Walbert, Tobias

Abstract BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome is caused by pathogenic germline variants in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, predisposing individuals to malignancies, including glioblastoma (GBM). MMR-deficient tumors are resistant to monofunctional alkylators such as temozolomide but not to bifunctional alkylators such as the nitrosourea lomustine. Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab represents another treatment option, which is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of mismatch repair deficient cancers. METHODS We present a patient with multifocal GBM and Lynch syndrome who experienced rapid progression following standard-of-care chemoradiation, followed by durable responses to lomustine and then to pembrolizumab. RESULTS A 58-year-old man with Lynch syndrome (MSH2 mutation) and prior history of colon cancer presented with seizures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain identified right frontal and left parietal masses. Right frontal tumor was resected; pathology was consistent with GBM, IDH wildtype, MGMT-unmethylated. Both lesions were treated with radiation therapy (60 Gy, 30 fractions) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. After two cycles of adjuvant temozolomide, his left parietal tumor progressed and was subtotally resected, followed by four cycles of lomustine (stopped due to myelotoxicity). He remained progression-free for 15 months. Surveillance MRI identified new enhancement involving the left frontal lobe, left periventricular white matter, and right internal auditory canal, concerning for leptomeningeal dissemination. MRI spine identified no additional lesions. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology was negative for tumor cells on two occasions. Patient was treated with pembrolizumab. He remains on treatment with stable disease four months after ICI initiation and 31 months after GBM diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Patients with MMR-deficient GBM resist standard chemoradiation. Alternatives such as nitrosourea or ICI therapy may achieve durable responses. While data is insufficient to administer these agents as upfront therapy in this specific setting, both should be considered as options for recurrent disease.

PURPOSE Pharmacologic therapies for neurofibromatosis type 1-associated plexiform neurofibromas (NF1-PNs) are limited; currently, none are US Food and Drug Administration–approved for adults. METHODS ReNeu is an open-label, multicenter, pivotal, phase IIb trial of mirdametinib in 58 adults (≥18 years of age) and 56 children (2 to 17 years of age) with NF1-PN causing significant morbidities. Patients received mirdametinib capsules or tablets for oral suspension (2 mg/m 2 twice daily, maximum 4 mg twice daily), regardless of food intake, in 3 weeks on/1 week off 28-day cycles. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR; proportion of patients with a ≥20% reduction of target PN volume from baseline on consecutive scans during the 24-cycle treatment phase) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS Twenty-four of 58 adults (41%) and 29 of 56 children (52%) had a BICR-confirmed objective response during the 24-cycle treatment phase; in addition, two adults and one child had confirmed responses during long-term follow-up. Median (range) target PN volumetric best response was –41% (−90 to 13) in adults and –42% (−91 to 48) in children. Both cohorts reported significant and clinically meaningful improvement in patient- or parent proxy-reported outcome measures of worst tumor pain severity, pain interference, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) that began early and were sustained during treatment. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, and nausea in adults and dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, and paronychia in children. CONCLUSION In ReNeu, the largest multicenter NF1-PN trial reported to date, mirdametinib treatment demonstrated significant confirmed ORRs by BICR, deep and durable PN volume reductions, and early, sustained, and clinically meaningful improvement in pain and HRQOL. Mirdametinib was well-tolerated in adults and children.

