Ernst, Brenda

Abstract Objective The validity of progression-free survival (PFS) as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) in the antibody-drug conjugate (ADCs) era remains uncertain. We evaluated the association between treatment effects on PFS and OS in randomized trials of ADCs for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and explored the surrogate threshold effect (STE). Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for published randomized controlled phase II–IV trials evaluating ADCs in mBC and reporting hazard ratios (HRs) for both PFS and OS. A meta-epidemiological approach was used. The primary metric was the ratio of hazard ratios (rHR = HR_PFS/ HR_OS), with rHR < 1 indicating a larger effect on PFS. Trial-level associations were assessed using weighted linear regression (R²) and Spearman’s correlation. Results Twenty-one trials (n = 21; 18 phase III) evaluating nine ADCs were included. The pooled rHR was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73–0.86), indicating a larger relative effect on PFS than OS. Numerically, the largest discrepancies were observed in triple-negative disease (rHR 0.72) and trials allowing crossover (rHR 0.71). Concordant statistical significance between endpoints occurred in 76% of the trials, whereas 24% showed a significant PFS benefit without OS improvement. The trial-level association between PFS and OS was moderate (R² = 0.62; ρ = 0.67). Conclusion Treatment effects on PFS consistently exceeded those on OS, although effect directions were highly concordant between endpoints. These findings provide an exploratory framework to contextualize the relationship between PFS and OS in ADC trials, requiring further validation in diverse clinical settings.

639 Background: Large cohort studies have shown a survival benefit with the use of GLP1 receptor agonists (GLP1 RA) in cancer patients. The impact of GLP1 RA usage in breast cancer (BC) and the different subtypes is unknown. To investigate the potential influence of GLP1 RA usage on BC survival, a study was conducted on a large institutional database. Methods: A de-identified institutional database identified newly diagnosed Stage I, II, and III BC patients from 2005 to present and use of GLP1 RA. The study compared survival rates for BC patients with and without GLP1 RA and further stratified by BC subtype [ER+HER2-, HER2+, ER-PR-HER2-(triple negative BC (TNBC))], BMI, and age. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate overall survival. This study analyzed de-identified data accessed through Mayo Clinic Platform Discover. Per 45 CFR 46.102, this activity did not require IRB review. Data was extracted using an established privacy-preserving protocol and de-identified via expert determination under the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Raw EHR data and other unreported data cannot be shared due to de-identification parameters. Results: 88015 BC patients were identified, of which 3919 (4.5%) received GLP1 RA. The 5-year survival rate was 98.5% with vs 85.5% without GLP1 RA (p-value <0.0001). The survival benefit persisted for different BMI’s and ages: BMI >30 (98.4% vs 85.1%), >25 (98.4% vs 85.4%), and age <50 (99.5% vs 89.3%) and >50 (98.1% vs 84.8%) [all p<0.0001]. 21770 patients with ER+ disease were identified, of which 1412 (6.5%) received GLP1 RA. The 5-year survival rate was 99.0% vs 87.7% (p-value <0.0001). The survival benefit persisted by BMI and age: BMI >30 (99.0% vs 86.2%), >25 (98.9% vs 87.1%) and age <50 (99.6% vs 90.5%) and >50 (98.7% vs 87.2%) [all p<0.0001]. 3599 patients with HER2+ disease were identified, of which 202 (5.6%) received GLP1 RA. The 5-year survival rate was 99.3% vs 80.1% (p-value <0.0001). The survival benefit persisted by stratification: BMI >30 (100.0% vs 80.0%, p-value <0.0004), and <25 (97.7% vs 76.2%, p-value <0.019), and age <50 (100% vs 87.0%, p-value <0.043) and > 50 (99.0% vs 77.2%, p-value <0.0002). 8389 patients with TNBC disease were identified, of which 360 (4.3%) received GLP1 RA. The 5-year survival rate was 91.0% vs 71.9% (p-value <0.0001). The survival benefit persisted by stratification: BMI >30 (96.4% vs 72.9%, p-value <0.0001), >25 (93.2% vs 71.8%, p-value <0.0001), and age <50 (96.0% vs 73.0%, p-value <0.0028) and >50 (88.9% vs 71.8%, p-value <0.0001). For those TNBC patients who received GLP1 RA, having a BMI >30 conferred a protective effect with a 5-year survival rate was 97.9 vs 89.8% (p-value <0.0014). Conclusions: The study suggests that GLP1-RA improves 5-year survival rates of patients with BC and this applies to all subtypes of BC. These results suggest that further study of the impact of GLP1-RA on BC patients is warranted.

