Seville, Teresa A

Abstract Background Large cohort studies from the Veteran’s Administration support the negative predictive value of the methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) swabs for skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI). We investigated the use of the nasal MRSA PCR swab to reduce the inappropriate empiric use of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam for SSTI at our institution. Methods Between July and August 2021, we educated Hospital Internal Medicine (HIM) and Internal Medicine Residents (IMR) on the basics of SSTI management and the utility of a negative nasal MRSA PCR swab. Data on empiric use of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam for SSTIs were collected 3/1/2021 to 7/1/2021 (pre-intervention) and 8/30/2021 to 12/29/2021 (post-intervention). We excluded patients who didn’t have an SSTI, weren’t managed by IMR or HIM, and whose empiric antibiotics were for another indication. To account for antibiotics started in the emergency department (ED), a patient was regarded as having received appropriate empiric antibiotics if they were de-escalated in the first 24 hours of being admitted to IMR or HIM. Example of education material. These fliers were distributed to resident rooms following a series of noon conferences Results Pre-intervention there were 106 patient encounters. In 56 of these (52.8%), patients were placed on inappropriate empiric antibiotics. Post-intervention, there were 72 patient encounters. In 23of these (31.9%), patients were placed on inappropriate empiric antibiotic for an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 20.9% with a statistically significant 95% CI (6.522 - 35.249) and a number needed to treat (NNT) of 4.78. Nasal MRSA PCR testing increased from 40.6% to 56.9%. The ARR among the HIM teams was 21.3% and was statistically significant with a 95% CI (4.24 - 38.394). Their proportion of MRSA testing increased from 41.5% to 50%. The IMR teams had an ARR of 14.8%, which was not statistically significant (95% CI, -11.339 to 40.884). Their MRSA nasal PCR testing increased from 37.5% to 72%. Conclusion Education on SSTI treatment coupled with use of the MRSA nares PCR appeared to improve empiric antibiotic choices. Residents stated that the nasal MRSA PCR facilitated empiric antibiotic choice. Positive ARR was seen in whole and sub-group analyses of physician teams. We theorize that the lack of statistical significance in the IMR group was related to a small sample size. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Abstract Background Antispike monoclonal antibodies are recommended for early treatment of high-risk persons with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, clinical outcomes of their use during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Omicron wave are limited. Methods This is a descriptive retrospective study of high-risk adult patients who received treatment with sotrovimab (January 1–March 20, 2022) or bebtelovimab (March 21–April 30, 2022). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who progressed to severe outcome within 30 days after receiving antispike-neutralizing monoclonal antibody infusion. Results A total of 3872 high-risk patients (median age, 62.7 years; 41.1% male) with mild to moderate COVID-19 received sotrovimab (n = 2182) or bebtelovimab (n = 1690). Among sotrovimab-treated patients, the most common comorbidities were an immunosuppressed condition (46.7%), hypertension (38.2%), and diabetes (21.2%). The rates of severe outcome, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality were 2.2%, 1.0%, and 0.4%, respectively, after sotrovimab infusion. Among bebtelovimab-treated patients, the most common comorbidities were hypertension (42.7%), diabetes (17.1%), and an immunosuppressed condition (17.0%). The rates of severe disease, ICU admission, and mortality were 1.3%, 0.5%, and 0.2%, respectively, after bebtelovimab infusion. Older age, immunosuppressed status, and several comorbidities were associated with severe disease progression, while COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower risk. No anaphylaxis was reported during monoclonal antibody infusion. Conclusions This real-world analysis of a large cohort of high-risk patients demonstrates low rates of severe disease after treatment with sotrovimab during the era dominated by Omicron B.1.1.529 and after treatment with bebtelovimab during the era dominated by BA.2 and Omicron subvariants.

Abstract The effectiveness of bebtelovimab in real-world settings has not been assessed. In this retrospective cohort study of 3607 high-risk patients, bebtelovimab was used more commonly than nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among older patients, immunosuppressed patients, and those with multiple comorbid conditions. Despite its use in patients with multiple comorbid conditions, the rate of progression to severe disease after bebtelovimab (1.4% [95% confidence interval, 1.2%–1.7%]) was not significantly different from that for nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatment (1.2% [.8%–1.5%]). Our findings support the emergency use authorization of bebtelovimab for treatment of COVID-19 during the Omicron epoch dominated by BA.2 and subvariants.