O’Horo, John C.

Abstract Background Nocardial brain abscesses are rare, and published literature describing brain abscesses due to Nocardia species is limited to individual case reports or small series. We report one of the largest contemporary retrospective studies describing risk factors, diagnostic evaluation, management, and outcomes of nocardial brain abscess. Methods Retrospective review of all adults with brain abscess due to culture-confirmed Nocardia species at our institution between January 1, 2009, and June 30, 2020. Results Overall, 24 patients had nocardial brain abscesses during the study period. The median age at presentation was 64 years, and 62.5% were immunocompromised. Pulmonary and cutaneous infections were the most common primary sites of nocardial infection. All 24 patients had magnetic resonance imaging performed, and the frontal lobe was the most commonly involved. The most common organism isolated was Nocardia farcinica, followed by Nocardia wallacei and Nocardia cyriacigeorgica. Thirteen patients were managed with antimicrobial therapy alone, while 11 had both medical and surgical management. In all patients, dual therapy was recommended for the initial 6 weeks of treatment, and 22 patients received at least 1 oral agent as part of their final antibiotic regimen, predominantly trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and linezolid. Fourteen patients achieved complete clinical and radiographic resolution of infection. Conclusions Nocardia is an important cause of brain abscess in the immunocompromised host. Early diagnostic and therapeutic aspiration may help health care providers confirm the diagnosis, choose an appropriate antimicrobial regimen, and achieve source control.

Abstract Here we analyze hospitalized andintensive care unit coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) patient outcomes from the international VIRUS registry ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04323787 ). We find that COVID‐19 patients administered unfractionated heparin but not enoxaparin have a higher mortality‐rate (390 of 1012 = 39%) compared to patients administered enoxaparin but not unfractionated heparin (270 of 1939 = 14%), presenting a risk ratio of 2.79 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [2.42, 3.16]; p = 4.45e−52). This difference persists even after balancing on a number of covariates including demographics, comorbidities, admission diagnoses, and method of oxygenation, with an increased mortality rate on discharge from the hospital of 37% (268 of 733) for unfractionated heparin versus 22% (154 of 711) for enoxaparin, presenting a risk ratio of 1.69 (95% CI: [1.42, 2.00]; p = 1.5e−8). In these balanced cohorts, a number of complications occurred at an elevated rate for patients administered unfractionated heparin compared to patients administered enoxaparin, including acute kidney injury, acute cardiac injury, septic shock, and anemia. Furthermore, a higher percentage of Black/African American COVID patients (414 of 1294 [32%]) were noted to receive unfractionated heparin compared to White/Caucasian COVID patients (671 of 2644 [25%]), risk ratio 1.26 (95% CI: [1.14, 1.40]; p = 7.5e−5). After balancing upon available clinical covariates, this difference in anticoagulant use remained statistically significant (311 of 1047 [30%] for Black/African American vs. 263 of 1047 [25%] for White/Caucasian, p = .02, risk ratio 1.18; 95% CI: [1.03, 1.36]). While retrospective studies cannot suggest any causality, these findings motivate the need for follow‐up prospective research into the observed racial disparity in anticoagulant use and outcomes for severe COVID‐19 patients.

Abstract Large Phase 3 clinical trials of the two FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccines, mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech), have demonstrated efficacies of 94.1% (n = 30,420, 95% CI: 89.3-96.8) and 95% (n = 43,448, 95% CI: 90.3-97.6) in preventing symptomatic COVID-19, respectively. Given the ongoing vaccine rollout to healthcare personnel and residents of long-term care facilities, here we provide a preliminary assessment of real-world vaccination efficacy in 62,598 individuals from the Mayo Clinic and associated health system (Arizona, Florida, Minnesota, Wisconsin) between December 1st 2020 and February 8th 2021. Our retrospective analysis contrasts 31,299 individuals receiving at least one dose of either vaccine with 31,299 unvaccinated individuals who are propensity-matched based on demographics, location (zip code), and number of prior SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests. Administration of two COVID-19 vaccine doses was 89.0% effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection (95% CI: 69.1-97.2%) with onset at least 36 days after the first dose. Furthermore, vaccinated patients who were subsequently diagnosed with COVID-19 had significantly lower 14-day hospital admission rates than propensity-matched unvaccinated COVID-19 patients (3.7% vs. 9.2%; Relative Risk: 0.4; p-value: 0.007). Building upon the previous randomized trials of these vaccines, this study demonstrates their real-world effectiveness in reducing the rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity among individuals at highest risk for infection.

