Rosenbaum, Andrew

Axillary artery intra-aortic balloon pump (axIABP) placement has been implemented as a bridging solution before heart transplantation. This study evaluates complications associated with axIABP support and describes an approach to minimize adverse events. We previously described a percutaneous approach for axIABP placement. However, patients receiving axIABP between September 1, 2017, and September 26, 2019 (n = 32) demonstrated a high rate of balloon pump malfunction (8/32; 25%) and other complications (totaling 15/32; 47%). Sixty-four patients were sequentially treated under a revised protocol. Compared to the initial cohort, no significant differences in demographics were noted. A significant reduction in rate of balloon malfunction (8/32, 25% vs. 1/64, 2%; p < 0.001) and total complications (15/32, 47% vs. 10/64, 16%; p = 0.0025) during the period of support were noted after intervention. Subsequent analysis of total complications per device size (40 vs. ≤ 34 ml balloon) revealed significantly reduced complications in patients with smaller devices (40% vs. 13%, respectively; p = 0.0022). This study provides guidelines to limit complications in patients supported with axIABP, facilitating a protracted period of bridging support.

Background: Although genetic testing (GT) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) enables molecular diagnosis, family screening and provides prognostic information, it is underutilized. Our hypothesis was that systemic intervention (INT) in the heart failure (HF) clinic could increase the frequency of GT for DCM. Methods: Eligible DCM patients in a 17-month period before and after the INT were compared for frequency of genetic counseling and GT uptake. The INT comprised of the following: 1. Pre-emptive cardiovascular genomics e-consult (with a specialist in genetic DCM) for all new HF patients that could be canceled by the treating physician if the patient was considered ineligible or was uninterested. If eligible and patient was willing, 2. They were shown a video in person on genetic testing for DCM prepared by a genetics counselor 3. A trained HF clinic nurse provided answers to questions and completed the test requisition 4. Educational material was provided to the patient 5. Results were reviewed electronically and communicated to the patient via letter or phone call by the physician completing the e-consult. Clinical genetics consultation was available throughout the study period. Standard commercially available cardiomyopathy gene panels were used for GT. Results: There were 162 eligible DCM patients before and 194 after the INT. DCM patients were more likely to undergo genetic counseling post-INT versus (vs) pre-INT (33.5% vs 14.8%, OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7-4.8, P <.0001). Similarly, DCM patients were more likely to undergo GT post-INT vs pre-INT (27.3% vs 13%, OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.3, P =.001). Consequently, the total number of patients who were diagnosed to have likely pathogenic or pathogenic DCM-related genetic variants increased from 2 pre-INT to 6 post-INT. These variants were detected in the following genes: FLNC (n=2), TTN (n=2), DES , LMNA , PLN and TNNT2 . Conclusion: An intervention that was pre-emptive, easily accessible and available to the healthcare provider was successful in raising the rates of genetic counseling and testing in DCM patients seen in the HF clinic. Whether such low-cost interventions will enhance cascade screening and provide an opportunity for precision medicine remains to be determined.

AbstractRamp studies are utilized for speed optimization of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF‐LVADs). We here report the utility of combined left and right heart catheterization during a ramp study to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the hemodynamic implications on both ventricles. Pressure‐volume loop (PV loop) monitoring uncovered compromised systolic and mildly compromised right ventricular function with increasing LVAD speeds, despite improvement in left ventricular unloading. These findings informed patient management and highlight the potential utility of PV loop monitoring as an adjunct to left and right heart catheterization during ramp studies of next‐generation LVADs.

