Wiktor, AE

Abstract Introduction: The appropriate assessment of HER2 amplification status is critical to determining which patients should receive HER2-directed therapy. An alternative to FISH is D-ISH (Ventana Medical Systems Tucson, Arizona) which utilizes chromogenic HER2 and chromosome 17 probes. Both FISH and D-ISH utilize formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) human breast cancer tissue specimens. D-ISH has two principle advantages over FISH: it can be visualized using light microscopy and after analysis the specimens can be archived. Methods: We tested 250 samples with FISH and with D-ISH. Fifty specimens were controls: 25 cases with no HER2 or CEP17anomaly and 25 cases with HER2 amplification. There were also 200 test subjects of 50 cases each of chromosome 17 aneusomy, HER2 deletion (HER2/CEP17 ratio <0.8), HER2 duplication (HER2/CEP17 ratio 1.3–1.8), and equivocal results (HER2/CEP17 ratios between 1.8 and 2.2). FISH (Abbott Molecular) and D-ISH analysis were performed using methods described in the appropriate clinical kit package inserts, with the following exception: Four cases with CEP17 and HER2 co-amplification were also included and for FISH analysis these cases were reflexed to the use of chromosome 17 control probe (D17S122). Results: Four samples failed testing by D-ISH. There was a 63% (155/246) concordance between FISH and D-ISH by anomaly (aneusomy, duplication, deletion, etc.) and an 83% concordance by amplification status (non-amplified, equivocal, and amplified). D-ISH detected 18 (62%) of F-ISH-amplified cases. D-ISH resulted in lower estimates of HER2/CEP17 ratios than FISH, and many cases that were equivocal by FISH were normal by D-ISH. D-ISH did not detect HER2 amplification in any of the four HER2 and CEP17 co-amplified cases. Conclusions: We observed a lower concordance rate between FISH and D-ISH than the ∼95% rate in the D-ISH package insert. This lower concordance rate is likely a result of how this study was designed: it was biased toward common chromosome 17 anomalies and difficult specimens. Such specimens comprise about 60% of our current clinical HER2 biomarker practice. D-ISH may underestimate the HER2/CEP17 ratio, or FISH may overestimate this ratio. D-ISH also does not reliably detect HER2 amplification when the centromere of chromosome 17 is also co-amplifed. Compared to FISH, in this study cohort D-ISH had a significant false negative rate for the detection of HER2 amplification. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD02-05.

Abstract Identification of HER2 as an important cellular marker in the biology and treatment of breast cancer has highlighted the importance of reliable testing methodology. Controversy exists regarding type of test, reliability, definition of positivity, and which test may best predict for patient (pt) efficacy to anti-HER2 therapies. Purpose: To determine the concordance between HER2 results by 3 central laboratories, impact of round-robin adjudication of discordant cases, and heterogeneity in HER2 results using specimens from 3 adjuvant trials where HER2 testing was performed by local and central laboratories for enrollment. Methods: We performed a blinded round-robin exchange of randomly sampled, HER2-normal (IHC-& FISH-) and HER2-positive breast tumors among 3 central laboratories (NCCTG, BCIRG and NSABP) for confirmatory HER2 testing. The 3 laboratories performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HER2 using the HercepTest kit (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2 using the PathVysion HER2 DNA probe kit/HER2/CEN17 probe mixture (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL) on 389 tumor specimens obtained from N9831/BCIRG006 (37 IHC+/FISH+, 33 IHC+/FISH-, 36 IHC-/FISH+, 62 IHC-& FISH-) and BCIRG005 (96 IHC-& FISH-); 123 cases had ≥2 blocks examined from the same pt. HER2 positivity was defined according to FDA-approved guidelines used in the clinical trials (IHC+: 3+ complete membrane staining in >10% cells; FISH+: HER2/CEN17 ratio ≥2.0). The HER2 status (IHC: 3+ vs 0-2+; FISH: amplified vs not) for each block was independently determined at each site; discordant IHC and FISH cases were adjudicated at a face-to-face meeting. Results: Independent reads were concordant across pathologists in IHC status in 351/381 (92%) cases and in FISH status in 343/373 (92%) cases. Upon adjudication, a consensus was reached on 16 and 18 of the discordant IHC and FISH cases, respectively. Among 96 BCIRG005 cases, IHC-and FISH-were confirmed in the primary block in all 96 cases. Among 59 evaluable N9831 HER2-normal cases, IHC-and FISH-were confirmed in the primary block in 57 (97%) cases (but another block tested HER2+ for 4 cases). Among 102 N9831/BCIRG006 HER2+ cases, HER2 positivity was confirmed in the primary block in 73 (72%) cases. Among 118 cases with IHC results for > 1 block, the adjudicated IHC result agreed across blocks in 106 (90%) cases. Among 113 cases with FISH results for >1 block, the adjudicated FISH result agreed in 107 (95%) cases. Among 53 N9831 HER2-normal cases adjudicated as IHC-& FISH-(although they all had a previous local HER2+ test), there was significant improvement in disease-free survival associated with trastuzumab given concurrently with paclitaxel after doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide compared to chemotherapy alone (HR=0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.91; A 23 pts, 10 events; C 30 pts, 5 events). Conclusions: Excellent agreement (96%) was observed among the pathologists at adjudication, suggesting that standardized methods improve assay proficiency. HER2 heterogeneity across blocks was observed more at the protein than at the gene level. In the small subset of N9831 pts adjudicated as HER2-normal trastuzumab benefit was observed. This work was supported by NCI and Genentech. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-02.