AbstractBackgroundNeutropenia is a risk factor for development of infections; however, the direct effect of neutropenia on development of bloodstream infection (BSI) is not known. D‐index, which is area between the neutrophil time curve and a neutrophil count of 0.5 × 109/L, incorporates the combined effect of severity and duration of neutropenia. We aimed to evaluate whether D‐index can be used as a marker for BSI in patients with allogeneic stem cell transplantation.MethodWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation between January 1, 2005, and September 30, 2015. The primary outcome measure was the development of BSI within 30 days of transplantation.ResultsA total of 714 patients were included in the study of whom 101 developed BSI. Patients with BSI had a significantly higher median D‐index value compared with patients who did not have BSI (4990 vs. 3570, P < .001). As a marker, the performance of the D‐index was similar to that of the duration of profound neutropenia (P = .18) and significantly better than the total duration of neutropenia (P = .001).ConclusionThe D‐index performed better than the total duration of neutropenia as a marker for BSI in patients with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. There was no difference between D‐index and, a more easily calculable indicator, duration of profound neutropenia.

Abstract Background The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in critically ill adults is increasing. There are currently no guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis. We analyzed 7 years of prophylactic antimicrobial use across 3 time series for patients on ECMO at our institution in the development, improvement, and streamlining of our ECMO antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol. Methods In this quasi-experimental interrupted time series analysis, we evaluated the impact of an initial ECMO antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol, implemented in 2014, on antimicrobial use and National Healthcare Safety Network–reportable infection rates. Then, following a revision and streamlining of the protocol in November 2018, we reevaluated the same metrics. Results Our study population included 338 intensive care unit patients who received ECMO between July 2011 and November 2019. After implementation of the first version of the protocol, we did not observe significant changes in antimicrobial use or infection rates in these patients; however, following revision and streamlining of the protocol, we demonstrated a significant reduction in broad-spectrum antimicrobial use for prophylaxis in patients on ECMO without any evidence of a compensatory increase in infection rates. Conclusions Our final protocol significantly reduces broad-spectrum antimicrobial use for prophylaxis in patients on ECMO. We propose a standard antimicrobial prophylaxis regimen for patients on ECMO based on current evidence and our experience. Summary: There are no guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). A rational approach employing concepts of antimicrobial stewardship can drive logical antimicrobial selection for prophylaxis in patients on ECMO without adversely impacting outcomes.

Abstract Background Brain abscess and cerebritis are diseases associated with high-risk morbidity and mortality despite the advancement of imaging technologies and antimicrobial therapy for the past 30 years. We aimed to describe the demographics of patients with brain abscess and cerebritis at Mayo Clinic. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the demographics of all adult patients with the diagnosis of intracranial brain abscess, cerebritis, or both at our institution from January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2019. All analyses were performed using JMP software (Cary, NC). Results A total of 666 patients with brain abscess and cerebritis were identified during the study period. The median patient age was 59.7 years, and the majority were males (64.8%; P=0.0001). A total of 587 (88.1%) patients self-identified as Whites (P=&lt; 0.0001) and 608 (91.2%) as Non-Hispanic or Latino (P=&lt; 0.0001). A total of 453 (68.01%) patients were from the Midwest, with Minnesota and Wisconsin being the two most common States with 243 (36.4%; P=&lt; 0.0001) and 101 (15.1%; P=0.01) patients respectively. The majority of patients (69.2%) had coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular disease with a median Charlson comorbidity index of 7 (P= &lt; 0.0001) and an estimated 10-year survival of 0%. Conclusion Male, White Non-Hispanics, and elderly patients seem to be the most prevalent patient population at risk for brain abscess or cerebritis. This investigation provides clinicians the demographic data needed to identify potentially complex patients with brain abscesses. Disclosures M. Rizwan Sohail, MD, Aziyo Biologics (Consultant)Medtronic Inc (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)