Abstract Aims Graft dysfunction (GD) after heart transplantation (HTx) can develop without evidence of cell- or antibody-mediated rejection. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has an evolving role in detecting rejection; however, its role in biopsy-negative GD has not been described. This study examines CMR findings, evaluates outcomes based on CMR results, and seeks to identify the possibility of rejection missed through endomyocardial biopsy by using CMR in HTx recipients with biopsy-negative GD. Methods and results HTx recipients with GD [defined as a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by &gt;5% and LVEF &lt; 50%] in the absence of rejection by biopsy or allograft vasculopathy and who underwent CMR were included in the study. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, re-transplantation, or persistent LVEF &lt; 50%. Overall, 34 HTx recipients developed biopsy-negative GD and underwent CMR. Left ventricular late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR was observed in 16 patients with two distinct patterns: diffuse epicardial (n = 13) and patchy (n = 3) patterns. Patients with LGE developed GD later after HTx [4 (1.4–6.8) vs. 0.8 (0.3–1.2) years, P &lt; 0.001], were more often symptomatic (88% vs. 56%, P = 0.06), and had greater haemodynamic derangement (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure: 19 ± 7 vs. 13 ± 3 mmHg, P = 0.002) as compared with those without LGE. No significant difference was observed in the primary composite outcome between patients with LGE and those without LGE (50% vs. 38% of patients with events, P = 0.515). During a median follow-up of 3.8 years, mean LVEF improved similarly in the LGE-negative (37–55%) and LGE-positive groups (32–55%) (P = 0.16). Conclusions Biopsy-negative GD occurs with and without LGE when assessed by CMR, indicative of possible rejection/inflammation occurring only in a subset of patients. Irrespective of LGE, LVEF improvement occurs in most GD patients, suggesting that other neurohormonal or immunomodulatory mechanisms may also contribute to GD development.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate left ventricular (LV) unloading strategies in patients supported with peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive patients requiring VA-ECMO support for any indication, who underwent novel LV unloading strategies with either direct left atrial venoarterial (LAVA) cannulation or pulmonary artery venoarterial (PAVA) venting, in comparison to Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). The primary outcome was successful bridge to transplant, LV assist device, or myocardial recovery. Forty-six patients (63% male, mean age 52.8 ± 17.6 years) were included. Fourteen patients (30%) underwent novel unloading with either LAVA or PAVA, 11 patients (24%) underwent IABP placement, and 21 patients (46%) underwent Impella insertion. In the novel LV unloading cohort, 10 patients (71%) survived to hospital discharge. Four patients (29%) were weaned from ECMO and eight patients (57%) underwent cardiac transplantation. Although a trend favoring cannula-based unloading for the primary outcome was noted, the cohort was too small for statistical significance (79% LAVA/PAVA, 57% Impella, 45% IABP; p = 0.21). However, probability of survival was greater in the LAVA/PAVA cohort compared to Impella and IABP (p < 0.05). Thus, we demonstrate the efficacy of LA and PA cannulation as an alternative LV unloading strategy for patients supported with peripheral VA-ECMO.

AbstractBackgroundGastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF‐LVADs) is often related to GI angiodysplasia (GIAD). We previously reported data on VEGF inhibition with IV bevacizumab in the treatment of LVAD‐associated GIAD bleeding, and now present follow‐up data on patients treated with IV bevacizumab and/or low‐dose oral pazopanib.MethodsAll consecutive adult patients with LVAD‐associated GIB from GIAD treated with bevacizumab or pazopanib, from July 20, 2017 to June 22, 2022, were included in the analysis. Data on hospitalizations, GI endoscopic procedures, and blood transfusions were obtained from first admission for GIB up to a median of 35.7 months following treatment initiation (range 1.3–59.8 months).ResultsEleven patients (91% male, mean 69.5 ± 8.9 years) were included. Eight patients (73%) received IV bevacizumab, two patients (18%) received oral pazopanib, and one patient (9%) received bevacizumab followed by pazopanib therapy. We observed a significantly decreased number of annualized hospitalizations for GIB (median difference − 2.87, p = 0.002), blood transfusions (median difference − 20.9, p = 0.01), and endoscopies (median difference − 6.95, p = 0.007) in patients pre‐ and post‐anti‐angiogenic therapy (bevacizumab and/or pazopanib). Similarly, a significant improvement in these clinical outcomes was noted in the bevacizumab group with decreased annualized hospitalizations (median difference − 2.75, p = 0.014), blood transfusions (median difference − 24.5, p = 0.047), and number of endoscopies (median differences −6.88, p = 0.006).ConclusionAnti‐angiogenic therapy with IV bevacizumab and/or low‐dose oral pazopanib appears to provide benefits in patients with LVAD‐associated GIB with reduced hospitalizations, blood transfusions, and need for GI endoscopic procedures.