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy in adults. Standard of care (SOC) for suspected GBM begins with maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and temozolomide, and maintenance temozolomide. Imvax has utilized its Goldspire™ platform to create IGV-001, an autologous biologic-device combination product for the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM). IGV-001 consists of autologous GBM tumor cells and an antisense oligonucleotide against IGF-1R mRNA (IMV-001), irradiated and administered via biodiffusion chambers implanted in the abdomen. Together, these components stimulate immunogenic cell death and antigen release. In a phase 1b study in patients with ndGBM, IGV-001 was well tolerated without unexpected adverse events. Multiple efficacy signals were also observed, including significant improvements in progression-free survival, overall survival, radiographic evidence of tumor response, and changes in immune response biomarkers. A phase 2b randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and efficacy of IGV-001 in patients with ndGBM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04485949) is ongoing. Here, we present the first safety data from the study. MATERIAL AND METHODS After surgical resection, patients are treated with IGV-001 or placebo followed by SOC. The study will enroll approximately 93 patients at 20 sites in the United States, with a 2:1 randomization favoring IGV-001. The primary outcome is progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomization to first progression, as determined by blinded central radiology review, or death. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, and safety. RESULTS As of February 2, 2024, a total of 72 patients have been randomized and 69 have been implanted with IGV-001 or placebo plus SOC. The median age was 60.0 years (range, 24-70 years). Most randomized patients (76.4%) were 51-70 years of age, and the male:female ratio was 2.27. A total of 39/45 (86.7%) patients with enough follow-up time, initiated treatment with concurrent radiation and temozolomide. A total of 9/72 (12.5%) randomized patients discontinued treatment, including 7 patients who discontinued during the SOC treatment period. No patients discontinued treatment for adverse events, protocol deviations, or death. A total of 11/72 (15.3%) randomized patients discontinued the study after randomization. CONCLUSION To date, the review of blinded safety data did not show any emerging risk and supports that there is no change to the benefit-risk profile of treatment with IGV-001 versus placebo. The data will be updated before presentation.

Abstract BACKGROUND Preclinical studies have demonstrated that IDH1-mutant (IDHmt) gliomas harbor a BRCAness phenotype with a defect in homologous recombination that confers PARP inhibitor sensitivity. METHODS The phase II component of ABTC 1801 examined the efficacy of the combination of pamiparib (BeiGene BGB-290) with low dose metronomic temozolomide in recurrent IDHmt grade 2 and 3 gliomas. In this two-stage design, Arm A enrolled patients who had failed two lines and Arm B a single line of alkylator therapy. Pamiparib and temozolomide doses based on phase I results was 60 mg BID and 20 mg daily. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS 39 patients (Arm A 15, Arm B 24) enrolled in the phase II. Median age was 45 (range: 25-69), 56% male, and median KPS 90. 72% of tumors were MGMT methylated. There were no confirmed responses in Arm A and one in Arm B; neither arm met the threshold for additional accrual. One-third of subjects discontinued treatment for reasons other than progressive disease. Estimated median PFS was 5.8 months in Arm A and 11.3 months in Arm B. Seven subjects (Arm A 3, Arm B 4) developed DLT during treatment. Grade 3+ toxicity was principally hematologic; 9 patients had grade 3 anemia, 7 grade 3 and 3 grade 4 neutropenia, and 3 grade 3 thrombocytopenia. In enhancing and non-enhancing tumors from 8 surgical arm patients, median unbound drug tumor/plasma ratios were 0.98 and 0.92, respectively; and median unbound pamiparib tumor concentrations were 209 and 188 nmol/L (or nmol/kg), respectively, which were >20-fold the in vitro IC50 for PARP inhibition. CONCLUSIONS While pamiparib appeared to achieve sufficient pharmacologically active concentrations in both enhancing and non-enhancing tumors, combination with temozolomide did not produce a meaningful ORR in IDHmt recurrent gliomas. Cumulative hematologic toxicity was substantial.

Abstract Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumor. They are slow growing and often incidentally found tumors that arise from the arachnoid villi. As they grow, they have a greater likelihood of becoming symptomatic with seizures being one of the most clinically significant symptoms. Seizures are more likely to present as a symptom of larger meningiomas and meningiomas that compress cortical areas particularly those in non-skull base locations. These seizures are often managed medically, utilizing the same anti-seizure medications that are used to treat other causes of epilepsy. We discuss common anti-seizure medications used including valproate, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, phenytoin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam and topiramate and their common adverse effects. The goal of pharmacotherapy for seizure control is to maximize seizure control while minimizing the adverse effects of the medication. The decision to provide medical management is dependent on individual seizure history and plans for surgical treatment. Patients who did not require seizure prophylaxis before surgery are commonly prescribed seizure prophylaxis postoperatively. Symptomatic meningiomas not controlled by medical management alone are commonly evaluated for surgical resection. The efficacy of surgical resection in providing seizure freedom is dependent on several features of the tumor including tumor size, the extent of the peritumoral edema, the number of tumors, sinus infiltration and the degree of resection.

