Armstrong, Gregory T.

PURPOSE Recent studies reveal that 5%-18% of children with cancer harbor pathogenic variants in known cancer-predisposing genes. However, DNA damage repair (DDR) genes, which are frequently somatically altered in pediatric tumors, have not been systematically examined as a source of novel cancer-predisposing signals. METHODS To address this gap, we interrogated 189 DDR genes for presence of germline predisposing variants (PV) among 5,993 childhood cancer cases and 14,477 adult noncancer controls (discovery cohort). PV were determined using a tiered approach incorporating ClinVar annotations, InterVar classification, and in silico tools (REVEL, CADD, and MetaSVM). Using logistic and firth regression, we identified genes with PV statistically enriched in the germline of children with tumors and replicated findings among 1,497 additional childhood cancer cases across three independent cohorts. RESULTS Analysis across all cases with cancer revealed enrichment of TP53 PV. Cancer-specific analyses confirmed known associations including germline TP53 PV in adrenocortical carcinoma, high-grade glioma (HGG), and medulloblastoma (MB), PMS2 in HGG and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), MLH1 in HGG, BRCA2 in NHL, and BARD1 in neuroblastoma. In addition, four novel associations were uncovered, including BRCA1 in ependymoma, SPIDR in HGG, SMC5 in MB, and SMARCAL1 in osteosarcoma (OS). Importantly, the SMARCAL1 :OS association was significant in the discovery (6/230, 2.6%, false discovery rate [FDR] logistic = 0.0189) as well as all three replication cohorts (Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: 8/275, 2.9%; P Fisher < .0001; Cancer Predisposition Syndrome-German Childhood Cancer Registry: 4/135, 3%, P Fisher = .002; Individualized Therapy for Relapsed Malignancies in Childhood: 4/217, 1.8%, P Fisher = .012). The remaining wild-type SMARCAL1 allele was deleted in three of four OS tumors with available data. CONCLUSION Our study confirms the relevance DDR genetic variation in pediatric cancer risk and establishes SMARCAL1 as a novel OS predisposing gene, providing insights into tumor biology and creating opportunities to optimize care for patients with this challenging tumor.

10026 Background: Childhood cancer survivors are at high risk for developing subsequent breast cancer with higher mortality than females in the general population with primary breast cancer. Whether therapeutic tradeoffs in treating primary versus subsequent breast cancer alter survival is unknown. Methods: Breast cancer treatment data were abstracted from medical records for female survivors from the CCSS and a multi-institutional sample of females with primary breast cancer matched one-to-one by demographics, diagnosis age/year, and breast cancer characteristics. Survivors’ excess mortality risk was evaluated as hazard ratios (HRs), adjusting for receipt of historically-appropriate guideline-concordant treatment established for primary breast cancer. Results: Subsequent breast cancers were diagnosed between 1981-2016 among 431 survivors, with a median diagnosis age of 40 years (IQR: 35-44). Most subsequent breast cancers were invasive (77%), with hormone receptor profiles similar to the general population (78% ER-positive; 26% HER2-positive). Guideline-concordant breast cancer treatment did not differ between survivors and controls (N = 688; 94% versus 93%), but treatment selection differed, reflecting survivors’ complex clinical history and guidelines’ multiple treatment options. Anthracyclines were used in 47% of survivors (controls 66%), mastectomy in 81% of survivors (controls 60%), and radiotherapy in 18% of survivors (controls 61%). In the subgroup treated with surgery and chemotherapy (survivors 31%, controls 26%), survivors did not have greater likelihood of dose reductions or omissions, treatment delays, or hospitalization for fever and neutropenia, but they were more likely to experience hematological toxicities (21% vs. 9%, p = 0.033) and other organ system-specific toxicities (36% vs. 11%, p < 0.001). Over one-third (38%) of survivors died during follow-up (median follow-up 9 years, IQR 6-14) after breast cancer. Strikingly higher all-cause mortality was observed among survivors than controls (HR = 3.5, 95% CI 2.2-5.6), especially after in situ disease (HR = 9.9, 95% CI 2.2-44.2). Among survivors with invasive disease, breast cancer accounted for most deaths (51%), followed by other subsequent malignancies (15%) and cardiovascular diseases (15%). Other health conditions accounted for 67% of deaths following in situ disease. Conclusions: Childhood cancer survivors with subsequent breast cancer generally receive guideline-concordant breast cancer treatment. While the treatments survivors receive differ from females with primary breast cancer, they do not experience higher rates of on-therapy treatment modifications. Despite this, they face excess mortality, primarily driven by other health conditions. Managing comorbidities is critical to enhancing long-term survival for this high-risk population.

