Lingle, WL

Abstract Background: Adding adjuvant trastuzumab to chemotherapy for patients (pts) with resected HER2+ breast cancer (BC) improves disease free and overall survival (Perez EA, et al. J Clin Oncol 2011). Understanding which pts are most likely to benefit from these therapies is a goal of our team. Methods: Baseline 1639 annotated tumor specimens from pts enrolled in the phase III N9831 adjuvant trastuzumab trial (NCT00005970) were processed via the >29,000 gene probe DASL technology (Illumina) to identify genomic predictors of pt outcome to Arm A chemotherapy or Arm C chemotherapy plus concurrent trastuzumab. Samples were spotted in 96 well plates, with appropriate replicates. Extensive quality control and internal validation were performed. The association of each gene with recurrence-free survival (RFS) was determined for each treatment arm separately using CoxPH models adjusted for clinical and tumor risk factors. A p < 0.0001 was used to define significance. A geneset analysis (using 408 Kegg/BioCarta genesets) was performed to determine pathways associated with RFS. Results: PRPF4B, EWSR1, BMI1, CNNM1, FOXO4, CLIP2, MCCC1, CHRM2 were found to be significantly associated with RFS for Arm A and AAK1, DAZAP2, TP53INP1, MACF1 and ADHFE1 were associated with RFS for Arm C. The most significant pathway associated with RFS in Arm A was the KEGG hypertrophic cardiomyopathy pathway and for Arm C, the BioCarta pertussis toxin-insensitive CCR5 signaling in macrophage pathway. Conclusions: We have identified 8 genes associated with RFS for pts treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, and 5 genes associated with RFS for pts treated with concurrent trastuzumab and chemotherapy in pts with HER2 early stage BC. In addition, geneset analysis identified BioCarta and Kegg pathways associated with RFS for each arm. Validation in an independent cohort is expected to be completed by the end of 2012. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-04.

Abstract Background: Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), unlike ERα, classically functions as a tumor suppressor in vitro. However, ERβ's biological functions in vivo and predictive/prognostic value in breast cancer are controversial. Methods: Expression of ERβ protein was determined using a well characterized and validated ERβ specific monoclonal antibody that only recognizes the full-length form of this receptor (PPG5/10) in the following 3 cohorts: 1) a cohort with all breast cancer subtypes (n = 182), 2) a prospective NCCTG adjuvant tamoxifen trial for postmenopausal women with ERα positive breast cancer with long-term follow-up (n = 198) and 3) a cohort of 80 triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs). To elucidate the biological functions of ERβ in breast cancer, novel ERβ expressing MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines were developed and characterized using multiple techniques and were examined for responsiveness to various ERβ targeted therapies. Results: About one-third of all breast tumors, regardless of sub-type, were shown to express nuclear ERβ and this expression was independent of ERα or HER2. In the NCCTG 89-30-52 cohort, breast cancer recurrence rates were significantly associated with ERβ protein expression with 10 year recurrence rates of 25%, 15% and 4% for zero, low or high levels of ERβ expression respectively. Interestingly, in TNBCs, nuclear ERβ was expressed at intermediate or high levels in 24% of tumors. In the triple negative MDA-MB-231 cell line, expression of ERβ led to inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in response to estrogen and multiple ERβ specific agonists. Conversely, these same treatments induced proliferation of ERβ-expressing MCF7 cells which endogenously express ERα. However, ERβ expression sensitized MCF7 cells to the anti-proliferative effects of anti-estrogens. Microarray analysis and RT-PCR profiling of MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells revealed that estrogen and ERβ agonists highly induced the expression of multiple cystatins, a family of small secreted cysteine protease inhibitors which function as tumor suppressors, and potently inhibited canonical TGFβ signaling. Conditioned media isolated from estrogen or ERβ agonist treated MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells suppressed the proliferation rates and inhibited TGFβ signaling in other TNBC cell lines, effects that were completely reversed following the depletion of cystatins from the conditioned media. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that ERβ is expressed in a substantial proportion of breast cancers and may have value as a predictive and/or prognostic biomarker. Therapeutic targeting of ERβ may have clinical benefit in multiple breast cancer sub-types; however, the specific drug of choice may vary based on ERα status. Specifically, we have demonstrated that ERβ expression in ERα+ MCF7 cells sensitizes them to the effectiveness of anti-estrogens, an observation that was confirmed in women enrolled in a prospective adjuvant tamoxifen trial. In TNBCs, where targeted therapies are lacking, our data suggest that targeting ERβ with either estrogen or ERβ specific agonists will elicit anti-tumor effects through the induction of cystatins and inhibition of TGFβ signaling resulting in tumor regression and improved patient outcomes. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-04-03.

