Reynolds, C. Patrick

e15131 Background: Elimusertib is a highly selective oral inhibitor of the Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) kinase, which is required for efficient end-joining repair of double-stranded breaks, particularly during DNA replication. Many pediatric cancers involve potential ATR susceptibilities such as increased replication stress due to oncogenic fusions, specific DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiencies, oncogenic activation of DNA damage and nucleases such as PGBD5, as well as alternative lengthening of telomeres. We report the initial phase 1 results of PEPN2112 (NCT05071209), an ongoing pediatric phase 1/2 clinical trial of elimusertib monotherapy. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) included children, adolescents, and young adults with relapsed or refractory tumors with: (1) Ewing sarcoma or related EWSR1 fusion positive tumors (EWS), (2) alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, PAX3-FOXO1 fusion positive (aRMS), or (3) non-CNS primary tumors exhibiting specific DDR pathway defects anticipated to sensitize to ATR inhibition. For pts < 18 years (yrs), a rolling-six design was used to evaluate elimusertib administered BID x3 days/week of a 28-day cycle starting at the adult equivalent recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 24 mg/m2/dose (max 40 mg) with a potential de-escalation to 18 mg/m2/dose (max 30 mg). The pediatric RP2D determination was based upon dose limiting toxicity (DLT) criteria (CTCAEv5) during cycle 1. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were performed. Pts > 18 yrs could enroll onto the phase 2 cohorts at the adult RP2D simultaneously with the pediatric phase 1. Once the pediatric RP2D was defined, pts < 18 yrs accrued to the phase 2 cohorts and a PK expansion for pts < 12 yrs was opened. Results: 8 eligible pts were enrolled (4 males) on the phase 1 part of the study. 2 pts were inevaluable for DLT as they received < 75% of protocol therapy. Median (range) age was 13 (10-17) yrs. Diagnoses included: EWS (n = 4) and 1 pt each with aRMS, adrenocortical carcinoma, clear cell sarcoma, and osteosarcoma. At 24 mg/m2/dose, no DLTs were observed. Toxicities were hematologic, with grade 3 toxicities including anemia (n = 3), neutropenia (n = 4), and decreased white blood cells (n = 1). One pt experienced grade 4 lymphopenia. There were no grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities. Day 1 mean ± SD values of Tmax, Cmax, AUC0-8h and t1/2 were 1.6 ± 0.5 h, 1532 ± 385 ng/mL, 5863 ± 1841 h*ng/mL and 3.6 ± 0.9 h, respectively. Conclusions: Elimusertib-related toxicities were primarily hematologic. The RP2D for elimusertib monotherapy in pediatric pts is 24 mg/m2/dose (max 40 mg) orally BID x3 days/week continuously, analogous to dosing in adults with similar PK. Phase 2 and PK expansion cohorts as well as pharmacodynamic studies are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05071209 .

AbstractBackgroundVorinostat combined with retinoids produces additive antitumor effects in preclinical studies of neuroblastoma. Higher systemic exposures of vorinostat than achieved in pediatric phase I trials with continuous daily dosing are necessary for in vivo increased histone acetylation and cytotoxic activity. We conducted a phase I trial in children with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat on an interrupted schedule, escalating beyond the previously identified pediatric MTD.MethodsIsotretinoin (cis‐13‐retinoic acid) 80 mg/m2/dose was administered by mouth twice daily on days 1–14 in combination with escalating doses of daily vorinostat up to 430 mg/m2/dose (days 1–4; 8–11) in each 28‐day cycle using the standard 3 + 3 design. Vorinostat pharmacokinetic testing and histone acetylation assays were performed.ResultsTwenty‐nine patients with refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma were enrolled and 28 were evaluable for dose escalation decisions. Median number of cycles completed was two (range 1–15); 11 patients received four or more cycles. Three patients experienced cycle 1 dose‐limiting toxicities. A total of 18 patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicities related to study therapy. The maximum intended dose of vorinostat (430 mg/m2/day, days 1–4; 8–11) was tolerable and led to increased histone acetylation in surrogate tissues when compared to lower doses of vorinostat (P = 0.009). No objective responses were seen.ConclusionsIncreased dose vorinostat (430 mg/m2/day) on an interrupted schedule is tolerable in combination with isotretinoin. This dose led to increased vorinostat exposures and demonstrated increased histone acetylation. Prolonged stable disease in patients with minimal residual disease warrants further investigation.

