Bakken, Katrina K.

Abstract Background EGFR targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are highly effective against EGFR-amplified tumors, but poor distribution across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) limits their efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM) when administered systemically. We studied whether convection-enhanced delivery (CED) can be used to safely infuse ADCs into orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of EGFRvIII mutant GBM. Methods The efficacy of the EGFR-targeted ADCs depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M) and Serclutamab talirine (Ser-T) was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. CED was performed in nontumor and tumor-bearing mice. Immunostaining was used to evaluate ADC distribution, pharmacodynamic effects, and normal cell toxicity. Results Dose-finding studies in orthotopic GBM6 identified single infusion of 2 μg Ser-T and 60 μg Depatux-M as safe and effective associated with extended survival prolongation (>300 days and 95 days, respectively). However, with serial infusions every 21 days, four Ser-T doses controlled tumor growth but was associated with lethal toxicity approximately 7 days after the final infusion. Limiting dosing to two infusions in GBM108 provided profound median survival extension of over 200 days. In contrast, four Depatux-M CED doses were well tolerated and significantly extended survival in both GBM6 (158 days) and GBM108 (310 days). In a toxicity analysis, Ser-T resulted in a profound loss in NeuN+ cells and markedly elevated GFAP staining, while Depatux-M was associated only with modest elevation in GFAP staining. Conclusion CED of Depatux-M is well tolerated and results in extended survival in orthotopic GBM PDXs. In contrast, CED of Ser-T was associated with a much narrower therapeutic window.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) are inherently resistant to radiation therapy (RT), and development of radiosensitizers is one strategy to overcome this limitation. Repair of DNA double strand breaks induced by RT are mediated by the protein kinase Ataxia Telangiectasia mutated (ATM). In this study, the novel ATM inhibitor WSD-0628 was evaluated in combination with RT using GBM and melanoma models. In vitro evaluation of 10uM WSD-0628 binding to a panel of potential drug targets, including receptors, ion channels, enzymes, and transporters, indicated a satisfactory safety profile with low risk for off-target liability. WSD-0628 potently inhibits ATM-mediated phosphorylation of the DNA damage response protein KAP1 in MCF-7 cells at sub-nanomolar (nM) concentrations (IC50 0.42nM) in comparison to much less potent inhibition of the related kinases ATR (phosphorylation of CHK1, IC50 742nM) or DNA-PKcs (auto-phosphorylation of DNA-PK, IC50 169nM) in HT29 cells assessed by ELISA. In U251 GBM cells, 30 nM WSD-0628 potently inhibited RT-induced phospho-KAP1 and robustly reduced clonogenic survival by 5-fold when combined with 5 Gy irradiation (combination vs RT alone, p<0.01). Similar potent radiosensitizing effects were seen in a melanoma brain metastasis PDX line M12 (10nM WSD-0628+IR-5Gy 1% survival vs 5% survival with IR-5Gy alone. p<0.01), and the SV-40 transformed astrocyte line SVG-A (10nM WSD-0628 + IR-2.5Gy survival 0.2% vs 15% with IR-2.5Gy alone. p<0.01). Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic profile of WSD-0628 in mice 2h after a single 5 mg/kg oral dose reveals a high level of free drug availability in the brain (34nM) and in the CSF (50nM) with little to no Pgp/BCRP substrate liability. An initial in vivo dose finding study in orthotopic GBM43 PDX yielded significant benefit with WSD-0628 at either 5 or 10 mg/kg PO daily when combined with radiation (2Gy QD for 5 days); Median survival for sham RT (29d) or RT alone (34d) were significantly different from RT combinations with 5 mg/kg (54d) and 10 mg/kg (73d; p<0.01 for both dose levels), although the higher dose combination was poorly tolerated with body weight loss between 15-20% one week after RT completion. Dosing of WSD-0628 (7.5 mg/kg PO, QD) given just before and 24h after a single dose of RT (12.5Gy) in mice with orthotopic M12 was well tolerated and provided robust radiosensitizing effects with median survival for combination treatment of over 180d vs 17d for control and 49d with RT alone groups (combination vs RT alone, p=0.04). Collectively, these results suggest a promising role for WSD-0628 in combination with RT in GBM and melanoma metastatic to the brain. Citation Format: Ann Mladek Tuma, Wei Zhong, Lily Liu, Danielle M. Burgenske, Brett L. Carlson, Katrina K. Bakken, Zeng Hu, Margaret A. Connors, Jann N. Sarkaria. WSD-0628, a novel brain penetrant ATM inhibitor, radiosensitizes GBM and melanoma patient derived xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3305.

