Introduction: Although most patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) have a benign prognosis, there is a subgroup with bileaflet MVP syndrome (biMVPS) at increased risk of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF). The phenotypic features of this syndrome include myxomatous bileaflet prolapse, complex ventricular ectopy (VE), T-wave inversion in inferolateral ECG leads, and female predominance. The mechanism of ventricular arrhythmia in these patients is unknown. Methods: We reviewed our center’s ablation experience of 14 consecutive patients with biMVPS patients between February 2007 and October 2013 (n=13 female, median [range] age at index ablation 33.8 [21.0 - 58.7] years, left ventricular ejection fraction [EF] 60 [45-67] %, all ≤ moderate mitral regurgitation [MR]). We compared findings from 6 with prior sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) and recurrent ICD shocks for drug refractory VF with 8 who had symptomatic drug-refractory complex VE but without prior SCA. Results: All patients with prior SCA had a predominant VE trigger for the VF. There was no difference between the two groups in EF, MR severity, VE burden, and number of different VE morphologies or foci ablated. Sites of successful VE ablation at index procedure were the LV papillary muscles (PM, n=6 anterior, 6 posterior), fascicular system (n=5 anterior, 4 posterior), mitral annulus (n=2), outflow tracts (3 RVOT, 1 LVOT), and coronary sinus (n=1). All patients had at least one LV papillary or fascicular VE focus. Purkinje origin VE was identified as the VF trigger in 6/6 SCA patients (3 from PM, 3 from LV fascicles) and only 4/8 (none from PM) non-SCA patients (p=0.04). Acute success was seen in 17/19 procedures with no complications. VF storm occurred within 24 hours of ablation in a single patient. At 310 (39 - 2099) days follow-up, 1 SCA patient received a single shock (p=0.031 compared to pre-ablation), and symptoms from VE were reduced in 12/14. Conclusions: BiMVPS is characterized by VE from the LV fascicles and papillary muscles that trigger VF. The VE is invariably multifocal and may also involve the outflow tracts and mitral annulus. Ablation of clinically dominant VE foci alleviates symptoms and reduces the number of VF-terminating ICD shocks.
Device‐detected nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in adult congenital heart disease without tetralogy of fallot
AbstractObjectivesTo evaluate any association between non‐sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) detected by intra‐cardiac device and clinical outcomes in repaired adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) without tetralogy of Fallot (TOF).BackgroundNSVT portends a higher risk of serious ventricular tachyarrhythmia in TOF. However its clinical significance when incidentally detected by implantable cardiac device is not well elucidated in non‐TOF ACHD cohort.MethodsWe performed a single center, retrospective, longitudinal follow‐up study in repaired ACHD (≥18 years) patients without TOF who hosted a pacemaker or automatic implantable cardiac defibrillator (AICD). The cohort was divided based on presence/absence of device detected NSVT. The primary end‐point was a composite of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), or sudden cardiac death (SCD).ResultsOne hundred fifty eight patients (male 56.3%, median [IQR] age of 35 [28–43] years at last follow‐up] with longitudinal post‐implant follow‐up duration of 8 (5–12) years were included. NSVT was detected in 52 (33%) patients. The primary composite end‐point was more frequent in NSVT group [11.5% vs. 2.8%; p = .04]. Patients with NSVT were (i) older at the time of initial implant (age 25 vs. 18 years, p = .011) and more frequently demonstrated (ii) systemic ventricular dysfunction (44% vs. 26%; p = .015), as well as (iii) history of ventriculotomy (38% vs. 21%; p = .017).ConclusionsIn our repaired ACHD cohort, we noted a significant association between device‐detected‐NSVT and the primary composite end‐point of sustained VT/VF or SCD. Systemic ventricular dysfunction and history of ventriculotomy were more frequent in the NSVT group and likely constituted the clinical milieu.
