Back to Authors

Mosovsky, Sherri

Mayo Clinic

University of Pittsburgh

Citations 6

Validation of automated detection of REM sleep without atonia using in-laboratory and in-home recordings
Levendowski, Daniel J. , Lewis, Simon J.G. , Finstuen, Thomas, Mosovsky, Sherri, Parikh, Hersh, Anderson, Jack , Walsh, Christine M. , Lee‐Iannotti, Joyce , Finstuen, Thomas J, St Louis, Erik K, Lewis, Simon J G , Chahine, Lana M. , Galbiati, Andrea , Berka, Chris , Parikh, Hersh, Neylan, Thomas C. , Ferini-Strambi, Luigi , Boeve, Bradley F. , Louis, Erik K. St.

Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine | November 21, 2024 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 583-592

10.5664/jcsm.11488 Get It

Central and peripheral α‐synuclein in Parkinson disease detected by seed amplification assay
Chahine, Lana M. , Beach, Thomas G. , Hepker, Monica, Kanthasamy, Anumantha G. , Appel, Scott, Pritzkow, Sandra , Pinho, Michelle, Mosovsky, Sherri, Coffey, Christopher S. , Oliveira, Luís M. A. , Eberling, Jamie L., Mollenhauer, Brit , Study, For the Systemic Synuclein Sampling, Amara, Amy W. , Kanthasamy, Anumantha , Visanji, Naomi P , Adler, Charles H. , Serrano, Geidy E. , Brumm, Michael C. , Study, For the Systemic Synuclein Sampling

Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology | March 28, 2023 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 696-705