Abstract Introduction: EGFR targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) show promise as a novel treatment in a subset of glioblastoma (GBM). Two EGFR targeting ADCs include first generation Depatux-M, with an antimitotic toxin monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF), and ABBV-321, with a DNA crosslinking agent pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer (PBD) toxin. Due to the large molecular weight, poor drug distribution across the blood-brain barrier significantly limits the efficacy in EGFR-amplified GBM. We studied whether convection enhanced delivery (CED) can be used to safely infuse these two EGFR-targeted ADCs in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of EGFR-amplified GBM. Methods: The efficacy of Depatux-M and ABBV-321 was evaluated in vitro and in vivo in two EGFRviii-amplified PDXs (GBM6 and GBM108). Immunofluorescence staining was used to evaluate drug distribution along with pharmacodynamics of the ADCs. CED was performed by stereotactic placement of an infusion catheter in the same location as the original tumor implantation. Immunohistochemistry was used to explore mechanisms of normal cell toxicity. Results: Despite potent activity in vitro (high ng/ml IC50), systemic administration of either ADC conferred minimal extension in survival for either GBM6 or GBM108. In contrast, CED significantly enhanced ADC delivery to tumor and peri-tumoral regions and extended survival. In a pilot study in GBM6 with n=3 mice per group, a single CED infusion of 0.002mg ABBV-321 resulted in extended survival beyond 365 days for two mice, while other doses and placebo were associated with shorter median survival (0 mg - 39 days; 0.03 mg - 105 days; 0.3 mg - 49 days). In a subsequent trial evaluating serial infusions performed every 21 days, four infusions at 0.002 mg ABBV-321 resulted in lethal toxicity. In contrast, limiting ABBV-321 to only two serial CED infusions in GBM108 was associated with extended survival of more than 300 days vs. 53 days for AB095 antibody control infusion. In contrast, serial infusion with Depatux-M was much better tolerated. In a single infusion in GBM6, a 0.06 mg dose was well tolerated and associated with a 49-day extension in median survival. Further, four serial infusions at 0.06 mg given every 21 days in GBM6 and GBM108 was associated with 100 day and more than 250-day extension in survival as compared to AB095 antibody control infusion. To investigate the mechanism of toxicity, infusion of non-tumor bearing C57Bl6 mice with ABBV-321 resulted in a marked loss in NeuN staining and elevated CD68 and GFAP staining 7 days later; Depatux-M infusion was only associated with modest elevation in GFAP without loss of NeuN staining or elevated CD68-positive cells. Conclusion: Depatux-M is well tolerated when infused into normal brain and results in extended survival in orthotopic GBM PDXs. In contrast, ABBV-321, with a distinct PBD toxin, had a much narrower therapeutic window when delivered by CED. Citation Format: Kendra A. Porath, Ann Mladek, Rachael A. Vaubel, Michael S. Regan, Sonia Jain, Danielle Burgenske, Katrina Bakken, Brett Carlson, Margaret Connors, Zeng Hu, Lihong He, Paul A. Decker, Gaspar Kitange, Shiv Gupta, Nathalie Y. Agar, Thomas M. Feldsien, Didier R. Lefebvre, Jann N. Sarkaria. Convection enhanced delivery of EGFR-targeting antibody drug conjugates ABBV-321 and Depatux-M [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 334.