Abstract 20364: Successful Ablation of Ventricular Fibrillation in Malignant Bileaflet Mitral Valve Prolapse Syndrome
Introduction: Although the vast majority of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is benign, women with bileaflet MVP (biMVP), complex ventricular ectopy (VE), and abnormal T waves may comprise the recently described malignant biMVP syndrome. The mechanism of ventricular arrhythmia is unknown. To further characterize the arrhythmic substrate, we reviewed our center’s ablation experience in 6 biMVP patients with prior cardiac arrest and recurrent ICD shocks for drug refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF). Methods and Results: Six women with biMVP (median age 31.5 [range 24.2 - 58.7] years, EF 65 [45 - 67]%, all ≤moderate mitral regurgitation) experienced 6 (3 - 25) appropriate ICD shocks over 4.8 (2.8 - 10.7) years and underwent index ablation between 2/2007 - 10/2013. All had multiple VE morphologies (median 7 [3 - 24]) with variable coupling intervals but with a predominant VE trigger for the VF. A median 2 (1 - 4) VE foci were ablated. Sites of successful ablation of VF-triggering and other dominant VE were left ventricular papillary muscles [PM] (1 anterior, 1 posterior, 1 both), fascicles (1 anterior, 1 posterior), or both (1 both PM and posterior fascicle). Outflow tract VE was also present and targeted (1 left, 1 right)i. Two underwent repeat ablation (288 and 312 days) for recurrent complex VE without shocks, with different foci to the index ablation (1 posterior fascicle, 1 both fascicles). The VF-triggering VE in all patients was confirmed as originating from within the left fascicular system, which in 3/6 was at a papillary muscle. Acute procedural success was seen in all with no complications to date. A VF storm occurred within 24 hours of ablation in a single patient. At follow-up of a mean 662 (47 - 2099) days, 1 patient received a single shock (p=0.03 vs. preablation). Symptomatic VE was reduced in all; while 3/6 continue Class 1c antiarrhythmics and 5/6 have beta blockade. Conclusion: Malignant biMVP syndrome is characterized by fascicular and papillary muscle PVCs that trigger ventricular fibrillation, yet in all patients, the VE is multifocal. Ablation of at least one focus appears to improve symptoms and reduce shocks.
Sites of Successful Ventricular Fibrillation Ablation in Bileaflet Mitral Valve Prolapse Syndrome
Background— Although the vast majority of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is benign, a small subset of patients, predominantly women, with bileaflet prolapse, complex ventricular ectopy (VE), and abnormal T waves comprise the recently described bileaflet MVP syndrome. We compared findings on electrophysiological study in bileaflet MVP syndrome patients with and without cardiac arrest to identify factors that may predispose to malignant ventricular arrhythmia. Methods and Results— Fourteen consecutive bileaflet MVP syndrome patients (n=13 women; median [limits], age at index ablation, 33.8 [21.0–58.7] years; ejection fraction, 60% [45%–67%]; all ≤ moderate mitral regurgitation; n=6 with previous cardiac arrest and implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks for ventricular fibrillation; and n=8 without implantable cardioverter defibrillator although with symptomatic complex VE) were included. The 2 groups had similar baseline echocardiographic and electrocardiographic characteristics. All patients had at least 1 left ventricular papillary or fascicular VE focus. Purkinje origin VE was identified as the ventricular fibrillation trigger in 6 of 6 cardiac arrest patients (4 from papillary muscle) and Purkinje origin of dominant VE was seen in 5 of 8 (3 from papillary muscle) nonarrest patients. Acute success was seen in 17 of 19 procedures, and a ventricular fibrillation storm occurred within 24 hours of ablation in a single patient. Repeat ablation for recurrent symptomatic arrhythmia was performed in 6 patients. At 478 (39–2099) days of follow-up, 2 cardiac arrest patients received appropriate shocks. Symptoms from VE were reduced in 12 of 14. Conclusions— Bileaflet MVP syndrome is characterized by fascicular and papillary muscle VE that triggers ventricular fibrillation. Ablation of clinically dominant VE foci improves symptoms and reduces appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks.
Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Ventricular Fibrillation out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Secondary to Acute Coronary Syndrome
Background Survivors of ventricular fibrillation out of hospital cardiac arrest ( VF ‐ OHCA ) due to a potentially reversible cause such as acute myocardial infarction (MI) or ischemia are considered to be at low risk of recurrent arrhythmia. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators ( ICD ) are not routinely recommended in such patients. However, the outcome of these patients in the era of rapid coronary revascularization and ICD therapy is not known. Methods and Results We examined the outcome of 114 consecutive survivors of VF OHCA due to acute MI or ischemia in Olmsted County, MN from 1990 to 2011. An ICD was implanted in 45/114 patients. ICD recipients had lower EF [median ( IQR ) 38 (26 to 54) versus 48 (35 to 58) %, P =0.04]. During a median ( IQR ) follow‐up of 9.9 (4.4 to 14.6) years, ICD implantation was associated with reduced cardiac mortality ( HR 0.24 [0.07 to 0.88], P =0.031) and a trend towards reduced all‐cause mortality ( HR 0.56 [0.30 to 1.02], P =0.059) after adjusting for the first principal component. One or more appropriate ICD therapies were delivered in 19/45, with half of the patients receiving therapy within 1 year. Patients with EF ≤35% at discharge continued to be at long‐term risk for ICD therapy compared with those with EF >35% who were at increased risk predominantly in the first 8 months. EF and revascularization were not significantly associated with ICD therapy in the multivariable analysis. Conclusions Patients with VF ‐ OHCA in the setting of acute MI or myocardial ischemia remain at high risk of recurrent ventricular arrhythmias, particularly if EF ≤35%. This suggests that ICD implantation may be reasonable if EF ≤35%.