10.1002/acn3.51753 Get It

AbstractObjectivesDetection of α‐synuclein aggregates by seed amplification is a promising Parkinson disease biomarker assay. Understanding intraindividual relationships of α‐synuclein measures could inform optimal biomarker development. The objectives were to test accuracy of α‐synuclein seed amplification assay in central (cerebrospinal fluid) and peripheral (submandibular gland) sources, compare to total α‐synuclein measures, and investigate within‐subject relationships.MethodsThe Systemic Synuclein Sampling Study aimed to characterize α‐synuclein in multiple tissues and biofluids within Parkinson disease subjects (n = 59) and compared to healthy controls (n = 21). Motor and non‐motor measures and dopamine transporter scans were obtained. Four measures of α‐synuclein were compared: seed amplification assay in cerebrospinal fluid and formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded submandibular gland, total α‐synuclein quantified in biofluids using enzyme‐linked immunoassay, and aggregated α‐synuclein in submandibular gland detected by immunohistochemistry. Accuracy of seed amplification assay for Parkinson disease diagnosis was examined and within‐subject α‐synuclein measures were compared.ResultsSensitivity and specificity of α‐synuclein seed amplification assay for Parkinson disease diagnosis was 92.6% and 90.5% in cerebrospinal fluid, and 73.2% and 78.6% in submandibular gland, respectively. 25/38 (65.8%) Parkinson disease participants were positive for both cerebrospinal fluid and submandibular gland seed amplification assay. Comparing accuracy for Parkinson disease diagnosis of different α‐synuclein measures, cerebrospinal fluid seed amplification assay was the highest (Youden Index = 83.1%). 98.3% of all Parkinson disease cases had ≥1 measure of α‐synuclein positive.Interpretationα‐synuclein seed amplification assay (cerebrospinal fluid>submandibular gland) had higher sensitivity and specificity compared to total α‐synuclein measures, and within‐subject relationships of central and peripheral α‐synuclein measures emerged.
Effect of Urate-Elevating Inosine on Early Parkinson Disease Progression
Investigators, The Parkinson Study Group SURE-PD3, Bluett, Brent , Togasaki, Daniel M., Mihaila, Dragos, Evatt, Marian L., Rezak, Michael, Jain, Samay , Schwarzschild, Michael A. , Ascherio, Alberto, Casaceli, Cindy, Kamp, Cornelia , Lungu, Codrin , Oakes, David , Rudolph, Alice, Shoulson, Ira , Scott, B.L. , Gauger, Lisa, Aldred, Jason , Bixby, Melissa, Ciccarello, Jill, Gunzler, Steven A. , Henchcliffe, Claire , Brodsky, Matthew , Keith, Kellie, Hauser, Robert A. , LeDoux, Mark S. , Hinson, Vanessa K. , Kumar, Rajeev , Hunter, Christine , Christine, Chadwick W. , Daley, Aaron, Leehey, Maureen A. , Marcaida, Joy Antonelle de, Hung, Albert Y. , Bwala, Grace, Simon, David K. , Simuni, Tanya , Poon, Cynthia , Schiess, Mya C. , Park, Ariane , Peterson, Carolyn, Criswell, Susan R. , Durphy, Jennifer, Shill, Holly A. , Mehta, Shyamal H. , Deik, Andres , Fang, John Y., Stover, Natividad , Zhang, Lin , Dewey, Richard B. , Gerald, Ashley, Boyd, James T. , Houston, Emily , Suski, Valerie, Mosovsky, Sherri, Cloud, Leslie , Shah, Binit, James, Raymond , Zauber, S. Elizabeth , Reich, Stephen G. , Langhammer, April, LaFaver, Kathrin , Kaminski, Patricia L. , Goudreau, John L. , Russell, Doozie, Houghton, David , LaRoche, Ashley , Thomas, Karen , McGraw, Martha, Mari, Zoltan, Blindauer, Karen, Rabin, Marcie, Kurlan, Roger, Morgan, John C. , Ainslie, Melissa, Bódis-Wollner, Iván , Waters, Cheryl , Ratel, Amber Servi, Beck, Christopher A. , Bolger, Patrick, Callahan, Katherine F., Crotty, Grace F. , Klements, David , Kostrzebski, Melissa, McMahon, Gearoid M. , Pothier, Lindsay , Hauser, Robert A , Simuni, Tanya , Investigators, The Parkinson Study Group SURE-PD3, Curhan, Gary C. , Fitzgerald, Rebecca, Macklin, Eric A. , Marek, Kenneth , Mozaffarian, Dariush , Videnovic, Aleksandar , Goetz, Christopher G. , Espay, Alberto J. , Jimenez‐Shahed, Joohi , Friedman, Joseph H. , Litvan, Irene , Chou, Kelvin L. , Bhatti, Danish , Rosenthal, Liana S. , Ahmed, Anwar E. , Saint‐Hilaire, Marie , Shprecher, David , Pahwa, Rajesh , LeWitt, Peter A. , Kaminski, Patricia, Thomas, Karen, Serrano, Carmen , Soileau, Michael J , Schneider, Ruth B. , Waikar, Sushrut S. , Lang, Anthony E. , Mestre, Tiago

JAMA | September 14, 2021 | Volume: 326 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 926

10.1001/jama.2021.10207 Get It

Screening peripheral biopsies for alpha‐synuclein pathology using deep machine learning
Signaevski, Maxim, Tabish, Nabil, Marami, Bahram , Koenigsberg, Daniel , Bryce, Clare , Mollenhauer, Brit , Mosovsky, Sherri, Riley, Lindsey , Dave, Kuldip D. , Eberling, Jamie L., Coffey, Christopher S. , Koll, John, Zeineh, Jack, Cordon‐Cardo, Carlos , Beach, Thomas G. , Crary, John F. , Prastawa, Marcel W. , Chahine, Lana M. , Adler, Charles H. , Serrano, Geidy E. , White, Charles L. , Fernández, Gerardo

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 7, 2020 | Volume: 16 | Issue: S5 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.047358 Get It

