Prolonged durations of hypotension during septic shock promote organ injury and mortality. Empirical evidence suggests that earlier vasopressin initiation may improve outcomes in septic shock. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of a ready-to-use vasopressin formulation availability in intensive care unit automated dispensing cabinets on outcomes in septic shock. This was a pre-post quasi experimental study of adults admitted for septic shock who received vasopressin as a second line vasopressor after norepinephrine. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores was used to balance baseline covariates between those who received the ready-to-use vasopressin product and the traditional pharmacy-compounded vasopressin product. Outcomes included time from vasopressin order to administration, time to target mean arterial pressure, length of stay, and mortality. A total of 1104 patients with septic shock were included. After propensity score adjustment, the ready-to-use group was associated with faster time to vasopressin administration (17 vs 41 min, P < 0.001), faster time to target mean arterial pressure (hazard ratio 1.29, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.47, P < 0.001), and a shorter length of intensive care unit stay (hazard ratio 1.23, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.43, P = 0.006) as the compounded group. Mortality was not significantly different. In patients with septic shock, availability of a ready-to-use vasopressin product in the intensive care unit automated medication dispensing cabinet was associated with faster time to administration, improved time to target mean arterial pressure, and reduced duration of intensive care.
Real-World Phenobarbital Use, Treatment Escalation, and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Cohort Study
IMPORTANCE: Phenobarbital use in ICU alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) may reflect severe or refractory withdrawal and treatment escalation, making multicenter data important to understand its use within ICU practice and its relationship with clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate phenobarbital use in real-world ICU AWS as a marker of severe or refractory withdrawal and treatment escalation. We also examined its association with time-to-discharge and safety outcomes compared with nonphenobarbital regimens. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study using multiple imputation and propensity score matching. Adults with AWS, defined as Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, revised (CIWA-Ar) score greater than or equal to 10, were included if they received a phenobarbital-based or nonphenobarbital-based regimen in ICUs across a large academic health system from June 30, 2017, to July 1, 2024. Postoperative ICU admissions were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were time to ICU and hospital discharge alive from treatment initiation. Safety outcomes were hypotension, new intubation, and aspiration within 48 hours. RESULTS: Of 1216 patients, 345 (28.4%) received phenobarbital. Before matching, phenobarbital-treated patients had higher CIWA-Ar, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, and pre-ICU benzodiazepine exposure, consistent with more severe or refractory withdrawal. In adjusted time-to-discharge models, phenobarbital use was not significantly associated with time to hospital discharge alive (discharge rate ratio [DRR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74–1.12; p = 0.370) or ICU discharge alive (DRR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59–1.01; p = 0.057). Hypotension and intubation were similar, and aspiration was less frequent with phenobarbital. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary ICU cohort, phenobarbital use reflected treatment escalation in patients with more severe or refractory AWS. After adjustment, time to ICU and hospital discharge alive did not differ significantly, hypotension and intubation were similar, and aspiration was less frequent with phenobarbital. Future studies should define optimal timing, dosing, and patient selection.
Gallbladder neoplasia is associated with a higher incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis
Background: Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are at risk for developing gallbladder neoplasia (GBN) and biliary neoplasia, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), because of chronic inflammation and an underlying field effect. However, the risk of CCA after GBN detection in those with PSC remains poorly understood. We aimed to determine if the incidence of CCA is higher in those with GBN. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients with large-duct PSC seen at Mayo Clinic between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2019. Incidence rates for CCA development were calculated. Cox regression analyses were performed to determine features associated with CCA development beginning at the time of PSC diagnosis. Results: Our study included 1,829 patients with PSC. CCA and GBN developed in 334 (18.26%) and 71 individuals (3.88%), respectively. Among those with GBN, 14 (19.72%) developed CCA. The annual incidence of CCA was nearly twofold higher in patients with GBN (4.34% versus 2.21%). GBN was associated with CCA in an unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio 2.14 [95% CI 1.16–3.94]). When adjusting for other predictors of CCA, an association between GBN and CCA may remain. Conclusions: While few patients with PSC develop GBN, this subgroup is more likely to develop CCA. Consequently, once GBN is detected, clinicians should consider more intensive screening for CCA.
P-1848. Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy: How Adherence to Best Practices Shapes Patient Outcomes
Abstract Background Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) allows patients to complete extended antimicrobial treatment at home, improving quality of life and reducing healthcare costs. National guidelines outline best practices for antimicrobial administration, vascular access management, monitoring, and recommend involving an infectious disease physician and a multidisciplinary team. Evaluating adherence to these practices can identify improvement opportunities and enhance outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to assess patient outcomes related to adherence to OPAT best practices at Mayo Clinic Health System – Southwest Wisconsin (MCHS–SWWI). Secondary objectives included evaluating adherence to key process metrics and identifying associations between baseline characteristics and outcomes. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adults discharged from MCHS–SWWI on home OPAT from November 2021 to July 2024. Patients were excluded if under 18 years old or if they received OPAT in non-home settings (e.g., skilled nursing, infusion center). Data on process metrics, outcomes, and safety were collected through manual chart review. These findings were evaluated against established best practices to assess the OPAT program's adherence and determine the impact of this adherence on patient outcomes. Statistical analysis used Pearson’s chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to measure associations of patient characteristics with outcomes. Results A total of 164 patients were included. The MCHS-SWWI OPAT program demonstrated high adherence ( > 85%) to majority of established best practices. Successful OPAT completion occurred in 92.7% of patients, and overall incidence of adverse events and poor outcomes was generally low. Adherence to best practices was below 85% for vascular access selection (81.7%) and completion of weekly labs and vascular access care throughout the OPAT course (∼69%). Conclusion High adherence to OPAT best practices led to a generally low incidence of adverse events, treatment failures, and other unfavorable patient outcomes. The results of this study provide valuable insights to guide institutional quality improvement initiatives aimed at optimizing patient outcomes in OPAT therapy through targeted interventions. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures