Tan, Nicholas Y.

AbstractOutflow tract ventricular arrhythmias are the most common type of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia. A systematic understanding of the outflow tract anatomy improves procedural efficacy and enables electrophysiologists to anticipate and prevent complications. This review emphasizes the three‐dimensional spatial relationships between the ventricular outflow tracts using seven anatomical principles. In turn, each principle is elaborated on from a clinical perspective relevant for the practicing electrophysiologist. The developmental anatomy of the outflow tracts is also discussed and reinforced with a clinical case.

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has known benefit for heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and dyssynchrony. However, very little is known about its benefit in infiltrative cardiomyopathies such as cardiac amyloidosis (CA) due to relative rarity of these conditions. Methods: This retrospective case series (2003-2021) comprised patients with HF due to transthyretin wild-type CA with (case) or without (control) CRT implant. Only controls with an indication for CRT or LVEF <40% were included. To further match disease severity, cases were 1:1 matched (propensity score tolerance 0.04) to controls for age, NYHA class, and CA stage (UK Staging). Primary outcome was MACE (major adverse cardiac events) which included stroke, myocardial infarction, HF hospitalization and cardiac mortality during a 3-year follow-up. Loss to follow-up was censored as per last visit date. LVEF and NYHA were noted closest to 1-year follow-up. Survival analysis for MACE was performed with Kaplan-Meier (KM) and multivariable cox regression models. Results: Study Cohort (n=160) had a mean age of 75.5 (SD 7.8) years and 97.5% were males. A majority had NYHA class 2 or 3 (92.3%) and CA stage 2 (42.2.%). Notably, median LVEF at baseline was lower in controls (33.5 vs 36.5; P = .001) and 77.5% of controls had an indication for CRT device. A total of 79 MACE events occurred, most frequent being HF hospitalization (n=45). KM curves were comparable for MACE events in the two groups (log-rank test; P = .059). Even after adjusting, as in table, CRT device was not associated with MACE events (adjusted HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.40-1.09; P = .106). Lastly, change in LVEF ( P = .84) and NYHA ( P = .86) at follow-up was similar in cases vs controls. Conclusions: The findings of this largest yet observational study to examine this question suggest that CRT in patients with transthyretin wild-type CA does not favorably impact outcomes for MACE events, improve LVEF or NYHA functional class.

Ventricular arrhythmias are a common clinical manifestation in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and other arrhythmogenic inflammatory cardiomyopathies (AIC). The management of sustained ventricular arrhythmias in these patients presents unique challenges. Current therapies include immunosuppressive, antiarrhythmic agents, and catheter ablation. Significant progress has been made in deciphering the importance of patient selection for ablation, systematic preablation evaluation, and optimal ablation timing, as well as ablation approaches and techniques. In this overview, we discuss the evaluation and management of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with CS, focusing on catheter ablation, which has evolved into an effective approach in reducing the burden of ventricular arrhythmias in these patients in the context of multifaceted treatment along with medical therapies.

Abstract Background The use of irreversible electroporation (IRE) for cardiac ablation in the management of cardiac arrhythmias, known as Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA), has gained the attention of many researchers, physicians and companies. Despite the demonstrated efficacy and safety profiles of the technique, there are still many open questions. One of them deals with the effective electric field thresholds necessary for cardiac tissue ablation. Contrary to radiofrequency (RF) ablation, where the thermotemporal thresholds for tissue damage are well established, the electric field thresholds for effective IRE are uncertain and depend on the tissue type and the waveform characteristics of the delivered electric field. Purpose The use of numerical models to understand the electric field distribution and the corresponding lesion for a specific electrode geometry are widely used in IRE for cancer treatment. Models can predict ablation volumes when the field thresholds are known or can be used to estimate the field thresholds when the lesion geometry is established post-treatment. The goal of the present study was to build a subject-specific realistic 3D numerical model to assess the ability of modeling to predict PFA lesions. Methods PFA experiments were performed in male mongrel dogs following a protocol approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Briefly, animals were sedated and intubated, and two non-irrigated deflectable catheters with an 8-mm tip were positioned on both sides of the interventricular septum under fluoroscopy guidance. Submicrosecond pulses were delivered in a bipolar fashion across both catheters. Sequences of pulses of 300 ns duration (or other durations in that range) were repetitively applied with voltage levels in the kV range. 30 days after the procedure, MRI with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were acquired to assess the presence of ablation lesions in the treated tissue. Ventricular areas were segmented from MRI images and 3D volumes were created. The generated 3D geometries were imported into software COMSOL Multiphysics. Realistic 3D geometries of the catheters were placed in the same positions than during the experiments, fluoroscopy videos recorded during the procedures were used as a guidance. The computed electric field intensity distributions were compared to the LGE areas to extract the range of electric field thresholds where the predicted lesion size was compatible with the real size of the LGE areas for each application site and pulsing protocol. Results and conclusions Our results show how the numerical model is able to reproduce the shape of the LGE fibrotic lesion areas observed 30 days after the procedure. Additionally, the model clearly confirms the dose-dependent lesion sizes observed experimentally. This study supports that numerical modeling is a valuable tool for understanding PFA treatments and that it could be used as patient-specific treatment planning tool. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie

