Galbiati, Andrea

Abstract Introduction This study investigated the impact of visual editing of sleep recordings for use in predicting neurodegenerative disorder (NDD) risk. Methods All participants underwent in-home Sleep Profiler studies. Forty-four were diagnosed with mild cognitive impartment (MCI = 40) or Alzheimer’s disease (AD = 4)(MCI/AD: 55% women, 72.6+/-8.6 years), 26 with REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD: women = 27%, age = 67+/-9.8), and 29 were controls (NC: women = 69%, age = 63+/-11.5). A 4-class machine learning algorithm used age plus eight sleep biomarkers to assign NDD risk probabilities. Records with CG-assigned probabilities >70% were labeled Probably-Normal, and from 45-70% Likely-Normal. Similar thresholds were used to assign Likely- or Probably-Abnormal. NDD risk characterizations were generated based on auto-scoring (“auto”), and again after the recordings were visually edited for accuracy (“edited”). Results Comparing the auto- vs. edited-NDD classifications in the MCI/AD group, the same NDD risk classifications were observed in 91% (39/43), with 2 cases shifting from Likely-Normal to Probably-Normal, one shifted from Likely-AD to Likely-Normal with AD Indications, and one changed from Probably-AD to Likely-AD. The same NDD risk classifications were observed in 81% (21/26) of the RBD cases, 3 shifted from Probably-Abnormal to Likely-Abnormal, one shifted from Likely-Normal to Probably-Normal, and one changed from Likely-Abnormal to Likely-Normal. The same NDD risk classifications were observed in 86% of the NC group, with 4 cases shifting from Likely-Normal to Probably-Normal. Conclusions These findings suggest that the likelihood of a gross misclassification of NDD risk resulting from auto-detected sleep biomarkers is relatively low with inconsistencies directed toward slightly increased NDD risk classifications.

ObjectiveThis study assessed the relationship between speech and language impairment and outcome in a multicenter cohort of isolated/idiopathic rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD).MethodsPatients with iRBD from 7 centers speaking Czech, English, German, French, and Italian languages underwent a detailed speech assessment at baseline. Story‐tale narratives were transcribed and linguistically annotated using fully automated methods based on automatic speech recognition and natural language processing algorithms, leading to the 3 distinctive linguistic and 2 acoustic patterns of language deterioration and associated composite indexes of their overall severity. Patients were then prospectively followed and received assessments for parkinsonism or dementia during follow‐up. The Cox proportional hazard was performed to evaluate the predictive value of language patterns for phenoconversion over a follow‐up period of 5 years.ResultsOf 180 patients free of parkinsonism or dementia, 156 provided follow‐up information. After a mean follow‐up of 2.7 years, 42 (26.9%) patients developed neurodegenerative disease. Patients with higher severity of linguistic abnormalities (hazard ratio [HR = 2.35]) and acoustic abnormalities (HR = 1.92) were more likely to develop a defined neurodegenerative disease, with converters having lower content richness (HR = 1.74), slower articulation rate (HR = 1.58), and prolonged pauses (HR = 1.46). Dementia‐first (n = 16) and parkinsonism‐first with mild cognitive impairment (n = 9) converters had higher severity of linguistic abnormalities than parkinsonism‐first with normal cognition converters (n = 17).InterpretationAutomated language analysis might provide a predictor of phenoconversion from iRBD into synucleinopathy subtypes with cognitive impairment, and thus can be used to stratify patients for neuroprotective trials. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:530–543

ObjectiveThis multilanguage study used simple speech recording and high‐end pattern analysis to provide sensitive and reliable noninvasive biomarkers of prodromal versus manifest α‐synucleinopathy in patients with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) and early‐stage Parkinson disease (PD).MethodsWe performed a multicenter study across the Czech, English, German, French, and Italian languages at 7 centers in Europe and North America. A total of 448 participants (337 males), including 150 with iRBD (mean duration of iRBD across language groups 0.5–3.4 years), 149 with PD (mean duration of disease across language groups 1.7–2.5 years), and 149 healthy controls were recorded; 350 of the participants completed the 12‐month follow‐up. We developed a fully automated acoustic quantitative assessment approach for the 7 distinctive patterns of hypokinetic dysarthria.ResultsNo differences in language that impacted clinical parkinsonian phenotypes were found. Compared with the controls, we found significant abnormalities of an overall acoustic speech severity measure via composite dysarthria index for both iRBD (p = 0.002) and PD (p < 0.001). However, only PD (p < 0.001) was perceptually distinct in a blinded subjective analysis. We found significant group differences between PD and controls for monopitch (p < 0.001), prolonged pauses (p < 0.001), and imprecise consonants (p = 0.03); only monopitch was able to differentiate iRBD patients from controls (p = 0.004). At the 12‐month follow‐up, a slight progression of overall acoustic speech impairment was noted for the iRBD (p = 0.04) and PD (p = 0.03) groups.InterpretationAutomated speech analysis might provide a useful additional biomarker of parkinsonism for the assessment of disease progression and therapeutic interventions. ANN NEUROL 2021;90:62–75