Giri, Sharmila

Abstract Background: Patients with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for HER2-positive breast cancer remain at high risk for recurrence even with standard adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). H2NVAC, a multi-epitope HER2 peptide vaccine, has previously demonstrated the ability to elicit robust and durable immune responses. Here, we assessed the safety and early immunogenicity of H2NVAC in combination with T-DM1 in this high-risk population. Methods: Patients with stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer and residual invasive disease following NAC and HER2-directed therapy received standard adjuvant T-DM1 alongside six priming doses of H2NVAC administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) within 21 days of the first vaccination, with adverse events graded per CTCAE v5.0. Immunogenicity assessments included HER2-specific T-cell responses measured by IFNγ ELISpot and HER-specific serum antibodies measured by ELISA at baseline and 30 days after the sixth priming dose. Results: 20 patients were enrolled. H2NVAC plus T-DM1 was well tolerated with no DLTs observed. All treatment-emergent AEs were grade 1-2, with fatigue (grade 1 60%, grade 2 5%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (grade 1 35%, grade 2 10%), elevated alkaline phosphatase (grade 1 40%), nausea (grade 1 35%, grade 2 5%), arthralgia (grade 1 30%), and injection-site reactions (grade 1 50%) being most common. Robust vaccine-specific T-cell responses by ELISpot were observed in 94% of evaluable patients, who mounted HER2-specific T-cell responses at 30 days after the sixth priming dose, with a mean 197-fold increase over baseline. Further CYTOF analysis showed a significant decrease in exhausted T-cell phenotypes, with reduced LAG3 and TIM3 expression on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. For antibody responses by ELISA, 26% of patients developed HER2 protein-specific antibody responses at this time point. There was no significant increase in antibodies to H2NVAC peptides or to unrelated tumor antigens (p53, IGFBP2, TERT, myoglobin) at 30 days after the sixth vaccine. Ongoing correlative analyses will assess the evolution of immune responses at later time points following completion of T-DM1 therapy. Conclusions: Concurrent administration of H2NVAC with T-DM1 was safe and did not increase toxicity beyond single-agent T-DM1. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that a cancer vaccine can be delivered concurrently with an antibody-drug conjugate without increasing adverse effects while still eliciting robust T-cell responses. Ongoing analyses will further define the kinetics and durability of vaccine-induced antibody and T-cell responses at later time points, as well as evaluate the efficacy of H2NVAC in reducing recurrence risk in the randomized phase 2 trial. Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Sharmila Giri, Andy J. Ness, David W. Hillman, Nadine Norton, Davitte Cogen, Brian M. Necela, Aziza Nassar, Donald W. Northfelt, Pooja Advani, Rohit Rao, Alvaro Mareno-Aspitia, Brenda Ernst, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Matthew P. Goetz, Keith L. Knutson. Safety, tolerability, and early immune responses in the safety run-in of an HER2 multi-epitope vaccine combined with T-DM1 in residual HER2-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6715.

Abstract Background: Despite the promising efficacy of CAR-T for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL), more than 60% of patients will relapse, the majority of which occur in the first 6 months. Approximately 30% of patients with LBCL treated with CAR-T achieve a partial response (PR) on day 30 (D30) PET-CT assessment. Of patients in a D30 PR, 70% will eventually progress, yet the standard of care remains close observation. Early consolidative treatment strategies utilizing therapies with a different mechanism of action may improve outcomes, but there are currently no reliable biomarkers. Epcoritamab (Epco), a bispecific antibody directed against CD20 and CD3, has been approved by the FDA for LBCL patients who relapse after at least 2 lines of therapy. By treating prior to overt relapse, Epco has the potential to salvage inadequate responses post CAR-T. This study is a trial-in-progress that will evaluate the efficacy of epco compared to observation for patients with LBCLs achieving a PR on D30 post CAR-T PET-CT assessment. Methods This is an investigator-initiated, randomized, phase II, multicenter, open-label study (NCT06238648) evaluating epco monotherapy for a fixed duration of 12 cycles compared to observation for LBCL patients with D30 PR after standard of care CAR-T. A maximum of 120 patients will be randomized 1:1 to epco or observation across 10 academic centers. Stratification factors include line of CAR-T (second vs third line) and costimulatory domain (CD28 vs 4-1BB). Key inclusion criteria include PET evidence of a D30 PR. non-bulky disease ( <7.5cm), ANC of >1000, hemoglobin >7 g/dL if asymptomatic or >8 if symptomatic, platelet count >50,000. G-CSF, pRBCs and platelet transfusions are allowed. Key exclusion criteria include ongoing or uncontrolled CRS or ICANS, and active or symptomatic CNS disease. This study is available to all eligible patients, regardless of race, gender, or ethnic origin. To adapt to current practices, prior bispecific antibody exposure is allowed if used as holding or bridging therapy without disease progression. Epco is administered subcutaneously at a dose of 0.16mg on day 1, 0.8mg on day 8, prior to full dose of 48mg on day 15. Epco is administered weekly in 28 day cycles (C) for C1-3, on day 1 and 15 of C4-9 and on day 1 of C10-12. PET-CT response is assessed by the 2014 Lugano criteria after 2 cycles, and then every 3 months during active treatment. The primary objective is efficacy, measured as conversion from D30 PR to CR. The secondary endpoints include frequency and severity of treatment emergent adverse events, ORR, duration of response, duration of complete response, progression free survival, event free survival, and overall survival. Peripheral blood samples will be collected pre-treatment and during treatment to assess for biomarkers of response and resistance and CAR-T persistence. The study was activated in January 2024 and recruitment is ongoing.