Abstract Background: Unstained recuts from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues are commonly collected for cooperative group studies. There is concern among pathologists that improper storage conditions can lead to antigen degradation. In an effort to quantify this effect, we compared the expression of HER1 and HER2 on two sets of identical cohort tissue microarrays (TMAs) from the N9831 HER2+ adjuvant phase III trial (NCT00005970; www.clinicaltrials.gov); one freshly cut set (cut April 18, 2011) and a second set stored at 4 degrees for over two years (cut between Nov, 2007 and Jan, 2008). Methods: The two sets of TMA slides containing 1580 tumor samples from the N9831 cohort were treated identically using the AQUA method of quantitative immunofluorescence. HER1 was tested with D38B1 (rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and HER2 with CB11 (mouse monoclonal, Biocare, Inc.) on tumors from 695 patients (712 specimens) in the fresh TMAs and 779 patients (800 specimens) in the old TMAs in up to three-fold redundancy per specimen. Results: Frequency distributions of the expression of HER2 revealed bimodality in the fresh TMAs compared to an attenuated distribution of the old cases. The average score of the entire cohort was significantly lower in old TMAs compared to fresh cuts (paired t-test, p<0.0001). Linear regression of the average HER2 scores from new TMAs versus the average scores from old TMAs showed a slope term of 0.52, which is statistically significantly different from the hypothetical value of 1 (p<0.0001). Regressions between any two fresh slides showed slopes close to 1.0. Similar results were seen for HER1, but fewer positive cases made the changes less dramatic. Conclusions: The storage condition of tissue slides is a critical pre-analytical variable that can dramatically lower the score of HER1 and HER2, artificially. Thus, studies done on inadequately stored slides, either whole sections or TMAs, must be interpreted with caution. Tissue collection and analysis of biomarkers for cooperative group studies should not include unstained recuts, but rather, entire blocks or large cores from tissue blocks. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-04.

Abstract Background The role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in breast cancer has been studied extensively; yet, much less is known about full-length ERβ (ERβ1) and even less about its 4 variant forms (ERβ2-5). We have recently implicated a role for ERβ1 in sensitizing ERα expressing breast cancer cells to anti-estrogens. However, the ability of ERβ2-5 to modulate ERα and ERβ1 activity, and their association with cancer development, progression, and response to estradiol (E2) and anti-estrogens are not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that the presence of ERβ variants may be of diagnostic and clinical relevance for breast cancer patients and describe the development and characterization of a novel, highly specific monoclonal antibody (MC10) that is able to detect their expression in tumor biopsies. Methods: Transient transfection and luciferase assays were used to determine the transcriptional activity of ERβ2-5 in response to E2 and anti-estrogens alone or in combination with ERα and ERβ1. A novel monoclonal antibody targeting all ERβ variants (MC10) was developed and characterized. The sub-cellular localization of ERβ2-5 was determined via confocal microscopy. Finally, the MC10 antibody was used to assess ERβ positivity in breast tumors and was compared to that of another monoclonal antibody which only detects ERβ1. Results: Unlike ERβ1, ERβ2-5 do not activate an estrogen response element (ERE) in response to E2 and instead, slightly repress the activity of this reporter construct. Expression of ERβ2-5 does not significantly alter the transcriptional activity of ERβ1 following E2 treatment. However, ERβ2, 3 and 5, but not ERβ4, significantly enhance the E2-induced transcriptional activity of ERα. Interestingly, expression of ERβ3, 4 and 5, but not ERβ2, enhance the ability of anti-estrogens to block ERα mediated transcriptional activity. Confocal microscopy revealed that ERβ1 and 2 are almost exclusively localized to the cell nucleus. However, ERβ3-5 exhibit significant cytoplasmic and peri-nuclear localization. Immunohistochemistry of breast cancer biopsies using the MC10 antibody revealed multiple staining patterns including tumors which exhibit primarily nuclear staining and others primarily cytoplasmic, both in the presence and absence of ERα. These results are in contrast to the almost exclusive nuclear staining obtained on the same tumors with an ERβ1-specific antibody. Conclusions: ERβ variants exhibit variable sub-cellular localization patterns and can influence the function of ERα, both in response to E2 and anti-estrogens. Therefore, the differential expression of ERβ variants and their cellular localization may influence breast cancer progression and/or therapeutic responses. The use of ERβ antibodies which do not detect all ERβ variants, or the use of a single ERβ antibody which does not discriminate between ERβ1 and its variants, is unlikely to reveal the complete biological significance of total ERβ expression in breast cancer and may in part explain the conflicting studies which have been reported for ERβ in the field. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-03.

