Arnold, Michael A

PURPOSE Detection of bone marrow disease has been a major component of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) staging with bilateral bone marrow aspirates/biopsies (BMAB) from the iliac crests considered the diagnostic gold standard. This study's goal was to determine if 2- 18 F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([ 18 F]FDG PET/CT) or PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may replace BMAB in RMS staging. METHODS Patients were recruited in Europe and North America. Medical records, FDG PET/CT or FDG PET/MRI (PET), and BMAB reports were collected retrospectively. Images were re-reviewed by nuclear medicine physicians at the patients' home institutions if PET reports indicated increased FDG uptake at bone/bone marrow sites or if tumor cells were detected in bone marrow samples. RESULTS PET imaging and BMAB were performed before chemotherapy and tumor resection in 301 patients with FDG-avid RMS. Bone marrow metastases were detected by PET and BMAB in 54, by PET only in 24, and by BMAB only in one of 301 patients with FDG-avid primary tumors. Absence of bone marrow metastases was confirmed by PET and BMAB in 222 of 301 patients. These observations translated into 98% sensitivity and 90% specificity for PET in detecting bone marrow metastases when BMAB was considered as gold standard. FDG-avid marrow disease was patchy (1-5 foci) in one third of cases. Patients with marrow disease indicated by PET and BMAB had more FDG-avid bone marrow foci, more metastatic sites, and lower survival than those with marrow disease indicated by PET only, suggesting more advanced disease stages. CONCLUSION Bone marrow sampling may be omitted in patients without evidence of FDG-avid bone marrow disease by PET. If there are FDG-avid bone marrow lesions, further investigation by MRI and/or biopsy should be considered.

10026 Background: Childhood cancer survivors are at high risk for developing subsequent breast cancer with higher mortality than females in the general population with primary breast cancer. Whether therapeutic tradeoffs in treating primary versus subsequent breast cancer alter survival is unknown. Methods: Breast cancer treatment data were abstracted from medical records for female survivors from the CCSS and a multi-institutional sample of females with primary breast cancer matched one-to-one by demographics, diagnosis age/year, and breast cancer characteristics. Survivors’ excess mortality risk was evaluated as hazard ratios (HRs), adjusting for receipt of historically-appropriate guideline-concordant treatment established for primary breast cancer. Results: Subsequent breast cancers were diagnosed between 1981-2016 among 431 survivors, with a median diagnosis age of 40 years (IQR: 35-44). Most subsequent breast cancers were invasive (77%), with hormone receptor profiles similar to the general population (78% ER-positive; 26% HER2-positive). Guideline-concordant breast cancer treatment did not differ between survivors and controls (N = 688; 94% versus 93%), but treatment selection differed, reflecting survivors’ complex clinical history and guidelines’ multiple treatment options. Anthracyclines were used in 47% of survivors (controls 66%), mastectomy in 81% of survivors (controls 60%), and radiotherapy in 18% of survivors (controls 61%). In the subgroup treated with surgery and chemotherapy (survivors 31%, controls 26%), survivors did not have greater likelihood of dose reductions or omissions, treatment delays, or hospitalization for fever and neutropenia, but they were more likely to experience hematological toxicities (21% vs. 9%, p = 0.033) and other organ system-specific toxicities (36% vs. 11%, p < 0.001). Over one-third (38%) of survivors died during follow-up (median follow-up 9 years, IQR 6-14) after breast cancer. Strikingly higher all-cause mortality was observed among survivors than controls (HR = 3.5, 95% CI 2.2-5.6), especially after in situ disease (HR = 9.9, 95% CI 2.2-44.2). Among survivors with invasive disease, breast cancer accounted for most deaths (51%), followed by other subsequent malignancies (15%) and cardiovascular diseases (15%). Other health conditions accounted for 67% of deaths following in situ disease. Conclusions: Childhood cancer survivors with subsequent breast cancer generally receive guideline-concordant breast cancer treatment. While the treatments survivors receive differ from females with primary breast cancer, they do not experience higher rates of on-therapy treatment modifications. Despite this, they face excess mortality, primarily driven by other health conditions. Managing comorbidities is critical to enhancing long-term survival for this high-risk population.