PURPOSE Radiation-associated cardiac disease is a major cause of morbidity/mortality among childhood cancer survivors. Radiation dose-response relationships for cardiac substructures and cardiac diseases remain unestablished. METHODS Using the 25,481 5-year survivors of childhood cancer treated from 1970 to 1999 in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, we evaluated coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), valvular disease (VD), and arrhythmia. We reconstructed radiation doses for each survivor to the coronary arteries, chambers, valves, and whole heart. Excess relative rate (ERR) models and piecewise exponential models evaluated dose-response relationships. RESULTS The cumulative incidence 35 years from diagnosis was 3.9% (95% CI, 3.4 to 4.3) for CAD, 3.8% (95% CI, 3.4 to 4.2) for HF, 1.2% (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.5) for VD, and 1.4% (95% CI, 1.1 to 1.6) for arrhythmia. A total of 12,288 survivors (48.2%) were exposed to radiotherapy. Quadratic ERR models improved fit compared with linear ERR models for the dose-response relationship between mean whole heart and CAD, HF, and arrhythmia, suggesting a potential threshold dose; however, such departure from linearity was not observed for most cardiac substructure end point dose-response relationships. Mean doses of 5-9.9 Gy to the whole heart did not increase the risk of any cardiac diseases. Mean doses of 5-9.9 Gy to the right coronary artery (rate ratio [RR], 2.6 [95% CI, 1.6 to 4.1]) and left ventricle (RR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.3 to 3.7]) increased risk of CAD, and to the tricuspid valve (RR, 5.5 [95% CI, 2.0 to 15.1]) and right ventricle (RR, 8.4 [95% CI, 3.7 to 19.0]) increased risk of VD. CONCLUSION Among children with cancer, there may be no threshold dose below which radiation to the cardiac substructures does not increase the risk of cardiac diseases. This emphasizes their importance in modern treatment planning.

10027 Background: Thoracic radiotherapy (RT) is a risk factor for cardiac disease among survivors of childhood cancer based on studies considering RT doses to the entire heart. Dose to specific cardiac substructures may provide more precise dose-response associations to guide RT planning. We report associations between RT dose to cardiac substructures and risk of specific cardiac outcomes. Methods: We determined the cumulative incidences of CTCAE grade 3 – 5 coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), and valvular disease (VD) among 25,481 5-year childhood cancer survivors diagnosed 1970 – 1999 in the CCSS. Median age at diagnosis was 6.1 years (0 – 20 years) and at last follow-up 29.8 years (5.6 – 65.9 years). For the 12,228 individuals receiving RT, fields were reconstructed on an age scaled computational phantom. Mean doses to the entire heart, cardiac chambers, valves, and left main, anterior descending (LAD), circumflex, and right coronary (RCA) arteries were estimated. Adjusted piecewise exponential models (including cumulative anthracycline dose) evaluated associations between mean RT dose to each structure and outcomes. Results: At 30 years from diagnosis, the cumulative incidences of grades 3 – 5 CAD, HF, and VD were 2.3% (95% CI 2.0 – 2.5), 2.6% (95% CI 2.4 – 2.9), and 0.6% (95% CI 0.5 – 0.8) respectively. Low dose RT (mean 5 – 9.9 Gy) to the RCA (relative rate [RR] = 2.6, 95% CI 1.6 – 4.1, p < 0.001), LAD (RR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 – 3.3, p = 0.019), and left ventricle (RR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.3 – 3.7, p = 0.002) was associated with increased risk of CAD relative to those not exposed; mean dose of 5 – 