Matthay, Katherine K.

10526 Background: Pro-angiogenic factors may represent therapeutic targets in sarcoma. Preclinical studies have demonstrated a potential additive or synergistic interaction between anti-angiogenic agents and chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) effects of PAZIT in patients with advanced sarcoma. Methods: Patients 6-30 years of age with relapsed/refractory sarcomas were eligible. In the initial dose escalation plan (A), patients received pazopanib PO (225-450 mg/m2/dose) on Days 1-21 of 21-day cycles. Pazopanib was combined with fixed doses of irinotecan (IV 50 or PO 90 mg/m2/dose) and temozolomide PO 100 mg/m2/dose on Days 1-5. Due to DLTs, an amendment was made to the dose escalation plan (B) and patients received fixed doses of pazopanib PO (225 mg/m2/dose) on Days 1-21 of 21-day cycles and reduced irinotecan doses (IV 25-37.5 or PO 45-67.5 mg/m2/dose) and temozolomide PO 100 mg/m2/dose on Days 1-5. Oral cephalosporin diarrhea prophylaxis was required. Dose escalation followed a 3+3 design. Correlative studies included PK (pazopanib, irinotecan) and PD (angiogenic factors, ctDNA) effects. Results: Sixteen patients were treated (median age 16 years, range 7-21). The dose levels in the table were evaluated. First cycle DLTs occurred at all dose levels (Table) and included diarrhea, pancreatitis, colitis, neutropenia, hypertension, deep vein thrombosis, and ALT increase. Due to excessive toxicity, an MTD could not be established. One patient with osteosarcoma had a partial response. Four patients had prolonged stable disease > 4 cycles, including 2 patients with Ewing sarcoma (5 and 6 cycles), rhabdomyosarcoma (9 cycles), and desmoplastic small round cell tumor (6 cycles). Mean±SD plasma exposures to pazopanib, irinotecan, and SN-38 in patients treated on dose level 1B (n = 4) on Day 4 were 601±83, 1.4±0.2 and 0.1±0.04 ug/mL*hr, respectively. Analyses of correlative studies are ongoing. Conclusions: Combination PAZIT therapy is not tolerable as evaluated at these doses/schedules. This study provides important toxicity data to inform future clinical trials using combination anti-angiogenic strategies in sarcoma. Clinical trial information: NCT03139331. [Table: see text]

Abstract Purpose: In phase I testing, alisertib tablets with irinotecan and temozolomide showed significant antitumor activity in patients with neuroblastoma. This study sought to confirm activity of this regimen; evaluate an alisertib oral solution; and evaluate biomarkers of clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods: We conducted a two-stage phase II trial of alisertib tablets (60 mg/m2/dose × 7 days), irinotecan (50 mg/m2/dose i.v. × 5 days), and temozolomide (100 mg/m2/dose orally × 5 days) in patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma. The primary endpoint was best objective response. A separate cohort was treated with alisertib at 45 mg/m2 using oral solution instead of tablets. Exploratory analyses sought to identify predictors of toxicity, response, and progression-free survival (PFS) using pooled data from phase I, phase II, and oral solution cohorts. Results: Twenty and 12 eligible patients were treated in the phase II and oral solution cohorts, respectively. Hematologic toxicities were the most common adverse events. In phase II, partial responses were observed in 19 evaluable patients (21%). The estimated PFS at 1 year was 34%. In the oral solution cohort, 3 patients (25%) had first cycle dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Alisertib oral solution at 45 mg/m2 had significantly higher median Cmax and exposure compared with tablets at 60 mg/m2. Higher alisertib trough concentration was associated with first cycle DLT, whereas MYCN amplification was associated with inferior PFS. Conclusions: This combination shows antitumor activity, particularly in patients with MYCN nonamplified tumors. Data on an alisertib oral solution expand the population able to be treated with this agent.

AbstractBackgroundVorinostat combined with retinoids produces additive antitumor effects in preclinical studies of neuroblastoma. Higher systemic exposures of vorinostat than achieved in pediatric phase I trials with continuous daily dosing are necessary for in vivo increased histone acetylation and cytotoxic activity. We conducted a phase I trial in children with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat on an interrupted schedule, escalating beyond the previously identified pediatric MTD.MethodsIsotretinoin (cis‐13‐retinoic acid) 80 mg/m2/dose was administered by mouth twice daily on days 1–14 in combination with escalating doses of daily vorinostat up to 430 mg/m2/dose (days 1–4; 8–11) in each 28‐day cycle using the standard 3 + 3 design. Vorinostat pharmacokinetic testing and histone acetylation assays were performed.ResultsTwenty‐nine patients with refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma were enrolled and 28 were evaluable for dose escalation decisions. Median number of cycles completed was two (range 1–15); 11 patients received four or more cycles. Three patients experienced cycle 1 dose‐limiting toxicities. A total of 18 patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicities related to study therapy. The maximum intended dose of vorinostat (430 mg/m2/day, days 1–4; 8–11) was tolerable and led to increased histone acetylation in surrogate tissues when compared to lower doses of vorinostat (P = 0.009). No objective responses were seen.ConclusionsIncreased dose vorinostat (430 mg/m2/day) on an interrupted schedule is tolerable in combination with isotretinoin. This dose led to increased vorinostat exposures and demonstrated increased histone acetylation. Prolonged stable disease in patients with minimal residual disease warrants further investigation.