536 Background: Folate receptor alpha (FRα) is overexpressed in ~80% of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). We previously demonstrated that patients (pts) with breast cancer naturally mount immune responses to FRα. In prior Phase I and II studies, a GM-CSF-adjuvanted FRα peptide vaccine (FRPV) was safe and induced durable FRα-specific T-cell immunity in 83–90% of pts with breast and ovarian cancer. Methods: Eligible pts were women ≥18 years with TNBC (ER/PR ≤10%) with 1+ of the following: stage ≥T1c disease, node-positivity, or residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive FRPV or placebo (GM-CSF alone) every 28 days for cycles 2-7 and then every six months for 7 booster doses, with cycle 1 consisting of cyclophosphamide 50mg orally twice daily for days 1-7 and 15-21 (in both arms). Randomization was stratified by chemotherapy setting (adjuvant only vs neoadjuvant) and stage (I/II vs III). FRα expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The study was designed to detect (at 30 months after the last pt enrolled) a disease-free survival (DFS) difference of 14% assuming a 3.5-year DFS rate of 70% in the control group and with 78% power. Results: 280 pts were enrolled (median age 52). The majority had stage I or II tumors (n = 219, 78%). There were numerically more node-positive tumors in the vaccine arm, 78 (41%) vs 27 (32%), p = 0.15. Median follow-up was 3.5 years, and 33 (FRPV: 25, placebo: 8) DFS events were observed; 3.5-year DFS rate was 88% with FRPV and 90% with placebo (HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.64–3.15; p = 0.39). Overall survival (OS) also did not differ by arm (HR 2.48, 95% CI 0.55–11.20; p = 0.22). Among node-positive pts (n = 105), DFS did not differ between arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.34–2.66; p = 0.92). However, a numerical DFS event rate improvement (14% for vaccine vs. 26% for placebo) was observed in 61 patients with stage III disease (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.16–1.68; p = 0.26). DFS did not differ by chemotherapy setting or by receipt of anthracycline, capecitabine, and/or an immune checkpoint inhibitor. FRPV was well tolerated, with predominantly grade 1–2 adverse events (AEs) and no vaccine-related grade ≥4 AEs. FRα expression was available from tumor in 230 pts, with 72% expressing > 0. Overall, DFS was not significantly associated with FRα expression (0 vs > 0; HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.21–1.44; p = 0.21), and no significant differences in DFS by FRα expression were observed between treatment arms. Conclusions: FRPV following oral cyclophosphamide was safe, with no vaccine-related high-grade AEs. While no significant improvement in DFS or OS was observed overall, a numeric trend toward improved DFS was observed in pts with stage III TNBC. This finding is hypothesis-generating and supports further evaluation of FRα-targeted vaccination in higher-risk TNBC. Immune correlative analyses are ongoing to better define vaccine immunogenicity and its relationship to clinical outcomes. Clinical trial information: W81XWH-15-1-0293.