Abstract BACKGROUND Standard of care (SOC) and patient survival in glioblastoma have changed little in the past 17 years. We evaluated in a phase 3 trial whether adding an autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccine (murcidencel) to SOC extends survival. Patients and METHODS Newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients were randomized 2:1 to either murcidencel or placebo. Under a crossover design, all patients could receive murcidencel following tumor recurrence. All parties remained blinded regarding treatments before recurrence. Patients thus received murcidencel at new diagnosis (nGBM) or at recurrence (rGBM) following crossover from placebo. The primary and secondary endpoints compare overall survival (OS) with contemporaneous, matched external controls. Four sets of analyses were conducted to ensure rigorous matching of the controls, reduce biases, and confirm the robustness of the results. RESULTS 331 patients were enrolled. With the crossover, 89% received murcidencel. Median OS (mOS) for nGBM patients (n = 232) was 19.3 months from randomization (22.4 months from surgery) with murcidencel vs. 16.5 months from randomization in the controls (HR = 0.80, p = 0.002). Survival at 48 months from randomization was 15.7% vs. 9.9%, and at 60 months was 13% vs. 5.7%. For rGBM (n = 64), mOS was 13.2 months from relapse vs. 7.8 months in the controls (HR = 0.58, p < 0.001). Survival at 24 months post-recurrence was 20.7% vs. 9.6%, and at 30 months post-recurrence was 11.1% vs 5.1%. In nGBM patients with methylated MGMT (n = 90), mOS was 30.2 months from randomization (33 months from surgery) with murcidencel vs. 21.3 months from randomization in the controls (HR = 0.74, p = 0.027). The treatment was well tolerated, with only 5 serious adverse events deemed at least possibly related to the vaccine. CONCLUSION Clinically meaningful and statistically significant survival extension was seen in both nGBM and rGBM patients treated with murcidencel and SOC compared with contemporaneous, matched external controls who received SOC alone.

Abstract Background The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Patient-Reported Outcome (RANO-PRO) working group aims to provide guidance on the use of PROs in brain tumor patients. PRO measures should be of high quality, both in terms of relevance and other measurement properties. This systematic review aimed to identify PRO measures that have been used in brain tumor studies to date. Methods A systematic literature search for articles published up to June 25, 2020 was conducted in several electronic databases. Pre-specified inclusion criteria were used to identify studies using PRO measures assessing symptoms, (instrumental) activities of daily living [(I)ADL] or health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adult patients with glioma, meningioma, primary central nervous system lymphoma, or brain metastasis. Results A total of 215 different PRO measures were identified in 571 published and 194 unpublished studies. The identified PRO measures include brain tumor-specific, cancer-specific, and generic instruments, as well as instruments designed for other indications or multi- or single-item study-specific questionnaires. The most frequently used instruments were the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 (n = 286 and n = 247), and the FACT-Br (n = 167), however, the majority of the instruments were used only once or twice (150/215). Conclusion Many different PRO measures assessing symptoms, (I)ADL or HRQoL have been used in brain tumor studies to date. Future research should clarify whether these instruments or their scales/items exhibit good content validity and other measurement properties for use in brain tumor patients.

AbstractBuilding on an initiative to enhance clinical trial participation involving the Society for Neuro-Oncology, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group, patient advocacy groups, clinical trial cooperative groups, and other partners, we evaluate the impact of eligibility criteria and trial conduct on neuro-oncology clinical trial participation. Clinical trials often carry forward eligibility criteria from prior studies that may be overly restrictive and unnecessary and needlessly limit patient accrual. Inclusion and exclusion criteria should be evaluated based on the goals and design of the study and whether they impact patient safety and/or treatment efficacy. In addition, we evaluate clinical trial conduct as a barrier to accrual and discuss strategies to minimize such barriers for neuro-oncology trials.