9.9 Gy to the entire heart was not (RR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.8 – 1.6, p = 0.59). Table shows the associated cumulative incidences of CAD for these structures. Mean RT doses of 5 – 9.9 Gy to the aortic valve (RR = 4.6, 95% CI 1.5 – 14.0, p = 0.008) and tricuspid valve (RR = 5.5, 95% CI 2.0 – 15.1, p = 0.001) were associated with risk of VD compared to those with no RT; mean heart dose 5 – 9.9 Gy was not (RR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.2 – 1.3, p = 0.16). No cardiac structure was significantly associated with an increased risk of HF at a mean dose of 5 – 9.9 Gy. Mean RT doses below 5 Gy were not associated with increased risks of CAD, HF, or VD; doses ≥10 Gy to nearly all substructures and the entire heart were. Conclusions: Low dose RT to the coronary arteries and cardiac valves (5 – 9.9 Gy) from RT is associated with increased risk of CAD and VD, respectively. Sensitivity to low dose RT may vary across the heart and doses to specific structures may be more predictive of late cardiac disease than whole heart dose. These data can guide RT planning to prioritize substructures for avoidance.[Table: see text]

11570 Background: Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) protocols included treatment modifications, which may have ameliorated late health outcomes for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) survivors treated in more recent era. Methods: We evaluated chronic health conditions (CHCs) and late mortality ( > 5 years from diagnosis) among survivors treated 1970-1990 (IRSG I-III) and 1991-1999 (IRSG IV), and associations with specific treatments to identify treatment-related factors for adverse outcomes. Associations between treatments and CHCs and mortality were evaluated using Fine and Gray’s proportional hazards method accounting for competing risks. Results: 856 survivors treated 1970-90 (median diagnosis age 5.4 years [0- 20]) and 306 treated 1991-99 (median diagnosis age 5.5 years [0-20]) were included. Significant exposure differences between eras included higher percentage (53% vs. 17%, p < 0.01) receiving ≥ 20gm/m2 cumulative alkylators in 1991-99, but more receiving platinums (13% vs 5%, p < 0.01) and abdomen/ pelvis radiation (29% vs. 23%, p = 0.04) in 1970-90. 20-year cumulative incidence for any (40% vs. 28%, p < 0.01), ≥2 (16% vs. 7%, p < 0.01), and endocrine (8% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.01) grade 3-5 CHCs was higher in 1970-90 compared to 1991-99. The hazard ratio (HR) for any (HR 0.7, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.55-0.9), ≥2 (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.22-0.66) and endocrine (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.67) grade 3-5 CHC was lower for 1991-99 survivors than 1970-90. The effect of era (1991-99 vs 1970-90, HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59-0.91) on CHC was not attenuated when treatment variables were added to multivariable model. Exposures with increased risk of grade 3-5 CHC included platinums (hearing, HR 2, 95% CI 1.07-3.8), anthracycline ≥250mg/m2 (cardiovascular, HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6) and abdomen/ pelvis radiation (second malignant neoplasms, HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4, gastrointestinal, HR 7.4, 95% CI 3.5-16 and endocrine, HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.4). Gonadal dysfunction was the most common endocrine CHC. There was no difference in all cause or cause-specific mortality between the two cohorts. Conclusions: RMS survivors from the IRSG IV era are at reduced risk for late onset chronic health conditions compared to previous era.

