Sepiashvili, Lusia

Abstract Background Vitamin D supplementation is common practice for neonates and infants due to limited stores of vitamin D at birth. Although not commonly encountered, vitamin D toxicity can occur due to over-supplementation. However, toxic concentrations are often not included in method validation experiments, and assays often are not validated in the neonatal population. Methods We compared serial 25 hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] measurements in pre-term neonates receiving 25(OH)D supplementation and identified 12 patients wherein concentrations of 25(OH)D were above 50 ng/mL (125 nM) that required additional investigations as the 25(OH)D results did not match the clinical picture. Available samples were compared across 4 immunoassay platforms (LIAISON XL, Roche Cobas e602, Abbott Alinity i, and Siemens Centaur XP) and LC–MS/MS. Results Concentrations of 25(OH)D observed on one individual immunoassay platform (LIAISON XL) fluctuated substantially between subsequent blood draws in select neonates with elevated concentrations. Serum samples from these patients showed variable agreement between LC–MS/MS and other immunoassay platforms. These fluctuations were not explained by the presence of 3-epimer-25(OH)D or 24,25(OH)2D. Conclusions Although we were unable to identify a cause for the variable elevated results, our findings suggest that neonatal 25(OH)D measurements alone should not be used for assessment of nutritional monitoring, and that clinical correlation and other laboratory parameters including ionized calcium should be considered.

Abstract Background The clinical laboratory continues to play a critical role in managing the coronavirus pandemic. Numerous US Food and Drug Administration emergency use authorization (EUA) and laboratory-developed test (LDT) serologic assays have become available. The performance characteristics of these assays and their clinical utility continue to be defined in real time during this pandemic. The AACC convened a panel of experts from clinical chemistry, microbiology, and immunology laboratories; the in vitro diagnostics industry; and regulatory agencies to provide practical recommendations for implementation and interpretation of these serologic tests in clinical laboratories. Content The currently available EUA serologic tests and platforms, information on assay design, antibody classes including neutralizing antibodies, and the humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 are discussed. Verification and validation of EUA and LDT assays are described, along with a quality management approach. Four indications for serologic testing are outlined. Recommendations for result interpretation, reporting comments, and the role of orthogonal testing are also presented. Summary This document aims to provide a comprehensive reference for laboratory professionals and healthcare workers to appropriately implement SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays in the clinical laboratory and to interpret test results during this pandemic. Given the more frequent occurrence of outbreaks associated with either vector-borne or respiratory pathogens, this document will be a useful resource in planning for similar scenarios in the future.

Abstract BACKGROUND Free light chain (FLC) quantification is the most analytically sensitive blood-based method commercially available to diagnose and monitor patients with plasma cell disorders (PCDs). However, instead of directly detecting monoclonal FLCs (mFLCs), FLC assays indirectly assess clonality based on quantifying κ and λ FLCs and determination of the к/λ FLC ratio. Often an abnormal FLC ratio is the only indication of a PCD, and confirmation by a direct method increases diagnostic confidence. The aim of this study was to develop an analytically sensitive method for direct detection of mFLCs. METHODS Patient sera (n = 167) previously assessed by nephelometric FLC quantification and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) were affinity enriched for IgG, IgA, and total and free κ and λ light chains and subjected to MALDI-TOF MS. Relative analytical sensitivity of these methods was determined using serially diluted sera containing mFLCs. RESULTS In sera with abnormal FLC ratios (n = 127), 43% of monoclonal proteins were confirmed by IFE, 57% by MALDI-TOF MS without FLC enrichment, and 87% with FLC enrichment MALDI-TOF MS. In sera with normal FLC ratios (n = 40), the FLC MALDI-TOF MS method identified 1 patient with an mFLC. Serial dilution and analysis of mFLC containing sera by IFE, nephelometry, and FLC MALDI-TOF MS demonstrated that FLC MALDI-TOF MS analysis had the highest analytical sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS FLC immunoenrichment coupled to MALDI-TOF MS enables direct detection of mFLCs and significantly increases the confirmation of abnormal serum FLC ratios over IFE and MALDI-TOF MS without FLC enrichment, thereby providing added confidence for diagnosing FLC PCDs.