Timm, Paul

ObjectiveThis study assessed the relationship between speech and language impairment and outcome in a multicenter cohort of isolated/idiopathic rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD).MethodsPatients with iRBD from 7 centers speaking Czech, English, German, French, and Italian languages underwent a detailed speech assessment at baseline. Story‐tale narratives were transcribed and linguistically annotated using fully automated methods based on automatic speech recognition and natural language processing algorithms, leading to the 3 distinctive linguistic and 2 acoustic patterns of language deterioration and associated composite indexes of their overall severity. Patients were then prospectively followed and received assessments for parkinsonism or dementia during follow‐up. The Cox proportional hazard was performed to evaluate the predictive value of language patterns for phenoconversion over a follow‐up period of 5 years.ResultsOf 180 patients free of parkinsonism or dementia, 156 provided follow‐up information. After a mean follow‐up of 2.7 years, 42 (26.9%) patients developed neurodegenerative disease. Patients with higher severity of linguistic abnormalities (hazard ratio [HR = 2.35]) and acoustic abnormalities (HR = 1.92) were more likely to develop a defined neurodegenerative disease, with converters having lower content richness (HR = 1.74), slower articulation rate (HR = 1.58), and prolonged pauses (HR = 1.46). Dementia‐first (n = 16) and parkinsonism‐first with mild cognitive impairment (n = 9) converters had higher severity of linguistic abnormalities than parkinsonism‐first with normal cognition converters (n = 17).InterpretationAutomated language analysis might provide a predictor of phenoconversion from iRBD into synucleinopathy subtypes with cognitive impairment, and thus can be used to stratify patients for neuroprotective trials. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:530–543

Abstract Study Objectives Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) carries a high lifetime risk for phenoconversion to a defined neurodegenerative disease (NDD) including Parkinson disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and multiple system atrophy. We aimed to examine iRBD patient values and preferences regarding prognostic counseling. Methods One hundred thirteen iRBD patient participants enrolled in the Mayo Clinic iRBD Patient Registry were sent an email survey concerning their values and preferences concerning NDD prognostic counseling and their experiences following diagnosis with iRBD. Results Of 81 respondents (71.7% response rate), the majority were men (74.0%) with an average age of 65.7 (±9.7) years. Responses indicated a strong preference toward receiving prognostic information about possible future NDD development. 92.5% of respondents felt knowledge concerning personal NDD risk was important, while 87.6% indicated prognostic discussions were important to maintaining trust in their physician. 95.7% indicated a desire for more information, while only 4.3% desired less information regarding their NDD prognostic risk. Most respondents strongly agreed that prognostic information was important to discuss with their family and friends and inform future life planning, and most expressed interest in learning more about future neuroprotective therapies and symptomatic treatments for parkinsonism and dementia. Conclusions Most iRBD patients indicated strong preferences for disclosure of NDD prognostic risk and indicated that prognostic information was important for family discussions and future life planning. Future broader surveys and qualitative studies of clinic-based and ultimately community dwelling iRBD patients’ values and preferences are needed to guide appropriately tailored and individualized prognostic counseling approaches following iRBD diagnosis.

