Bonilla, Hilda Mariana Gonzalez

Abstract Background AL amyloidosis and multiple myeloma are plasma cell dyscrasias characterized by excess light-chain production leading to cardiac amyloid deposition and organ dysfunction. While effective, proteasome inhibitor–based therapy and stem cell transplantation are often limited in advanced disease. Daratumumab provides durable and well-tolerated plasma cell suppression and enables assessment of long-term cardiac outcomes. Purpose To evaluate the long-term effects of daratumumab therapy on cardiac biomarkers and myocardial amyloid burden, assessed by artificial intelligence- based electrocardiographic (AI-ECG) and echocardiographic measures, in patients with AL amyloidosis and cardiac involvement. Methods Following IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective review of patients with AL amyloidosis and cardiac involvement treated with daratumumab at Mayo Clinic Rochester since 2015, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Demographic, clinical, cardiac biomarker, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data were collected at baseline and last follow-up. Paired comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results Overall, 67 patients with AL amyloidosis were included (mean age at diagnosis 59 ± 10 years; 47 [70%] male; concomitant multiple myeloma 13 (19%) patients, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 61 ± 7%), with a mean follow-up duration of 8.3 ± 5.4 years. At diagnosis, the most common organ involvements were renal and cardiac, affecting 78% and 67% of patients, respectively. Free light-chain isotype was λ in 52 patients (75%) and κ in 17 (25%) and immunoglobulin heavy-chain was identified in 26 patients. Among patients with available baseline staging data, Mayo Clinic revised cardiac staging (2012) classified 32% as stage I, 14% as stage II, 21% as stage III, and 32% as stage IV. Most patients were NYHA class II (62%), with 27% in class III–IV. Baseline creatinine clearance <60 ml/min was observed in 48% of patients. No significant changes were observed in conventional echocardiographic parameters during follow-up. In contrast, cardiac biomarkers improved significantly with high-sensitivity troponin T decreased from a baseline median of 59 [25, 104.5] ng/L to 30.5 [14.5, 58.75] ng/L at follow-up (p = 0.003), and NT-proBNP declined from 1,053 [423.5, 6,211.5] pg/mL to 729 [299, 2,328] pg/mL (p = 0.02). Interestingly, artificial intelligence–based electrocardiographic analysis demonstrated a marked reduction in the predicted likelihood of cardiac amyloidosis, decreasing from 55.8% [5.1, 99.6] at baseline to 19.3% [4.3, 68.4] at follow-up (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Long-term daratumumab therapy was associated with significant reductions in cardiac biomarkers and AI-ECG derived measures of myocardial amyloid burden. These findings support the hypothesis that sustained suppression of pathogenic light-chain production may permit gradual improvement in amyloid cardiomyopathy over time.

Axillary artery intra-aortic balloon pump (axIABP) placement has been implemented as a bridging solution before heart transplantation. This study evaluates complications associated with axIABP support and describes an approach to minimize adverse events. We previously described a percutaneous approach for axIABP placement. However, patients receiving axIABP between September 1, 2017, and September 26, 2019 (n = 32) demonstrated a high rate of balloon pump malfunction (8/32; 25%) and other complications (totaling 15/32; 47%). Sixty-four patients were sequentially treated under a revised protocol. Compared to the initial cohort, no significant differences in demographics were noted. A significant reduction in rate of balloon malfunction (8/32, 25% vs. 1/64, 2%; p < 0.001) and total complications (15/32, 47% vs. 10/64, 16%; p = 0.0025) during the period of support were noted after intervention. Subsequent analysis of total complications per device size (40 vs. ≤ 34 ml balloon) revealed significantly reduced complications in patients with smaller devices (40% vs. 13%, respectively; p = 0.0022). This study provides guidelines to limit complications in patients supported with axIABP, facilitating a protracted period of bridging support.

For patients in cardiogenic shock, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSD) have emerged as critical tool to improve hemodynamics and optimize end-organ perfusion; successfully bridging patients to recovery, decision or transplantation. The most commonly utilized MCSD is the femoral intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). However, femoral access hampers the patient's mobility, quality of life, and capacity to participate in rehabilitation. The advent of the axillary artery approach has served to circumvent limitations associated with the femoral artery approach. However, optimum anatomical placement of IABP within the axillary artery (axIABP) is a topic of debate considering its proximity to the brachial plexus. Here, we report our experince with percutaneous access of the third poriton of the axillary artery which showed promising results with minimal device related complications or adverse events. Methods/Results: Between 2017-2023, a total of 89 patients in cardiogenic shock underwent percutaneous axIABP placement at the Mayo Clinic, MN. All demographic, clinical, and periprocedural data were obtained from hospital chart review and recorded in a database under IRB approval. Indications for axIABP support was determined by multidisciplinary assessment. Complications encountered in the cohort included infection at site 6.7% (n=6), device malfunction [rupture, fracture, leak] 8.98%(n=8), and balloon migration 5.61% (n=5). One patient developed local erythema, 4 (4.49%) patients developed significant vascular complications, including access site bleeding in two patients 2.24%, arterial thrombosis in three patients 3.37%, and self-limited intracranial bleeding in one patient 1.12%. Of note, no nerve injury or damage was observed in the entire patient cohort. Conclusion: Our study highlights the feasibility of percutaneous axIABP in the third portion of the axillary artery, while assessing safety profile and ease of removal. Notably in our review, we did not encounter any brachial nerve damage. Ultrasound was pivotal in identifying and avoiding nerves and nerve bundles during initial access. In conclusion, this approach of axIABP insertion is feasible and can be leveraged for delivery of future innovation in MCSD