Abstract Background RBBP4 activates transcription by histone acetylation, but the partner histone acetyltransferases are unknown. Thus, we investigated the hypothesis that RBBP4 interacts with p300 in a complex in glioblastoma (GBM). Methods shRNA silencing of RBBP4 or p300 and RNAseq was used to identify genes co-regulated by RBBP4 and p300 in GBM43 patient-derived xenograft (PDX). RBBP4/p300 complex was demonstrated using proximity ligation assay (PLA) and ChIPseq delineated histone H3 acetylation and RBBP4/p300 complex binding in promoters/enhancers. Temozolomide (TMZ)-induced DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) were evaluated by γ-H2AX and proliferation by CyQuant and live cell monitoring assays. In vivo efficacy was based on survival of mice with orthotopic tumors. Results shRBBP4 and shp300 downregulated 4768 genes among which 1485 (31%) were commonly downregulated by both shRNAs, while upregulated genes were 2484, including 863 (35%) common genes. The pro-survival genes were the top-ranked among the downregulated genes, including C-MYC. RBBP4/p300 complex was demonstrated in the nucleus, and shRBBP4 or shp300 significantly sensitized GBM cells to TMZ compared to the control shNT in vitro (P < .05). Moreover, TMZ significantly prolonged the survival of mice bearing GBM22-shRBBP4 orthotopic tumors compared with control shNT tumors (median shNT survival 52 days vs. median shRBBP4 319 days; P = .001). CREB-binding protein (CBP)/p300 inhibitor CPI-1612 suppressed H3K27Ac and RBBP4/p300 complex target proteins, including C-MYC, and synergistically sensitized TMZ in vitro. Pharmacodynamic evaluation confirmed brain penetration by CPI-1612 supporting further investigation to evaluate efficacy to sensitize TMZ. Conclusions RBBP4/p300 complex is present in GBM cells and is a potential therapeutic target.

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is an incurable disease with few approved therapeutic interventions. Radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) remain the standards of care. The efficacy and optimal deployment schedule of the orally bioavailable small-molecule tumor checkpoint controller lisavanbulin alone, and in combination with, standards of care were assessed using a panel of IDH-wildtype GBM patient-derived xenografts. Methods Mice bearing intracranial tumors received lisavanbulin +/−RT +/−TMZ and followed for survival. Lisavanbulin concentrations in plasma and brain were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, while flow cytometry was used for cell cycle analysis. Results Lisavanbulin monotherapy showed significant benefit (P < .01) in 9 of 14 PDXs tested (median survival extension 9%-84%) and brain-to-plasma ratios of 1.3 and 1.6 at 2- and 6-hours postdose, respectively, validating previous data suggesting significant exposure in the brain. Prolonged lisavanbulin dosing from RT start until moribund was required for maximal benefit (GBM6: median survival lisavanbulin/RT 90 vs. RT alone 69 days, P = .0001; GBM150: lisavanbulin/RT 143 days vs. RT alone 73 days, P = .06). Similar observations were seen with RT/TMZ combinations (GBM39: RT/TMZ/lisavanbulin 502 days vs. RT/TMZ 249 days, P = .0001; GBM26: RT/TMZ/lisavanbulin 172 days vs. RT/TMZ 121 days, P = .04). Immunohistochemical analyses showed a significant increase in phospho-histone H3 with lisavanbulin treatment (P = .01). Conclusions Lisavanbulin demonstrated excellent brain penetration, significant extension of survival alone or in RT or RT/TMZ combinations, and was associated with mitotic arrest. These data provide a strong clinical rationale for testing lisavanbulin in combination with RT or RT/TMZ in GBM patients.

