Gibson, Lawrence E.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Primary cutaneous melanoma incidence is increasing in elderly individuals. This population-based cohort examines incidence and mortality rates among adults aged 61 years and older with cutaneous melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project, patients aged 61 years of age or older with a first lifetime diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma between January 1, 1970 and December 31, 2020 were identified. RESULTS The age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate increased from 16.4 (95% CI, 8.2–24.6) per 100,000 person-years in 1970 to 1979 to 201.5 (95% CI, 185.1–217.8) per 100,000 person-years in 2011 to 2020 (12.3-fold increase). There was a 16.0x increase in males and an 8.5× increase in females. Melanoma incidence has stabilized in males (1.2-fold increase, p = .11) and continues to significantly increase in females (2.7-fold increase, p < .001). Older age at diagnosis was significantly associated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.23 per 5-year increase in age at diagnosis, 95% CI, 1.02–1.47). CONCLUSION Melanoma incidence continues to increase since 1970. The incidence has risen in elderly females, but has stabilized in males. Mortality has decreased throughout this period.

AbstractBackgroundFollicular mucinosis (FM) is a rare disease characterized by mucin accumulation in the follicular unit. FM's etiology is still widely debated since its first description in 1957. Follicular mucinosis is usually reported to be benign in children, although reports of malignant transformation, most commonly mycosis fungoides, exist. The present project aims to demonstrate that children with a diagnosis of follicular mucinosis have positive long‐term outcomes and do not develop mycosis fungoides.Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study where patients with a diagnosis of follicular mucinosis ages 22 years and below were identified. Data surrounding the patient's diagnosis of FM, differential diagnosis, treatments, and long‐term outcomes were collected. Patients who were lost to follow‐up were contacted by phone for an update on the status of their skin and overall health.ResultsOut of 14 patients with follow‐up information, none developed subsequent mycosis fungoides or other hematologic malignancies.ConclusionPediatric patients with follicular mucinosis will likely present with limited disease and not experience malignant transformation.

Abstract Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a serious complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), frequently involves the skin. Since clinicopathologic features of GVHD can mimic those of certain drug eruptions, accurate diagnosis can be challenging. We aimed to develop a tissue-based molecular assay to improve differentiation of GVHD from vacuolar interface drug eruption in the post-HCT period. After identifying 62 putative tissue-based biomarkers using unbiased molecular methods, we incorporated 26 into a quantitative RT-PCR assay. We tested skin biopsy specimens showing vacuolar interface changes attributable to either acute GVHD (n=67) or drug reaction (n=17), as classified by meticulous review of clinical features and course. Data were incorporated into clinical-molecular fusion diagnostic models. Significant differences in the expression of several genes, including MX1, MNDA, OAS, LIMA1, GSTM5, and SPP1, were detected between the two diagnostic groups (p<0.05). The optimal fusion model, which incorporated quantitative expression of MX1, MNDA, OAS, and GSTM5, as well as the clinical feature of diarrhea, imparted high diagnostic accuracy (receiver operating characteristic area-under-curve: 0.89). This novel tissue-based diagnostic molecular assay and fusion model demonstrates potential to improve distinction of GVHD from drug eruptions in the post-HCT setting. Multicenter validation studies are required.

AbstractBackgroundPatients with hypertrophic lichen planus (HLP) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) diagnoses present clinicians with diagnostic and disease management challenges.ObjectiveTo better define the clinical and treatment outcomes of patients with concomitant diagnoses of HLP and SCC.Methods and MaterialsA retrospective review was performed from January 1, 2008, to July 31, 2015, at Mayo Clinic. Patients with a histologic diagnosis of HLP and SCC were included. Patient demographics, associated comorbidities, histopathologic characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were evaluated.ResultsThirty‐three patients were identified; 79% were female, and mostly the lower extremities were involved. Most of the SCCs were well‐differentiated and in situ with the majority treated with destruction or excision. There were no cases of local recurrence, metastasis, or disease‐specific death during the follow‐up period (mean 55.8 months).ConclusionPatients with diagnoses of both HLP and SCC appear to be a distinct population that is predominantly female with lesion predilection for the lower extremities. However, regardless of treatment modality or tumor size, there were no adverse outcomes. An initial trial of more conservative treatment measures with close follow‐up may be reasonable with biopsy of lesions unresponsive to conventional treatment.

AbstractAntineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)‐associated vasculitis (AAV) comprises a group of small vessel vasculitides grouped by commonalities of clinical manifestations and ANCA testing. Skin findings are not uncommon, although there is considerable overlap and many times nonspecificity. In general, patients with skin findings tend to have more significant systemic illness, and skin lesions most often develop simultaneously or following onset of systemic symptoms. There are clinical and pathological clues of help in the differentiation of skin findings in these disorders. Purpura of various forms with leukocytoclastic vasculitis is common to all AAV. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) comprises the largest number of patients with an AAV. Upper airway, oral, ear, and facial lesions, with or without granuloma, are more commonly seen in this AAV. Pyoderma gangrenosum‐like lesions, including facial location, while not common are most closely associated with GPA. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) as its name implies is more closely associated with eosinophilic, allergic, or asthmatic conditions. Papular lesions of the extensor extremities showing extravascular granulomatous changes are characteristic but not specific for EGPA. Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) is more closely associated with livedoid skin changes, and vascular inflammation tends to be deeper in the skin than with the other AAV. Extravascular granulomas are not expected. While the skin findings in AAV can be nonspecific and overlapping, combining careful full skin examination with histopathologic study of selected lesions is critical to making the correct diagnosis and in ruling out other similar diseases not ANCA related. The aim of this article is to encourage increased participation by dermatologists and dermatopathologists in the care of these patients.

AbstractBackgroundANCA‐associated vasculitis (AAV) may present a wide array of dermatological manifestations. Patients may remain ANCA negative, rendering diagnosis challenging for dermatologists if they depend heavily on ANCA testing to either confirm or rule out AAV.ObjectiveTo compare clinical and histopathological features of AAV patients with skin lesions who are ANCA positive versus those who are ANCA negative.MethodsRetrospective review of medical charts to identify patients diagnosed with AAV by clinical and pathologic criteria who also had cutaneous manifestations.ResultsSearch revealed that 211 out of 932 (23%) patients had cutaneous manifestations. Of those, 40/211 (20%) patients had persistently ANCA‐negative serology. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) comprised the largest cohort. Palpable purpura was the most prominent clinical feature. The most common histopathological feature was leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) in 19 (29%) specimens, extravascular granuloma in 14 (22%), followed by perivascular infiltrate in 12 (18%), with eosinophils in nine. In the ANCA‐negative subgroup, perivascular infiltrate was more common followed by LCV but without statistically significant difference.ConclusionsDiagnosis of AAV should not be based on ANCA testing alone since a considerable number of patients with cutaneous lesions may be ANCA negative. The clinical or histopathologic findings of skin lesions in this study group did not vary based on ANCA status.