Abstract Background: Up to 50% of patients with breast cancer experience chemotherapy-inducednausea (CIN) and 95% experience fatigue. A comprehensive understanding of biological mechanisms remains elusive. Herein, we evaluated the association of CIN and fatigue with clinical and multi-omics features, including serum and stool metabolites before (T1) to after chemotherapy (T2). Methods: Patients with breast cancer (n=36) who were to receive chemotherapy, provided symptom assessment using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, stool and blood samples at T1 and T2. Patients provided dietary intake data using a Dietary Screener Questionnaire at T1. Descriptive and univariate analyses evaluated associations of co-occurringsymptoms and diet with CIN and fatigue at T2. Gut microbiome was sequenced using shotgun metagenomics. Targeted metabolomics was performed on stool and serum. Shift in the abundance of taxonomic groups and metabolite levels from T1 to T2 were evaluated in association with CIN and fatigue. Results: Approximately 64% of the patients experienced CIN and 94% experienced fatigue atT2. Three gastrointestinal symptoms co-occurred with CIN and fatigue. Higher daily average intake of calcium (p=0.013) and dairy (p=0.035) were associated with CIN. Levels of hexosylceramides, ceramide, phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelins were significantly perturbed in association with CIN and fatigue (p&lt;0.05). Conclusion: CIN and fatigue are associated with perturbation in the sphingolipid turnover pathway, which negatively impacts functions in the gut-liver axis that include apoptosis activity and change in bile acid levels. Confirmatory studies are warranted to support the development of interventions to alleviate CIN and fatigue in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.Keywords: breast cancer; chemotherapy-induced nausea; fatigue; metabolites; sphingolipids Citation Format: Komal Preet Singh, Brenda J. Ernst, Jun Chen, Surendra Dasari, Felipe Batalini, Cindy Tofthagen, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Keenan Pituch, Linda Chlan. Perturbations in gut liver axis functions are associated with chemotherapy induced nausea and fatigue in patients with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6309.

Abstract Background: Patients with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for HER2-positive breast cancer remain at high risk for recurrence even with standard adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). H2NVAC, a multi-epitope HER2 peptide vaccine, has previously demonstrated the ability to elicit robust and durable immune responses. Here, we assessed the safety and early immunogenicity of H2NVAC in combination with T-DM1 in this high-risk population. Methods: Patients with stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer and residual invasive disease following NAC and HER2-directed therapy received standard adjuvant T-DM1 alongside six priming doses of H2NVAC administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) within 21 days of the first vaccination, with adverse events graded per CTCAE v5.0. Immunogenicity assessments included HER2-specific T-cell responses measured by IFNγ ELISpot and HER-specific serum antibodies measured by ELISA at baseline and 30 days after the sixth priming dose. Results: 20 patients were enrolled. H2NVAC plus T-DM1 was well tolerated with no DLTs observed. All treatment-emergent AEs were grade 1-2, with fatigue (grade 1 60%, grade 2 5%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (grade 1 35%, grade 2 10%), elevated alkaline phosphatase (grade 1 40%), nausea (grade 1 35%, grade 2 5%), arthralgia (grade 1 30%), and injection-site reactions (grade 1 50%) being most common. Robust vaccine-specific T-cell responses by ELISpot were observed in 94% of evaluable patients, who mounted HER2-specific T-cell responses at 30 days after the sixth priming dose, with a mean 197-fold increase over baseline. Further CYTOF analysis showed a significant decrease in exhausted T-cell phenotypes, with reduced LAG3 and TIM3 expression on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. For antibody responses by ELISA, 26% of patients developed HER2 protein-specific antibody responses at this time point. There was no significant increase in antibodies to H2NVAC peptides or to unrelated tumor antigens (p53, IGFBP2, TERT, myoglobin) at 30 days after the sixth vaccine. Ongoing correlative analyses will assess the evolution of immune responses at later time points following completion of T-DM1 therapy. Conclusions: Concurrent administration of H2NVAC with T-DM1 was safe and did not increase toxicity beyond single-agent T-DM1. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that a cancer vaccine can be delivered concurrently with an antibody-drug conjugate without increasing adverse effects while still eliciting robust T-cell responses. Ongoing analyses will further define the kinetics and durability of vaccine-induced antibody and T-cell responses at later time points, as well as evaluate the efficacy of H2NVAC in reducing recurrence risk in the randomized phase 2 trial. Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Sharmila Giri, Andy J. Ness, David W. Hillman, Nadine Norton, Davitte Cogen, Brian M. Necela, Aziza Nassar, Donald W. Northfelt, Pooja Advani, Rohit Rao, Alvaro Mareno-Aspitia, Brenda Ernst, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Matthew P. Goetz, Keith L. Knutson. Safety, tolerability, and early immune responses in the safety run-in of an HER2 multi-epitope vaccine combined with T-DM1 in residual HER2-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6715.