Abstract Background Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), is a promising therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma (GBM) but recent clinical trials did not demonstrate a survival benefit. Understanding the mechanisms of failure for this promising strategy is critically important. Methods PDX models were employed to study efficacy of systemic vs intracranial delivery of Depatux-M. Immunofluorescence and MALDI-MSI were performed to detect drug levels in the brain. EGFR levels and compensatory pathways were studied using quantitative flow cytometry, Western blots, RNAseq, FISH, and phosphoproteomics. Results Systemic delivery of Depatux-M was highly effective in nine of 10 EGFR-amplified heterotopic PDXs with survival extending beyond one year in eight PDXs. Acquired resistance in two PDXs (GBM12 and GBM46) was driven by suppression of EGFR expression or emergence of a novel short-variant of EGFR lacking the epitope for the Depatux-M antibody. In contrast to the profound benefit observed in heterotopic tumors, only two of seven intrinsically sensitive PDXs were responsive to Depatux-M as intracranial tumors. Poor efficacy in orthotopic PDXs was associated with limited and heterogeneous distribution of Depatux-M into tumor tissues, and artificial disruption of the BBB or bypass of the BBB by direct intracranial injection of Depatux-M into orthotopic tumors markedly enhanced the efficacy of drug treatment. Conclusions Despite profound intrinsic sensitivity to Depatux-M, limited drug delivery into brain tumor may have been a key contributor to lack of efficacy in recently failed clinical trials.

Abstract Human tissue samples commonly preserved as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues after diagnostic or surgical procedures in the clinic represent an invaluable source of clinical specimens for in-depth characterization of signaling networks to assess therapeutic options. Tyrosine phosphorylation (pTyr) plays a fundamental role in cellular processes and is commonly dysregulated in cancer but has not been studied to date in FFPE samples. In addition, pTyr analysis that may otherwise inform therapeutic interventions for patients has been limited by the requirement for large amounts of frozen tissue. Here we describe a method for highly sensitive, quantitative analysis of pTyr signaling networks, with hundreds of sites quantified from one to two 10-μm sections of FFPE tissue specimens. A combination of optimized magnetic bead–based sample processing, optimized pTyr enrichment strategies, and tandem mass tag multiplexing enabled in-depth coverage of pTyr signaling networks from small amounts of input material. Phosphotyrosine profiles of flash-frozen and FFPE tissues derived from the same tumors suggested that FFPE tissues preserve pTyr signaling characteristics in patient-derived xenografts and archived clinical specimens. pTyr analysis of FFPE tissue sections from breast cancer tumors as well as lung cancer tumors highlighted patient-specific oncogenic driving kinases, indicating potential targeted therapies for each patient. These data suggest the capability for direct translational insight from pTyr analysis of small amounts of FFPE tumor tissue specimens. Significance: This study reports a highly sensitive method utilizing FFPE tissues to identify dysregulated signaling networks in patient tumors, opening the door for direct translational insights from FFPE tumor tissue banks in hospitals.

Abstract Tesevatinib is a potent oral brain penetrant EGFR inhibitor currently being evaluated for glioblastoma therapy. Tesevatinib distribution was assessed in wild-type (WT) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) triple knockout (TKO) FVB mice after dosing orally or via osmotic minipump; drug–tissue binding was assessed by rapid equilibrium dialysis. Two hours after tesevatinib dosing, brain concentrations in WT and TKO mice were 0.72 and 10.03 μg/g, respectively. Brain-to-plasma ratios (Kp) were 0.53 and 5.73, respectively. With intraperitoneal infusion, brain concentrations were 1.46 and 30.6 μg/g (Kp 1.16 and 25.10), respectively. The brain-to-plasma unbound drug concentration ratios were substantially lower (WT mice, 0.03–0.08; TKO mice, 0.40–1.75). Unbound drug concentrations in brains of WT mice were 0.78 to 1.59 ng/g. In vitro cytotoxicity and EGFR pathway signaling were evaluated using EGFR-amplified patient-derived glioblastoma xenograft models (GBM12, GBM6). In vivo pharmacodynamics and efficacy were assessed using athymic nude mice bearing either intracranial or flank tumors treated by oral gavage. Tesevatinib potently reduced cell viability [IC50 GBM12 = 11 nmol/L (5.5 ng/mL), GBM6 = 102 nmol/L] and suppressed EGFR signaling in vitro. However, tesevatinib efficacy compared with vehicle in intracranial (GBM12, median survival: 23 vs. 18 days, P = 0.003) and flank models (GBM12, median time to outcome: 41 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007; GBM6, 44 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007) was modest and associated with partial inhibition of EGFR signaling. Overall, tesevatinib efficacy in EGFR-amplified PDX GBM models is robust in vitro but relatively modest in vivo, despite a high brain-to-plasma ratio. This discrepancy may be explained by drug-tissue binding and compensatory signaling.

