Hall, Scott T.

AbstractUsing pharmacy claims data from a single commercial health plan to identify opportunities for opioid use disorder (OUD) focused screening and interventions communicated via targeted prescriber messaging. Participants included members ≥18 years using more than 90 morphine milligram equivalents (MMED) daily based on all opioid claims, had >1 paid claim for an opioid product, and had ≥90 days of total opioid therapy. Members were excluded with ≥1 claims for an oral chemotherapy agent (except methotrexate). Intervention was completed with a secure communication to the primary outpatient opioid prescriber that included resources for diagnosis, treatment, and best practices for opioid prescribing. The main outcome measure was any documented change to opioid use following the intervention. Seven hundred forty‐five members were identified; a subset (n = 20) was further assessed, and all had identified OUD risk factors; providers were subsequently sent a communication. Sixteen providers acknowledged receipt and 11 patients (55%) had at least one documented intervention following communication receipt. Provision of targeted, evidence‐based recommendations to providers for patients identified to be at risk of OUD from pharmacy claims data can result in increased recognition and intervention. Future efforts to explore feasibility of provider education detailing efforts and continued evaluation of efficacy are needed.

Background Sexual assault survivors are at increased risk for sexually transmitted infections. Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner programs guide sexually transmitted infection treatment, monitoring, and follow-up scheduling according to guidelines by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Reported low rates of provider adherence to CDC treatment guidelines and patient adherence to follow-up necessitate a review of medication prescribing and follow-up scheduling practices, especially at smaller community hospitals in the United States. Methods A retrospective medical record review was conducted to assess adherence rates to CDC guidelines for prescribing practices, scheduling, and follow-up of sexual assault survivors. We included pediatric and adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) and participating in the ED Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner program at a rural, community-based teaching hospital in La Crosse, WI, from January 2018 to December 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate results. Results Analysis included 103 patients. Prescribing adherence to CDC guidelines was >80% for all except human immunodeficiency virus (53.4%), trichomoniasis (68.1%), and hepatitis B (69%). Of the 38 patients who had a follow-up scheduled during their ED encounter, 78.9% attended their scheduled follow-up and 94.7% of those appointments were scheduled within the CDC-recommended time frame, leading to an overall adherence of 40%. Conclusions Adherence rates were high for most prescribing practices, and attendance of scheduled follow-up was higher than expected. Opportunities to improved adherence to CDC guidelines were identified in prescribing for 3 disease states (human immunodeficiency virus, trichomoniasis, and hepatitis B) and in scheduling of follow-up.

Abstract Background Sexual assault survivors are at increased risk for sexually transmitted infections. Due to patient vulnerability, institutions have implemented Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) protocols to care for these patients. These protocols guide evidence collection, testing, treatment, and medical follow-up to ensure optimization of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) treatment, monitoring and follow-up. Previous gap analyses have identified decreased prescribing of prophylactic STI medications and scheduling follow-up appointments compared to guideline recommendations. The purpose of this study was to assess adherence of medication prescribing and follow-up scheduling practices to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines. Methods This study was a single-center, retrospective, observational, descriptive assessment which evaluated adherence rates to CDC guidelines, to scheduling medical follow-up, and patient attendance at scheduled appointments. Pediatric and adult patients who presented to the emergency department at Mayo Clinic Health System in La Crosse, WI from January 2018 through December 2021 were included. Data collected through chart review included demographics and laboratory data necessary for prescribing prophylactic HIV medications, antibiotics for STIs, emergency contraception, and vaccine administration. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate results. Results One hundred three patients were evaluated. Majority of patients were female and presented within 3 days of assault. Medication adherence to CDC guidelines was ≥ 80% for chlamydia and gonorrhea whereas < 80% was noted for trichomoniasis and HIV prophylaxis. Adherence to post-ED discharge follow-up was 40%. Conclusion Opportunities to improve adherence of ED-SANE protocols for medication prescribing and medical follow-up for trichomoniasis and HIV prophylaxis exist. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Abstract The effectiveness of bebtelovimab in real-world settings has not been assessed. In this retrospective cohort study of 3607 high-risk patients, bebtelovimab was used more commonly than nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among older patients, immunosuppressed patients, and those with multiple comorbid conditions. Despite its use in patients with multiple comorbid conditions, the rate of progression to severe disease after bebtelovimab (1.4% [95% confidence interval, 1.2%–1.7%]) was not significantly different from that for nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatment (1.2% [.8%–1.5%]). Our findings support the emergency use authorization of bebtelovimab for treatment of COVID-19 during the Omicron epoch dominated by BA.2 and subvariants.

Abstract Background Treatment of intraabdominal infections (IAI) commonly involves broad spectrum antimicrobials based on the severity and etiology of infections as well as the underlying medical conditions. However, the overuse of broad-spectrum agents has driven selection for Gram-negative and -positive resistance, as well as collateral consequences such as Clostridioides difficile colitis. We sought to evaluate the utilization of a pharmacy-driven multifaceted antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) intervention to optimize empiric antimicrobial therapy by risk stratification among IAI patients and reduce the number of antibiotic treatment days. Methods This is a single-center case observation study in hospitalized adult IAI patients on antimicrobial therapy from Dec 2019-Feb 2020 compared to patients from Dec 2020-Feb 2021 after initiation of AMS with daily prospective audit and feedback. The composite primary outcome is reduction of antibiotic treatment days and de-escalation from broad spectrum antibiotics (fluoroquinolones, piperacillin/tazobactam, and carbapenems) to cephalosporins. Results We identified 40 patients each in the baseline (pre-AMS group) and post-AMS group via electronic medical record. Baseline characteristics were well-matched between groups. The majority of patients were diagnosed with community-acquired IAIs such as appendicitis, diverticulitis, and cholecystitis. Fluoroquinolone use as empiric therapy was significantly lower in the post-AMS group vs. pre-AMS group (2.5% vs. 25%, p< 0.001), while non-Pseudomonas cephalosporin use was increased (25% post-AMS vs. 0% pre-AMS, p< 0.001). Oral fluoroquinolone use at discharge was significantly decreased in the post-AMS group (p< 0.001). Antibiotic treatment days remained unchanged. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, relapse, and C. difficile colitis. Conclusion A multifaceted antimicrobial therapy intervention successfully reduced the use of fluoroquinolones in patients with community-acquired IAI during hospitalization and discharge. No differences in mortality, readmission, or relapse rates were observed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

AbstractBackgroundKetorolac is an effective analgesic but the potential for acute kidney injury (AKI) is concerning, particularly in geriatric “G‐60 trauma” patients. The objectives of this study are to report the incidence of AKI in patients who receive ketorolac, identify risk factors for AKI, and develop a risk factor‐guided algorithm for safe utilization.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included trauma patients age 60 years and older who received intravenous ketorolac. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AKI.ResultsAmong 316 patients evaluated, the incidence of AKI was 2.5%. Patients with AKI received more nephrotoxins, had more comorbidities, and higher use of loop diuretics or vasopressors. Loop diuretic therapy and number of comorbidities were independent predictors of AKI.ConclusionsRisk for AKI with ketorolac was low, being more prevalent with comorbidities or receipt of loop diuretics.