Virk, Abinash

Abstract Background Outpatient antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) are recommended by the CDC and Joint Commission. We analyzed the impact of annual, focused syndrome-specific ASP interventions on trends in long-duration antibiotic prescribing (LDAP). Methods This was a retrospective, observational, multicenter cohort study from November 2020 through June 2025. All ambulatory encounters generating systemic antibiotic prescriptions within the healthcare enterprise were screened. Hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and infectious diseases encounters were excluded. Encounters generating ≥1 systemic antibiotic with >7 days duration were categorized as long-duration. Targeted departments (primary and urgent care) received direct intervention (eg, education, peer-comparison reporting, data tracking). LDAP was modeled over time by month and compared by diagnosis group (ASP-priority diagnoses vs nonpriority) and provider specialty department (ASP-targeted vs nontargeted) using linear regression models. Results Of 642 579 encounters included, 42.2% were long duration. LDAP in ASP-targeted departments dropped from 46.8% to 34.8% (difference −12 percentage points [pp]), whereas nontargeted departments dropped from 45.5% to 39.1% (difference −6.4 pp). The estimated annual LDAP decrease was 3.4 pp in targeted versus 2.4 pp in nontargeted departments (difference 1.0 pp, P = .009). Within targeted departments, significant LDAP decreases were seen both in priority and nonpriority diagnoses, whereas nontargeted departments showed no change in LDAP in priority diagnoses. In a sensitivity analysis of nonpriority diagnoses, ASP-targeted departments had a larger estimated annual decrease in LDAP versus nontargeted (difference 1.4 pp, P < .001). Conclusions Annual syndrome-specific ASP interventions correlated with improvements in LDAP, including outside of priority syndromes in targeted departments. LDAP is a viable metric for evaluating ambulatory ASPs.

BACKGROUND Guidelines and evidence related to antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery have evolved since the authors' previously published advisory statement. OBJECTIVE To provide an updated advisory statement on antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery as guided by updated recommendations from the American Heart Association and the American Dental Association with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines. METHODS A structured literature review was performed. A multidisciplinary team of specialists from dermatologic surgery, infectious diseases, and pharmacy were convened to review up-to-date data and develop updated comprehensive evidence-based recommendations. RESULTS Consistent with the previous advisory statement, prophylactic antibiotics are recommended for patients with high-risk cardiac or prosthetic joint conditions, when the dermatologic surgical site is infected or if the procedure breaches the mucosa. Significant changes were made for prophylaxis of surgical site infection. Updated recommendations were made regarding antibiotic selection in penicillin-allergic patients and intraoperative use of intraincisional clindamycin in the local anesthetic. LIMITATIONS Reviewed data are predominantly limited to retrospective data. CONCLUSION Recommendations regarding antibiotic prophylaxis around dermatologic surgery are evolving as new data and practices are introduced. The 2025 advisory statement provides the latest recommendations for appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery.

Abstract Background Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus [GBS]) may cause pneumonia or may colonize the respiratory tract, making its clinical significance uncertain when detected in respiratory specimens. This study aimed to assess whether clinicians interpreted GBS detected by the BIOFIRE Pneumonia Panel (BF-PP) as a pathogen implicated in pneumonia. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adult patients hospitalized with suspected pneumonia at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between September 2020 and February 2025. Cases were independently classified into pathogen and nonpathogen groups by 2 infectious diseases (ID) specialists, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of both groups were recorded. A subgroup analysis of patients who had an ID consultation was performed. Results A total of 109 cases were included. GBS was considered a pneumonia pathogen in 47.7% of cases and a nonpathogen in 52.3%. ID consultation was performed in 33.0% of cases, with GBS considered a pathogen in 30.6% of those. Common comorbid conditions included pulmonary, gastrointestinal, neurologic, and cardiovascular disease and obesity. Rates of endotracheal intubation were similar in the pathogen and nonpathogen groups (51.9% vs 50.9%, respectively), with the in-hospital mortality rate being numerically but not significantly higher in the former versus the latter (21.2% vs 14.0%; P = .33); findings were similar in the ID-assessed subgroup. In 76.1% of GBS detections, other microorganisms—most commonly Staphylococcus aureus—were codetected. Only 10.2% of BF-PP GBS-positive specimens were culture positive for GBS. Conclusions While GBS is not an uncommon pneumonia pathogen, the clinical significance of its detection by BF-PP is uncertain in many cases.