Abstract Abstract 664 Background: Survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who received prophylactic cranial radiation therapy (CRT) are at increased risk for deficits in neurocognitive skills, including attention, working memory and processing speed. As survivors age, global brain injury from CRT may reduce cognitive reserve, placing them at risk for early onset dementia or long-term memory deficits. The prevalence of dementia and memory abnormalities in adult survivors of childhood ALL has not previously been established. Methods: Analyses were conducted on 265 of 445 (60%) eligible survivors of childhood ALL (median age 36 years, range 26–54 years; 52% female) treated with 18Gy (n=127) or 24Gy (n=138) CRT with a median time from CRT of 30 years (range 15–46 years). Participants completed the Wechsler Memory Scale IV, including the Brief Cognitive Status Exam (BSCE), and the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). Age-adjusted standard scores were calculated and the BSCE was also adjusted for education level. Prevalence of memory impairment (<1 SD below age-expected mean), stratified by RT dose exposure, is reported and logistic regression used to identify risk factors for impairment. A subset of survivors (n=85) completed brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including assessment of hippocampal volume, cortical thickness, white matter volume, diffusion tensor imaging, and functional MRI (fMRI) during a cued-recall memory task. Results: Survivors who received 24 Gy CRT had increased impairment on global measures of both short-term recall (33%; p<0.001) and long-term recall (30%; p<0.001), while no increase in impairment was seen after 18Gy. Impaired short-term recall was associated with smaller right (p=0.02) and left (p<0.01) temporal lobe volumes, while impaired long-term recall was associated with thinner parietal and frontal cortices. On subtests evaluating narrative memory (i.e. story recall) and design memory, increasing RT dose (24 vs. 18Gy) was associated with an increased prevalence of long-term memory impairment (narrative: 28% vs. 12%, p=0.001; designs: 13% vs. 3.2%, p=0.003). However, no CRT dose response was identified for short term narrative and design memory. Survivors with impaired long-term memory for designs demonstrated a compensatory increase in left hippocampal fMRI activation (p=0.005), and the effect was greater in the higher dose group (p = 0.04). The mean score for long-term narrative memory among survivors who received 24Gy was equivalent to the mean score of a 70–74 year old adult population. Neither young age (0–4 years) at CRT (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8–2.7), time from CRT (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9–1.1) nor intrathecal methotrexate exposure (OR 3.9, 95% CI 0.4–36.1) were significantly associated with long-term memory deficits. Reduced cognitive status (by BSCE) was identified after 18Gy (9%, p=0.11) and 24Gy (18%, p<0.001), suggesting a CRT dose-response effect. On diffusion tensor imaging, increased radial diffusivity in the frontal, parietal and temporal regions, an inverse measure of white matter integrity, was associated with reduced BSCE. Current employment rates were equivalent (63%) in both CRT dose groups, suggesting no difference in functional status. Conclusions: Aging adult survivors of ALL who received 24Gy CRT have reduced cognitive status and significant impairment in short-term and long-term memory. There appears to be a dose response effect selective for long-term narrative and design memory, but not for short term narrative and design memory. These patterns are consistent with early onset of age-related (long-term) memory loss, and early stage dementia, yet at a median age of only 36 years. After 24Gy, survivors have the narrative memory equivalent to a 70 year-old in the general population. Survivors with memory impairment demonstrated reduced integrity on structural and functional neuroimaging in anatomical regions established as essential for memory formation and long-term recall. However, these memory impairments do not seem to affect functional status (employment rates) suggesting that, rather than frank dementia, deficits in middle adulthood are consistent with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Longitudinal evaluation of this population is needed as MCI often progresses into early onset dementia with age. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The improvement in survival of childhood cancer observed across the past 50 years has resulted in a growing acknowledgment that simply extending the lifespan of survivors is not enough. It is incumbent on both the cancer research and the clinical care communities to also improve the health span of survivors. It is well established that aging adult survivors of childhood cancer are at increased risk of chronic health conditions, relative to the general population. However, as the first generation of survivors age into their 50s and 60s, it has become increasingly evident that this population is also at risk of early onset of physiologic aging. Geriatric measures have uncovered evidence of reduced strength and speed and increased fatigue, all components of frailty, among survivors with a median age of 33 years, which is similar to adults older than 65 years of age in the general population. Furthermore, frailty in survivors independently increased the risk of morbidity and mortality. Although there has been a paucity of research investigating the underlying biologic mechanisms for advanced physiologic age in survivors, results from geriatric populations suggest five biologically plausible mechanisms that may be potentiated by exposure to cancer therapies: increased cellular senescence, reduced telomere length, epigenetic modifications, somatic mutations, and mitochondrial DNA infidelity. There is now a critical need for research to elucidate the biologic mechanisms of premature aging in survivors of childhood cancer. This research could pave the way for new frontiers in the prevention of these life-changing outcomes.