Introduction PET-directed therapy using ABVD with or without radiation therapy (RT) is considered standard in early stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Brentuximab vedotin (BV) and nivolumab (NVB) have transformed the treatment paradigm in advanced stage disease, but their roles remain uncertain in the management of early stage cHL. CALGB 50604 evaluated 2 cycles of ABVD followed by 2 more cycles of ABVD in patients with negative interim PET or 2 cycles of escalated BEACOPP and RT (3060 cGy) in patients with positive interim PET. More recently, ACCRU-LY1601 evaluated 3 cycles of BV+AVD followed by NVB consolidation in interim PET-negative patients. Interim PET-positive patients received 4 cycles of BV+NVB prior to NVB consolidation. Both studies had similar eligibility criteria as phase 2 trials in early stage non-bulky cHL. We hypothesize that patients who receive novel agents as part of frontline therapy (ACCRU-LY1601) may have superior clinical outcomes compared to those who receive conventional chemotherapy with or without RT (CALGB 50604) in adjusted analysis. Methods The primary endpoint was the progression free survival (PFS) rate at 3 years for both studies. The following secondary endpoints were analyzed: PET negativity (defined as Deauville score 1-3) at interim assessment, response rates, and adverse events (AEs). Data from the ACCRU-LY1601 up to May 2024 were included. Patient characteristics, complete metabolic response (CMR) rates, and AE incidence were compared with Fisher's exact tests. Kaplan-Meier techniques were used to estimate landmark survival rates; the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for probabilities of PFS at 3 years landmark rates were assessed. Results of a formal propensity-matched analysis are forthcoming. Results Two-hundred twenty-nine participants receiving frontline therapy for early stage, non-bulky cHL were identified for analysis (N=149 from CALGB 50604; N=80 from ACCRU-LY1601). Median age in both cohorts was 31 (ranges: 18-58 in CALGB 50604 and 19-60 in ACCRU-LY1601). The majority of patients were white (84.6% in CALGB 506048 and 82.5% in ACCRU-LY1601; P=0.58) and had stage II cHL (85.2% in CALGB 50604 and 88.8% in ACCRU-LY1601; P=0.83) with ECOG score of 0 (75.2% in CALGB 50604 and 75.0% in ACCRU-LY1601; P=0.87). B symptoms were present in 27.4% and 32.9% of patients in CALGB 50604 and ACCRU-LY1601, respectively (P=0.44). At time of analysis, the median follow-up was 3.8 years for CALGB 50604 and 3.6 years for ACCRU-LY1601. Interim PET results were available for 140/149 CALGB 50604 and 77/80 ACCRU-LY1601 cohorts; 90.1% and 94.8% were interim PET negative in CALGB 50604 and ACCRU-LY1601, respectively (P=0.31). Thirteen patients (8.7%) received RT after positive interim PET per the study protocol in CALGB 50604. No patient received RT while enrolled in ACCRU-LY1601 although 2 patients (2.5%) received RT off protocol. Seventeen PFS events (11.4%) were observed in CALGB 50604 while one event (1.3%) was observed in ACCRU-LY1601. Reported estimates of 3-year landmark PFS were 89.0% (95% CI, 84-95%) in CALGB 50604 and 97.5% (95% CI, 83.6-99.6%) in ACCRU-LY1601. Grade ≥ 3 AEs, including febrile neutropenia (6.3% in CALGB 50604 vs. 8.8% in ACCRU-LY1601; P=0.59), were similar between the trial cohorts. All grade peripheral sensory neuropathy was reported in 41.6% and 37.5% (Grade ≥ 3: 2.8% and 2.5%; P>0.99) of patients in CALGB 50604 and ACCRU-LY1601, respectively. Conclusion CALGB 50604 and ACCRU-LY1601 represent two recent studies aimed at developing new strategies to reduce exposure to cytotoxic chemotherapy and RT in early stage cHL. Both studies share the same primary endpoint