Abstract Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) drive many outpatient encounters and, despite being predominantly viral, are associated with high rates of antibiotic prescriptions. With rising antibacterial resistance, optimization of prescribing of antibiotics in outpatients with RTIs is a critical need. Fortunately, this challenge arises at a time of increasing availability of novel RTI diagnostics to help discern which patients have bacterial infections warranting treatment. Effective implementation of antibiotic stewardship is needed, but optimal approaches for ambulatory settings are unknown. Future research needs are reviewed in this summary of a research summit convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America in the fall of 2019.

Abstract Background Rapid blood culture diagnostics are of unclear benefit for patients with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing outcomes of patients with GNB BSIs who had blood culture testing with standard-of-care (SOC) culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) vs rapid organism identification (ID) and phenotypic AST using the Accelerate Pheno System (RAPID). Methods Patients with positive blood cultures with Gram stains showing GNB were randomized to SOC testing with antimicrobial stewardship (AS) review or RAPID with AS. The primary outcome was time to first antibiotic modification within 72 hours of randomization. Results Of 500 randomized patients, 448 were included (226 SOC, 222 RAPID). Mean (standard deviation) time to results was faster for RAPID than SOC for organism ID (2.7 [1.2] vs 11.7 [10.5] hours; P < .001) and AST (13.5 [56] vs 44.9 [12.1] hours; P < .001). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to first antibiotic modification was faster in the RAPID arm vs the SOC arm for overall antibiotics (8.6 [2.6–27.6] vs 14.9 [3.3–41.1] hours; P = .02) and gram-negative antibiotics (17.3 [4.9–72] vs 42.1 [10.1–72] hours; P < .001). Median (IQR) time to antibiotic escalation was faster in the RAPID arm vs the SOC arm for antimicrobial-resistant BSIs (18.4 [5.8–72] vs 61.7 [30.4–72] hours; P = .01). There were no differences between the arms in patient outcomes. Conclusions Rapid organism ID and phenotypic AST led to faster changes in antibiotic therapy for gram-negative BSIs. Clinical Trials Registration NCT03218397.

Abstract Background Whipple disease (WD), a rare systemic infection caused by Tropheryma whipplei, can be a diagnostic challenge due to its variable presentation. The role of T. whipplei polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is unclear as small bowel biopsy with Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining remains the diagnostic gold standard. Individualized diagnostic approaches based on variable clinical manifestations are underutilized. We investigated the methodologies employed at our institution to diagnose WD. Methods We retrospectively collected all cases of WD diagnosed from 1994 to 2016. Microbiology laboratory and anatomic pathology databases were queried. Case characteristics and disease clinical phenotypes (classical, localized WD arthritis, and localized central nervous system [CNS] disease) were described. The diagnostic approach and testing yield were analyzed and reported. Results Thirty-three cases of WD were diagnosed (18 classic WD [CWD], 9 localized WD arthritis [LWD], 6 CNS WD). Misdiagnosis and delay in diagnosis were frequent. Diagnostic approach and test yield differed by classical vs localized WD involvement. Small bowel tissue biopsy PAS stain/PCR was overwhelmingly positive (86%/92%) in CWD, yet seldom positive (12%/42%) in LWD (P < .001). Affected joint synovial fluid PCR was frequently positive in both CWD (100%, 3/3) and LWD (85%, 6/7). Conclusions These results support the role of small bowel biopsy PAS stain/PCR in the diagnosis of CW, though this approach may be of limited utility in LWD or CNS WD without gastrointestinal symptoms. Affected joint synovial fluid or cerebrospinal fluid PCR was frequently positive in both CWD and LWD, supporting its diagnostic usefulness.

ABSTRACT MICs of 25 Abiotrophia defectiva and 109 Granulicatella adiacens isolates were determined by broth microdilution. Using CLSI breakpoints, the susceptibilities of A. defectiva and G. adiacens isolates were, respectively, 24% and 34% to penicillin, 92% and 22% to ceftriaxone, 48% and 3% to cefepime, 72% and 87% to meropenem, 92% and 10% to cefotaxime, 100% and 97% to levofloxacin, 92% and 80% to clindamycin, and 24% and 50% to erythromycin. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin. In the penicillin-susceptible subgroup, all A. defectiva isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone; however, 62% of G. adiacens isolates were ceftriaxone nonsusceptible.

ABSTRACT Streptococcus suis is an emerging swine-associated zoonotic agent that can cause meningitis and septicemia in humans. We present, to our knowledge, the first case of S. suis arthroplasty infection and streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome due to an nonencapsulated serotype 5 strain in North America.