Background: Previous animal studies have shown no significant vascular injury from pulsed electrical field (PEF) ablation. We sought to assess the effect of PEF on swine coronary arteries. Methods: We performed intracoronary and epicardial (near the coronary artery) PEF ablations in swine pretreated with dual antiplatelet and antiarrhythmic therapy. Intracoronary PEF was delivered using MapiT catheters (Biotronik, Berlin), whereas epicardial PEF was delivered using EPT catheters (Boston Scientific, MA). PEF pulse duration was microseconds (Nanoknife 3.0, Angio Dynamics, NY) or nanoseconds (CellFX, Pulse Biosciences, CA). Results: We performed 39 intracoronary ablations in 10 swine and 20 epicardial-pericoronary ablations in 4 separate swine. Intracoronary PEF was delivered at higher energy compared with epicardial PEF (46 [interquartile range, IQR 20–85] J versus 10 [IQR 10–11] J, P < 0.01). Reversible coronary spasm occurred in 49% intracoronary ablations and 45% epicardial ablations ( P =0.80). At the end study, fixed coronary stenosis was demonstrated in 44% intracoronary ablations (80% for microsecond PEF and 18% for nanosecond PEF) and 0% epicardial ablations. Visible hemorrhagic and/or fibrotic myocardial lesions were observed at necropsy with similar frequency between intracoronary and epicardial PEF (45% versus 50%, P =0.70). Nanosecond PEF (49 ablations in 11 swine), when compared with microsecond PEF (10 intracoronary ablations in 3 swine), resulted in lower energy delivery (21 [IQR 10–46] J versus 129 [IQR 24–143] J, P =0.03) and less incidence of fixed coronary stenosis (18% versus 80%, P =0.04). Conclusions: In the swine model, intracoronary PEF resulted both in significant coronary spasm and fixed coronary stenosis. Epicardial PEF, delivered at lower energy, resulted in reversible spasm but no fixed coronary stenosis.

Abstract A 70‐year‐old woman with longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation underwent Micra leadless pacemaker implantation and atrioventricular nodal ablation. No postprocedural complications were noted. She subsequently underwent surgical mitral valve replacement 4 years later. During the surgery, Micra tine perforation of the right ventricular free wall was seen. No device revision was performed due to her asymptomatic status and stable pacemaker position/function. Pericardial effusion is a known complication of Micra implantation. The incidence of tine perforation is unknown as many patients may be asymptomatic. The clinical consequences regarding adverse events, device functionality, and explantation/extraction risk profile remain to be determined.

Background: Optimal management of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in patients with Ebstein anomaly during tricuspid valve (TV) surgery is unknown. Thus, we aimed to characterize CIED management/outcomes in patients with Ebstein anomaly undergoing TV surgery. Methods: Patients at the Mayo Clinic from 1987 to 2020 with Ebstein anomaly and CIED procedure were reviewed for procedural details, complications, echocardiogram, and lead parameters. Five-year cumulative incidence of CIED complications were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Ninety-three patients were included; 51 were female, and mean age was 40.7±17.5 years. A new CIED was implanted in 45 patients at the time of TV surgery with the majority receiving an epicardial (n=37) CIED. Among 34 patients who had preexisting CIED (11 epicardial, 23 transvenous) at time of TV surgery, 20 had a transvenous right ventricular lead managed by externalizing the lead to the TV (n=15) or extracting the transvenous lead with epicardial lead implantation (n=5). Fourteen patients underwent CIED implantation (4 epicardial, 10 transvenous) without concurrent surgery. Placement of lead across the TV was avoided in 85% of patients. The 5-year cumulative incidence of CIED complications was 24% with no significant difference between epicardial and transvenous CIEDs (26% versus 23%, P =0.96). Performance of lead parameters was similar in epicardial and transvenous leads during median (interquartile range) follow-up of 44.5 (61.1) months. Conclusions: In patients with Ebstein anomaly undergoing TV surgery, the use of epicardial leads and externalization of transvenous leads to the TV can avoid lead placement across the valve leaflets. Lead performance and CIED complications was similar between epicardial and transvenous CIEDs.

