Back to Authors

LADEWIG, DEJAE J.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

Abstract 371: Assessment of Catheter Position Above or Below the Aortic Valve by Evaluation of Characteristics of the Local Electro Gram: an Acute Canine Study
Pa, Deepak, Witt, Chance M. , Sugrue, Alan , Suddendorf, Scott H., Powers, Joanne, Ladewig, Dejae, Drakulic, Budimir , Foxall, Thomas, LADEWIG, DEJAE J., Asirvatham, Samuel J.

Circulation Research | March 20, 2022 | Volume: 121 | Issue: suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/res.121.suppl_1.371 Get It

Background: Ablation in the sinuses of Valsalva (SoV) within the aorta is fraught with risk, owing to the proximity of the coronary arteries. Assessment of catheter tip position is not very easy at this location owing to complex local anatomy and poor images from available modalities. Objectives: We propose the use of novel local unipolar electrogram characteristics using a new signal recording system to guide the assessment of catheter tip position in this region. Methods: We recorded unipolar signals from above the SoV, within the coronaries and below the SoV using the PURE-EP™ (BioSig Technologies, MN) signal processing system in 4 anesthetized canines in the setting of an acute study. We used fluoroscopy, intracardiac echocardiography and angiography for confirmation of the position of the catheter tip. We recorded changes in the signals when transitioning between (1) the coronary arteries and the SoV and (2) the SoV and below the SoV. Results: The unipolar signal showed a negative current of injury (COI) when the catheter tip was present in the SoV, whereas within the coronary artery or below the SoV, the COI was positive. We propose that the difference in the distribution of ventricular muscle below and above the SoV is responsible for this phenomenon. These changes in the COI were noted immediately when transitioning from one location to another and were present reproducibly in all the dogs. ( Figure 1 ) Conclusions: Analysis of the changes on the local electrogram can provide information about the location of the catheter tip which could prove critical in saving lives.
Evaluation of a Unique Defibrillation Unit with Dual‐Vector Biphasic Waveform Capabilities: Towards a Miniaturized Defibrillator
Okamura, Hideo , Killu, Ammar M. , Gilles, Emily J., Tri, Jason , Asirvatham, Roshini, LADEWIG, DEJAE J., Suddendorf, Scott H., Powers, Joanne, Wood‐Wentz, Christina M. , Gray, Peter D., RAYMOND, DOUGLAS M., SAVAGE, SHELLEY J., Savage, Walter T., Asirvatham, Samuel J. , Friedman, Paul A. , Powers, Joanne M, Wood-Wentz, Christina M, Bruce, Charles J. , DeSimone, Christopher V. , GRAY, PETER D., Asirvatham, Samuel J

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology | December 19, 2016 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 108-114

10.1111/pace.12979 Get It

BackgroundAutomated external defibrillators can provide life‐saving therapies to treat ventricular fibrillation. We developed a prototype unit that can deliver a unique shock waveform produced by four independent capacitors that is delivered through two shock vectors, with the rationale of providing more robust shock pathways during emergent defibrillation. We describe the initial testing and feasibility of this unique defibrillation unit, features of which may enable downsizing of current defibrillator devices.MethodsWe tested our defibrillation unit in four large animal models (two canine and two swine) under general anesthesia. Experimental defibrillation thresholds (DFT) were obtained by delivery of a unique waveform shock pulse via a dual‐vector pathway with four defibrillation pads (placed across the chest). DFTs were measured and compared with those of a commercially available biphasic defibrillator (Zoll M series, Zoll Medical, Chelmsford, MA, USA) tested in two different vectors. Shocks were delivered after 10 seconds of stable ventricular fibrillation and the output characteristics and shock outcome recorded. Each defibrillation series used a step‐down to failure protocol to define the defibrillation threshold.ResultsA total of 96 shocks were delivered during ventricular fibrillation in four large animals. In comparison to the Zoll M series, which delivered a single‐vector, biphasic shock, the energy required for successful defibrillation using the unique dual‐vector biphasic waveform did not differ significantly (P = 0.65).ConclusionsOur early findings support the feasibility of a unique external defibrillation unit using a dual‐vector biphasic waveform approach. This warrants further study to leverage this unique concept and work toward a miniaturized, portable shock delivery system.