Abstract Previous findings suggested that patients (pts) with copy number alterations of MYC (8q24) and centromere 8 (CEN 8) in the setting of HER2-positive breast cancer may be associated with improved outcome to adjuvant trastuzumab. Our tissue microarray (TMA) data suggested that alternate cutpoints for MYC copy number anomalies [of 802 pts, those with MYC:CEN8 ratio ≥1.3 or <1.3 & polysomy 8 (N=658; 82%) had a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.44 (P<0.001) and those with MYC copy number ≥2.5 (N=669; 84%) had a HR of 0.42 (P<0.001)] were potentially predictive of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab when administered concurrently with chemotherapy in the NCCTG N9831 HER2+ phase III trial. Purpose: We were interested in determining whether MYC is the target protein responsible for the suggested benefit from trastuzumab. We evaluated the association between MYC protein expression and disease-free survival (DFS) of pts randomized to receive chemotherapy alone (Arm A) or chemotherapy with sequential (Arm B) or concurrent trastuzumab (Arm C) using N9831 TMAs. Patients/Methods: This analysis included 1220 pts from Arms A, B, and C. The percentage of strong (3+) nuclear staining was determined in TMA sections containing 3 cores per block using immunohistochemistry (IHC; clone 9E10, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). A patient's tumor was considered positive (MYC+) if the maximum nuclear 3+ staining percentage across cores was >30% a priori. Median follow-up was 5.8 years. Results: Of 1220 pts with completed IHC analyses, 557 (46%) were MYC+. MYC+ was associated with a higher rate of hormone receptor positivity (58% vs 48%, chi-sq P<0.001) and higher rate of nodal positivity (92% vs 84%, chi-sq P<0.001) but not associated with age, race, tumor histology, tumor grade, or tumor size. In comparing DFS between arms C and A, MYC+ and MYC-pts had HRs of 0.46 (p=0.002; A: 187 pts, 57 events, C: 161 pts, 25 events) and 0.70 (p=0.09; A: 213 pts, 59 events, C: 208 pts, 38 events), respectively (interaction p=0.20). In comparing DFS between arms B and A, MYC+ and MYC-pts had HRs of 0.74 (p=0.11; B: 209 pts, 52 events) and 0.81 (p=0.29; B: 242 pts, 53 events), respectively (interaction p=0.80) (Figure). In addition, pts with nuclear MYC staining of 3+ in 0-9%, 10-30%, 31-60%, and 61-100% of cells had HRs (C vs A) of 0.98 (95% CI 0.53-1.82), 0.54 (95% CI 0.30-0.97), 0.55 (95% CI 0.27-1.12), and 0.37 (95% CI 0.19-0.75). Conclusions: In our analysis of 1220 pts, we observed that MYC protein expression positively correlated with hormone receptor positivity and nodal status. We observed a trend towards greater trastuzumab benefit among MYC+ as compared to MYC-pts. A rising trend in trastuzumab benefit was observed with increasing MYC protein expression. Analyses including pts with whole sections and outcome by MYC protein and gene copy number will be presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-08.

Abstract Abstract #56 Background: Recent findings from NSABP B-31 suggested that breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) with c-MYC (MYC)/HER2 co-amplification in their primary tumors may benefit more in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) from adjuvant trastuzumab (n=471; p<0.0001, HR 0.24; 13 vs. 51 events) than those pts with only HER2 amplification in their primary tumors (n=1078, p=0.007, HR 0.63; 55 vs. 82 events).
 Purpose: The overall objective of this analysis is to determine the association between MYC/HER2 co-amplification and outcome of pts randomized to receive chemotherapy alone (Arm A) or chemotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab (Arm C) on N9831.
 Patients/Methods: This analysis included 868 pts from the HER2+ NCCTG N9831 Intergroup adjuvant trastuzumab phase III clinical trial on Arms A or C. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed at a central laboratory, Mayo Clinic Clinical Cytogenetics Laboratory, using dual probe mixtures for HER2 (17q11.2-12/centromere 17) and for MYC (8q24/centromere 8). The HER2 amplification status in whole tissue sections was evaluated to determine eligibility of pts for N9831. Tissue microarrays containing three cores from each patient's tumor were analyzed for MYC amplification status. The gene and centromere copy number as well as the distribution of the signals for each marker were determined in sixty non-overlapping interphase nuclei.
 Results: Of 273 pts with completed FISH analyses, 34 (12%) pts had MYC amplification. The rate of MYC amplification was similar across arms (18/135 [13%] vs. 16/138 [12%]; ChiS p=0.66). Co-amplification of MYC/HER2 was observed in 32 (12%) pts with similar co-amplification rates across arms (17/135 [13%] vs. 15/138 [11%]; ChiS p=0.66). Based on preliminary analyses, MYC amplification and MYC/HER2 co-amplification do not appear to be associated with race, menopausal status, hormone receptor status, nodal status, tumor histology, tumor grade, or tumor size (all ChiS p>0.05); however, MYC amplified pts were significantly younger than MYC non-amplified pts (mean 46.4 vs. 51.0, t-test p=0.02) and MYC/HER2 co-amplified pts were significantly younger than MYC/HER2 non-co-amplified pts (mean 45.9 vs. 51.0, t-test p=0.01).
 Conclusions: In our initial analyses of 239 pts, we observed a lower frequency of MYC/HER2 co-amplification than the previously reported 30% for NSABP B-31. Complete FISH analyses of 868 pts in N9831 and association with DFS will be presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 56.