Abstract Introduction Accurate, early diagnosis of isolated rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is crucial given its injury potential and neurological prognosis. We aimed to analyze visual and automated REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) diagnostic thresholds in a current cohort of iRBD patients using submentalis (SM) and individual four limb electromyography (EMG) recordings, including bilateral flexor digitorum superificialis (FDS) and anterior tibialis (AT) during polysomnography. Methods We analyzed RSWA in 20 iRBD patients and 20 age-sex-AHI matched controls who underwent polysomnography between 2017-2021 for phasic burst durations, phasic, tonic, and "any" muscle activity, and automated REM atonia index (RAI). Group RSWA metrics were analyzed with non-parametric comparisons, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine optimal diagnostic cutoff thresholds for iRBD. Correlation explored associative relationships between RSWA metrics, and principal components analysis (PCA) defined determinants of RSWA metric variance. Results All mean RSWA metrics were higher in iRBD patients than controls (p<0.05), except for left and bilateral AT phasic density and duration. RSWA(phasic%, AUC; "any"%, AUC) cutoffs were: SM (6.5%, AUC=90.2; 6.5%, AUC=92.5); L FDS (7.3%, AUC=95.8; 7.3%, AUC=95.8%); R FDS (5.4%, AUC=93.5; 5.8%, AUC=93.2%); Bilateral FDS (10.7%, AUC=96; 15.3%, AUC=95.8); L AT (6.7%, AUC=74.5; 6.7%, AUC=74.8%); R AT (4.7%, AUC=76.8; 4.7%, AUC=76.8%); Bilateral AT (7.5%, AUC=77.5; 7.5%, AUC=77.5%), combined SM/FDS (15.0%, AUC=95.5; 15.1%; AUC=95.8), combined SM/AT (16.5%, AUC=85.8; 21.0%; AUC=88.8),tonic (0.5%; AUC=85.9), and RAI (0.90; AUC=91.4). Phasic burst duration cutoffs were: SM=0.7s (AUC=90.2), L FDS=0.5 s (AUC=83.2), R FDS=0.6 (AUC=85.2), L AT=0.3 s (AUC=65.0) and R AT=0.4 s (AUC=77.0). PCA demonstrated that FDS and combined SM/FDS and SM/AT RSWA metrics best explained RSWA variance and differentiated controls from RBD, while SM and AT alone were less explanatory. Conclusion This study provides evidence for quantitative RSWA diagnostic thresholds applicable in current iRBD populations, and confirms the key importance of FDS to assure accurate iRBD diagnosis. Interestingly, these RSWA diagnostic thresholds are lower than previously determined thresholds, suggesting secular trends toward earlier iRBD detection and heterogeneous disease duration relative to polysomnography acquisition, underscoring the necessity of future large scale prospective, multicenter polysomnographic analyses to determine definitive iRBD diagnostic RSWA thresholds. Support (If Any)

AbstractBackgroundTo examine patient preferences regarding prognostic counseling for idiopathic/isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD). Idiopathic/isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) carries an approximate 73‐91% long term risk for phenoconversion to dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson disease (PD). Previous research has shown that most providers counsel their patients concerning this risk, yet patients’ values and preferences regarding counseling are unknown.Methods122 participants with iRBD in the Mayo Clinic iRBD Patient Registry enrolled. Participants were sent a survey concerning prognostic counseling and their experience in being diagnosed with iRBD.ResultsOf 81 respondents (67.2% response rate), 74% were men with an average age of 65.7 ± 9.7 years. Responses indicated a strong preference toward receiving prognostic information; 92.5% felt knowledge concerning neurodegenerative disease risk was important, while 87.6% felt prognostic discussion was important to maintain trust in their physician. Additionally, 95.7% indicated they desired more information, while only 4.3% would have desired less information regarding prognostic risk following iRBD diagnosis. Most respondents agreed strongly that prognostic information was important for discussions with their family and friends and future life planning, and expressed interest in learning more about future neuroprotective therapies and symptomatic treatments for parkinsonism and dementia.ConclusionsiRBD patients indicated a strong preference for disclosure of neurodegenerative prognostic risk information, preferred more rather than less information, and felt prognostic information was important for family discussions and life planning. This data informs prognostic counseling practices regarding iRBD and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Abstract Study Objectives Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) share some common features including prominent nightmares and sleep disturbances. We aimed to comparatively analyze REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) between patients with chronic PTSD with and without dream enactment behavior (DEB), isolated RBD (iRBD), and controls. Methods In this retrospective study, we comparatively analyzed 18 PTSD with DEB (PTSD+DEB), 18 PTSD without DEB, 15 iRBD, and 51 controls matched for age and sex. We reviewed medical records to determine PTSD clinical features and quantitatively analyzed RSWA. We used nonparametric analyses to compare clinical and polysomnographic features. Results PTSD patients, both with and without DEB, had significantly higher RSWA than controls (all p < .025, excepting submentalis phasic duration in PTSD+DEB). Most RSWA measures were also higher in PTSD+DEB than in PTSD without DEB patients (all p < .025). Conclusions PTSD patients have higher RSWA than controls, whether DEB is present or not, indicating that REM sleep atonia control is abnormal in chronic PTSD. Further prospective studies are needed to determine whether neurodegenerative risk and disease markers similar to RBD might occur in PTSD patients.