with similar eligibility criteria, making the comparative analysis feasible. There was no significant difference in major baseline patient characteristics between the two studies. They also showed similar toxicity profiles, including comparable rates of febrile neutropenia and peripheral sensory neuropathy. ACCRU-LY1601 was associated with a higher rate of estimated 3-year PFS rate compared to CALGB 50604 (97.5% vs. 89.0%) although their CIs overlapped. Overall, the current data demonstrate the potential role of incorporating novel agents in frontline therapy to further reduce the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy and RT while improving survival outcomes, providing a strong basis for designing future trials in early stage cHL.

TPS7100 Background: Despite the promising efficacy of CAR-T for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL), more than 60% of patients will relapse, the majority of which occur in the first 6 months. Approximately 30% of patients with LBCL treated with CAR-T achieve a partial response (PR) on day 30 (D30) PET-CT assessment. Of patients in a D30 PR, 70% will eventually progress, yet the standard of care remains close observation. Early consolidative treatment strategies utilizing therapies with a different mechanism of action may improve outcomes, but there are currently no reliable biomarkers. Epcoritamab (Epco), a bispecific antibody directed against CD20 and CD3, has been approved by the FDA for LBCL patients who relapse after at least 2 lines of therapy. In the phase 2 study, Epco was associated with an overall response rate (ORR) of 63% and a complete response (CR) rate of 39%, including similar responses in a subset of patients who were relapsed 100 days post CAR-T. This study is a trial-in-progress that will evaluate the efficacy of epco compared to observation for patients with LBCLs achieving a PR on D30 post CAR-T PET-CT assessment. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, randomized, phase II, multicenter, open-label study (NCT06238648) evaluating epco monotherapy for a fixed duration of 12 cycles compared to observation for LBCL patients with D30 PR after standard of care CAR-T. A maximum of 120 patients will be randomized 1:1 to epco or observation across 10 academic centers. Stratification factors include line of CAR-T (second vs third line) and costimulatory domain (CD28 vs 4-1BB). Key inclusion criteria include PET evidence of a D30 PR. non-bulky disease ( <7.5cm), ANC of >1000, hemoglobin >7 g/dL if asymptomatic or >8 if symptomatic, platelet count >50,000. G-CSF, pRBCs and platelet transfusions are allowed. Key exclusion criteria include prior anti CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody therapy, ongoing or uncontrolled CRS or ICANS, and active or symptomatic CNS disease. Epco is administered subcutaneously at a dose of 0.16mg on day 1, 0.8mg on day 8, prior to full dose of 48mg on day 15. Epco is administered weekly in 28 day cycles (C) for C1-3, on day 1 and 15 of C4-9 and on day 1 of C10-12. PET-CT response is assessed by the 2014 Lugano criteria after 2 cycles, and then every 3 months during active treatment. The primary objective is efficacy, measured as conversion from D30 PR to CR. The secondary endpoints include frequency and severity of treatment emergent adverse events, ORR, duration of response, duration of complete response, progression free survival, event free survival, and overall survival. Peripheral blood samples will be collected pre-treatment and during treatment to assess for biomarkers of response and resistance. The study was activated in January 2024 and recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT06238648 .