Introduction: Prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer is challenging as patients are at increased bleeding and thrombotic risk. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has evolved as a promising strategy for stroke prevention with protentional to reduce bleeding risk, though no data exists on its efficacy in patients with cancer. Hypothesis: LAAO is a safe and effective strategy for reducing stroke and bleeding risk in cancer patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAO at all Mayo Clinic sites from 2017-2020 and identified those who had undergone prior or current treatment for cancer. Baseline demographics, malignancy history, atrial fibrillation parameters, procedural success/complications, stroke and bleeding incidence and major adverse cardiac events were ascertained. Results: 55 patients were included in the study; 44 (80.0%) were male and mean age was 79.0 ± 6.1 years. Most common primary malignancies included prostate cancer (29.1%), oropharyngeal cancer (12.7%), and melanoma (10.9%) with 15 (27.3%) having metastatic disease and 14 (25.5%) patients having active malignancy at device implant. Mean CHA2DS2-Vasc score was 4.9 ± 1.3, with 47 (85.5%) patients having a prior bleeding event. Acute procedural success was achieved in all patients with 30-day complications including 4 (7.3%) with vascular access site bleeding, 1 (1.8%) with pericarditis and 1 (1.8%) with a seizure. At a follow up of 1.8 ± 1.1 years, ischemic stroke occurred in 2 (3.6%) patients with bleeding complications in 5 (9.1%) patients. Device related complications occurred in 6 (10.9%) patients with 4 (7.3%) with device thrombosis and 2 (3.6%) with a peri-device leak. Death occurred in 14 (25.5%) patients most commonly due to malignancy progression (9.1%) and infection (7.3%). Conclusions: In our study cohort, LAAO in patients with cancer was achieved with excellent procedural success and offered reasonable reduction in stroke and bleeding risk. Mortality was high likely due to the age of the patients studied, underlying malignancy and comorbidities. Further studies are needed to investigate the prevalence of device thrombosis in cancer patients.

Background The epidemiology of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) is not well defined. Methods and Results Residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, with advanced HF from 2007 to 2017 were identified using the 2018 European Society of Cardiology criteria. Billing codes were used to capture VAs; severe VAs requiring emergency care were defined as events associated with emergency department visits or hospitalizations. The cumulative incidence of VAs postadvanced HF was estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariable Cox analyses were used to determine the following: (1) Predictors of severe VAs postadvanced HF; and (2) Impact of severe VAs on mortality. Of 936 patients with advanced HF, 261 (27.9%) had a history of VA. The 1‐year cumulative incidence of severe VAs postadvanced HF was 5.4%. Prior VAs (hazard ratio [HR] 2.22 [95% CI, 1.26–3.89], P =0.006) and left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (HR, 3.79 [95% CI, 1.72–8.39], P <0.001) were independently associated with increased severe VA risk postadvanced HF. New‐onset severe VAs were associated with increased mortality (HR, 4.41 [95% CI, 2.80–6.94]; P <0.001), whereas severe VAs in patients with prior VAs had no significant association with mortality risk (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.65–1.78]; P =0.77). Severe VAs were associated with increased mortality in patients without implantable cardioverter defibrillators (HR, 4.89 [95% CI, 2.89–8.26]; P <0.001), but not in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 0.92–2.19]; P =0.11). Conclusions Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <40% and prior VAs have increased risk of severe VA postadvanced HF. New‐onset severe VAs or severe VAs without implantable cardioverter defibrillators postadvanced HF are associated with increased mortality.