Abstract Background: Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), unlike ERα, classically functions as a tumor suppressor in vitro. However, ERβ's biological functions in vivo and predictive/prognostic value in breast cancer are controversial. Methods: Expression of ERβ protein was determined using a well characterized and validated ERβ specific monoclonal antibody that only recognizes the full-length form of this receptor (PPG5/10) in the following 3 cohorts: 1) a cohort with all breast cancer subtypes (n = 182), 2) a prospective NCCTG adjuvant tamoxifen trial for postmenopausal women with ERα positive breast cancer with long-term follow-up (n = 198) and 3) a cohort of 80 triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs). To elucidate the biological functions of ERβ in breast cancer, novel ERβ expressing MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines were developed and characterized using multiple techniques and were examined for responsiveness to various ERβ targeted therapies. Results: About one-third of all breast tumors, regardless of sub-type, were shown to express nuclear ERβ and this expression was independent of ERα or HER2. In the NCCTG 89-30-52 cohort, breast cancer recurrence rates were significantly associated with ERβ protein expression with 10 year recurrence rates of 25%, 15% and 4% for zero, low or high levels of ERβ expression respectively. Interestingly, in TNBCs, nuclear ERβ was expressed at intermediate or high levels in 24% of tumors. In the triple negative MDA-MB-231 cell line, expression of ERβ led to inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in response to estrogen and multiple ERβ specific agonists. Conversely, these same treatments induced proliferation of ERβ-expressing MCF7 cells which endogenously express ERα. However, ERβ expression sensitized MCF7 cells to the anti-proliferative effects of anti-estrogens. Microarray analysis and RT-PCR profiling of MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells revealed that estrogen and ERβ agonists highly induced the expression of multiple cystatins, a family of small secreted cysteine protease inhibitors which function as tumor suppressors, and potently inhibited canonical TGFβ signaling. Conditioned media isolated from estrogen or ERβ agonist treated MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells suppressed the proliferation rates and inhibited TGFβ signaling in other TNBC cell lines, effects that were completely reversed following the depletion of cystatins from the conditioned media. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that ERβ is expressed in a substantial proportion of breast cancers and may have value as a predictive and/or prognostic biomarker. Therapeutic targeting of ERβ may have clinical benefit in multiple breast cancer sub-types; however, the specific drug of choice may vary based on ERα status. Specifically, we have demonstrated that ERβ expression in ERα+ MCF7 cells sensitizes them to the effectiveness of anti-estrogens, an observation that was confirmed in women enrolled in a prospective adjuvant tamoxifen trial. In TNBCs, where targeted therapies are lacking, our data suggest that targeting ERβ with either estrogen or ERβ specific agonists will elicit anti-tumor effects through the induction of cystatins and inhibition of TGFβ signaling resulting in tumor regression and improved patient outcomes. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-04-03.

AbstractPurpose: To determine the response rate to oral capsular fenretinide in children with recurrent or biopsy proven refractory high-risk neuroblastoma.Experimental Design: Patients received 7 days of fenretinide: 2,475 mg/m2/d divided TID (&lt;18 years) or 1,800 mg/m2/d divided BID (≥18 years) every 21 days for a maximum of 30 courses. Patients with stable or responding disease after course 30 could request additional compassionate courses. Best response by course 8 was evaluated in stratum 1 (measurable disease on CT/MRI ± bone marrow and/or MIBG avid sites) and stratum 2 (bone marrow and/or MIBG avid sites only).Results: Sixty-two eligible patients, median age 5 years (range 0.6–19.9), were treated in stratum 1 (n = 38) and stratum 2 (n = 24). One partial response (PR) was seen in stratum 2 (n = 24 evaluable). No responses were seen in stratum 1 (n = 35 evaluable). Prolonged stable disease (SD) was seen in 7 patients in stratum 1 and 6 patients in stratum 2 for 4 to 45+ (median 15) courses. Median time to progression was 40 days (range 17–506) for stratum 1 and 48 days (range 17–892) for stratum 2. Mean 4-HPR steady-state trough plasma concentrations were 7.25 μmol/L (coefficient of variation 40–56%) at day 7 course 1. Toxicities were mild and reversible.Conclusions: Although neither stratum met protocol criteria for efficacy, 1 PR + 13 prolonged SD occurred in 14/59 (24%) of evaluable patients. Low bioavailability may have limited fenretinide activity. Novel fenretinide formulations with improved bioavailability are currently in pediatric phase I studies. Clin Cancer Res; 17(21); 6858–66. ©2011 AACR.

PurposeTo determine the maximal tolerated dosage (MTD) of oral fenretinide given as intact capsules for 7 days, repeated every 21 days, in children with high-risk solid tumors.MethodsChildren 21 years of age or younger received daily doses from 350 mg/m2to 3,300 mg/m2(divided into two or three doses), with pharmacokinetics during course one. The MTD was defined as zero to one of six patients with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), with at least two of three or two of six DLT at next higher dose.ResultsFifty-four patients, age 2 years to 20 years (median, 9 years), were treated: neuroblastoma (n = 39), Ewing sarcoma (n = 5), and other (n = 10). Prior therapy included autologous stem cell transplantation (n = 42), 13-cis-RA (n = 35), and 9-cis-RA (n = 1). One of four patients at 1,050 mg/m2with prior liver transplant had grade 3 ALT/abdominal pain/nausea/dehydration and grade 4 AST/emesis. At 1,860 mg/m2, one of seven patients had grade 3 hypoalbuminemia/hypophosphatemia. At 2,475 mg/m2, one of eight patients had grade 3 alkaline phosphatase; three of five patients had DLT at 3,300 mg/m2: grade 3 AST/ALT (n = 1), grade 4 bilirubin/grade 3 AST/ALT (n = 1), pseudotumor cerebri (n = 1). Pseudotumor cerebri also occurred at 600 mg/m2and 800 mg/m2. There was one complete response and 13 patients with stable disease (SD) for 8 or more courses in 30 assessable neuroblastoma patients. SD for 8 or more courses was seen in one of five Ewing sarcoma patients and one melanoma patient. Mean N-4-hydroxyphenyl retinamide plasma level (day 7, steady-state concentration) was 9.9 μmol/L at MTD.ConclusionThe pediatric MTD of oral capsular fenretinide was 2,475 mg/m2per day, which achieved levels active against neuroblastoma in vitro with minimal toxicity. Response data support a phase II trial in neuroblastoma.