AbstractStudy ObjectivesRapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) and other sleep disturbances are frequent in leucine-rich, glioma inactivated protein 1-IgG (LGI1) and contactin-associated protein 2-IgG (CASPR2) autoimmunity, yet polysomnographic analyses of these disorders remain limited. We aimed to characterize clinical presentations and analyze polysomnographic manifestations, especially quantitative REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) in LGI1/CASPR2-IgG seropositive (LGI/CASPR2+) patients.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical and polysomnographic features and quantitative RSWA between LGI1+/CASPR2+ patients and age-sex matched controls. Groups were compared with Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square tests. Combined submentalis and anterior tibialis (SM + AT) RSWA was the primary outcome.ResultsAmong 11 (LGI1+, n = 9; CASPR2+, n = 2) patients, Morvan syndrome sleep features were present in seven (63.6%) LGI1+/CASPR2+ patients, with simultaneous insomnia and dream enactment behavior (DEB) in three (27.3%), and the most common presenting sleep disturbances were DEB (n = 5), insomnia (n = 5), and sleep apnea (n = 8; median apnea-hypopnea index = 15/hour). Median Epworth Sleepiness Scale was nine (range 3–24; n = 10), with hypersomnia in four (36.4%). LGI1+/CASPR2+ patients had increased N1 sleep (p = .02), decreased REM sleep (p = .001), and higher levels of SM + AT any RSWA (p < .001). Eight of nine (89%) LGI1+ exceeded RBD RSWA thresholds (DEB, n = 5; isolated RSWA, n = 3). RSWA was greater in AT than SM. All 10 LGI1+/CASPR2+ patients treated with immunotherapy benefitted, and 5/10 had improved sleep disturbances.ConclusionsLGI1/CASPR2-IgG autoimmunity is associated with prominent dream enactment, insomnia, RSWA, sleep apnea, and shallower sleep. Polysomnography provides objective disease markers in LGI1+/CASPR2+ autoimmunity and immunotherapy may benefit associated sleep disturbances.

Abstract Purpose Compare agreements between polysomnography-based (PSG) diagnosis of isolated REM-sleep-behavior-disorder (iRBD) and Non-REM-Hypertonia (NRH), a novel biomarker independently associated with synucleinopathy-related neurodegenerative diseases. Methods Sixteen patients with histories of dream-enactment-behavior (DEB)(women=38%; age:64.6±13.0) underwent PSG with simultaneously-recorded Sleep Profiler (SP). Two boarded sleep neurologists independently characterized iRBD. Physician1 combined abnormal qualitative REM-sleep-without-atonia (RSWA) by submental electromyography, with video-confirmation of probably DEB. Physician2 relied solely on qualitative RSWA. SP was auto-staged, technically reviewed, and reprocessed for automated abnormal NRH detection. Kappa scores measured physician and NRH agreements. Results In the 14 records with REM sleep, iRBD was characterized in: Physician1=64%, Physician2=79%, NRH=71% of the records. Across the three methods, unanimous iRBD agreement occurred in 57% of the records (positive=7, negative=1). The between-physician agreement in iRBD classifications was fair (kappa=0.32). The agreement between NRH and Physician1 was moderate (kappa=0.52) versus slight with Physician2 (kappa=0.05). NRH comparisons to consensus physician agreement yielded one false-positive and one false-negative iRBD finding. Physician2 classified: a) iRBD in two cases that were negative by Physician1 and NRH, and b) one negative case that Physician1 and NRH characterized as iRBD. Physician1 identified one negative case that was classified iRBD by Physician2 and NRH. Additionally, NRH was abnormal in one of the two records with no REM sleep. Discussion NRH may assist in iRBD risk assessment, given it agreed with at least one physician in 86% of the cases and the between-physician iRBD agreement was only fair. NRH also characterized iRBD-risk in patients with insufficient REM sleep for RSWA assessment.