Abstract Identification of HER2 as an important cellular marker in the biology and treatment of breast cancer has highlighted the importance of reliable testing methodology. Controversy exists regarding type of test, reliability, definition of positivity, and which test may best predict for patient (pt) efficacy to anti-HER2 therapies. Purpose: To determine the concordance between HER2 results by 3 central laboratories, impact of round-robin adjudication of discordant cases, and heterogeneity in HER2 results using specimens from 3 adjuvant trials where HER2 testing was performed by local and central laboratories for enrollment. Methods: We performed a blinded round-robin exchange of randomly sampled, HER2-normal (IHC-& FISH-) and HER2-positive breast tumors among 3 central laboratories (NCCTG, BCIRG and NSABP) for confirmatory HER2 testing. The 3 laboratories performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HER2 using the HercepTest kit (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2 using the PathVysion HER2 DNA probe kit/HER2/CEN17 probe mixture (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL) on 389 tumor specimens obtained from N9831/BCIRG006 (37 IHC+/FISH+, 33 IHC+/FISH-, 36 IHC-/FISH+, 62 IHC-& FISH-) and BCIRG005 (96 IHC-& FISH-); 123 cases had ≥2 blocks examined from the same pt. HER2 positivity was defined according to FDA-approved guidelines used in the clinical trials (IHC+: 3+ complete membrane staining in >10% cells; FISH+: HER2/CEN17 ratio ≥2.0). The HER2 status (IHC: 3+ vs 0-2+; FISH: amplified vs not) for each block was independently determined at each site; discordant IHC and FISH cases were adjudicated at a face-to-face meeting. Results: Independent reads were concordant across pathologists in IHC status in 351/381 (92%) cases and in FISH status in 343/373 (92%) cases. Upon adjudication, a consensus was reached on 16 and 18 of the discordant IHC and FISH cases, respectively. Among 96 BCIRG005 cases, IHC-and FISH-were confirmed in the primary block in all 96 cases. Among 59 evaluable N9831 HER2-normal cases, IHC-and FISH-were confirmed in the primary block in 57 (97%) cases (but another block tested HER2+ for 4 cases). Among 102 N9831/BCIRG006 HER2+ cases, HER2 positivity was confirmed in the primary block in 73 (72%) cases. Among 118 cases with IHC results for > 1 block, the adjudicated IHC result agreed across blocks in 106 (90%) cases. Among 113 cases with FISH results for >1 block, the adjudicated FISH result agreed in 107 (95%) cases. Among 53 N9831 HER2-normal cases adjudicated as IHC-& FISH-(although they all had a previous local HER2+ test), there was significant improvement in disease-free survival associated with trastuzumab given concurrently with paclitaxel after doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide compared to chemotherapy alone (HR=0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.91; A 23 pts, 10 events; C 30 pts, 5 events). Conclusions: Excellent agreement (96%) was observed among the pathologists at adjudication, suggesting that standardized methods improve assay proficiency. HER2 heterogeneity across blocks was observed more at the protein than at the gene level. In the small subset of N9831 pts adjudicated as HER2-normal trastuzumab benefit was observed. This work was supported by NCI and Genentech. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-02.