550 Background: Residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) confers poor outcomes. Despite additional trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in the adjuvant setting, a significant number of patients with residual disease still develop recurrence. H2NVAC is a multi-epitope T helper cell-activating peptide vaccine that is composed of 4 degenerate HER2-derived HLA-DR epitopes admixed with GM-CSF. Our previous phase I trial showed that this vaccine was safe and generated robust, long-lasting T and B cell immune responses. Methods: Patients with stage II-III HER2+ BC with any amount of residual disease in the breast /axilla after NAC were enrolled in a safety run-in phase of H2NVAC in combination with T-DM1. Patients were treated with H2NVAC and T-DM1 for 6 cycles, followed by 2 boosters at 3 and 12 months. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade (G) ≥ 3 adverse events (AE) occurring within 21 days after the first vaccination. Results: A total of20 patients were enrolled with a median age of 51 years (range 27-69), 80% were White and 15% were Black. Most patients had hormone receptor-positive disease (90%). 40% were premenopausal, 40% were postmenopausal, and 20% were unknown. 14 patients had ypT1, 3 patients ypT2, 3 patients ypT3, 1 patient ypT4, 8 patients ypN0, 9 patients yp N1, 1 patient ypN1mi, and 2 patients ypN2. H2NVAC, in combination with T-DM1, was well tolerated, with no DLT being observed. Only grades 1 and 2 AEs were observed during the DLT period, with fatigue being the most common (G1 60%, G2 5%), followed by peripheral sensory neuropathy (G1 55%, G2 5%) and injection site reaction (G1 50%). Across all treatment cycles, the top 10 most common AEs that were at least possibly related to treatment include injection site reaction (G1 85%, G2 15%), AST increase (G1 65%), ALT increase (G1 45%), fatigue (G1 35%, G2 10%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (G1 35%, G-tube 10%), alk-phos increase (40% G1), nausea (G1 35%, G2 5%), arthralgia (G1 35%), myalgia (G1 25%, G2 5%), and platelet count decrease (G1 30%). There were four patients with G3 AEs at least possibly related to the vaccine observed after the DLT period, including allergic reaction, myositis/skin infection, urticaria, and pruritus/maculopapular rash. Conclusions: H2NVAC, in combination with T-DM1, was safe without DLT observed. The side effect profile was favorable, with the most common AE being the G1 injection site reaction. A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of H2NVAC vs. placebo in combination with trastuzumab emtansine is currently ongoing through the ACCRU consortium. Clinical trial information: NCT04197687 .

Abstract Background: Residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC) confers poor outcomes. Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is approved for HER2+ patients with residual disease after NAC. However, many patients still develop recurrence. H2NVAC is a multi-epitope CD4 helper T cell activating vaccine that includes a pool of 4 degenerate HER2-derived HLA-DR epitopes admixed with GM-CSF. Our previous phase I trial showed that this vaccine was safe and generated robust, long-lasting T and B cell immune responses. Method: We conducted a safety run-in phase of H2NVAC in combination with T-DM1 in stage II-III HER2+ BC with residual disease after NAC. Patients were treated with H2NVAC and T-DM1 for 6 cycles, followed by 2 boosters at 3 and 12 months. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade (G) ≥ 3 toxicity occurring within 21 days after the first vaccination. Results: 20 patients were enrolled (median age 51; 27-69 years), including 80% White and 15% Black. 90% had hormone receptor-positive disease. There was no DLT observed in the safety run-in cohort. All adverse events (AEs) during the DLT period were grades 1 and 2, with fatigue being the most common (60% G1, 5% G2), followed by peripheral sensory neuropathy (55% G1, 5% G2), and injection site reaction (50% G1). Across all treatment cycles, the 10 most common AEs that were at least possibly related to treatment in all cycles are summarized in the table below. The injection site reaction was the most common AE, with 85% G1 and 15% G2. Conclusion: H2NVAC, in combination with T-DM1, was safe, with a favorable side effect profile. There was no DLT observed. The most common AE was injection site reaction, with the majority being G1. A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of H2NVAC vs. placebo in combination with trastuzumab emtansine is currently ongoing through the ACCRU consortium (NCT04197687). Adverse Events Grades 1 2 N % N % Injection site reaction 17 85.0 3 15.0 Aspartate aminotransferase increase 13 65.0 Alanine aminotransferase increase 9 45.0 Fatigue 7 35.0 2 10.0 Peripheral sensory neuropathy 7 35.0 2 10.0 Alkaline phosphatase increase 8 40.0 Nausea 7 35.0 1 5.0 Arthralgia 7 35.0 Myalgia 5 25.0 1 5.0 Platelet count decrease 6 30.0 Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Sharmila Giri, Andy J. Ness, David W. Hillman, Nadine Norton, Davitte Cogen, Brian M. Necela, Aziza Nassar, Donald W. Northfelt, Pooja Advani, Rohit Rao, Kostandinos Sideras, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Brenda J. Ernst, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Matthew P. Goetz, Keith L. Knutson. Safety and tolerability of multi-epitope HER2 peptide vaccines in combination with trastuzumab emtansine in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5005.

