Erdemoğlu, Evrim

Background/Objectives: Pelvic exenteration is a radical procedure performed for recurrent gynecologic cancers. The goal of exenteration is to prolong survival, but this procedure also results in extensive tissue loss and consequently high morbidity. Reconstruction using vascularized flaps, particularly the VRAM flap, is crucial to restoring pelvic integrity and decreasing complications resulting from extensive tissue loss. With the rise of minimally invasive surgery, the traditionally open abdominal approach to exenteration and reconstruction can now be performed with the assistance of robotic platforms. This review aims to summarize available evidence, describe techniques, and propose future directions for robotic rectus flap reconstruction after pelvic exenteration. Methods: This narrative review was conducted following the SANRA guidelines for narrative synthesis. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and November 2025 on pelvic exenteration followed by robotic rectus abdominis flap reconstruction in gynecologic oncology. Eligible studies were retrospective or prospective reports, technical descriptions, case series, or comparative analyses. Non-robotic techniques and animal studies were excluded. Although the primary focus was gynecologic oncology, technically relevant studies from other oncologic disciplines were included when the reconstructive approach was directly applicable to pelvic exenteration. Extracted data included patient demographics, surgical details, and perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Results: The literature search identified primarily case reports and small single-center series describing robot-assisted rectus muscle-based flap reconstruction after pelvic exenteration. Reported cases demonstrated technical feasibility and successful flap harvest using robotic platforms, with adequate pelvic defect coverage. Potential benefits, such as reduced wound morbidity and preservation of a minimally invasive workflow, have been described. However, patient numbers were small, techniques varied, and standardized outcome measures or comparative data with open approaches were lacking. Conclusions: Robotic rectus flap reconstruction represents a promising advancement in pelvic exenteration surgery, potentially reducing morbidity and improving recovery. Further research, including multicenter prospective studies, is needed to validate these findings and establish standardized protocols.

Background/Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) and oncological outcomes in premenopausal women diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who are receiving either bilateral oophorectomy (BO) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH) therapy. Both methods serve to inhibit ovarian function, which is essential for the management of estrogen-dependent tumors; however, their effects on QoL have yet to be fully clarified. Methods: Data were analyzed from the Mayo Clinic Breast Disease Registry, focusing on women under 55 diagnosed with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who received either BO or GnRH within one year of diagnosis. QoL was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS-10) at baseline and annually for five years. Results: A total of 181 patients were enrolled in the study; 40 into the BO group and 141 to the GnRH group. Both groups exhibited similar levels of sexual dysfunction after a one-year period; however, the BO group stated a higher frequency of hot flashes. PROMIS-10 scores improved in both mental and physical health over time, with no significant differences between the groups. Within the BO group, one recurrence was observed, in contrast to the GnRH group, which had six events. Nonetheless, the difference in recurrence rates did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: The long-term QoL and oncologic outcomes for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer were similar for BO and GnRH therapy. These findings emphasize the need for individualized treatment decisions, considering patient preferences and side effects.

Background/Objectives: Bowel resection may be necessary during cytoreductive surgery (CS) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer to achieve complete tumor removal. However, concerns about increased perioperative risks and unclear survival benefits have led to ongoing debate. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of bowel resection on perioperative mortality and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing CS. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 127 patients with FIGO stage IIB–IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent primary or interval CS between 2007 and 2021. Patients were stratified based on the performance of bowel resection. Clinical, surgical, and survival data were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Primary outcomes were 90-day mortality and OS. Results: Bowel resection was performed in 58 patients (46%) with more extensive disease and poorer ECOG performance scores. Although the resection group had increased perioperative risks (e.g., higher transfusion rates and ICU use), OS was similar between groups (log-rank p = 0.122). Multivariate analysis identified that increasing age (HR = 1.042, p = 0.005) was independently associated with poorer OS, whereas lymph node dissection (HR = 0.450, p = 0.003) and undergoing primary CS (HR = 0.540, p = 0.047) were associated with improved survival. Bowel resection was not independently associated with OS. Conclusions: Bowel resection does not adversely affect OS when optimal cytoreduction is achieved. Although it increases perioperative complexity, it can be safely incorporated into CS in selected patients. These findings support its use as part of an individualized surgical strategy for advanced ovarian cancer.