Abstract Background: A major issue surrounding the use of therapeutic drugs for the treatment of breast cancer is the eventual development of resistance. Endoxifen, the most potent tamoxifen metabolite, is being developed as a novel endocrine therapy for the treatment of endocrine responsive breast cancer patients. While numerous studies have investigated the process of tamoxifen resistance, no such data exist regarding the mechanism by which cells develop resistance to endoxifen. Here, we describe the development and characterization of a novel endoxifen resistant MCF7 breast cancer cell line and the identification of a specific treatment to effectively target these resistant cells. Methods: MCF7 cells were chronically exposed to concentrations of endoxifen previously demonstrated to be associated with the greatest reductions in estrogen stimulated proliferation and transcription (1000 nM). Changes in the physiological and molecular properties of these cells were monitored during the course of resistance using a wide range of techniques. Results: Following 15 months of endoxifen exposure, an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) was induced in MCF7 cells, characterized by loss of E-cadherin expression, up-regulation of fibronectin and vimentin expression and increased responsiveness to TGFβ. Resistant cells exhibit a 7-fold increase in their proliferation rates relative to parental cells and display basal like properties (triple negative) due to silencing of ERα , progesterone receptor and CD24 expression. Resistant cells were confirmed to be estrogen insensitive through the use of cell proliferation and gene expression studies. Wound healing and cell migration assays revealed that resistant cells are highly aggressive with a significant level of metastatic potential. Microarray analysis revealed over 7500 genes to be differentially expressed in the resistant cell line relative to parental cells using a 2-fold cutoff, of which only 52 genes (0.7%) were determined to be up-regulated. Interestingly, a number of the most highly altered genes have previously been implicated in the development of EMT and/or resistance including Twist2, IGF binding protein 5, GATA and β-tubulin. Based on the identification of P-tubulin as the most up-regulated gene in resistant cells, 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME2) was recognized as a candidate drug to specifically target this resistant cell line due to it known roles in blocking tubulin polymerization. Indeed, 2ME2 exposure resulted in the induction of apoptosis and significant cell death in vitro. Conclusions: Chronic exposure of MCF7 cells to high concentrations of endoxifen led to induction of EMT with cells that are basal like, estrogen and SERM insensitive, highly TGFP responsive with significantly increased proliferation rates and metastatic potential relative to parental cells. These findings suggest that the mechanisms of resistance to endoxifen may differ from those observed with long term exposure to tamoxifen and have identified 2ME2 as a potentially successful alternative therapy for endoxifen resistant breast cancer cells. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-11.

Abstract The central importance of the HER2/Neu/EGFR/RAS signaling pathway has been well established in the growth, invasion and metastasis of human breast cancer, even though oncogenic RAS mutations are rare in breast cancer, activation of the tumor-promoting ERBB/RAS/MEK/MAPK pathway has been consistently documented in high-grade breast tumors. As such, novel approaches to inhibit activated ERBB/RAS signals constitute important measures to block tumor growth and metastasis in mammary tumors. In this study, instead of targeting an upstream signaling component such as HER2/EGFR/RAS, we targeted the most downstream signaling module identified in the RAS pathway — the SIAH proteolytic machinery. SIAH is an evolutionarily conserved RING E3 ligase that is a critical “gatekeeper” required for RAS signal transduction in human cancer cells. SIAH is specifically expressed in tumor cells in 120 human breast cancer patients examined so far. The increased SIAH expression is correlated with increased grades and aggressiveness of human breast cancer. We then asked whether inhibiting the gatekeeper function of SIAH would be effective in blocking mammary tumorigenesis and metastasis in human breast cancer. Our results indicated that SIAH2-deficiency successfully abolished tumor growth of three breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435 and MDA-MB-468) in soft agar assays as well as in athymic nude mice. Importantly, by inhibiting SIAH2 function in highly aggressive human breast cancer cells, we are able to completely block tumorigenesis and metastasis of two highly invasive and metastatic human breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-435). These findings suggest that SIAH2 may be an attractive new therapeutic target for novel breast cancer therapy and developing anti-SIAH molecules will aid in expanding our arsenal of effective anticancer therapies. More effective breast cancer treatments may be obtained by multi-pronged synergistic inhibitions at upstream (HER2/EGFR membrane receptors), midstream (RAS/RAF/MEK/mTOR) and downstream (SIAH E3 ligase) signaling modules in the HER2/EGFR/RAS pathway in parallel. Thus, by attacking the growth-promoting ERBB/RAS pathway at multiple signaling modules simultaneously, we may be in a great position to halt the genesis, progression and metastasis of human breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-15-14.