Introduction: Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) with magnetically levitated impellers have become standard due to hemocompatibility and survival profile. To optimize LVAD speeds, we previously introduced simultaneous right and left heart (RH/LH) catheterization during ramp studies. Here, we report pairing of this approach with pressure-volume (PV) assessment in a patient with a HeartMate 3 LVAD with mitral regurgitation (MR). The combined approach evaluated left ventricular (LV) hemodynamics and right ventricular (RV) PV-relationships during ramp testing. Methods: A 68-year-old male with ischemic cardiomyopathy, two years following HeartMate3 implantation, presented with NYHA class III symptoms. To evaluate for dyspnea, he underwent a RH/LH catheterization ramp study. RV PV-loops were created by use of a conductance catheter system, allowing creation of PV loops. Results: At the baseline LVAD speed of 5300 rotations per minute (RPM), right atrial pressure was elevated at 16 mmHg and pulmonary artery (PA) pressure of 26 mmHg. Left-end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was elevated (16mmHg). Baseline cardiac index (CI) was 2.01 L/min/m 2 . Ramp testing was performed, increasing speeds from 5300 to 5800 RPM. Progressive LV unloading was observed with a 5 mmHg drop in LVEDP and a 3 mmHg drop in PA pressure. However, RV PV loop monitoring revealed a negative impact on RV contractility with the maximal elastance (Emax) slope demonstrating a 22% reduction. Furthermore, a 17% reduction in RV stroke volume was documented, while diastolic function remained unchanged. Thus, despite excellent LV offloading and diminishment of RV afterload, the significant negative impact on Emax resulted in no net increase in CI (+0.04 L/min/m 2 ) during the ramp evaluation. Inotrope therapy was initiated for RV function with increased LVAD RPM to outcompete MR. Conclusions: While RH/LH catheterization provides a real-time perspective of the interventricular relationship during ramp, the impact of increasing LVAD speeds on RV function has yet to be directly measured. Here, the RV PV loop relationship during LVAD ramp showed that although LVAD speed increases in the setting of MR may facilitate LV unloading, a drop in RV afterload did not compensate for reduction in RV contractility.

For patients in cardiogenic shock, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSD) have emerged as critical tool to improve hemodynamics and optimize end-organ perfusion; successfully bridging patients to recovery, decision or transplantation. The most commonly utilized MCSD is the femoral intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). However, femoral access hampers the patient's mobility, quality of life, and capacity to participate in rehabilitation. The advent of the axillary artery approach has served to circumvent limitations associated with the femoral artery approach. However, optimum anatomical placement of IABP within the axillary artery (axIABP) is a topic of debate considering its proximity to the brachial plexus. Here, we report our experince with percutaneous access of the third poriton of the axillary artery which showed promising results with minimal device related complications or adverse events. Methods/Results: Between 2017-2023, a total of 89 patients in cardiogenic shock underwent percutaneous axIABP placement at the Mayo Clinic, MN. All demographic, clinical, and periprocedural data were obtained from hospital chart review and recorded in a database under IRB approval. Indications for axIABP support was determined by multidisciplinary assessment. Complications encountered in the cohort included infection at site 6.7% (n=6), device malfunction [rupture, fracture, leak] 8.98%(n=8), and balloon migration 5.61% (n=5). One patient developed local erythema, 4 (4.49%) patients developed significant vascular complications, including access site bleeding in two patients 2.24%, arterial thrombosis in three patients 3.37%, and self-limited intracranial bleeding in one patient 1.12%. Of note, no nerve injury or damage was observed in the entire patient cohort. Conclusion: Our study highlights the feasibility of percutaneous axIABP in the third portion of the axillary artery, while assessing safety profile and ease of removal. Notably in our review, we did not encounter any brachial nerve damage. Ultrasound was pivotal in identifying and avoiding nerves and nerve bundles during initial access. In conclusion, this approach of axIABP insertion is feasible and can be leveraged for delivery of future innovation in MCSD