Objective: We aimed to analyze the current literature for IORT in gynecological cancers and summarized clinical outcomes regarding patient selection. Methods: A systematic search was conducted utilizing PUBMED, Embase, and CINAHL to identify studies following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A PICOS structure was utilized: population: patients with epithelial gynecological cancers; intervention: IORT; C: a comparator was not required, as we aimed to analyze patient selection; outcome: clinical outcomes and overall survival; and S: experimental and quasi-experimental analytical observational studies and descriptive observational studies, excluding case series published in English and limited to the last 10 years. Data extraction was conducted for patient selection, IORT, oncological outcomes, and morbidity. Results: A total of 707 results were identified, and 509 studies were uploaded to Covidence for screening after removing duplications. Of the 21 eligible studies, 9 were included in the final review. The total number of patients included was 348. The studies were retrospective single-institution studies, except for one. There was significant heterogeneity in their design and protocols. IORT was exclusively used for recurrent and advanced stage gynecological cancers adjunct to pelvic exenteration or laterally extended endopelvic resections with variable indications across institutions. The mean number of IORT patients per study was 2.8 per year. Survival rates were variable and dependent on the surgical margin. Endometrial cancer had a favorable outcome compared to vulvar and cervical cancers. Conclusions: Current clinical practice, as demonstrated by the research, is consistent with NCCN guidelines that endorse the application of IORT in instances of recurrent cervical, vaginal, and vulvar malignancies; however, there are no established recommendations for primary tumors. The analysis shows that there are gaps in our knowledge, mainly regarding the status of the margins, the criteria used to choose patients, and the outcomes that are specific to each histology. The standardization of protocols and prospectively powered studies are needed to refine patient selection criteria.

Background: The objective in epithelial ovarian cancer is to reach maximal cytoreduction with no visible residual tumor. Tumor detection during cytoreductive surgery depends on visual inspection, palpation, or blind biopsy, methods that lack reliability for identifying microscopic disease. Although the importance of microscopic disease in epithelial ovarian cancer is controversial, it may harbor chemoresistant cells and explain the high recurrence rates. Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) is an emerging approach. However, the potential in ovarian cancer remains underexplored; the majority of the existing evidence pertains to gastrointestinal tumors and a limited group of ovarian cancer patients. Their comparative effectiveness is still uncertain. Objective: To systematically review and evaluate the role of fluorescence-guided surgical techniques in detecting microscopic disease in ovarian cancer and compare their efficacy to total peritonectomy. Data Sources: A systematic search was made in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase). The search was conducted from 1975 to 2024, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and conference abstracts in the last 25 years. Study Selection: Clinical studies published in English involving ovarian cancer patients undergoing FGS or total peritonectomy were included. Case reports, reviews, animal studies, and studies involving mixed cancer populations without ovarian cancer-specific data were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened 631 studies, yielding 12 eligible studies for final analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted and synthesized in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, using random-effects models for independent analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and odds ratios (ORs) were grouped, accompanied by subgroup analyses based on the fluorescence agent employed. For quality assessment, we utilized the NIH quality tool. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): The primary outcome was the rate of change in surgical management due to fluorescence guidance or total peritonectomy. Secondary outcomes comprised lesion-level sensitivity, specificity, and PPV. Safety outcomes included adverse events associated with fluorescence agents. Results: There were 12 studies involving 429 ovarian cancer patients. FGS improved the detection of microscopic disease compared to standard visualization methods, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.77. Folate receptor-targeted agents had high sensitivity (84%) but low specificity (26%). Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) showed superior diagnostic accuracy with a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 96%. Total peritonectomy showed no significant advantage over FGS for detecting microscopic disease. The adverse events were mild, with no serious events reported. We observed a high heterogeneity across studies and methodologies. Conclusions and Relevance: Fluorescence-guided surgery utilizing fluorescence tracers demonstrates potential in improving the detection of microscopic disease and may change surgical management in epithelial ovarian cancer, particularly with 5-ALA. Variability in performance and limited data on survival outcomes necessitates additional research. Total peritonectomy does not offer further advantage in the detection of microscopic disease. Future trials should focus on standardizing methodology and evaluating the effects of microscopic disease removal on survival outcomes. Registration: The study was registered to PROSPERO as CRD42024578274.