Objectives: Thrombocytopenia is common in critically ill patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy and decreases in platelets following continuous renal replacement therapy initiation have been associated with increased mortality. Platelets play a role in innate and adaptive immunity, making it plausible that decreases in platelets following continuous renal replacement therapy initiation predispose patients to development of infection. Our objective was to determine if greater decreases in platelets following continuous renal replacement therapy correlate with increased rates of secondary infection. Design: Retrospective cohort analysis. Setting: This study uses a continuous renal replacement therapy database from Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN), a tertiary academic center. Participants: Adult patients who survived until ICU discharge and were on continuous renal replacement therapy for less than 30 days were included. A subgroup analysis was also performed in patients with thrombocytopenia (platelets < 100 × 103/µL) at continuous renal replacement therapy initiation. Measurements and Main Results: The primary predictor variable was a decrease in platelets from precontinuous renal replacement therapy levels of greater than 40% or less than or equal to 40%, although multiple cut points were analyzed. The primary outcome was infection after ICU discharge, and secondary endpoints included post-ICU septic shock and post-ICU mortality. Univariable, multivariable, and propensity-adjusted analyses were used to determine associations between the predictor variable and the outcomes. Results: Among 797 eligible patients, 253 had thrombocytopenia at continuous renal replacement therapy initiation. A greater than 40% decrease in platelets after continuous renal replacement therapy initiation was associated in the multivariable-adjusted models with increased odds of post-ICU infection in the full cohort (odds ratio, 1.49; CI, 1.02–2.16) and in the thrombocytopenia cohort (odds ratio, 2.63; CI, 1.35–5.15) cohorts. Conclusions: Platelet count drop by greater than 40% following continuous renal replacement therapy initiation is associated with an increased risk of secondary infection, particularly in patients with thrombocytopenia at the time of continuous renal replacement therapy initiation. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of both continuous renal replacement therapy and platelet loss on subsequent infection risk.

AbstractBackgroundAscertaining involvement of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a patient presenting with bloodstream infection (BSI) can be challenging, frequently leading to use of chronic antimicrobial suppressive (CAS) therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy of CAS therapy to prevent relapse of BSI from LVAD and non-LVAD sources.MethodsWe retrospectively screened adults receiving LVAD support from 2010 through 2018, to identify cases of BSI. Bloodstream infection events were classified into LVAD-related, LVAD-associated, and non-LVAD BSIs.ResultsA total of 121 episodes of BSI were identified in 80 patients. Of these, 35 cases in the LVAD-related, 14 in the LVAD-associated, and 46 in the non-LVAD BSI groups completed the recommended initial course of therapy and were evaluated for CAS therapy. Chronic antimicrobial suppressive therapy was prescribed in most of the LVAD-related BSI cases (32 of 35, 91.4%) and 12 (37.5%) experienced relapse. Chronic antimicrobial suppressive therapy was not prescribed in a majority of non-LVAD BSI cases (33, 58.9%), and most (31, 93.9%) did not experience relapse. Chronic antimicrobial suppressive therapy was prescribed in 9 of 14 (64.2%) cases of LVAD-associated BSI and none experienced relapse. Of the 5 cases in this group that were managed without CAS, 2 had relapse.ConclusionsPatients presenting with LVAD-related BSI are at high risk of relapse. Consequently, CAS therapy may be a reasonable approach in the management of these cases. In contrast, routine use of CAS therapy may be unnecessary for non-LVAD BSIs.