Huang, Angela

AbstractTixagevimab/cilgavimab (tix/cil) received emergency use authorization in December 2021 for pre‐exposure prophylaxis against COVID‐19 in moderately to severely immunocompromised patients. Our study aimed to describe the incidence of COVID‐19 infection and assess the immunologic risks associated with tix/cil in kidney, pancreas, liver, and heart transplant recipients. Retrospective chart review was completed to provide descriptive analysis. Outcomes data included COVID‐19 infection, severity of COVID‐19 infection, graft function, and rejection. Safety outcomes included cardiovascular (CV) and hypersensitivity events post tix/cil administration. A total of 410 transplant patients were included in the analysis: 20 heart, 92 liver, 243 kidney, 25 simultaneous pancreas/kidney, 23 simultaneous liver/kidney, and seven simultaneous heart/kidney. Twenty‐seven (6.5%) patients tested positive for COVID‐19 via PCR or antigen test post tix/cil. No apparent difference was observed in patients testing positive for COVID‐19 by type of organ transplant (p = .122). Twenty‐five of the 27 patients testing positive for COVID‐19 reported symptomatic infection, only nine of whom were hospitalized. No patients were mechanically ventilated and no deaths due to COVID‐19 occurred. No significant changes in graft function were observed. Clinically significant rejection was diagnosed and treated in four patients. COVID‐19 breakthrough infection rates remained low in immunocompromised solid organ transplant recipients who received tix/cil. No significant immunologic risks were observed.

Abstract Background The BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel (GIPP) tests for 22 potential pathogens in stool, including Clostridioides difficile. C. difficile nucleic acid is detected via nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting toxin A (TcdA) and/or toxin B (TcdB) genes. While PCR-based diagnostic methods are highly sensitive, they lack specificity to differentiate colonization from C. difficile infection (CDI). Mayo Clinic Arizona (MCA) uses enzyme immunoassay (EIA) testing for toxin A/B and glutamate dehydrogenase antigens with reflex to PCR for discordance as the primary algorithm for diagnosing CDI; however, GIPP PCR testing circumvents this algorithm. When used in patients with low pretest probability for CDI, clinical false positives can lead to inappropriate diagnosis and treatment of colonization. GIPA Results in the Electronic Medical Record Pre-Intervention MCA Standalone C. difficile Testing Algorithm Abbreviations – EIA, enzyme immunoassay; GDH, glutamate dehydrogenase; NAAT, nucleic acid amplification test Methods We convened a multidisciplinary quality improvement team to reduce the detection and treatment of C. difficile colonization secondary to GIPP test results. Surveys were sent to providers and nurses as part of a formal gap analysis and included questions around ordering patterns, knowledge of appropriate tests, and associated costs. Baseline data was compiled from GIPP orders in MCA from 1/1/2022-9/30/2022. Results There were 1978 GIPP orders for 1694 patients during the study period (∼7 GIPPs/day). Most orders (65%) originated from ambulatory settings. The most common positive target was C. difficile (355/723, 49%), which resulted in treatment for suspected CDI in 94.9% (337/355) of cases. Of the 49 providers who responded to the survey, 86% ordered the GIPP at least monthly. Testing for C. difficile was the 2nd most common reason for ordering the GIPP. Most providers underestimated the cost of the panel and were unfamiliar with the differences between the GIPP and EIA testing algorithm. Nurses sought clarification on stool samples suitable for GIPP testing. Following education and modifications to ordering in the electronic health record, the decision was made to remove the C. difficile target from the GIPP. Provider Understanding of C. difficile Testing Methods GIPA Results in the Electronic Medical Record Post-Intervention Conclusion Multiplex PCR panels are comprehensive but require careful implementation to facilitate diagnostic stewardship. Facilities with robust standalone C. difficile testing algorithms may consider removing the C. difficile target from the GIPP. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background Inappropriate use of carbapenems is a major driver of antimicrobial resistance. The intensive care unit (ICU) at Mayo Clinic Arizona had a higher meropenem (MER) days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days (PD) compared to other Mayo Clinic Enterprise sites, despite low rates of Pseudomonal resistance to narrower spectrum anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams. Methods A multidisciplinary team of infectious diseases (ID) and critical care medicine (CCM) physicians and pharmacists was created to reduce inappropriate use of MER in the ICU. The baseline rate of appropriateness was determined by evaluating all MER days in the ICU during Q4 2019 and Q4 2020. Each MER day was designated as appropriate or inappropriate based on pre-determined criteria after review by at least one ID and one CCM member. Discordant days were evaluated by the whole team to achieve consensus. The team provided education to the CCM department on the initiative, baseline data, and strategies to reduce inappropriate MER use. The active intervention included prospective audit and feedback of all patients on MER performed by the ID clinical pharmacists Mon-Fri 0700-1530 in Q4 2022. DOT/1000 PD was assessed for the pre-intervention and intervention periods. Results The baseline rate of inappropriate MER use in the ICU was 52% (442/846 days). The two most common reasons for inappropriate MER use in the baseline period were: susceptible organism for which a narrower agent could have been used (93/442, 21%), and infectious workup/cultures negative (89/442, 20%). During the intervention period, the inappropriate rate of MER use was reduced to 23%, below the pre-determined goal of 30%. The MER DOT/1000 PD in the baseline period were 103.9 (Q4 2019) and 151.5 (Q4 2020) versus 66.1 (Q4 2022) in the intervention period. There was no difference in ICU sepsis-related mortality in the pre-intervention vs intervention period (13.4 vs 0%, p=0.04). Conclusion A multidisciplinary team approach, including education and prospective audit and feedback, reduced inappropriate MER use in the ICU of an academic medical center from 52 to 23%. An associated decrease in MER DOT/1000 patient days was also observed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background Treatment of intraabdominal infections (IAI) commonly involves broad spectrum antimicrobials based on the severity and etiology of infections as well as the underlying medical conditions. However, the overuse of broad-spectrum agents has driven selection for Gram-negative and -positive resistance, as well as collateral consequences such as Clostridioides difficile colitis. We sought to evaluate the utilization of a pharmacy-driven multifaceted antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) intervention to optimize empiric antimicrobial therapy by risk stratification among IAI patients and reduce the number of antibiotic treatment days. Methods This is a single-center case observation study in hospitalized adult IAI patients on antimicrobial therapy from Dec 2019-Feb 2020 compared to patients from Dec 2020-Feb 2021 after initiation of AMS with daily prospective audit and feedback. The composite primary outcome is reduction of antibiotic treatment days and de-escalation from broad spectrum antibiotics (fluoroquinolones, piperacillin/tazobactam, and carbapenems) to cephalosporins. Results We identified 40 patients each in the baseline (pre-AMS group) and post-AMS group via electronic medical record. Baseline characteristics were well-matched between groups. The majority of patients were diagnosed with community-acquired IAIs such as appendicitis, diverticulitis, and cholecystitis. Fluoroquinolone use as empiric therapy was significantly lower in the post-AMS group vs. pre-AMS group (2.5% vs. 25%, p< 0.001), while non-Pseudomonas cephalosporin use was increased (25% post-AMS vs. 0% pre-AMS, p< 0.001). Oral fluoroquinolone use at discharge was significantly decreased in the post-AMS group (p< 0.001). Antibiotic treatment days remained unchanged. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, relapse, and C. difficile colitis. Conclusion A multifaceted antimicrobial therapy intervention successfully reduced the use of fluoroquinolones in patients with community-acquired IAI during hospitalization and discharge. No differences in mortality, readmission, or relapse rates were observed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures