Pinto, Navin

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines (NCCN Guidelines) for Wilms Tumor (WT; nephroblastoma) cover strategies for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of WT, which is the most frequent primary kidney tumor in children. WT can generally be separated into 2 histology types: favorable histology WT and anaplastic WT. Five-year survival is high for children with favorable histology WT who receive appropriate treatment; however, survival rates are much lower for patients who present with higher stage diffuse anaplastic WT. Treatment of WT can range from surgery alone to surgery plus intensive chemotherapy and radiation depending on whether the tumor is unilateral or bilateral, histology, and local stage. The goal of therapy is to maximize cure while minimizing long-term toxicities. The content featured in this issue covers the NCCN panel’s recommendations for overall management of both favorable histology WT and anaplastic WT.

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor diagnosed in children. This inaugural version of the NCCN Guidelines for Neuroblastoma provides recommendations for the diagnosis, risk classification, and treatment of neuroblastoma. The information in these guidelines was developed by the NCCN Neuroblastoma Panel, a multidisciplinary group of representatives with expertise in neuroblastoma, consisting of pediatric oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists from NCCN Member Institutions. The evidence-based and consensus recommendations contained in the NCCN Guidelines are intended to guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate treatments for their patients with this clinically heterogeneous disease.

3053 Background: Recently, early studies have identified circulating stromal cells (CStCs), i.e. Cancer Associated Macrophage-Like cells (CAMLs), in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed invasive cancers, which are phagocytic myeloid immune cells emanating from primary tumors. However, no study has evaluated CAMLs as a pan solid tumor screening tool nor their clinical impact on pt outcomes. We analyzed the blood of untreated newly diagnosed cancer pts (n=441), or in non-malignant conditions (i.e. pancreatic cysts, n=77), or healthy controls (n=100). We found that CAMLs are prevalent (82%) in cancer pt blood, absent in healthy controls (0%) and less common in non-malignant conditions (36%), with correlations to worse clinical outcomes. Methods: Anonymized peripheral blood was taken from n=441 pts before or after confirmation of invasive malignancy [stage I (n=105), stage II (n=125), stage III (n=114), stage IV (n=97) with pathologically confirmed lung (n=84), pancreas (n=61), breast (n=73), prostate (n=65), esophageal (n=34), Renal Cell (n=29), Sarcoma (n=27), or Other (n=68). In addition, anonymized blood was taken from pts with untreated non-malignant conditions including benign breast masses (n=19), Lupus (n=11), liver Cirrhosis (n=6), rising PSA (n=24), or other benign mass (n=17); and from healthy control volunteers (n=100). CAMLs were isolated by CellSieve microfiltration, defined as enlarged polyploid cells with cytokeratin+ and/or CD45/CD14+. Pts were monitored for 0-8 years (median=2.6) for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: CAMLs were found in 82% of all cancer pts averaging 5.4 CAMLs, specifically, in 66% of Stage I, 85% Stage II, 84% Stage III, and 92% Stage IV. No CAMLs were found in any healthy controls, but were in 36% of non-malignant pts. CAML sensitivity in cancer vs healthy was 82% (CI95% 78-85%), specificity=100% (CI95% 96-100%), PPV=100% (CI95% 99-100%), NPV=55% (CI95% 50-60%). CAML sensitivity in cancer vs benign was 82% (CI95% 78-85%), specificity=64% (CI95% 32-44%), PPV=93% (CI95% 90-95%), NPV=38% (CI95% 32-44%). CAML presence was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR=2.0, 95%CI 1.4-2.9, p<0.0001) & OS (HR=2.2, 95%CI 1.4-3.3, p=0.0004), with engorged phagocytic CAMLs (>50um), highly significant for worse PFS (HR=3.3, 95%CI 2.5-4.5, p<0.0001) & OS (HR=3.0, 95%CI 2.1-4.3, p<0.0001). Further, in benign pts positive for CAMLs, 2 pts were in situ, 16 had histologies with increased cancer risk (i.e. IPMN, atypical hyperplasia), and 5 pts died within 3 years. Conclusions: CAMLs appear to be a highly sensitive blood based biomarker that can identify invasive carcinoma in all stages of cancer regardless of subtype, but are not found in healthy controls & rare in non-malignant conditions. Further, enlarged phagocytic CAMLs appeared to correlate with shorter PFS and OS prior to treatment induction.

3535 Background: Peripheral blood allows for a simple non-invasive method for isolating various cancer associated circulating stromal cells (CStCs) which may predict for cancer presence. Cancer Associated Macrophage-Like cells (CAMLs), a specific CStC, are phagocytic myeloid cells that derive from an immunological response to cancer and emanate from primary tumors. Using a filtration platform we screened the peripheral blood of untreated newly diagnosed cancer patients (n = 308) for CAMLs. In parallel, we screened patients with newly diagnosed non-malignant diseases, i.e. lupus, benign cysts, etc. (n = 39), and healthy control samples (n = 76). We found that CAMLs are highly prevalent (87%) in the blood of cancer patients, but uncommon in non-malignant conditions (20%) & absent in healthy individuals (0%). Methods: Anonymized peripheral blood were taken from 308 cancer patients after confirmation of invasive malignancy [stage I (n = 76), stage II (n = 73), stage III (n = 72), stage IV (n = 65) and unstaged non-metastatic (n = 22)] with pathologically confirmed lung (n = 65), pancreas (n = 53), breast (n = 52), prostate (n = 40), esophageal (n = 30), renal cell (n = 18), hepatocellular (n = 15), neuroblastoma (n = 10), melanoma (n = 8), and other (n = 17). Further, anonymized blood was taken from patients with untreated non-malignant conditions including benign breast masses (n = 19), lupus (n = 11), liver cirrhosis (n = 5), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (n = 3), and viral infection (n = 1); or from healthy control volunteers (n = 76). CAMLs were isolated from whole peripheral blood by the CellSieve™ microfiltration technique and defined as enlarged, multinuclear cells with cytokeratin and/or CD45/CD14 positive. Results: CAMLs were found in 87% of all cancer patients regardless of stage, ~5.4 CAMLs/7.5mL blood. Specifically, CAMLs were found in 80% of Stage I, 90% Stage II, 89% Stage III, and 97% Stage IV patients. No CAMLs were found in any healthy controls, but were found in 26% of benign breast masses, 18% of lupus, 0% of BPH and 0% of cirrhosis. In total, CAML sensitivity in cancer vs healthy was 87% (CI95% 82-90%), specificity = 100% (CI95% 95-100%), PPV = 100% (CI95% 100%), NPV = 67% (CI95% 58-71%). CAML sensitivity in cancer vs benign was 87% (CI95% 82-90%), specificity = 80% (CI95% 64-91%), PPV = 97% (CI95% 95-98%), NPV = 43% (CI95% 35-51%). Conclusions: CAMLs, a Circulating Stromal Cell subtype, is a sensitive blood based biomarker found in all stages of cancer that is rare in non-malignant conditions and absent in healthy individuals.

AbstractBackgroundVorinostat combined with retinoids produces additive antitumor effects in preclinical studies of neuroblastoma. Higher systemic exposures of vorinostat than achieved in pediatric phase I trials with continuous daily dosing are necessary for in vivo increased histone acetylation and cytotoxic activity. We conducted a phase I trial in children with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat on an interrupted schedule, escalating beyond the previously identified pediatric MTD.MethodsIsotretinoin (cis‐13‐retinoic acid) 80 mg/m2/dose was administered by mouth twice daily on days 1–14 in combination with escalating doses of daily vorinostat up to 430 mg/m2/dose (days 1–4; 8–11) in each 28‐day cycle using the standard 3 + 3 design. Vorinostat pharmacokinetic testing and histone acetylation assays were performed.ResultsTwenty‐nine patients with refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma were enrolled and 28 were evaluable for dose escalation decisions. Median number of cycles completed was two (range 1–15); 11 patients received four or more cycles. Three patients experienced cycle 1 dose‐limiting toxicities. A total of 18 patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicities related to study therapy. The maximum intended dose of vorinostat (430 mg/m2/day, days 1–4; 8–11) was tolerable and led to increased histone acetylation in surrogate tissues when compared to lower doses of vorinostat (P = 0.009). No objective responses were seen.ConclusionsIncreased dose vorinostat (430 mg/m2/day) on an interrupted schedule is tolerable in combination with isotretinoin. This dose led to increased vorinostat exposures and demonstrated increased histone acetylation. Prolonged stable disease in patients with minimal residual disease warrants further investigation.