Abstract Purpose/Objectives: Proton therapy is under investigation in breast cancer as a strategy to reduce heart and lung exposure, which is associated with late cardiopulmonary adverse events and secondary malignancy. To date, studies investigating postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) with protons have used conventional fractionation. We hypothesized that condensing treatment to 15 fractions would be safe based on evidence that breast cancer is more sensitive to higher dose fractions than surrounding normal tissues. Materials/Methods: We conducted a randomized non-inferiority phase II trial comparing conventional and hypofractionated proton PMRT with primary endpoint of 24-month complication rate (defined as grade 3 or higher late adverse events using CTCAE, v 4.0 and/or unplanned surgical intervention in patients undergoing mastectomy with reconstruction). With a 10% non-inferiority margin the study ensured 80% power and had a one sided-type I error rate of 0.05. Cardiotoxicity was assessed with serial transthoracic conventional and 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). Eligibility included age ≥ 18 years with non-inflammatory breast cancer resected by mastectomy with indications for PMRT. Assignment of treatments was balanced with respect to immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Conventional fractionation group received 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2 Gy, and hypofractionation group received 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions of 2.67 Gy (RBE 1.1). Target volume included the chest wall and axillary, supraclavicular, and internal mammary lymph nodes. All patients were treated with multi-field optimized pencil beam scanning (intensity modulated proton therapy). Results: Between 2016 and 2018, 82 patients were enrolled and randomized (41 conventional, 41 hypofractionation). Median patient age was 52 years. 32.9% were staged T3-T4 and 79.3% node positive at diagnosis. 57 of 82 patients (69.5%) elected IBR. The median mean heart dose was 0.49 Gy and the median ipsilateral lung volume receiving 40% of prescription or greater (V40%) was 13.6%. No significant changes on conventional or 2D-STE at end-of-treatment or 3-month follow-up compared to baseline were observed. The rate of ≥ grade 2 acute dermatitis was lower with hypofractionation (44% vs 15%, p = 0.006). Other ≥ grade 2 acute adverse events including esophagitis (0 vs 5%), infection (5% vs 2.4%) and skin hyperpigmentation (7.3% vs 4.8%) were not significantly different between the two arms. With a median follow-up of 38.3 months, the 24-month complication rate was conventional 14.6% vs hypofractionation 17.1% (absolute difference 2.4%, p=0.17, 95% CI [-, 15.7%]). In patients with IBR, 6 of 28 (21.4%) conventional and 7 of 29 (24.1%) hypofractionated patients developed complications (p =0.80). There was no significant difference in 3-year disease-free survival between the conventional (89.4%; 95% CI 80.0 – 99.8%) and hypofractionated (92.4%, 95% CI 84.5 – 100.0%) arms (p = 0.91). One local recurrence occurred in the hypofractionated arm simultaneous with regional and distant relapse. The remaining 6 recurrences were isolated distant events. Conclusions: Proton PMRT provided excellent locoregional control and normal tissue sparing. There were no subclinical echocardiographic changes indicative of radiation-induced cardiac dysfunction. Hypofractionation resulted in comparable disease control, tolerability and reconstruction outcomes as conventional fractionation. Although non-inferiority of hypofractionation could not be established based on the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for complication rate being greater than 10%, both conventional and hypofractionation may be considered appropriate regimens for ongoing phase 3 randomized trials comparing photon and proton radiotherapy. Citation Format: Robert Mutter, Sharmila Giri, Briant Fruth, Nicholas Remmes, Aman Anand, Kathryn Ruddy, Hector Villarraga, Sebastian Santos Patarroyo, Elizabeth Yan, Kenneth Merrell, Lisa McGee, Tamara Vern-Gross, Bradley Stish, Robert Gao, Judy C. Boughey, Sean Park, Kimberly Corbin, Carlos Vargas. Phase II randomized trial of conventional versus hypofractionated post-mastectomy proton radiotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-05.