AbstractBackgroundPost‐mortem assessment remains the only option and a gold standard for a definitive diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (PD). The antemortem diagnosis is challenging due to a variable clinical presentation and the abundance of mimicking conditions, obscuring the clinical picture and delaying the treatment. It is well established that while PD pathologically manifests in central nervous system with aggregation of α‐synuclein as Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites, this pathology is also found in the peripheral nervous system. Peripheral Lewy‐type synucleinopathy (LTS) is present in early PD, suggesting its utility as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. We have previously confirmed that detection of LTS in submandibular gland (SMG) biopsies is sensitive (.75) and specific (.90) for early PD. However, the assessment by a neuropathologist of multiple levels of such biopsy is laborious and time‐consuming.MethodHere work we applied two Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for detection of LTS on 283 digital whole slide images (WSI) from 95 unique SMG biopsies. A total number of 8,386 LTS were annotated following the interrater reliability study with kappa=.7. We used transfer learning to train a CNN model to classify image patches (40‐by‐40 pixels at 20x) with and without presence of LTS objects.ResultThe trained CNNs showed the following performance on image patches: sensitivity: .982/.988, specificity: .998/.999, precision: .852/.950, accuracy: .995/.998, and F‐1 score .912/.968 for ResNet30/InceptionV4 respectively. On test WSI the sensitivity in detecting LTS was .963/.971 respectively.ConclusionThis work is first to demonstrate the practical utility of an CNN for screening for LTS, which can further translate into a practical screening tool facilitating the antemortem diagnosis of PD. We further plan to develop neural networks for accurate and precise detection and quantification of LTS in antemortem SMG biopsies. This, altogether, would offer a screening, confirmatory, prognostic, and quantitative tool for clinical assessment of early PD.
Feasibility and Safety of Multicenter Tissue and Biofluid Sampling for α -Synuclein in Parkinson’s Disease: The Systemic Synuclein Sampling Study (S4)
Chahine, Lana M. , Beach, Thomas G. , Seedorff, Nicholas , Caspell‐Garcia, Chelsea , Coffey, Christopher S. , Brumm, Michael C. , Linder, Carly, Mosovsky, Sherri, Riss, Holly, Ecklund, Dixie , Seibyl, John , Jennings, Danna , Arnedo, Vanessa , Riley, Lindsey , Dave, Kuldip D. , Mollenhauer, Brit , study, on behalf of the Systemic sSynuclein Sampling, Adler, Charles H. , Serrano, Geidy E. , Foroud, Tatiana , study, on behalf of the Systemic sSynuclein Sampling

Journal of Parkinson’s Disease | September 21, 2018 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 517-527

10.3233/jpd-181434 Get It

Background: α-synuclein is a lead Parkinson’s disease (PD) biomarker. There are conflicting reports regarding accuracy of α-synuclein in different tissues and biofluids as a PD biomarker, and the within-subject anatomical distribution of α-synuclein is not well described. The Systemic Synuclein Sampling Study (S4) aims to address these gaps in knowledge. The S4 is a multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study evaluating α-synuclein in multiple tissues and biofluids in PD and healthy controls (HC). Objective: To describe the baseline characteristics of the S4 cohort and safety and feasibility of this study. Methods: Participants underwent motor and non-motor clinical assessments, dopamine transporter SPECT, biofluid collection (cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, and blood), and tissue biopsies (skin, sigmoid colon, and submandibular gland). Biopsy adequacy was determined based on presence of adequate target tissue. Tissue sections were stained with the 5C12 monoclonal antibody against unmodified α-synuclein. All specimens were acquired and processed in a standardized manner. Adverse events were systematically recorded. Results: The final cohort consists of 82 participants (61 PD, 21 HC). In 68 subjects (83%), all types of specimens were obtained but only 50 (61%) of subjects had all specimens both collected and evaluable for α-synuclein. Mild adverse events were common, especially for submandibular gland biopsy, but only 1 severe adverse event occurred. Conclusion: Multicenter tissue and biofluid sampling for α-synuclein is feasible and generally safe. S4 will inform understanding of the concurrent distribution of α-synuclein pathology and biomarkers in biofluids and peripheral nervous system in PD.