Abstract Background: Accurate staging is essential for treatment selection, prognosis assessment, and trial eligibility. While prior studies attempted automating pathological (p) staging, few address clinical (c) staging and no studies have compared LLM-derived staging with clinician staging during clinical visit and retrospective cancer registry staging. Methods: We developed a multi-agent framework using Gemini-2.0-Flash-001 and GPT-5 to (1) identify reports (2) extract key data, and (3) apply AJCC 8th edition staging criteria. LLM staging was compared with clinician documentation and registry staging in breast cancer patients. Clinician-registry agreement served as the reference standard. Two independent breast oncologists reviewed discordant cases. Results: We analyzed 122 randomly selected breast cancer patients across all three Mayo Clinic sites from 2018 - 2023. LLM performance matched or exceeded human inter-rater agreement for pathological staging (95-99.2% vs. 95-98.4%). Clinical staging was more challenging, with LLM concordance of 73-77.9% for cT and 87-89.3% for cN versus 87.8% and 91.0% clinician-registry agreement. Among 89 patients with clinician-registry concordance, LLM concordance was 98.9% for pT/pN, 79.8% for cT, and 91.0% for cN. Experts favored LLM staging in 27.8% (5/18) of cT and 25.0% (2/8) of cN discordances. Error analysis revealed LLM challenges in handling non-mass enhancements (6 cases), selecting radiologic measurements (2 cases), identifying discrete masses (2 cases), and miscellaneous (3 cases). Conclusion: LLMs achieved human-level performance for pathological staging (98%), supporting human-in-the-loop deployment. For clinical staging (79.8% cT, 91.0% cN), future work must enhance multimodal reasoning and integrate physical examination data. Prospective validation is needed to assess real-world impact. With targeted refinements and oversight, automated staging can transform registry workflows while augmenting clinical decision-making. Citation Format: Arshad Mohammed, Umair Ayub, Pooja Advani, Shakeela W. Bahadur, Amye J. Tevaarwerk, Tufia C. Haddad, Elisabeth I. Heath, Brenda J. Ernst, Ben Zhou, Cui Tao, Sara J. Holton, Karthik V. Giridhar, Irbaz B. Riaz. Automating clinical and pathological staging for breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2744.

Abstract Introduction: An Our Practice Advisory (OPA), formerly known as Best Practice Advisory (BPA), is an electronic health record (EHR) tool. OPAs identify key parameters to alert providers of potential interventions that could enhance quality of care. Such functionality is increasingly relevant given the rapid pace of new drug approvals. Within the Mayo Clinic system, we previously identified that amongst Mayo Clinic patients (pts) meeting the MonarchE criteria, 28% of pts did not undergo a documented discussion with their provider regarding the role of adjuvant abemaciclib (Premji, SABCS 2024). Further, a Flatiron study identified that only 40% of eligible pts received abemaciclib (Sandoval, Miami Breast 2025). To address this practice gap, in 2024 we began to implement EHR clinical decision support by creating an OPA trigger for pts eligible for an adjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i). Here we report on ‘action taken’ versus not for the OPA and the most common reasons for re-prompts. Methods: The Mayo Breast Disease Group designed an OPA including pts who are within 14 months of a clinical or pathologic diagnosis of high-risk early-stage breast cancer. We leveraged structured data captured in the Epic staging forms (Epic Systems) to identify pts with clinical or pathologic T-stage, N-stage, grade, ± Ki-67/ multigene signature to identify ER+/HER2- pts eligible for adjuvant ribociclib or abemaciclib based on FDA approvals. The OPA was triggered by a patient encounter in oncology when endocrine therapy (but not CDK4/6i) was on the active medication list resulting in a hard stop. The OPA gathered limited details about whether adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors were discussed and whether the provider followed a link that resulted in prescribing one—considered an indicator of action taken. In this IRB-exempt quality improvement project, we describe the responses captured in the OPA trigger utilizing Epic tools. Results: The OPA went live on 1/10/2025. Over a 5-month period post OPA initiation, we identified 517 OPA alerts among 332 unique pts. Their median age was 62.5 years, and the majority were female (97%). The median time to resolve the OPA was 17.5 seconds (range 2-567 seconds). 