index, length of stay index, and direct cost index for patients with sepsis. Targeted multidisciplinary QI interventions resulted in improved quality metrics and patient outcomes.

Background Sexual assault survivors are at increased risk for sexually transmitted infections. Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner programs guide sexually transmitted infection treatment, monitoring, and follow-up scheduling according to guidelines by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Reported low rates of provider adherence to CDC treatment guidelines and patient adherence to follow-up necessitate a review of medication prescribing and follow-up scheduling practices, especially at smaller community hospitals in the United States. Methods A retrospective medical record review was conducted to assess adherence rates to CDC guidelines for prescribing practices, scheduling, and follow-up of sexual assault survivors. We included pediatric and adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) and participating in the ED Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner program at a rural, community-based teaching hospital in La Crosse, WI, from January 2018 to December 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate results. Results Analysis included 103 patients. Prescribing adherence to CDC guidelines was >80% for all except human immunodeficiency virus (53.4%), trichomoniasis (68.1%), and hepatitis B (69%). Of the 38 patients who had a follow-up scheduled during their ED encounter, 78.9% attended their scheduled follow-up and 94.7% of those appointments were scheduled within the CDC-recommended time frame, leading to an overall adherence of 40%. Conclusions Adherence rates were high for most prescribing practices, and attendance of scheduled follow-up was higher than expected. Opportunities to improved adherence to CDC guidelines were identified in prescribing for 3 disease states (human immunodeficiency virus, trichomoniasis, and hepatitis B) and in scheduling of follow-up.

AbstractPurposeEmerging literature has detailed the safe use of cefazolin in patients with immunoglobulin E–mediated penicillin allergy labeling (PAL) such as hives and anaphylaxis. The purpose of this article is to detail efforts led by an antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist working with an interdisciplinary team to optimize preoperative antimicrobials in patients with PAL.MethodsA pharmacist-led, interdisciplinary collaborative practice agreement (CPA) was activated in January 2020 to permit pharmacists to independently optimize preoperative antibiotics to the preferred cefazolin in patients with PAL if nonsevere or severe reactions had been reported. A patient registry was established covering the timeframe between January 8, 2020, and January 6, 2022. Reaction during surgery was assessed via 2-provider documentation, which included surgeon and anesthesiology staff documentation of any complications during the procedure related to a suspected allergic safety event. Utilization of cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin for preoperative prophylaxis was monitored before and after implementation of the CPA.ResultsDuring the stated timeframe, 10,182 procedures and/or surgeries were completed on 1,572 (15.4%) patients with PAL and 659 (41.9%) patients previously reporting at least one reaction categorized as a severe reaction, which was hives for 71.2% of these patients. Of the 659 patients with PAL reporting a severe reaction, 356 received a preoperative cephalosporin (cefazolin, 98.8%; ceftriaxone, 1.2%) and tolerated it without a reported safety event, including 52 patients with PAL previously reporting anaphylaxis. An increase in preferred preoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis utilization was noted (cefazolin: 86% to 96.3%, P < 0.001; 2019 to 2021) with reductions noted in the use of nonpreferred preoperative antibiotics (clindamycin: 2.1% to 0.2%, P < 0.001; vancomycin: 3.2% to 0.4%, P < 0.001; 2019 to 2021).ConclusionA pharmacist-led, interdisciplinary CPA increased preferred preoperative antimicrobial use in patients with PAL reporting severe allergic reactions, including hives and anaphylaxis, without reported safety events.

Abstract Background Sexual assault survivors are at increased risk for sexually transmitted infections. Due to patient vulnerability, institutions have implemented Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) protocols to care for these patients. These protocols guide evidence collection, testing, treatment, and medical follow-up to ensure optimization of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) treatment, monitoring and follow-up. Previous gap analyses have identified decreased prescribing of prophylactic STI medications and scheduling follow-up appointments compared to guideline recommendations. The purpose of this study was to assess adherence of medication prescribing and follow-up scheduling practices to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines. Methods This study was a single-center, retrospective, observational, descriptive assessment which evaluated adherence rates to CDC guidelines, to scheduling medical follow-up, and patient attendance at scheduled appointments. Pediatric and adult patients who presented to the emergency department at Mayo Clinic Health System in La Crosse, WI from January 2018 through December 2021 were included. Data collected through chart review included demographics and laboratory data necessary for prescribing prophylactic HIV medications, antibiotics for STIs, emergency contraception, and vaccine administration. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate results. Results One hundred three patients were evaluated. Majority of patients were female and presented within 3 days of assault. Medication adherence to CDC guidelines was ≥ 80% for chlamydia and gonorrhea whereas < 80% was noted for trichomoniasis and HIV prophylaxis. Adherence to post-ED discharge follow-up was 40%. Conclusion Opportunities to improve adherence of ED-SANE protocols for medication prescribing and medical follow-up for trichomoniasis and HIV prophylaxis exist. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Abstract Background URIs are the most common indication for outpatient antibiotic prescribing. Given high rates of unnecessary prescribing, these indications have been identified as a high-priority target for outpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP). Our primary objective was to evaluate the impact of a system-wide, multifaceted, outpatient ASP intervention bundle on unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for URI. Methods This quasi-experimental study was conducted from 2019 to 2021. ICD-10 codes for URIs were grouped into 3 tiers (i.e., tier I = antibiotics always indicated, tier II = sometimes, tier III = never). Encounters from 5 care specialties (i.e., family medicine, community internal medicine, express care, pediatrics, and emergency department) with a tier III URI primary ICD-10 code but without a secondary tier I or tier II code were included. COVID-19 ICD-10 codes were excluded. Interventions included construction of a prescribing data model, dissemination of clinician prescribing data and education, promotion of symptom management strategies, a patient-facing commitment poster, and a pre-populated URI order panel. Tools were designed at a system level and implemented by regional champions beginning in the 3rd quarter of 2020. The primary outcome was the rate of antibiotic prescribing, and the secondary outcome and counterbalance measure was the rate of repeat URI-related healthcare contact within 14 days. Outcomes were analyzed with chi-square with an α level of 0.05. Results A total of 147403 encounters were included. The overall antibiotic prescribing rate decreased from 24.1% to 12.3% between 2019 and 2021 (p< 0.01). Significant reductions in tier III antibiotic prescribing were demonstrated for each region, care specialty, and syndrome evaluated (Table 1). A reduction in repeat healthcare contact was seen across the total cohort (9.5% in 2019 vs. 8.3% in 2021, p< 0.01); decreases in repeat contact rates were observed in those not initially receiving an antibiotic (10.3% vs. 8.6%, p< 0.01), but not in those who initially received an antibiotic (6.8% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.94). Tier III URI encounter level antimicrobial prescribing rates by region, care specialty, and syndrome Conclusion A multifaceted, outpatient ASP intervention bundle decreased rates of unnecessary antimicrobial prescribing without increasing rates of 14-day repeat URI-related healthcare contact. Disclosures Paschalis Vergidis, MD, AbbVie: DSMB|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support Evan Draper, PharmD, Gilead Foundation: Grant/Research Support Sara Ausman, PharmD, Gilead: Honoraria Christina G. Rivera, PharmD, Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Honoraria|Insmed: Honoraria.