Campbell, Elliott H.

BACKGROUND Guidelines and evidence related to antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery have evolved since the authors' previously published advisory statement. OBJECTIVE To provide an updated advisory statement on antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery as guided by updated recommendations from the American Heart Association and the American Dental Association with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines. METHODS A structured literature review was performed. A multidisciplinary team of specialists from dermatologic surgery, infectious diseases, and pharmacy were convened to review up-to-date data and develop updated comprehensive evidence-based recommendations. RESULTS Consistent with the previous advisory statement, prophylactic antibiotics are recommended for patients with high-risk cardiac or prosthetic joint conditions, when the dermatologic surgical site is infected or if the procedure breaches the mucosa. Significant changes were made for prophylaxis of surgical site infection. Updated recommendations were made regarding antibiotic selection in penicillin-allergic patients and intraoperative use of intraincisional clindamycin in the local anesthetic. LIMITATIONS Reviewed data are predominantly limited to retrospective data. CONCLUSION Recommendations regarding antibiotic prophylaxis around dermatologic surgery are evolving as new data and practices are introduced. The 2025 advisory statement provides the latest recommendations for appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery.

BACKGROUND Approximately 10% of patients report penicillin allergy. Based on historical guidelines, patients with a penicillin allergy should receive an alternative to cephalexin for prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery. OBJECTIVE To determine, based on evidence, if cephalexin should be used as a first-line prophylactic antibiotic in dermatologic surgery for patients with penicillin allergy. METHODS Systematic review of the literature was performed with defined search terms. RESULTS Less than 5% of those with penicillin allergy labels have a true penicillin allergy. For patients with true, persistent penicillin allergy, there is an overall low cross-reactivity with cephalosporins, especially with cephalosporins that do not share identical R1 side chain. The first-generation cephalosporins, including cephalexin, have a slightly higher risk of cross-reactivity in patients with reported allergy to amino-penicillins (amoxicillin, ampicillin) but not other penicillins. The risk of severe cross-reactivity of cephalosporins in patients with low-risk penicillin allergies is extremely low. Cephalexin has a superior side effect profile and efficacy compared to alternatives. CONCLUSION Cephalexin should be used as the first-line prophylactic antibiotic in dermatologic surgery for patients with documented penicillin allergy, including anaphylaxis. There may be a higher risk of cross-reactivity with cephalexin in patients with a confirmed amino-penicillin allergy.

BACKGROUND While increasing evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of immunohistochemistry-assisted Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for superficially invasive melanoma, there is a paucity of the literature investigating its effect on final defect size. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the tissue sparing effect of MMS for melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three hundred and twenty-eight patients with early-stage (T1a/T1b) cutaneous melanomas treated with MMS from January 2008 to December 2018 were evaluated. Measured defect sizes after Mohs tumor extirpation were compared with anticipated defect size that would result from standard-margin wide local excision (WLE). Average actual versus anticipated defect areas were compared using a paired t-test (95% confidence intervals). RESULTS The following groups demonstrated a significantly smaller defect area for MMS-treated tumors when compared with anticipated standard-margin WLE defect: All tumors combined (13.8 cm2 vs 10.4 cm2, p < .001), tumors requiring 1 stage (13.6 cm2 vs 10.1 cm2, p < .001), and tumors requiring 2 stages (13.2 cm2 vs 10.5 cm2, p = .004). The majority of patients (83.5%, n = 274) achieved clear margins with 1 stage. CONCLUSION Immunohistochemistry-assisted MMS for early-stage invasive melanoma is associated with smaller final defect size and overall tissue sparing effect compared with standard WLE margins.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Primary cutaneous melanoma incidence is increasing in elderly individuals. This population-based cohort examines incidence and mortality rates among adults aged 61 years and older with cutaneous melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project, patients aged 61 years of age or older with a first lifetime diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma between January 1, 1970 and December 31, 2020 were identified. RESULTS The age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate increased from 16.4 (95% CI, 8.2–24.6) per 100,000 person-years in 1970 to 1979 to 201.5 (95% CI, 185.1–217.8) per 100,000 person-years in 2011 to 2020 (12.3-fold increase). There was a 16.0x increase in males and an 8.5× increase in females. Melanoma incidence has stabilized in males (1.2-fold increase, p = .11) and continues to significantly increase in females (2.7-fold increase, p < .001). Older age at diagnosis was significantly associated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.23 per 5-year increase in age at diagnosis, 95% CI, 1.02–1.47). CONCLUSION Melanoma incidence continues to increase since 1970. The incidence has risen in elderly females, but has stabilized in males. Mortality has decreased throughout this period.