12.6% (65/517) of the time there was ‘action taken’ by selecting the hyperlink to potentially start a treatment plan. Providers selected the following OPA pre-set responses: ‘re-prompt in one month’ 248 (48%), ‘patient not a candidate for therapy’ 48 (9%), ‘patient declines’ 69 (13%), ‘outside oncologist will prescribe’ 36 (7%), ‘not discussed’ 44 (9%), and unknown 72 (14%). The most common free text comments among the 517 OPA alerts (summarized) included: ‘revisit in future’ 108 (21%), ‘too early’ 65 (13%), ‘patient declines’ 66 (13%), ‘outside oncologist will start’ 31 (6%), ‘not a candidate’ 26 (5%), and ‘co-morbidities’ 18 (3%). Erroneous OPA prompting occurred in 14 (3%) who previously failed a CDK4/6i due to toxicity and in 18 (3%) for pts currently on a CDK4/6i. 30 (6%) OPA comments noted that they discussed or started therapy that day. Conclusion: The OPA offered clinical decision support and ensured that clinicians considered prescribing CDK 4/6i in all pts identified as eligible, and captured deferrals. Refinements are needed to ensure appropriate timing of OPA and minimize erroneous firing. The OPA remains active and captures the reason for deferral of adjuvant CDK 4/6i prescription. This data pairs real world decision making to better understand clinically meaningful application of improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Citation Format: S. Premji, P. Advani, S. Chumsri, L. Mina, J. Taraba, J. Carroll, J. Hoppenworth, E. Cathcart-Rake, T. Haddad, B. Rudder, G. Choong, D. Idossa, C. O’Sullivan, S. Yadav, K. Ruddy, P. Peethambaram, T. Hobday, M. Goetz, R. Rao, B. Ernst, F. Batalini, R. Leon-Ferre, A. Tevaarwerk, K. Giridhar. Implementing an Our Practice Advisory (OPA) to provide clinical decision support for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors in early-stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer: The Mayo Clinic Experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-11-10.

Introduction Despite growing evidence to characterise cancer-associated cognitive decline (CACD) in women with breast cancer, interventions to mitigate CACD are limited. Emerging evidence suggests aerobic exercise may enhance cognition after breast cancer diagnosis and treatment; yet, CACD remains an understudied outcome of exercise, and few high-quality studies have been conducted. In addition to knowledge gaps in effectiveness, the translation of exercise interventions to community settings remains challenging. The Breast cancer Reasoning and Activity INtervention (BRAIN) investigates the effectiveness of aerobic exercise training, delivered in a community-based setting, for improving cognitive function in women with breast cancer and gathers information on the implementation success of the intervention. Methods and analysis This Hybrid Type I effectiveness–implementation study is conducted at an academic medical centre in the southwestern United States in partnership with a non-profit, community health and wellness organisation. The study enrols 160 women diagnosed with stage I–IIIa breast cancer and within 3–36 months of treatment completion into a 1:1 randomised controlled trial. Individuals randomised to the exercise group receive a 6-month, individually tailored aerobic exercise programme delivered by exercise trainers employed at local community fitness centres. The programme is progressive in nature and designed to help participants achieve aerobic exercise levels consistent with guidelines for cancer survivors. Individuals randomise to the control group receive a 6-month health education control intervention delivered virtually by hospital-based health educators. Cognitive performance (primary), self-reported cognition, patient-reported outcomes, physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness are measured at baseline, 6 months (postintervention) and 12 months (follow-up). Brain structure and function are measured via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and 6 months. Implementation outcomes are defined by the RE-AIM framework, which includes reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance. RE-AIM outcomes are measured at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and ongoing during the study. Ethics and dissemination This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (#23-000020). All participants provide informed consent prior to participation. Findings will be disseminated to scientific, clinical and community audiences through manuscripts, presentations and newsletters. Trial registration number NCT04816006.