Back to Authors

Guenther, Lillian M

0000-0002-5906-7504

Mayo Clinic

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Citations 2

Pediatric sarcomas: challenges and opportunities
Gao, Yuan, Bailey, Kelly M. , Blackman, Samuel C. , Bushweller, John H. , Chong, Shasha , DeHond, Kevin, Grembecka, Jolanta , Hatley, Mark E. , Kadoch, Cigall , Koehler, Angela N. , Linardic, Corinne M. , Renna, Phil, Stewart, Elizabeth A., Stillman, Bruce , Sweet-Cordero, E. Alejandro, Reu, Frederic J , Stillman, Bruce , Stegmaier, Kimberly , Vakoc, Christopher R , Guenther, Lillian M , Reu, Frederic J. , Rivera, Miguel N. , Stewart, Elizabeth A. , Sweet-Cordero, Alejandro

Genes & Development | August 4, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1101/gad.353549.125 Get It

Pediatric sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare mesodermal malignancies. These cancers, which affect children from infancy through adolescence and young adulthood, are in general challenging to treat with currently available therapies. Biologically, many are characterized by quiet genomes, fusion oncoproteins, immune “cold” microenvironments, and vast epigenetic deregulation that contributes to diverse and complex mechanistic drivers. Multifaceted advancements in research strategies, including high-throughput screening, new model systems, surfaceome profiling, and study of oncogenic fusion condensates have led to new opportunities for understanding the biology of pediatric sarcomas. To continue to make progress for these difficult to treat cancers, it will be critical to continue to improve access to bioinformatic data, approach patient care using innovative clinical trial frameworks, and foster interdisciplinary partnerships among medicinal chemists, scientists, clinicians, advocates, and industry partners.
Investigation of DNA Damage Response Genes Validates the Role of DNA Repair in Pediatric Cancer Risk and Identifies SMARCAL1 as a Novel Osteosarcoma Predisposition Gene
Oak, Ninad , Chen, Wenan , Blake, Alise K. , Harrison, Lynn , O’Brien, Martha A., Previti, Christopher , Balasubramanian, Gnanaprakash, Hirsch, Steffen , Penkert, Judith , Jones, Barbara C. , Schramm, Kathrin , Nathrath, Michaela , Witt, Olaf , Li, Jiaming , Ness, Kirsten K. , Kratz, Christian P. , Armstrong, Greg , Autry, Robert J. , Nichols, Kim E. , Armstrong, Gregory T. , Blake, Alise , Hirsch, Steffen , Penkert, Judith , Jones, Barbara C , Nathrath, Michaela , Pajtler, Kristian W , Jones, David T W , Witt, Olaf , Dirksen, Uta , Li, Jiaming , Sapkota, Yadav , Ness, Kirsten K , Guenther, Lillian M , Kratz, Christian , Wang, Zhaoming , Hudson, Melissa M , Wu, Gang , Nichols, Kim E , Sharma, Richa , O'Brien, Martha, Maaß, Kendra K. , Pajtler, Kristian W. , Jones, David , Sapkota, Yadav , Pfister, Stefan M. , Wang, Zhaoming , Hudson, Melissa M. , Wu, Gang , Sharma, Richa

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 9, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 36 | Pages: 3833-3843

10.1200/jco-25-01114 Get It

PURPOSE Recent studies reveal that 5%-18% of children with cancer harbor pathogenic variants in known cancer-predisposing genes. However, DNA damage repair (DDR) genes, which are frequently somatically altered in pediatric tumors, have not been systematically examined as a source of novel cancer-predisposing signals. METHODS To address this gap, we interrogated 189 DDR genes for presence of germline predisposing variants (PV) among 5,993 childhood cancer cases and 14,477 adult noncancer controls (discovery cohort). PV were determined using a tiered approach incorporating ClinVar annotations, InterVar classification, and in silico tools (REVEL, CADD, and MetaSVM). Using logistic and firth regression, we identified genes with PV statistically enriched in the germline of children with tumors and replicated findings among 1,497 additional childhood cancer cases across three independent cohorts. RESULTS Analysis across all cases with cancer revealed enrichment of TP53 PV. Cancer-specific analyses confirmed known associations including germline TP53 PV in adrenocortical carcinoma, high-grade glioma (HGG), and medulloblastoma (MB), PMS2 in HGG and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), MLH1 in HGG, BRCA2 in NHL, and BARD1 in neuroblastoma. In addition, four novel associations were uncovered, including BRCA1 in ependymoma, SPIDR in HGG, SMC5 in MB, and SMARCAL1 in osteosarcoma (OS). Importantly, the SMARCAL1 :OS association was significant in the discovery (6/230, 2.6%, false discovery rate [FDR] logistic = 0.0189) as well as all three replication cohorts (Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: 8/275, 2.9%; P Fisher < .0001; Cancer Predisposition Syndrome-German Childhood Cancer Registry: 4/135, 3%, P Fisher = .002; Individualized Therapy for Relapsed Malignancies in Childhood: 4/217, 1.8%, P Fisher = .012). The remaining wild-type SMARCAL1 allele was deleted in three of four OS tumors with available data. CONCLUSION Our study confirms the relevance DDR genetic variation in pediatric cancer risk and establishes SMARCAL1 as a novel OS predisposing gene, providing insights into tumor biology and creating opportunities to optimize care for patients with this challenging tumor.