BACKGROUND Current consensus guidelines have discouraged the use of sub-0.5-cm (in situ) and sub-1-cm (invasive) margins when performing Mohs micrographic surgery (Mohs) for melanoma, with minimal evidence to guide this recommendation. OBJECTIVE To compare melanoma local recurrence rates after Mohs based on initial margin size. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with search terms including Mohs micrographic surgery, surgical margin, recurrent disease, and melanoma. RESULTS Forty-three studies were included. The 5- to 10-mm margin category had a statistically significant lower local recurrence compared with 1- to 5-mm and 5-mm categories. Recurrence for 1- to 5-mm, 5-mm, 5- to 10-mm, and 10-mm categories were 2.3% (CI 0.8–3.5, p < .001), 1.4% (CI 0.6–2.2, p < .001), 0.3% (CI 0.2–0.5, p < .001), and 6.1% (CI -6.7 - 18.8, p = .349), respectively. Number of stages for 1 to 5, 5, 5 to 10, and 10-mm categories were 1.8, 1.8, 1.6, and 1.6, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = .694). CONCLUSION Five- to 10-mm margins were associated with the lowest local recurrence rates. A 5- to 10-mm initial margin should be considered where other factors (tumor characteristics, anatomical or functional considerations) allow.

BACKGROUND Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is a rare, slow growing neoplasm that presents most commonly in the anogenital region of older adults. OBJECTIVE To analyze the difference in local recurrence rates of EMPD in patients treated with wide local excision (WLE) versus Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis were performed. Inclusion criteria were adults greater than 18 years of age with a diagnosis of EMPD who have undergone surgical intervention and had follow-up data. Studies were independently reviewed by 2 coinvestigators with discrepancies resolved by the principal investigator. RESULTS Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Patients had a 2.67 times higher chance of local recurrence after WLE than MMS (95% confidence interval [CI]:1.47, 4.85; p = .001). Meta-analysis of single-arm studies revealed a 7.3% local recurrence rate after MMS (95% CI: 0.039, 0.107; p < .001) versus a 26.3% recurrence rate after WLE (95% CI: 0.149, 0.376; p < .001). After excluding recurrent tumors, the odds ratio for recurrence in WLE versus MMS was 2.3 (95% CI: 0.285, 18.43, p = .435). CONCLUSION There is a clinically and statistically increased risk of local recurrence of EMPD after WLE compared with MMS.

BACKGROUND Dermatologic surgeons are faced with a dilemma when counseling actively smoking patients who require dermatologic surgery: recommend total cessation of all nicotine that is associated with extremely high rates of cessation failure or recommend nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). OBJECTIVE To determine the safety of NRT in dermatologic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed was queried: [(nicotine OR electronic cigarettes) AND (flap OR wound healing)]. RESULTS Smoking tobacco is detrimental to wound healing, supported by ample evidence (1A). Perioperative smoking cessation reduces risk (1B). Basic science demonstrates both a benefit and detriment of nicotine depending on the factor studied (2A). Human studies suggest no detrimental effect of nicotine on perioperative complications (1B). Nicotine may be detrimental to flaps, but evidence is limited to basic science (2A). CONCLUSION Dermatologists should consider recommending nicotine replacement for smokers in the perioperative period. Evidence is lacking to determine safety in flaps. It is presumed based on animal studies that nicotine has a negative effect on flaps; however, it is likely less than tobacco. Weighing the risk of cessation failure without nicotine replacement versus nicotine replacement after flap is challenging. Electronic cigarettes should be discouraged as a means of NRT.