Abstract In the Breast International Group (BIG) and North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) co-led phase III adjuvant breast cancer trial, ALTTO (Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimisation), two central laboratories, the European Institute of Oncology (IEO; Milan, Italy) and Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN), are responsible for confirming the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), estrogen receptor α(ER), and progesterone receptor status of the primary breast tumors for the Rest of World (excluding China, which conducts a separate central review) and North American patients, respectively, prior to patient study entry. As of December 2009, discordance in HER2 and ER testing between local and central laboratories was observed by both central laboratories. For IEO, 14.5% of 8,037 HER2 cases locally positive [by either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)] were not able to be confirmed as centrally positive; whereas for Mayo, 5.8% of 412 HER2 cases locally positive were not able to be confirmed as centrally positive (Table 1). Central and local IHC ER discordance was 12.1% and 11.7% for 9,021 IEO screened cases and 419 Mayo screened cases, respectively (Table 2). In particular, IEO observed more false-positive (locally positive/centrally negative) HER2 findings than Mayo and Mayo observed more false-positive ER findings than IEO. Purpose: Motivated by the above findings, we launched a ring study to assess whether the central lab results of a subset of local/central discordant ALTTO cases could be confirmed in the other central lab. Methods: IEO and Mayo exchanged and retested a subset of FFPE breast tumors collected in ALTTO. IEO sent 20 HER2 false-positive, 5 ER false-positive, and 5 ER false-negative (locally negative/centrally positive) ALTTO breast tumors to Mayo. Mayo sent 5 HER2 false-positive, 20 ER false-positive, and 5 ER false-negative ALTTO breast tumors to IEO. IEO and Mayo performed IHC for ER according to their own methodology: DAKO cocktail of ER 1D5 and 2.123 monoclonal antibodies and monoclonal ER 1D5 antibody, respectively. The two laboratories performed IHC for HER2 according to the HercepTest® manufacturers’ instructions (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) and FISH for HER2 using the PathVysion HER2 DNA probe kit and the HER2/centromere 17 probe mixture (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL). Results: IEO and Mayo confirmed the central HER2-negative result in 100% of 25 cases. Analyses of ER are ongoing and ER results will be presented. Conclusions: In this subset of patients, enrollment ineligibility did not change when HER2 testing was performed by either IEO or Mayo Clinic central laboratories. Table 1. HER2 Local/Central Lab Results Table 2. ER Local/Central Lab Results Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-36.

Abstract Background: The role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in breast cancer has been studied extensively, and its protein expression is prognostic and a primary determinant of endocrine sensitivity; however, much less is known about the role of ERß. In vitro studies demonstrate a tumor suppressive function for ERß, and we have recently implicated a role for ERα in sensitizing ERα expressing breast cancer cells to the anti-estrogenic effects of endoxifen. However, the in vivo relevance of ERα remains unclear due to conflicting reports. Here, we provide evidence that some of this controversy may be explained by variability in antibody specificity. In addition, we describe the development and characterization of a novel, highly specific monoclonal antibody and provide data regarding ERα expression in human breast cancers. Methods: Five commercially available ERα antibodies were screened for their sensitivity and specificity using western blotting, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry in known ERα negative and positive cell lines as well as in normal human tissue samples. A novel monoclonal ERα antibody (C10) was developed and characterized in the same manner. Following identification of two specific antibodies, ERα expression was assessed in 66 breast tumors collected prior to adjuvant therapy. Samples were scored separately for nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. Results: In depth analysis of commercially available ERα antibodies reveled that the majority were non-specific with substantial cross-reactivity to ERα . Only one commercial antibody (PPG5/10), which solely recognizes full-length ERß, and our newly developed monoclonal antibody, which recognizes full-length and all 4 ERα variants, were determined to be sensitive and specific for ERα expression. These same two antibodies resulted in strong staining for endogenous levels of ERα protein in normal prostate tissue by immunohistochemistry. We further assessed these two antibodies in a set of breast tumors. Preliminary analysis revealed significant differences for ERα positivity between these two antibodies. Based on nuclear staining, 92% of tumors were ERα positive using the PPG5/10 antibody while only 34% were positive with C10. Approximately 50% of all tumors exhibited cytoplasmic staining with both antibodies. Conclusions: Our studies demonstrate that the majority of commercially available ERα antibodies are either non-specific or insensitive for the detection of ERα via immunohistochemistry. The present data call into question the relevance of prior studies which tested the association between clinical outcome and ERα expression and demonstrate the need to further analyze the role of ERα in breast cancer using highly specific and validated antibodies. While both the PPG5/10 and C10 antibodies are highly specific for ERß, the significant discrepancy in nuclear staining between them in breast tumors may be due to changes in epitope availability as a result of post-translational processing. Our newly developed C10 antibody could provide additional discriminatory features which may be useful in predicting response to therapy and/or associations with other clinicopathological factors and such studies are currently underway. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-25.