Abstract Non-genotoxic reactivation of p53 by MDM2 inhibitors represents a promising therapeutic strategy for tumors with wild-type TP53, particularly tumors harboring MDM2 amplification. MDM2 controls p53 levels by targeting it for degradation, while disruption of the MDM2-p53 interaction causes rapid accumulation of p53 and activation of the p53 pathway. We examined the efficacy of the small molecule MDM2 inhibitor KRT-232, alone and in combination with radiation therapy (RT), in MDM2-amplified and/or p53 wildtype patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of glioblastoma in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, glioblastoma PDX explant cultures showed sensitivity to KRT-232, both tumors with MDM2 amplification (GBM108 and G148) and non-amplified but TP53-wildtype lines (GBM10, GBM14, and GBM39), with IC50s ranging from 300-800 nM in FBS culture conditions. A TP53 p.F270C mutant PDX (GBM43) was inherently resistant, with IC50 >3000 nM. In the MDM2-amplified GBM108 line, KRT-232 led to a robust (5-6 fold) induction of p53-target genes p21, PUMA, and NOXA, with initiation of both apoptosis and senescence. Expression of p21 and PUMA was greater with KRT-232 in combination with RT (25-35 fold induction), while stable knock-down of p53 in GBM108 led to complete resistance to KRT-232. In contrast, GBM10 showed lower induction of p21 and PUMA (2-3 fold) and was more resistant to KRT-232. In an orthotopic GBM108 xenograft model, treatment with KRT-232 +/- RT for one week extended survival from 22 days (placebo) to 46 days (KRT-232 alone); combination KRT-232 + RT further extended survival (77 days) over RT alone (31 days). KRT-232 is an effective treatment in a subset of glioblastoma pre-clinical models alone and in combination with RT. Further studies are underway to understand the mechanisms conferring innate sensitivity or resistance to KRT-232.

Abstract Radio-resistance mechanisms limit the benefit of radiation therapy (RT) for melanoma brain metastases. A key pathway for radiation-induced DNA double-strand break repair is non-homologous end joining, which is critically mediated by DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs). Here we evaluated radio-sensitizing effects of M3814, a selective oral inhibitor of DNA-PKcs, in patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) of melanoma brain metastases. In a clonogenic survival assay, M3841 augmented RT-induced killing of M12 cells at concentrations of ≥300 nM, and a minimum of 16 h exposure with ~300 nM M3814 was required for effective sensitization. M3814 inhibited RT-induced (5 Gy) auto-phosphorylation of serine-2056 of DNA-PKcs in primary cultures of M12, M15 and M27 PDX lines. Interestingly, inhibition of RT-induced DNA-PKcs by M3814 coincided with increased KAP1 phosphorylation, a DNA damage signaling regulated via ATM. Persistent γH2AX foci were observed in 28% M12 cells at 24 hours after co-treatment with M3814 and RT as compared to 12% cells following RT alone. In vivo pharmacokinetic analysis after single oral dose of 20 mg/kg M3814, showed reasonably short half-life (~2.44 hours) and poor brain distribution in wild-type FBV mice (Kpuu, 0.027). Consistent with an efflux liability, brain distribution of M3814 in triple knockout mice for BCRP/MDR1A/B was ~11 fold higher (Kpuu, 0.215). Compared to normal brain, much higher M3814 concentrations were detected in intracranially implanted M12 tumors (~23 fold and ~20 fold) 2 and 6 hours after a single oral dose of 50mg/kg respectively. The relative exclusion of M3814 from normal brain as compared to brain metastases suggests that this drug may have a favorable toxicity profile when combined with radiation for treatment of melanoma brain metastases, and this hypothesis is being tested in ongoing efficacy studies.