AbstractBackgroundSurvivors of childhood non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are at increased risk for chronic health conditions. The objective of this study was to characterize health conditions, neurocognitive function, and physical performance among a clinically evaluated cohort of 200 childhood NHL survivors.MethodChronic health and neurocognitive conditions were graded as per a modified version of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and impaired physical function defined as performance < 10th percentile of normative data. Multivariable regression was used to investigate associations between sociodemographic characteristics, therapeutic exposures, and outcomes.ResultsSurvivors were a median age of 10 years (range 1–19) at diagnosis and 34 years (range 20–58) at evaluation. Eighty‐eight (44%) received radiation, 46 (23%) cranial radiation, and 69 (35%) high‐dose methotrexate. Most prevalent CTCAE Grades 3–4 (severe life‐threatening) conditions were obesity (35%), hypertension (9%), and impairment of executive function (13%), attention (9%), and memory (4%). Many had impaired strength (48%), flexibility (39%), muscular endurance (36%), and mobility (36%). Demographic and treatment‐related factors were associated with the development of individual chronic diseases and functional deficits.ConclusionsClinical evaluation identified a high prevalence of chronic health conditions, neurocognitive deficits, and performance limitations in childhood NHL survivors.

BACKGROUNDHealth complications related to childhood cancer may be influenced by risky health behaviors (RHBs), particularly when RHBs co‐occur. To the authors' knowledge, only limited information is available describing how RHBs cluster among survivors of childhood cancer and their siblings and the risk factors for co‐occurring RHBs.METHODSLatent class analysis was used to identify RHB clusters using longitudinal survey data regarding smoking, alcohol use, and physical activity from adult survivors (4184 survivors) and siblings (1598 siblings) in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Generalized logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between demographic characteristics, treatment exposures, psychological distress, health conditions, and cluster membership.RESULTSThree RHB clusters were identified: a low‐risk cluster, an insufficiently active cluster, and a high‐risk cluster (tobacco and risky alcohol use and insufficient activity). Compared with siblings, survivors were more likely to be in the insufficiently active cluster (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.06‐1.27) and were less likely to be in the high‐risk cluster (ORadj, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69‐0.88). Risk factors for membership in the high‐risk cluster included psychological distress (ORadj, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.98‐3.86), low educational attainment (ORadj, 7.49; 95% CI, 5.15‐10.88), income <$20,000 (ORadj, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.93‐3.57), being divorced/separated or widowed (ORadj, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.03‐1.79), and limb amputation (ORadj, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.03‐2.24). Risk factors for the insufficiently active cluster included chronic health conditions, psychological distress, low education or income, being obese or overweight, female sex, nonwhite race/ethnicity, single marital status, cranial radiation, and cisplatin exposure.CONCLUSIONSRHBs co‐occur in survivors of childhood cancer and their siblings. Economic and educational disadvantages and psychological distress should be considered in screening and interventions to reduce RHBs. Cancer 2016. © 2016 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2016;122:2747–2756. © 2016 American Cancer Society.