Quillen, Jaxon K

Peritoneal coccidioidomycosis is a rare, disseminated manifestation of Coccidioides infection with limited representation in the literature. We report 37 proven or probable cases from a single institution, including 12 patients (32%) with immunosuppression. Thirty-six patients received antifungal therapy, all of whom demonstrated clinical response. Among 11 (29.7%) patients who completed and stopped therapy after a median duration of 26 months, 2 (5%) experienced a relapse and were successfully retreated. Nine patients (24%) had no known relapse. Thirteen patients (35%) required modification of antifungal regimens, primarily due to azole adverse effects. Treatment approaches and median duration of therapy (57 months) were similar between immunosuppressed and non-immunosuppressed groups. No deaths were attributable to infection. Overall, outcomes were favorable, with strong clinical responses to azole therapy. Patients without identifiable immunologic deficits or additional sites of dissemination, when managed with antifungal therapy and close clinical, radiologic, and serologic monitoring, may achieve good prognosis, particularly when indefinite azole therapy is not feasible.

Abstract Background Outpatient antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) are recommended by the CDC and Joint Commission. We analyzed the impact of annual, focused syndrome-specific ASP interventions on trends in long-duration antibiotic prescribing (LDAP). Methods This was a retrospective, observational, multicenter cohort study from November 2020 through June 2025. All ambulatory encounters generating systemic antibiotic prescriptions within the healthcare enterprise were screened. Hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and infectious diseases encounters were excluded. Encounters generating ≥1 systemic antibiotic with >7 days duration were categorized as long-duration. Targeted departments (primary and urgent care) received direct intervention (eg, education, peer-comparison reporting, data tracking). LDAP was modeled over time by month and compared by diagnosis group (ASP-priority diagnoses vs nonpriority) and provider specialty department (ASP-targeted vs nontargeted) using linear regression models. Results Of 642 579 encounters included, 42.2% were long duration. LDAP in ASP-targeted departments dropped from 46.8% to 34.8% (difference −12 percentage points [pp]), whereas nontargeted departments dropped from 45.5% to 39.1% (difference −6.4 pp). The estimated annual LDAP decrease was 3.4 pp in targeted versus 2.4 pp in nontargeted departments (difference 1.0 pp, P = .009). Within targeted departments, significant LDAP decreases were seen both in priority and nonpriority diagnoses, whereas nontargeted departments showed no change in LDAP in priority diagnoses. In a sensitivity analysis of nonpriority diagnoses, ASP-targeted departments had a larger estimated annual decrease in LDAP versus nontargeted (difference 1.4 pp, P < .001). Conclusions Annual syndrome-specific ASP interventions correlated with improvements in LDAP, including outside of priority syndromes in targeted departments. LDAP is a viable metric for evaluating ambulatory ASPs.

Background/Objectives: Multi-cancer detection (MCD) tests have emerged as a promising tool to redefine the landscape of early cancer detection. Implementation of this novel technology will likely fall to primary care clinicians (PCC). The purpose of this study is to characterize and explore differences in PCCs perceptions and preferences towards MCD testing. Methods: Between March and May of 2023, this cross-sectional survey was administered to 281 PCCs, including physicians and advanced care providers practicing within an integrated healthcare system spanning five states. The survey collected data on self-reported characteristics, perceptions of MCD testing, and preferences for learning about MCD testing. Analysis was limited to those with no prior experience with MCD testing (N = 181, response rate 22.8%). Descriptive statistics summarized key variables and chi-square tests assessed differences in perceptions and preferences by key characteristics. Results: Most PCCs were interested in MCD testing (66.3%), but limited knowledge/awareness of MCD testing and confidence to manage patients with a positive test were observed, along with concerns around cost (76.7%) and misuse/poor implementation. The primary preferences for learning about MCD testing were online courses or classroom instruction (64.5%). Significant differences in perceptions and preferences for learning were observed by location, degree, and years in practice. Conclusions: PCCs in our study held positive views towards MCD testing, but gaps and variation in knowledge and confidence towards MCD testing and concerns around the cost and misuse/poor implementation were observed. While efforts to train and educate all PCCs on MCD testing is a critical first step, more research is needed to understand how best to support implementation tailored to individual and system-level needs and characteristics.

Background/Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) and oncological outcomes in premenopausal women diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who are receiving either bilateral oophorectomy (BO) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH) therapy. Both methods serve to inhibit ovarian function, which is essential for the management of estrogen-dependent tumors; however, their effects on QoL have yet to be fully clarified. Methods: Data were analyzed from the Mayo Clinic Breast Disease Registry, focusing on women under 55 diagnosed with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who received either BO or GnRH within one year of diagnosis. QoL was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS-10) at baseline and annually for five years. Results: A total of 181 patients were enrolled in the study; 40 into the BO group and 141 to the GnRH group. Both groups exhibited similar levels of sexual dysfunction after a one-year period; however, the BO group stated a higher frequency of hot flashes. PROMIS-10 scores improved in both mental and physical health over time, with no significant differences between the groups. Within the BO group, one recurrence was observed, in contrast to the GnRH group, which had six events. Nonetheless, the difference in recurrence rates did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: The long-term QoL and oncologic outcomes for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer were similar for BO and GnRH therapy. These findings emphasize the need for individualized treatment decisions, considering patient preferences and side effects.

Introduction: Cardiac involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) can present variably from being asymptomatic to manifesting with heart failure, conduction abnormalities, pulmonary hypertension, and pericardial effusion. Symptomatic cardiac involvement portends a poor prognosis and worse overall survival. Sacubitril/valsartan (SV), an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, has been shown to significantly reduce hospitalization rates and morbidity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study aimed to investigate the effects of SV treatment in patients with SSc and heart failure. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with SSc was conducted using an electronic data capture tool. Patients with SSc treated with SV between January 2015 and August 2023 were identified. Comprehensive clinical phenotyping and longitudinal data analysis were performed to characterize the sub-type of patients and evaluate clinical outcomes, including hospitalizations and mortality, laboratory markers, and echocardiographic findings. Results: Twenty-four patients with SSc were treated with SV for a mean duration of 20.6 months. HFrEF was the primary indication for SV use in 91% of patients, primarily due to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (87.5%). There was a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure from 128 mmHg to 114 mmHg (p < 0.001) and NT-proBNP levels from 15,130 pg/mL to 5082 pg/mL (p = 0.046). In the 19 patients with baseline and follow-up echocardiograms, there was a significant improvement in LVEF from 40.3% to 47.7% (p = 0.014). Hypotension was a common side effect leading to discontinuation of SV (n = 4, 16.7%). Serum creatinine had trends of improvement (1.9 mg/dL to 1.3 mg/d), though it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.057). Conclusions: This study showed that SV effectively improved cardiac symptoms and function in patients with SSc presenting with HFrEF. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the role of SV in the treatment of other manifestations of SSc.