Abstract Previous findings suggested that patients (pts) with copy number alterations of MYC (8q24) and centromere 8 (CEN 8) in the setting of HER2-positive breast cancer may be associated with improved outcome to adjuvant trastuzumab. Our tissue microarray (TMA) data suggested that alternate cutpoints for MYC copy number anomalies [of 802 pts, those with MYC:CEN8 ratio ≥1.3 or <1.3 & polysomy 8 (N=658; 82%) had a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.44 (P<0.001) and those with MYC copy number ≥2.5 (N=669; 84%) had a HR of 0.42 (P<0.001)] were potentially predictive of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab when administered concurrently with chemotherapy in the NCCTG N9831 HER2+ phase III trial. Purpose: We were interested in determining whether MYC is the target protein responsible for the suggested benefit from trastuzumab. We evaluated the association between MYC protein expression and disease-free survival (DFS) of pts randomized to receive chemotherapy alone (Arm A) or chemotherapy with sequential (Arm B) or concurrent trastuzumab (Arm C) using N9831 TMAs. Patients/Methods: This analysis included 1220 pts from Arms A, B, and C. The percentage of strong (3+) nuclear staining was determined in TMA sections containing 3 cores per block using immunohistochemistry (IHC; clone 9E10, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). A patient's tumor was considered positive (MYC+) if the maximum nuclear 3+ staining percentage across cores was >30% a priori. Median follow-up was 5.8 years. Results: Of 1220 pts with completed IHC analyses, 557 (46%) were MYC+. MYC+ was associated with a higher rate of hormone receptor positivity (58% vs 48%, chi-sq P<0.001) and higher rate of nodal positivity (92% vs 84%, chi-sq P<0.001) but not associated with age, race, tumor histology, tumor grade, or tumor size. In comparing DFS between arms C and A, MYC+ and MYC-pts had HRs of 0.46 (p=0.002; A: 187 pts, 57 events, C: 161 pts, 25 events) and 0.70 (p=0.09; A: 213 pts, 59 events, C: 208 pts, 38 events), respectively (interaction p=0.20). In comparing DFS between arms B and A, MYC+ and MYC-pts had HRs of 0.74 (p=0.11; B: 209 pts, 52 events) and 0.81 (p=0.29; B: 242 pts, 53 events), respectively (interaction p=0.80) (Figure). In addition, pts with nuclear MYC staining of 3+ in 0-9%, 10-30%, 31-60%, and 61-100% of cells had HRs (C vs A) of 0.98 (95% CI 0.53-1.82), 0.54 (95% CI 0.30-0.97), 0.55 (95% CI 0.27-1.12), and 0.37 (95% CI 0.19-0.75). Conclusions: In our analysis of 1220 pts, we observed that MYC protein expression positively correlated with hormone receptor positivity and nodal status. We observed a trend towards greater trastuzumab benefit among MYC+ as compared to MYC-pts. A rising trend in trastuzumab benefit was observed with increasing MYC protein expression. Analyses including pts with whole sections and outcome by MYC protein and gene copy number will be presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-08.