Lai, Hollie

Summary In adults with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) is valuable for risk stratification. This systematic review explored the role of volumetric parameters in children, adolescents and young adults (CAYA) with cHL. This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) method. Five databases were searched on 16 October 2024. Eligible studies were peer‐reviewed manuscripts, written in English, published since database inception that included patients ≤21 years of age with a diagnosis of cHL treated with chemotherapy ± radiotherapy with a baseline 18 F‐Fluorodeoxyglucose (F‐FDG) PET/CT scan for MTV quantification. The search strategy identified 3669 studies, of which 35 were eligible for inclusion. Fifteen studies (43%) evaluated a cohort exclusively ≤21 years of age. All eight studies that explored the association of baseline PET parameters with known risk factors identified a significant correlation. Nine of 12 papers (75%) demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with disease response to therapy on PET/CT. Fifteen of 20 papers (75%) demonstrated an independent statistically significant correlation with clinical outcomes. In the CAYAHL population, volumetric PET parameters are valuable for risk stratification despite heterogeneity in results. Future harmonization of the segmentation approach will facilitate incorporation of MTV into clinical practice.

AbstractChildhood spinal tumors are rare. Tumors can involve the spinal cord, the meninges, bony spine, and the paraspinal tissue. Optimized imaging should be utilized to evaluate tumors arising from specific spinal compartments. This paper provides consensus‐based recommendations for optimized imaging of tumors arising from specific spinal compartments at diagnosis, follow‐up during and after therapy, and response assessment.

Abstract Purpose: In phase I testing, alisertib tablets with irinotecan and temozolomide showed significant antitumor activity in patients with neuroblastoma. This study sought to confirm activity of this regimen; evaluate an alisertib oral solution; and evaluate biomarkers of clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods: We conducted a two-stage phase II trial of alisertib tablets (60 mg/m2/dose × 7 days), irinotecan (50 mg/m2/dose i.v. × 5 days), and temozolomide (100 mg/m2/dose orally × 5 days) in patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma. The primary endpoint was best objective response. A separate cohort was treated with alisertib at 45 mg/m2 using oral solution instead of tablets. Exploratory analyses sought to identify predictors of toxicity, response, and progression-free survival (PFS) using pooled data from phase I, phase II, and oral solution cohorts. Results: Twenty and 12 eligible patients were treated in the phase II and oral solution cohorts, respectively. Hematologic toxicities were the most common adverse events. In phase II, partial responses were observed in 19 evaluable patients (21%). The estimated PFS at 1 year was 34%. In the oral solution cohort, 3 patients (25%) had first cycle dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Alisertib oral solution at 45 mg/m2 had significantly higher median Cmax and exposure compared with tablets at 60 mg/m2. Higher alisertib trough concentration was associated with first cycle DLT, whereas MYCN amplification was associated with inferior PFS. Conclusions: This combination shows antitumor activity, particularly in patients with MYCN nonamplified tumors. Data on an alisertib oral solution expand the population able to be treated with this agent.